adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

American politics as both tragedy and farce – The Washington Post

Published

 on


The hard-working staff here at Spoiler Alerts has been writing a lot about the war in Ukraine — 15 columns in the past month. In the weeks to come, the staff will be producing a lot more columns about the most urgent crisis in world politics.

Today, however, I would like to take a small break and write about a meaningless yet aggravating poll.

This week, Ipsos released its survey findings after asking Americans which TV shows best captured real-life American politics. Their results? “The public feels West Wing is more realistic than comedies, like Veep and Parks and Rec.”

How best to express my reaction to this information?

Full disclosure: This result was triggering. “The West Wing” has its strengths: It gave good banter. Compared to most political shows, it put some effort into the verisimilitude of how the policy process works.

The problems with “The West Wing,” however, are legion. Aaron Sorkin’s faith in the “Big Speech” theory of politics makes sense for narrative purposes but is wildly unrealistic. Just as bad is the belief that the smarter, better-read guy always wins in political bargaining.

[Fun fact: I remember the one moment when I had a “West Wing”-like exchange in a policy context. I was attending a meeting in which national security folks were consulting with outside experts. Some private-sector dude was trying to impress participants by making a somewhat obscure reference to sound erudite. As it happened, I had read the essay he had referenced and realized he had badly misread it. I interjected and explained that it actually said the opposite of what he had claimed. The effect of this exchange on the subsequent policy debate was minimal. As time has passed, I remember that moment not because it showed me at my best, but it showed me at my most petty.]

A deeper dive into the poll reveals that the finding is less about “The West Wing” per se and more about Americans believing political dramas more accurately reflect American politics than political comedies. Fifty-one percent of Americans believed that “The West Wing” was very or somewhat realistic. But 46 percent said the same thing about “Madam Secretary,” the comfort food of the foreign affairs set; 42 percent thought “Scandal” was accurate, and “House of Cards” and “24” both netted 41 percent. In contrast, “Parks and Recreation” and “Veep” brought up the rear with 39 and 27 percent respectively.

Given the gyrations in American politics over the past five years or so, citizens can be forgiven for believing that American politics is the grist of grand drama. The stakes are certainly high, and bad decisions will get lots of people killed.

That said, as someone who has occasionally witnessed how the policy sausage is made, let me assure readers that unintentional comedy lurks inside an awful lot of American politics and American public policy. No one is as Machiavellian as Frank Underwood in “House of Cards” or as omniscient as Josiah Bartlett in “The West Wing.” Those portrayed as such in the media are on a lucky streak that is about to come to an end.

The Trump years should have disabused everyone of the idea that “The West Wing” is more accurate than “Veep.” This was an administration that beclowned itself on a regular basis. Trump was a radically immature leader who was so uninformed that he asked Kid Rock for advice on what to do in North Korea. Trump cannot offer a coherent answer about what to do to counter Russia in Ukraine. When John Oliver dubbed what Trump officials did as Stupid Watergate: “a scandal with all the potential ramifications of Watergate but where everyone involved is stupid and bad at everything.” That sounds an awful lot like “Veep”:

I wish American politics operated like inspiring drama. As I get older, however, it has become impossible to ignore the abundance of farce.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

NDP caving to Poilievre on carbon price, has no idea how to fight climate change: PM

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says the NDP is caving to political pressure from Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre when it comes to their stance on the consumer carbon price.

Trudeau says he believes Jagmeet Singh and the NDP care about the environment, but it’s “increasingly obvious” that they have “no idea” what to do about climate change.

On Thursday, Singh said the NDP is working on a plan that wouldn’t put the burden of fighting climate change on the backs of workers, but wouldn’t say if that plan would include a consumer carbon price.

Singh’s noncommittal position comes as the NDP tries to frame itself as a credible alternative to the Conservatives in the next federal election.

Poilievre responded to that by releasing a video, pointing out that the NDP has voted time and again in favour of the Liberals’ carbon price.

British Columbia Premier David Eby also changed his tune on Thursday, promising that a re-elected NDP government would scrap the long-standing carbon tax and shift the burden to “big polluters,” if the federal government dropped its requirements.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 13, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Quebec consumer rights bill to regulate how merchants can ask for tips

Published

 on

 

Quebec wants to curb excessive tipping.

Simon Jolin-Barrette, minister responsible for consumer protection, has tabled a bill to force merchants to calculate tips based on the price before tax.

That means on a restaurant bill of $100, suggested tips would be calculated based on $100, not on $114.98 after provincial and federal sales taxes are added.

The bill would also increase the rebate offered to consumers when the price of an item at the cash register is higher than the shelf price, to $15 from $10.

And it would force grocery stores offering a discounted price for several items to clearly list the unit price as well.

Businesses would also have to indicate whether taxes will be added to the price of food products.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Youri Chassin quits CAQ to sit as Independent, second member to leave this month

Published

 on

 

Quebec legislature member Youri Chassin has announced he’s leaving the Coalition Avenir Québec government to sit as an Independent.

He announced the decision shortly after writing an open letter criticizing Premier François Legault’s government for abandoning its principles of smaller government.

In the letter published in Le Journal de Montréal and Le Journal de Québec, Chassin accused the party of falling back on what he called the old formula of throwing money at problems instead of looking to do things differently.

Chassin says public services are more fragile than ever, despite rising spending that pushed the province to a record $11-billion deficit projected in the last budget.

He is the second CAQ member to leave the party in a little more than one week, after economy and energy minister Pierre Fitzgibbon announced Sept. 4 he would leave because he lost motivation to do his job.

Chassin says he has no intention of joining another party and will instead sit as an Independent until the end of his term.

He has represented the Saint-Jérôme riding since the CAQ rose to power in 2018, but has not served in cabinet.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending