adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Media

Media and entertainment companies must get more diverse. They shape how we see our world. – USA TODAY

Published

 on



I’ve confronted the diversity issue all my life, especially as a Black man in executive positions at corporations like Coca-Cola, Pepsi, Coors and GM.

Few issues rank higher on the agenda for brands, especially those in media and entertainment, than the ever-intensifying debate about diversity. But results throughout the industry landscape vary widely. Let’s face it, some companies are “doing” diversity better than others – getting it right while others fail to get it at all, and still others that land somewhere in between. Every day the stakes for success keep getting higher.  

These companies should be held to an even higher standard on DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion) than businesses in most other sectors. After all, they shape the images that our children see via television and movies. A recent study by McKinsey found that the industry remains disproportionately homogenous: 87% of TV executives and 92% of film executives are white. 

Netflix and Disney are leaders

My perspective is also based on metrics rather than mere opinion. The Association of National Advertisers and its Center for Brand Purpose recently established the ANA/Swayable ESG Brand Perception Index. The tool, reflecting daily surveys of consumer opinion, measures 400 national brands according to environmental, social and governance impact. Equity and diversity reporting and accountability are among the key metrics. 

Topping the list among entertainment brands are Netflix and Disney. At Netflix, for example, the number of Black employees in the United States doubled in the last three years. Soon after the murder of George Floyd, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings and his wife, Patty Quillin, donated $120 million to historically Black colleges and universities to honor his memory.  

USA TODAY’s opinion newsletter: Get the best insights and analysis delivered to your inbox

At Disney, Walt Disney Television recently unveiled the Onyx Collective, a new production entity designed to feature work by “underrepresented” creators such as those of color. Its content will be distributed largely through Hulu, a Disney streaming platform. In response to the Black Lives Matter movement sparked by the Floyd murder, Disney quickly issued a statement declaring that “the pandemic coupled with these recent injustices have pushed the issues of racial disparity into the open.”   

At the opposite end of the spectrum is ViacomCBS. Back in 2018, CEO Les Moonves was ousted amid allegations of sexual harassment. The following year, longtime executive Whitney Davis – the company’s own director of entertainment diversity and inclusion – resigned, accusing the network of having a “white problem” and neglecting to “value a diverse workplace.”   

If only those difficulties had inspired CBS to change. But no.

Black in Business: Racial Justice and diversity in business require leadership

Earlier this year, the Emmy award-winning daytime series “The Talk” was embroiled in a controversy with racial overtones. Long-time co-host Sharon Osbourne referred to Piers Morgan’s comment that he refused to “believe a word” of the Oprah Winfrey interview with Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan that was broadcast on CBS. In a hostile exchange about the topic with Sheryl Underwood, a Black co-host, Osbourne said, “I very much feel like I’m about to be put in the electric chair because I have a friend who many people think is a racist and that makes me a racist.” A CBS investigation led to Osbourne leaving the show.   

I’ve confronted the diversity issue up close and personal my entire adult life, especially in my experience as a Black man holding executive leadership positions in corporations such as Coca-Cola, Pepsi, Coors, and General Motors.  

At GM, for example, as Vice President of Marketing and Advertising for North America in 2007, I often complained to my superiors that our media buys lacked diversity. I expressed a particular concern about advertising for Chevrolet and Cadillac on “Imus in The Morning,” a nationally syndicated radio program on Westwood One, and simulcast on MSNBC.  

I was told that the company had to support voices from both the left and the right. This has nothing to do with the left or the right, I said, it’s that Don Imus is racist.

Weeks later, Imus said the words that got him kicked off the air. On hearing that the Rutgers women’s basketball team had lost an NCAA championship game, he used racist and sexist slurs to insult them and their appearances, most infamously their hair

DEI is a must-have for New Hollywood

Activists and journalists immediately called for Imus to be fired. Later that morning GM CEO Rick Wagoner told me, the company’s most senior Black marketing executive in North America, that Imus’ words were despicable and asked me what we should do. I put forward my recommendation and GM quickly issued a statement suspending its ads on the show.

GM turned out to be one of the first companies to withdraw advertising support from Don Imus. A domino effect ensued, with Amex, GlaxoSmithKline and Procter & Gamble also dropping the show. Finally. MSNBC dumped the show as well.  

Woefully undiverse: We’re here, we’re queer and we watch the Hallmark Channel’s corny Christmas movies, too

My experiences tell me that warnings are sounded again and again, only to go unheeded for years, leading to disastrous consequences. Media companies bear a special responsibility to build a culture that reflects the audiences who pay the bills. They must continue to deliver high-quality content from people of color, ensure that production budgets mirror the consumer market, and address the ongoing lack of diversity in the C-suite and among boards of directors.  

In the New Hollywood now emerging, the companies committed to embracing these changing dynamics will flourish. DEI is a “must-have” rather than a “nice to do.” McKinsey estimated that if the film and TV industry addressed these barriers, it would unlock more than $10 billion in annual revenues, equal to a 7% expansion in baseline industry revenues.

Talking the talk is good. But walking the walk will be even better.  

Mike Jackson is Chief Marketing Officer at Vision Media. 

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Trump could cash out his DJT stock within weeks. Here’s what happens if he sells

Published

 on

Former President Donald Trump is on the brink of a significant financial decision that could have far-reaching implications for both his personal wealth and the future of his fledgling social media company, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG). As the lockup period on his shares in TMTG, which owns Truth Social, nears its end, Trump could soon be free to sell his substantial stake in the company. However, the potential payday, which makes up a large portion of his net worth, comes with considerable risks for Trump and his supporters.

Trump’s stake in TMTG comprises nearly 59% of the company, amounting to 114,750,000 shares. As of now, this holding is valued at approximately $2.6 billion. These shares are currently under a lockup agreement, a common feature of initial public offerings (IPOs), designed to prevent company insiders from immediately selling their shares and potentially destabilizing the stock. The lockup, which began after TMTG’s merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), is set to expire on September 25, though it could end earlier if certain conditions are met.

Should Trump decide to sell his shares after the lockup expires, the market could respond in unpredictable ways. The sale of a substantial number of shares by a major stakeholder like Trump could flood the market, potentially driving down the stock price. Daniel Bradley, a finance professor at the University of South Florida, suggests that the market might react negatively to such a large sale, particularly if there aren’t enough buyers to absorb the supply. This could lead to a sharp decline in the stock’s value, impacting both Trump’s personal wealth and the company’s market standing.

Moreover, Trump’s involvement in Truth Social has been a key driver of investor interest. The platform, marketed as a free speech alternative to mainstream social media, has attracted a loyal user base largely due to Trump’s presence. If Trump were to sell his stake, it might signal a lack of confidence in the company, potentially shaking investor confidence and further depressing the stock price.

Trump’s decision is also influenced by his ongoing legal battles, which have already cost him over $100 million in legal fees. Selling his shares could provide a significant financial boost, helping him cover these mounting expenses. However, this move could also have political ramifications, especially as he continues his bid for the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential race.

Trump Media’s success is closely tied to Trump’s political fortunes. The company’s stock has shown volatility in response to developments in the presidential race, with Trump’s chances of winning having a direct impact on the stock’s value. If Trump sells his stake, it could be interpreted as a lack of confidence in his own political future, potentially undermining both his campaign and the company’s prospects.

Truth Social, the flagship product of TMTG, has faced challenges in generating traffic and advertising revenue, especially compared to established social media giants like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook. Despite this, the company’s valuation has remained high, fueled by investor speculation on Trump’s political future. If Trump remains in the race and manages to secure the presidency, the value of his shares could increase. Conversely, any missteps on the campaign trail could have the opposite effect, further destabilizing the stock.

As the lockup period comes to an end, Trump faces a critical decision that could shape the future of both his personal finances and Truth Social. Whether he chooses to hold onto his shares or cash out, the outcome will likely have significant consequences for the company, its investors, and Trump’s political aspirations.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Arizona man accused of social media threats to Trump is arrested

Published

 on

Cochise County, AZ — Law enforcement officials in Arizona have apprehended Ronald Lee Syvrud, a 66-year-old resident of Cochise County, after a manhunt was launched following alleged death threats he made against former President Donald Trump. The threats reportedly surfaced in social media posts over the past two weeks, as Trump visited the US-Mexico border in Cochise County on Thursday.

Syvrud, who hails from Benson, Arizona, located about 50 miles southeast of Tucson, was captured by the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office on Thursday afternoon. The Sheriff’s Office confirmed his arrest, stating, “This subject has been taken into custody without incident.”

In addition to the alleged threats against Trump, Syvrud is wanted for multiple offences, including failure to register as a sex offender. He also faces several warrants in both Wisconsin and Arizona, including charges for driving under the influence and a felony hit-and-run.

The timing of the arrest coincided with Trump’s visit to Cochise County, where he toured the US-Mexico border. During his visit, Trump addressed the ongoing border issues and criticized his political rival, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, for what he described as lax immigration policies. When asked by reporters about the ongoing manhunt for Syvrud, Trump responded, “No, I have not heard that, but I am not that surprised and the reason is because I want to do things that are very bad for the bad guys.”

This incident marks the latest in a series of threats against political figures during the current election cycle. Just earlier this month, a 66-year-old Virginia man was arrested on suspicion of making death threats against Vice President Kamala Harris and other public officials.

Continue Reading

Media

Trump Media & Technology Group Faces Declining Stock Amid Financial Struggles and Increased Competition

Published

 on

Tech News in Canada

Trump Media & Technology Group’s stock has taken a significant hit, dropping more than 11% this week following a disappointing earnings report and the return of former U.S. President Donald Trump to the rival social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. This decline is part of a broader downward trend for the parent company of Truth Social, with the stock plummeting nearly 43% since mid-July. Despite the sharp decline, some investors remain unfazed, expressing continued optimism for the company’s financial future or standing by their investment as a show of political support for Trump.

One such investor, Todd Schlanger, an interior designer from West Palm Beach, explained his commitment to the stock, stating, “I’m a Republican, so I supported him. When I found out about the stock, I got involved because I support the company and believe in free speech.” Schlanger, who owns around 1,000 shares, is a regular user of Truth Social and is excited about the company’s future, particularly its plans to expand its streaming services. He believes Truth Social has the potential to be as strong as Facebook or X, despite the stock’s recent struggles.

However, Truth Social’s stock performance is deeply tied to Trump’s political influence and the company’s ability to generate sustainable revenue, which has proven challenging. An earnings report released last Friday showed the company lost over $16 million in the three-month period ending in June. Revenue dropped by 30%, down to approximately $836,000 compared to $1.2 million during the same period last year.

In response to the earnings report, Truth Social CEO Devin Nunes emphasized the company’s strong cash position, highlighting $344 million in cash reserves and no debt. He also reiterated the company’s commitment to free speech, stating, “From the beginning, it was our intention to make Truth Social an impenetrable beachhead of free speech, and by taking extraordinary steps to minimize our reliance on Big Tech, that is exactly what we are doing.”

Despite these assurances, investors reacted negatively to the quarterly report, leading to a steep drop in stock price. The situation was further complicated by Trump’s return to X, where he posted for the first time in a year. Trump’s exclusivity agreement with Trump Media & Technology Group mandates that he posts personal content first on Truth Social. However, he is allowed to make politically related posts on other social media platforms, which he did earlier this week, potentially drawing users away from Truth Social.

For investors like Teri Lynn Roberson, who purchased shares near the company’s peak after it went public in March, the decline in stock value has been disheartening. However, Roberson remains unbothered by the poor performance, saying her investment was more about supporting Trump than making money. “I’m way at a loss, but I am OK with that. I am just watching it for fun,” Roberson said, adding that she sees Trump’s return to X as a positive move that could expand his reach beyond Truth Social’s “echo chamber.”

The stock’s performance holds significant financial implications for Trump himself, as he owns a 65% stake in Trump Media & Technology Group. According to Fortune, this stake represents a substantial portion of his net worth, which could be vulnerable if the company continues to struggle financially.

Analysts have described Truth Social as a “meme stock,” similar to companies like GameStop and AMC that saw their stock prices driven by ideological investments rather than business fundamentals. Tyler Richey, an analyst at Sevens Report Research, noted that the stock has ebbed and flowed based on sentiment toward Trump. He pointed out that the recent decline coincided with the rise of U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic presidential nominee, which may have dampened perceptions of Trump’s 2024 election prospects.

Jay Ritter, a finance professor at the University of Florida, offered a grim long-term outlook for Truth Social, suggesting that the stock would likely remain volatile, but with an overall downward trend. “What’s lacking for the true believer in the company story is, ‘OK, where is the business strategy that will be generating revenue?'” Ritter said, highlighting the company’s struggle to produce a sustainable business model.

Still, for some investors, like Michael Rogers, a masonry company owner in North Carolina, their support for Trump Media & Technology Group is unwavering. Rogers, who owns over 10,000 shares, said he invested in the company both as a show of support for Trump and because of his belief in the company’s financial future. Despite concerns about the company’s revenue challenges, Rogers expressed confidence in the business, stating, “I’m in it for the long haul.”

Not all investors are as confident. Mitchell Standley, who made a significant return on his investment earlier this year by capitalizing on the hype surrounding Trump Media’s planned merger with Digital World Acquisition Corporation, has since moved on. “It was basically just a pump and dump,” Standley told ABC News. “I knew that once they merged, all of his supporters were going to dump a bunch of money into it and buy it up.” Now, Standley is staying away from the company, citing the lack of business fundamentals as the reason for his exit.

Truth Social’s future remains uncertain as it continues to struggle with financial losses and faces stiff competition from established social media platforms. While its user base and investor sentiment are bolstered by Trump’s political following, the company’s long-term viability will depend on its ability to create a sustainable revenue stream and maintain relevance in a crowded digital landscape.

As the company seeks to stabilize, the question remains whether its appeal to Trump’s supporters can translate into financial success or whether it will remain a volatile stock driven more by ideology than business fundamentals.

Continue Reading

Trending