adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Politics without a point – al.com

Published

 on


Most of us have no idea what we really want out of politics. Fuming with outrage, we vent our emotions into the digital void. The cathartic moment evaporates, and we’re left with the sinking feeling that managed national decline is the best the “visionaries” we voted into office can muster. America has become a case study in political nihilism. More specifically, we suffer from politics without a point.

Watching House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy read “Green Eggs and Ham” in protest of cancel culture perfectly captures our present political moment. “Green Eggs and Ham” wasn’t ever in danger of being removed from publication. McCarthy didn’t read from one of the six Dr. Seuss books pulled from publication because they do, in fact, contain imagery that’s dated and offensive.

So why would he do it? Reading a non-offensive kid’s book isn’t exactly a big political flex. Was he trying to pressure a private publisher to keep distributing books it found offensive? I can’t imagine McCarthy hoped to indirectly champion racist images in old books with limited popularity.

There was no point. It was meaningless political theater, but he did it because it’s what we crave.

The directionally loud voices on social media and cable news shape our political beliefs far more than the likes of James Madison, Ayn Rand, Karl Marx, or Saul Alinsky. In a culture programmed to receive, critical thinking atrophies. When Tucker Carlson scrunches up his face and gets bent out of shape at liberals doing liberal things, Republicans can’t get enough. Don Lemon blasts Trump supporters as being on the side of the Klu Klux Klan, and Democrats howl with glee.

Too often, the personalities on our screens tell us that we’re good, and those who disagree with us want to destroy America. We may not know the point of our politics, but the attached entertainment industry has amazing clarity: Put eyeballs on emotionally driven content and monetize it. As a result, they’ve built a political equivalent of the World Wrestling Federation.

When we confuse governing and entertainment, the boring, tedious art of statecraft takes a back seat to the perpetual campaign. Running for elected office is far more exciting than the underlying job. Candidates thrill us as stump entertainers. They crow about stopping the other side, play to our fears, and promote general platitudes devoid of specifics.

We boldly ignore the reality that American government is specifically designed to prevent one person from assuming power and doing whatever he or she wants. That’s a huge letdown for voters who envisioned an American utopia just an election away. We’re temporarily entertained and then gravely disappointed.

For a people who possess the awesome power of selecting political representation, we perpetually hate our own choices. In a typical year, more than two-thirds of Americans disapprove of the job Congress is doing.

A 2020 Pew Research Center poll conducted before the last presidential election found that 56% of President Joe Biden’s supporters voted for him “because he is not Trump.” That was it. No other stated reason for supporting Biden was even close. In the prior election, Trump was not Hillary Clinton.

“Not the other guy” is neither the point of politics nor a plan for America’s future.

Every politician who heads to Washington with a singular focus of combatting the other side is like a NASCAR driver trying to get around the track by only applying the brakes. It’s not enough to be against the other team. Political leaders identify problems, apply principles, develop solutions, and build majorities to pass them. That’s the basic job description for every legislator or government executive in America. Otherwise, they are little more than publicly-funded sound machines.

Ronald Reagan famously said, “Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.” Many of my friends dutifully recite those last four words without question. Few of them know the context of Reagan’s words or that he went on to say, “It’s not my intention to do away with government. It is rather to make it work.”

In a country with hundreds of millions of people, we need effective government to maintain life, liberty, and human flourishing. Government sets up the guardrails for a society that delicately balances both liberty and security. It isn’t meant to provide our every need, but it’s not inherently evil either. Building and shaping that government is the point of politics even if we’ve forgotten it. Right now, it’s difficult to imagine us having an appetite for governing more than entertainment, but it’s necessary. Thankfully, I know at least one politician willing to read us a children’s book about trying things we’re not sure we’ll like.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

Youri Chassin quits CAQ to sit as Independent, second member to leave this month

Published

 on

 

Quebec legislature member Youri Chassin has announced he’s leaving the Coalition Avenir Québec government to sit as an Independent.

He announced the decision shortly after writing an open letter criticizing Premier François Legault’s government for abandoning its principles of smaller government.

In the letter published in Le Journal de Montréal and Le Journal de Québec, Chassin accused the party of falling back on what he called the old formula of throwing money at problems instead of looking to do things differently.

Chassin says public services are more fragile than ever, despite rising spending that pushed the province to a record $11-billion deficit projected in the last budget.

He is the second CAQ member to leave the party in a little more than one week, after economy and energy minister Pierre Fitzgibbon announced Sept. 4 he would leave because he lost motivation to do his job.

Chassin says he has no intention of joining another party and will instead sit as an Independent until the end of his term.

He has represented the Saint-Jérôme riding since the CAQ rose to power in 2018, but has not served in cabinet.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘I’m not going to listen to you’: Singh responds to Poilievre’s vote challenge

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says he will not be taking advice from Pierre Poilievre after the Conservative leader challenged him to bring down government.

“I say directly to Pierre Poilievre: I’m not going to listen to you,” said Singh on Wednesday, accusing Poilievre of wanting to take away dental-care coverage from Canadians, among other things.

“I’m not going to listen to your advice. You want to destroy people’s lives, I want to build up a brighter future.”

Earlier in the day, Poilievre challenged Singh to commit to voting non-confidence in the government, saying his party will force a vote in the House of Commons “at the earliest possibly opportunity.”

“I’m asking Jagmeet Singh and the NDP to commit unequivocally before Monday’s byelections: will they vote non-confidence to bring down the costly coalition and trigger a carbon tax election, or will Jagmeet Singh sell out Canadians again?” Poilievre said.

“It’s put up or shut up time for the NDP.”

While Singh rejected the idea he would ever listen to Poilievre, he did not say how the NDP would vote on a non-confidence motion.

“I’ve said on any vote, we’re going to look at the vote and we’ll make our decision. I’m not going to say our decision ahead of time,” he said.

Singh’s top adviser said on Tuesday the NDP leader is not particularly eager to trigger an election, even as the Conservatives challenge him to do just that.

Anne McGrath, Singh’s principal secretary, says there will be more volatility in Parliament and the odds of an early election have risen.

“I don’t think he is anxious to launch one, or chomping at the bit to have one, but it can happen,” she said in an interview.

New Democrat MPs are in a second day of meetings in Montreal as they nail down a plan for how to navigate the minority Parliament this fall.

The caucus retreat comes one week after Singh announced the party has left the supply-and-confidence agreement with the governing Liberals.

It’s also taking place in the very city where New Democrats are hoping to pick up a seat on Monday, when voters go to the polls in Montreal’s LaSalle—Émard—Verdun. A second byelection is being held that day in the Winnipeg riding of Elmwood—Transcona, where the NDP is hoping to hold onto a seat the Conservatives are also vying for.

While New Democrats are seeking to distance themselves from the Liberals, they don’t appear ready to trigger a general election.

Singh signalled on Tuesday that he will have more to say Wednesday about the party’s strategy for the upcoming sitting.

He is hoping to convince Canadians that his party can defeat the federal Conservatives, who have been riding high in the polls over the last year.

Singh has attacked Poilievre as someone who would bring back Harper-style cuts to programs that Canadians rely on, including the national dental-care program that was part of the supply-and-confidence agreement.

The Canadian Press has asked Poilievre’s office whether the Conservative leader intends to keep the program in place, if he forms government after the next election.

With the return of Parliament just days away, the NDP is also keeping in mind how other parties will look to capitalize on the new makeup of the House of Commons.

The Bloc Québécois has already indicated that it’s written up a list of demands for the Liberals in exchange for support on votes.

The next federal election must take place by October 2025 at the latest.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Social media comments blocked: Montreal mayor says she won’t accept vulgar slurs

Published

 on

 

Montreal Mayor Valérie Plante is defending her decision to turn off comments on her social media accounts — with an announcement on social media.

She posted screenshots to X this morning of vulgar names she’s been called on the platform, and says comments on her posts for months have been dominated by insults, to the point that she decided to block them.

Montreal’s Opposition leader and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association have criticized Plante for limiting freedom of expression by restricting comments on her X and Instagram accounts.

They say elected officials who use social media should be willing to hear from constituents on those platforms.

However, Plante says some people may believe there is a fundamental right to call someone offensive names and to normalize violence online, but she disagrees.

Her statement on X is closed to comments.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending