adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Investment

3 Reasons To Invest In Toast's $20B IPO – Forbes

Published

 on


If there is one thing I have learned about investing over the years, it is this: nobody can predict the future. What distinguishes the best companies — and makes their shares a good investment — is their ability to act quickly and effectively when the unexpected happens.

Usually private investors lack compelling evidence that a company can adapt to such seismic change. An exception to that rule is Boston restaurant-tech purveyor Toast which on August 27 filed for an IPO. I see three reasons to buy shares in Toast:

  • It’s growing fast in a large market
  • It adapted with agility to the pandemic
  • Its management team and culture bode well for future growth

(I have no financial interest in the securities mentioned in this post).

Toast’s Business And IPO Filing

Toast — which, according to the Boston Globe, sells “payment-processing tablets and handheld devices and cloud-based software for restaurants to manage orders, payroll, and marketing” — was founded in 2011.

Toast aims to make life easier for a restaurant’s stakeholders. As co-founders Aman Narang, Steve Fredette, and Jonathan Grimm wrote in its S-1 filing, “Running a restaurant is tough. We started Toast to make restaurant work a little easier.”

How so? Toast says its software is “easy for restaurant workers to use and lets diners order online, in-person or over their phones. Restaurants can also use the guest data it captures to craft loyalty and marketing programs,” noted Bloomberg.

Toast has not reported how much capital it wants to raise. Its prospectus includes a $100 million “placeholder amount” which is likely to change. This February, the Wall Street Journal estimated that it would seek a $20 billion IPO valuation. Toast declined to comment when I wrote about Toast’s possible IPO in February 2021.

It’s Growing Fast in a Huge Market

Toast is taking share in a large markets. Grand View Research forecasts that the restaurant point of sale (POS) terminal market will grow from $15.5 billion in 2020 at a 6.4% compound annual rate over the next seven years. By 2028, Grand View estimates, the restaurant POS software market will increase from $9.3 billion in 2020 at 9.5% average annual rate.

Since Toast’s revenue is growing faster than these markets, logic suggests that it is taking market share. How much faster? According to its prospectus, for the first half of 2021, revenue rose 105% to $704 million.

Toast’s financial condition has improved in 2021. Although its net loss nearly doubled to $235 million in the first half of 2021, its free cash flow during that period was nearly $39 million — a big improvement from the negative $129 million in free cash flow it consumed in the first half of 2020.

Toast has many restaurant customers. As of June 30, Toast was used in about 48,000 restaurants and processed $38 billion in gross payments — averaging 5.5 million guest orders per day — in the year ending this June.

Its customer count has grown very rapidly over the last three and a half years — at a compound annual rate of about 79% from 6,000 restaurants in 2017 to 47,912 this June, according to the S-1.

Why is it growing so fast? Toast offers restaurants a better value proposition than do rival products. As I wrote in February 2019, Snappy Pattys, a Medford, Mass. burger restaurant, previously used Clover — which was later acquired by First Data

FDC
— as its point of sale system.

The restaurant replaced Clover because “We couldn’t get in touch with them. Sometimes, we’d have to wait several days before they got back to us,” said owner Nick Dowling.

Dowling replaced Clover with Toast. Toast enabled the restaurant to track what was selling well and what was not. Toast also saved money for Snappy Pattys — Clover cost $30,000 a year, according to Dowling. “[Toast] exceeds at all areas at a fraction of the cost of other POS systems,” he said.

With a mere 6% of the 860,000 restaurants in the U.S. on its platform, Toast sees significant growth potential.

It Adapted With Agility to the Pandemic

Toast’s leadership team adapted effectively to the pandemic. When the pandemic shuttered restaurants, Toast cut costs and retooled its services to help restaurants adapt by letting customer order online and either pickup at the restaurant or take delivery to their homes.

Sadly for Toast, the pandemic struck shortly after it raised a big round of capital. In February 2020, the company raised $400 million at a valuation of $4.9 billion.

Two months later, the pandemic shuttered many restaurants — sending Toast’s revenue down over 80%. In April, Toast cut 50% of its staff, reduced executive pay, froze hiring, halted bonuses and pulled back job offers.

By the middle of 2020, business had bounced back. What was behind Toast’s recovery? Its software helped restaurants shift rapidly from in-house dining — which the pandemic radically curtailed — to picking up meals to-go at the restaurant and selling gift cards.

By November 2020, Toast’s business had came roaring back — boosting its valuation to $8 billion.

When I asked Toast this February about the Journal report of its $20 billion IPO, the company told me, “Toast does not comment on any speculated financial transactions. We remain laser-focused on supporting the restaurant industry as it moves toward recovery from the COVID-19 health crisis and furthering our mission to empower the restaurant community to delight guests, do what they love, and thrive.”

Its Management Team and Culture Will Drive Continued Growth

How was Toast able to make the right moves? Why is it well-positioned to adapt to whatever unexpected threats and opportunities might arise in the future? In a nutshell, the answers are Toast’s management and culture.

Toast was founded in 2011 by Aman Narang, Jon Grimm and Steve Fredette who had worked together at a Cambridge, Mass.-based software company, Endeca — which Oracle acquired for $1.1 billion in October 2011. Toast raised its initial $500,000 seed round from the founder of Endeca

Toast did not achieve success with its first product but did enjoy a surge in demand after building a new one. In a 2019 interview, Fredette (who I first interviewed for an October 2017 column in the Worcester Telegram & Gazette), Narang and Grimm, told me that Toast’s initial product — a restaurant paycheck app — struggled.

However, their pivot to a POS app was so popular that Toast could not keep up with the demand. They uncovered specific values that drove their early growth. As Narang said, “In the early days, our success was due to being close to the customers and caring about making our customers successful.”

Grimm, who was raised in a small Kansas farm town, said “We had the confidence to ignore people telling us that we’d fail because we were in a crowded market.” Ironically, that sense of confidence came from what Grimm called “a culture of no ego — doing right by the customer — rather than flashy, self-promotion.”

Fredette — who tried to compete with Facebook when Mark Zuckerberg was a Harvard student and turned down an offer to be one of its first employees — emphasized the importance of “learning what made our initial strategy work and leading by example rather than articulating values.”

Rather than define the culture when the company started, the cofounders tried to understand what values contributed to its success.

They identified employees who “carried the culture” and asked them what values drove Toast. As Narang said, “When we reached 80 to 100 employees we identified 10 to 30 of our employees who were best aligned with our core values. We focus-grouped the company’s six core values by asking ‘What does it mean to be successful here?'”

They also used the culture to keep out potential employees who did not fit its culture. As Fredette told me, he was interviewing a candidate for an engineering position and asked him, “‘What do you think of our team?’ The candidate replied, ‘Just OK.'” Fredette thought to himself, “He did well on the technical questions but why would you say that? If we hire someone toxic, it will spread.”

Toast saw itself applying that culture to a huge, untapped market. As CEO Chris Comparato — who joined Toast as CEO in February 2015 — told me in an April 2019 interview, “I have a customer success obsession. Our platform is giving restaurants a boost in same store sales and operating efficiency. It provides data analysis and empowers employees to delight guests.”

If Toast can maintain this culture as a public company, I expect it to continue growing rapidly.

Is Toast Worth $20 Billion or $67 Billion?

How much is Toast worth? We will have to wait until it goes public to find out.

While the $20 billion valuation seems popular in the financial media, I came up with what is probably a wildly optimistic value by looking at a comparable publicly-traded company.

Olo, a Manhattan-based food-ordering software provider, went public in March 2021 and its stock has risen 29% since to a market capitalization of $6.9 billion.

For the first six months of 2021, Olo’s revenues totaled $72 million (up 80%) — valuing Olo at 96 times its first half sales. Applying that high multiple might be inappropriately low since Toast is growing much faster — 105% — than Olo.

However, to be conservative, I multiplied Olo’s market cap/first half sales ratio by Toast’s $706 million in first half sales — yielding an estimate of $67.2 billion for Toast’s value.

If my estimate is anywhere in the ball park, February’s $20 billion IPO valuation for Toast would leave lots of money on the table.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Tesla shares soar more than 14% as Trump win is seen boosting Elon Musk’s electric vehicle company

Published

 on

 

NEW YORK (AP) — Shares of Tesla soared Wednesday as investors bet that the electric vehicle maker and its CEO Elon Musk will benefit from Donald Trump’s return to the White House.

Tesla stands to make significant gains under a Trump administration with the threat of diminished subsidies for alternative energy and electric vehicles doing the most harm to smaller competitors. Trump’s plans for extensive tariffs on Chinese imports make it less likely that Chinese EVs will be sold in bulk in the U.S. anytime soon.

“Tesla has the scale and scope that is unmatched,” said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives, in a note to investors. “This dynamic could give Musk and Tesla a clear competitive advantage in a non-EV subsidy environment, coupled by likely higher China tariffs that would continue to push away cheaper Chinese EV players.”

Tesla shares jumped 14.8% Wednesday while shares of rival electric vehicle makers tumbled. Nio, based in Shanghai, fell 5.3%. Shares of electric truck maker Rivian dropped 8.3% and Lucid Group fell 5.3%.

Tesla dominates sales of electric vehicles in the U.S, with 48.9% in market share through the middle of 2024, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Subsidies for clean energy are part of the Inflation Reduction Act, signed into law by President Joe Biden in 2022. It included tax credits for manufacturing, along with tax credits for consumers of electric vehicles.

Musk was one of Trump’s biggest donors, spending at least $119 million mobilizing Trump’s supporters to back the Republican nominee. He also pledged to give away $1 million a day to voters signing a petition for his political action committee.

In some ways, it has been a rocky year for Tesla, with sales and profit declining through the first half of the year. Profit did rise 17.3% in the third quarter.

The U.S. opened an investigation into the company’s “Full Self-Driving” system after reports of crashes in low-visibility conditions, including one that killed a pedestrian. The investigation covers roughly 2.4 million Teslas from the 2016 through 2024 model years.

And investors sent company shares tumbling last month after Tesla unveiled its long-awaited robotaxi at a Hollywood studio Thursday night, seeing not much progress at Tesla on autonomous vehicles while other companies have been making notable progress.

Tesla began selling the software, which is called “Full Self-Driving,” nine years ago. But there are doubts about its reliability.

The stock is now showing a 16.1% gain for the year after rising the past two days.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

S&P/TSX composite up more than 100 points, U.S. stock markets mixed

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was up more than 100 points in late-morning trading, helped by strength in base metal and utility stocks, while U.S. stock markets were mixed.

The S&P/TSX composite index was up 103.40 points at 24,542.48.

In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 192.31 points at 42,932.73. The S&P 500 index was up 7.14 points at 5,822.40, while the Nasdaq composite was down 9.03 points at 18,306.56.

The Canadian dollar traded for 72.61 cents US compared with 72.44 cents US on Tuesday.

The November crude oil contract was down 71 cents at US$69.87 per barrel and the November natural gas contract was down eight cents at US$2.42 per mmBTU.

The December gold contract was up US$7.20 at US$2,686.10 an ounce and the December copper contract was up a penny at US$4.35 a pound.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 16, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:GSPTSE, TSX:CADUSD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

S&P/TSX up more than 200 points, U.S. markets also higher

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was up more than 200 points in late-morning trading, while U.S. stock markets were also headed higher.

The S&P/TSX composite index was up 205.86 points at 24,508.12.

In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 336.62 points at 42,790.74. The S&P 500 index was up 34.19 points at 5,814.24, while the Nasdaq composite was up 60.27 points at 18.342.32.

The Canadian dollar traded for 72.61 cents US compared with 72.71 cents US on Thursday.

The November crude oil contract was down 15 cents at US$75.70 per barrel and the November natural gas contract was down two cents at US$2.65 per mmBTU.

The December gold contract was down US$29.60 at US$2,668.90 an ounce and the December copper contract was up four cents at US$4.47 a pound.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 11, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:GSPTSE, TSX:CADUSD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending