adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

To Understand Politics, Watch the Fringes – Bloomberg

Published

 on


Get Jonathan Bernstein’s newsletter every morning in your inbox. Click here to subscribe.

Lawmakers on the Democratic fringe are ideological outliers but not radicals; those on the Republican fringe are radical, but not necessarily policy outliers. We couldn’t get a better example of that distinction than in the news from Monday.

On the Republican side, first-term Representative Madison Cawthorn made news by repeating the false and irresponsible claim that the 2020 election was “stolen” and appeared to be sanctioning or even encouraging violence in response. Fellow Republican Adam Kinzinger got it right: “This is insane. Based on a total lie. This must stop.”

Unfortunately, there are a lot more Cawthorns than Kinzingers in the House Republican caucus. But that’s not a question of ideology (as liberals who like Kinzinger found out when he expressed hawkish views on Afghanistan over the past two weeks). There is, of course, nothing ideological about falsely calling an election fraudulent. Nor is there much in the way of policy content involved, unless you consider “Republicans should always win elections” to be policy. But the language Cawthorn uses is the language of radicalism — the demand that something must change, and must change now, or else the results will be apocalyptic. 

As for the Democrats? Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ayanna Pressley and three others made news by coming out against the renomination of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. Why? Because, they wrote, “We urge President Biden to re-imagine a Federal Reserve focused on eliminating climate risk and advancing racial and economic justice.” 

Members of the House, of course, have no vote in confirming presidential nominations. Nor is it likely that more than a handful of lawmakers agree that addressing climate risk and racial justice — rather than economic growth, jobs and stable prices — should be the main task of the Fed. That is: These are policy outliers; if you want to call them extremists, I’m not sure that they’d disagree. But they’re trying to move policy in their direction. In this case, the fact that they’re in a tiny minority and that they’re in the House, not the Senate, means that a little public performance is actually a fairly pragmatic approach. The radical move here might be to hold the infrastructure bills hostage, or to threaten to shut down the government, or even to refuse to vote to increase the debt limit, unless they got their way. Instead, the most liberal Democrats are issuing a press release in a situation where they don’t have leverage. In other words, they’re using the opportunity for a little advocacy (and, to be sure, self-promotion). But watch them: When they do have leverage, they use it to bargain for somewhat better (in their view) legislation. With rare exceptions, they are pragmatists, not radicals. 

All political parties have fringes. But the difference between the Democratic and Republican fringes is important, and it tells us a lot about the difference between the parties right now. 

1. Dan Drezner with a pessimistic view of Congress and foreign policy. He’s correct about Congress collectively. But it’s also true that in the past some representatives, and quite a few senators, have seen political advantage in heavy involvement in foreign policy. One thing that probably would help? Reviving House and Senate committees, and giving more money to professional staff for them and their subcommittees. 

2. Jacob Grumbach and Erick Schickler on Congress and protecting democracy.

3. Zoltan Hajnal, Vladimir Kogan and G. Agustin Markarian at the Monkey Cage on a reform that would instantly produce much higher voter participation

4. Greg Sargent on the urgent need to revise and update the Electoral Count Act

5. Nathaniel Rakich on the revolt of (some) House moderates.

6. And Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern on Texas law, the Supreme Court and Roe v. Wade

Get Early Returns every morning in your inbox. Click here to subscribe. Also subscribe to Bloomberg All Access and get much, much more. You’ll receive our unmatched global news coverage and two in-depth daily newsletters, the Bloomberg Open and the Bloomberg Close.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

Youri Chassin quits CAQ to sit as Independent, second member to leave this month

Published

 on

 

Quebec legislature member Youri Chassin has announced he’s leaving the Coalition Avenir Québec government to sit as an Independent.

He announced the decision shortly after writing an open letter criticizing Premier François Legault’s government for abandoning its principles of smaller government.

In the letter published in Le Journal de Montréal and Le Journal de Québec, Chassin accused the party of falling back on what he called the old formula of throwing money at problems instead of looking to do things differently.

Chassin says public services are more fragile than ever, despite rising spending that pushed the province to a record $11-billion deficit projected in the last budget.

He is the second CAQ member to leave the party in a little more than one week, after economy and energy minister Pierre Fitzgibbon announced Sept. 4 he would leave because he lost motivation to do his job.

Chassin says he has no intention of joining another party and will instead sit as an Independent until the end of his term.

He has represented the Saint-Jérôme riding since the CAQ rose to power in 2018, but has not served in cabinet.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘I’m not going to listen to you’: Singh responds to Poilievre’s vote challenge

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says he will not be taking advice from Pierre Poilievre after the Conservative leader challenged him to bring down government.

“I say directly to Pierre Poilievre: I’m not going to listen to you,” said Singh on Wednesday, accusing Poilievre of wanting to take away dental-care coverage from Canadians, among other things.

“I’m not going to listen to your advice. You want to destroy people’s lives, I want to build up a brighter future.”

Earlier in the day, Poilievre challenged Singh to commit to voting non-confidence in the government, saying his party will force a vote in the House of Commons “at the earliest possibly opportunity.”

“I’m asking Jagmeet Singh and the NDP to commit unequivocally before Monday’s byelections: will they vote non-confidence to bring down the costly coalition and trigger a carbon tax election, or will Jagmeet Singh sell out Canadians again?” Poilievre said.

“It’s put up or shut up time for the NDP.”

While Singh rejected the idea he would ever listen to Poilievre, he did not say how the NDP would vote on a non-confidence motion.

“I’ve said on any vote, we’re going to look at the vote and we’ll make our decision. I’m not going to say our decision ahead of time,” he said.

Singh’s top adviser said on Tuesday the NDP leader is not particularly eager to trigger an election, even as the Conservatives challenge him to do just that.

Anne McGrath, Singh’s principal secretary, says there will be more volatility in Parliament and the odds of an early election have risen.

“I don’t think he is anxious to launch one, or chomping at the bit to have one, but it can happen,” she said in an interview.

New Democrat MPs are in a second day of meetings in Montreal as they nail down a plan for how to navigate the minority Parliament this fall.

The caucus retreat comes one week after Singh announced the party has left the supply-and-confidence agreement with the governing Liberals.

It’s also taking place in the very city where New Democrats are hoping to pick up a seat on Monday, when voters go to the polls in Montreal’s LaSalle—Émard—Verdun. A second byelection is being held that day in the Winnipeg riding of Elmwood—Transcona, where the NDP is hoping to hold onto a seat the Conservatives are also vying for.

While New Democrats are seeking to distance themselves from the Liberals, they don’t appear ready to trigger a general election.

Singh signalled on Tuesday that he will have more to say Wednesday about the party’s strategy for the upcoming sitting.

He is hoping to convince Canadians that his party can defeat the federal Conservatives, who have been riding high in the polls over the last year.

Singh has attacked Poilievre as someone who would bring back Harper-style cuts to programs that Canadians rely on, including the national dental-care program that was part of the supply-and-confidence agreement.

The Canadian Press has asked Poilievre’s office whether the Conservative leader intends to keep the program in place, if he forms government after the next election.

With the return of Parliament just days away, the NDP is also keeping in mind how other parties will look to capitalize on the new makeup of the House of Commons.

The Bloc Québécois has already indicated that it’s written up a list of demands for the Liberals in exchange for support on votes.

The next federal election must take place by October 2025 at the latest.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Social media comments blocked: Montreal mayor says she won’t accept vulgar slurs

Published

 on

 

Montreal Mayor Valérie Plante is defending her decision to turn off comments on her social media accounts — with an announcement on social media.

She posted screenshots to X this morning of vulgar names she’s been called on the platform, and says comments on her posts for months have been dominated by insults, to the point that she decided to block them.

Montreal’s Opposition leader and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association have criticized Plante for limiting freedom of expression by restricting comments on her X and Instagram accounts.

They say elected officials who use social media should be willing to hear from constituents on those platforms.

However, Plante says some people may believe there is a fundamental right to call someone offensive names and to normalize violence online, but she disagrees.

Her statement on X is closed to comments.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending