adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Business

Rogers to buy Shaw in deal worth $26 billion, combining Canada's two largest cable providers – Financial Post

Published

 on


Rogers says it has the support of the Shaw family

Article content

Rogers Communications Inc. agreed to buy rival Shaw Communications Inc. in a $20 billion deal that would unite Canada’s two largest cable providers and shake up its wireless industry.

The $40.50-per-share cash offer has the support of Shaw’s board and isn’t conditional on financing, the companies said Monday. The proposal represents a 69 per cent premium over Shaw’s closing price on Friday. Including debt, the transaction is worth about $26 billion.

The transaction, if approved by regulators, would merge companies controlled by two of Canada’s most powerful business families, who have cooperated as well as competed in the battle against telecommunications rivals Telus Corp. and BCE Inc.

Rogers and Shaw have carved up, and sometimes traded, rival cable territories — with Shaw focused on Canada’s western provinces and Rogers dominating Ontario. But Rogers has pulled far ahead of Shaw because of its large wireless division, a business in which Shaw’s Freedom Mobile unit is a distant fourth place in Canada. That’s one reason Shaw’s share price has fallen over the past five years.

Advertisement

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Shaw Communications jumped 41 per cent to $33.65 at 9:31 a.m. in Toronto. Rogers rose 3.3 per cent to $61.55.

  1. None

    Posthaste: Five things you need to know about the blockbuster Rogers-Shaw merger

  2. Cogeco has reiterated to Rogers and Altice that the family-controlled cable provider isn't for sale.

    Cogeco spurns Rogers again, calling bid a ‘futile exercise’

  3. Rogers, Canada's no. 3 cable and wireless firm by market value, teamed up with Altice USA Inc. to launch a hostile takeover bid for Quebec-based Cogeco Inc. and subsidiary Cogeco Communications Inc.

    Rogers mulls next steps as $8.4-billion Cogeco offer expires

The deal needs approval from the Canadian government, which would have to accept a reduction of competition in the wireless sector, as some parts of the country would go from having four wireless providers to three. A competition review could take a year; Rogers and Shaw said they expect the transaction to close in the first half of 2022.

“This transaction will create long-term value for both companies’ shareholders, and just as important, this transaction will ensure Canada’s cable and wireless industry can support the significant capital requirements needed for 5G networks and the essential connectivity that rural Canadians desperately need,” Rogers Chief Financial Officer Tony Staffieri said on a conference call with analysts.

Rogers said that the deal would add to earnings and cash flow per share in the first year after closing and that cost savings would top $1 billion annually within two years.

Rogers has been trying to expand by acquisition recently, teaming up with Altice USA Inc. to launch a hostile bid last August for Quebec-based Cogeco Inc. and its subsidiary Cogeco Communications Inc. Cogeco’s controlling Audet family repeatedly rebuffed the bid, and it collapsed in November.

Advertisement

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

If the deal is completed, Shaw Chief Executive Officer Brad Shaw and another director nominated by the Shaw family would join the Rogers board. The Shaw family would also become a major shareholder in the combined company, with 60 per cent of its shares in Shaw Communications being exchanged for 23.6 million Class B shares of Rogers.

“Our families and our companies have known each other for many years and we hold similar values and philosophies,” Brad Shaw said. “For decades, Rogers and Shaw have been friendly but intense competitors. But all the while we have respected each other, admired each other and learned from each other’s actions.”

In November, Toronto-Dominion Bank analyst Vince Valentini said Shaw might have the most upside potential over the ensuing 18 months if it were to merge with Rogers.

The combined company would spend $2.5 billion to build a 5G network in western Canada and $3 billion on investments in network, service and technology, the companies said in a statement. Rogers’ western Canadian headquarters would be at Shaw’s current head office in Calgary.

But it’s an open question whether the government would allow such a deal without concessions, at least on the wireless side.

“I believe this will be one of the most complex antitrust cases in Canadian history,” Julian Klymochko, who manages an arbitrage exchange-traded-fund as chief investment officer at Calgary-based Accelerate Financial Technologies.

Advertisement

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

“It will test the government’s appetite to accept more consolidation in a highly concentrated industry and one in which there has been much regulatory pressure to reduce prices. The outcome is highly uncertain,” he said.

“We have been clear that greater affordability, competition and innovation in the Canadian telecommunications sector are as important to us as a government as they are to Canadians concerned about their cellphone bills,” Canadian Industry Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne said in an emailed statement. “These goals will be front and center in analyzing the implications of today’s news.”

Bloomberg.com

In-depth reporting on the innovation economy from The Logic, brought to you in partnership with the Financial Post.

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Transat AT reports $39.9M Q3 loss compared with $57.3M profit a year earlier

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – Travel company Transat AT Inc. reported a loss in its latest quarter compared with a profit a year earlier as its revenue edged lower.

The parent company of Air Transat says it lost $39.9 million or $1.03 per diluted share in its quarter ended July 31.

The result compared with a profit of $57.3 million or $1.49 per diluted share a year earlier.

Revenue in what was the company’s third quarter totalled $736.2 million, down from $746.3 million in the same quarter last year.

On an adjusted basis, Transat says it lost $1.10 per share in its latest quarter compared with an adjusted profit of $1.10 per share a year earlier.

Transat chief executive Annick Guérard says demand for leisure travel remains healthy, as evidenced by higher traffic, but consumers are increasingly price conscious given the current economic uncertainty.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TRZ)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Dollarama keeping an eye on competitors as Loblaw launches new ultra-discount chain

Published

 on

 

Dollarama Inc.’s food aisles may have expanded far beyond sweet treats or piles of gum by the checkout counter in recent years, but its chief executive maintains his company is “not in the grocery business,” even if it’s keeping an eye on the sector.

“It’s just one small part of our store,” Neil Rossy told analysts on a Wednesday call, where he was questioned about the company’s food merchandise and rivals playing in the same space.

“We will keep an eye on all retailers — like all retailers keep an eye on us — to make sure that we’re competitive and we understand what’s out there.”

Over the last decade and as consumers have more recently sought deals, Dollarama’s food merchandise has expanded to include bread and pantry staples like cereal, rice and pasta sold at prices on par or below supermarkets.

However, the competition in the discount segment of the market Dollarama operates in intensified recently when the country’s biggest grocery chain began piloting a new ultra-discount store.

The No Name stores being tested by Loblaw Cos. Ltd. in Windsor, St. Catharines and Brockville, Ont., are billed as 20 per cent cheaper than discount retail competitors including No Frills. The grocery giant is able to offer such cost savings by relying on a smaller store footprint, fewer chilled products and a hearty range of No Name merchandise.

Though Rossy brushed off notions that his company is a supermarket challenger, grocers aren’t off his radar.

“All retailers in Canada are realistic about the fact that everyone is everyone’s competition on any given item or category,” he said.

Rossy declined to reveal how much of the chain’s sales would overlap with Loblaw or the food category, arguing the vast variety of items Dollarama sells is its strength rather than its grocery products alone.

“What makes Dollarama Dollarama is a very wide assortment of different departments that somewhat represent the old five-and-dime local convenience store,” he said.

The breadth of Dollarama’s offerings helped carry the company to a second-quarter profit of $285.9 million, up from $245.8 million in the same quarter last year as its sales rose 7.4 per cent.

The retailer said Wednesday the profit amounted to $1.02 per diluted share for the 13-week period ended July 28, up from 86 cents per diluted share a year earlier.

The period the quarter covers includes the start of summer, when Rossy said the weather was “terrible.”

“The weather got slightly better towards the end of the summer and our sales certainly increased, but not enough to make up for the season’s horrible start,” he said.

Sales totalled $1.56 billion for the quarter, up from $1.46 billion in the same quarter last year.

Comparable store sales, a key metric for retailers, increased 4.7 per cent, while the average transaction was down2.2 per cent and traffic was up seven per cent, RBC analyst Irene Nattel pointed out.

She told investors in a note that the numbers reflect “solid demand as cautious consumers focus on core consumables and everyday essentials.”

Analysts have attributed such behaviour to interest rates that have been slow to drop and high prices of key consumer goods, which are weighing on household budgets.

To cope, many Canadians have spent more time seeking deals, trading down to more affordable brands and forgoing small luxuries they would treat themselves to in better economic times.

“When people feel squeezed, they tend to shy away from discretionary, focus on the basics,” Rossy said. “When people are feeling good about their wallet, they tend to be more lax about the basics and more willing to spend on discretionary.”

The current economic situation has drawn in not just the average Canadian looking to save a buck or two, but also wealthier consumers.

“When the entire economy is feeling slightly squeezed, we get more consumers who might not have to or want to shop at a Dollarama generally or who enjoy shopping at a Dollarama but have the luxury of not having to worry about the price in some other store that they happen to be standing in that has those goods,” Rossy said.

“Well, when times are tougher, they’ll consider the extra five minutes to go to the store next door.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:DOL)

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

U.S. regulator fines TD Bank US$28M for faulty consumer reports

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has ordered TD Bank Group to pay US$28 million for repeatedly sharing inaccurate, negative information about its customers to consumer reporting companies.

The agency says TD has to pay US$7.76 million in total to tens of thousands of victims of its illegal actions, along with a US$20 million civil penalty.

It says TD shared information that contained systemic errors about credit card and bank deposit accounts to consumer reporting companies, which can include credit reports as well as screening reports for tenants and employees and other background checks.

CFPB director Rohit Chopra says in a statement that TD threatened the consumer reports of customers with fraudulent information then “barely lifted a finger to fix it,” and that regulators will need to “focus major attention” on TD Bank to change its course.

TD says in a statement it self-identified these issues and proactively worked to improve its practices, and that it is committed to delivering on its responsibilities to its customers.

The bank also faces scrutiny in the U.S. over its anti-money laundering program where it expects to pay more than US$3 billion in monetary penalties to resolve.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending