adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

$100 oil won't derail the US economy – CNN

Published

 on


New York (CNN Business)Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has sent oil futures above $100 a barrel for the first time since 2014 and will probably bring $4-a-gallon gasoline to much of the United States. But it won’t be a major drag on US economic growth.

Economists project that at most the nation’s gross domestic product, the broadest measure of its economic activity, will have a few tenths of a percentage point shaved off its growth rate. With the economy growing very strong — GDP had its best growth since 1984 last year — America is expected to weather those higher prices just fine, even if drivers are grumbling.
The positives and negatives for the US economy from an oil price hike come close to balancing each other out, noted Paul Ashworth, chief North American economist for Capital Economics.
“While we know it will definitely mean a reduction for the real spending by households [on other goods], there will be a positive impact on domestic oil production,” Ashworth said. But he said that the run up in oil prices the last two years has done less than might be expected to raise oil production, investment spending and hiring by US oil companies. That’s partly because investors and banks have been reluctant to pour more money into fossil fuel companies.
“We’ve already had oil go from $40 a barrel to $90 with a lackluster response by shale producers,” Ashworth said. “So I expect the positive impact on production will be less than the negative on other household spending.
Goldman Sachs also expects only a modest impact on economic growth from the oil price spike — equal to about one-tenth of a percentage point of growth for every $10 rise in the price of an oil barrel.
The spike and the fighting in Ukraine could kill the talk of the Federal Reserve raising interest rates by a half percentage point at its next meeting, rather than the traditional quarter-percentage-point rise.
The Fed’s Geopolitical Risk Index is at the highest point since the Iraq War in 2003. If the Fed is more cautious on raising rates, that could cushion the blow that higher oil and gas prices might have on growth.
“We suspect that some participants will see it [geopolitical risk caused by the war] as a compelling reason not to hike by 50 basis points in March,” said a note from Goldman Sachs’ economists on Wednesday.
At the same time, the Goldman analysts noted that the the hit to US GDP growth could be somewhat larger if geopolitical risk increases uncertainty for businesses.

A history lesson

This expected muted impact on the American economy hasn’t always been the case.
The oil spike that followed the Arab Oil Embargo in 1973 was a major cause of the recession of 1973-74. And Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in August of 1990 nearly doubled the price of oil over the next two months to $40.42 a barrel, or about $85 in today’s dollars. It was a key factor in the the 1990-1991 recession. But the United States depended far more on imported oil then than it does today.
Beyond the question of where the oil came from in those days, the country was far more dependent on oil and other sources of energy overall. As the US economy has shifted from a manufacturing economy to a service economy, the amount of energy consumed per dollar of GDP is about 60% from where it was in 1975, and down about 45% from 1990, even controlling for inflation since that time.
When oil hit $100 for the first time in February 2008, it didn’t cause a recession, partly because the American economy was already well into the Great Recession, a severe downturn brought about by the bursting of the US housing bubble a few years before and the shockwaves that went through the US and global financial system.
The next time oil hit $100 a barrel was in 2011, when it briefly went above that mark. It did so again in early 2012. But it didn’t cause a recession.
The most recent bout of $100 oil before this one started in July 2013, and oil prices stayed near or above that mark for a bit more than a year. But the nation avoided a recession then as well. GDP did turn negative in the first quarter of 2014, but that was attributed to many other factors, including particularly bad winter weather that kept many consumers at home. And the economy bounced back strong in the second quarter of 2014, even though oil prices didn’t fall below $100 for good until the end of July.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

September merchandise trade deficit narrows to $1.3 billion: Statistics Canada

Published

 on

OTTAWA – Statistics Canada says the country’s merchandise trade deficit narrowed to $1.3 billion in September as imports fell more than exports.

The result compared with a revised deficit of $1.5 billion for August. The initial estimate for August released last month had shown a deficit of $1.1 billion.

Statistics Canada says the results for September came as total exports edged down 0.1 per cent to $63.9 billion.

Exports of metal and non-metallic mineral products fell 5.4 per cent as exports of unwrought gold, silver, and platinum group metals, and their alloys, decreased 15.4 per cent. Exports of energy products dropped 2.6 per cent as lower prices weighed on crude oil exports.

Meanwhile, imports for September fell 0.4 per cent to $65.1 billion as imports of metal and non-metallic mineral products dropped 12.7 per cent.

In volume terms, total exports rose 1.4 per cent in September while total imports were essentially unchanged in September.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending