Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says there is no choice for the West but to prevail over Russia over its aggression against Ukraine.
“We cannot let Ukraine down. They are counting on us,” Mr. Trudeau told the European Parliament in Brussels on Wednesday.
It’s the beginning of a visit by Mr. Trudeau to the Belgian capital – the Prime Minister’s second visit to Europe in a month – that will also see Mr. Trudeau attend a NATO summit and G7 Heads of State and Government Meeting.
The Prime Minister called for continued humanitarian aid, the continued supply of military equipment and lethal aid to Ukraine and further “unprecedented” sanctions on Russian President Vladimir Putin “and his enablers” in Russia and Belarus. He also said some thought should be given to investing to rebuild Ukraine after the conflict.
“We must ensure that the decision to invade a sovereign, independent country is understood to be a strategic failure that carries with it ruinous costs.”
The Prime Minister said President Putin has thought democracy weak. “He saw our disagreements as weakness. But what he has never understood is that the rigours of debate—that forceful civic engagement—makes us strong. And that democracy, at its best, will always be stronger than authoritarianism.”
At one point, Mr. Trudeau – denouncing “cynical populists” in current anxious times trying to exploit citizen anxieties – referred to recent blockades in Canada to protest pandemic restrictions which ended up leading the government to invoke the Emergencies Act.
“Even in Canada, where 90 per cent of people are vaccinated, and our motto is peace, order and good government, we saw anti-vaccine and anti-government protests devolve into illegal occupations of our communities and blockades of our borders. The leaders of these convoys were effective in turning citizens with real anxieties against the system best suited to allay their concerns.
“But democracy isn’t a game.”
Mr. Trudeau noted that Canada, like many European countries, has made massive investments to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.
“It was the right thing to do to protect our people, and it was the necessary thing to do to ensure a strong and robust economic recovery. We know that when we invest in people, including the most vulnerable, and when we grow the middle class and make life more affordable, everyone benefits. And democracy benefits.”
This is the daily Politics Briefing newsletter, written by Ian Bailey. It is available exclusively to our digital subscribers. If you’re reading this on the web, subscribers can sign up for the Politics newsletter and more than 20 others on our newsletter signup page. Have any feedback? Let us know what you think.
TODAY’S HEADLINES – LIBERAL/NDP DEAL
NDP SUPPORTS HIGHER MILITARY SPENDING – The New Democrats say they won’t stand in the way of higher military spending to confront the Russian threat as long as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau approves billions of dollars in new social programs as part of a deal to prop up the minority Liberal government until June, 2025. Story here.
NDP MP EXPECTS ACTION ON PHARMACARE – NDP health critic Don Davies says he expects the Liberal government to make good its renewed promise to deliver national pharmacare, but perhaps not all at once. Story here.
HEALTH-CARE ADVOCATES SUPPORT DEAL – Health care advocates are applauding a Liberal-NDP deal promising dental care for lower- and middle-income Canadians as well as progress toward universal pharmacare, saying the programs are long overdue and could have significant downstream impacts on health care costs and outcomes. Story here.
GLOBE AND MAIL EXPLAINER – What is the Liberal-NDP deal? The suply-and-confidence agreement explained. Check here.
OTHER HEADLINES
MAIL-IN BALLOTS INSTEAD OF IN-PERSON VOTE FOR KENNEY LEADERSHIP DECISION – The contentious April 9 party vote to determine the fate of Alberta Premier Jason Kenney’s leadership has been changed from an in-person vote to mail-in ballots, with the president of Alberta’s United Conservative Party linking the shift to the unexpected crush of people signing up to vote in Red Deer to decide whether Mr. Kenney should stay on as party leader. Story here.
QUEBEC BUDGET CUTS DEFICIT, INCREASES SPENDING – Quebec has reduced its deficit while increasing spending and keeping tax rates flat thanks to a strong economic performance during the pandemic, a windfall its government is using to send taxpayers direct cash payments in an election-year budget. Story here.
ALBERTA OPPOSITION MEMBER DEFENDS HACKING GOVERNMENT WEBSITE – An Alberta opposition legislature member under RCMP investigation after admittedly hacking into a government health website using some of Premier Jason Kenney’s personal information says he felt a professional responsibility to do it. Story here.
LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE PENALTY FACES LEGAL TEST – Canada’s life-without-parole penalty faces the first test of its constitutionality at the Supreme Court of Canada on Thursday, in the case of Alexandre Bissonnette, who murdered six Muslim worshippers at a Quebec City mosque in 2017. Story here.
DOCUMENTS SHED LIGHT ON BID TO REMOVE HILL MEMORIAL – The federal government had originally hoped to remove a Parliament Hill memorial dedicated to Indigenous children who died and went missing from residential schools months earlier than actually happened last year, according to newly released documents. Story here.
THIS AND THAT
TODAY IN THE COMMONS – Projected Order of Business at the House of Commons, March 23, is accessible here.
HANN LEAVES CPC – Cory Hann has left his role as director of communications for the Conservative Party of Canada. “It never quite hit me just how long I’ve been in the role until someone recently pointed out to me that our party just marked the 18th year anniversary of its founding…and I’m in my ninth year as its director of communications,” Mr. Hann said in a statement. “So, with a new interim leader firmly in place (the fifth leader to lead this party since I’ve been here), and with the third leadership election I’ve had a front row seat for now off the ground and underway, it feels like an appropriate time to vacate my seat at the party and allow for someone with fresh perspective to take over. While I have no immediate plans for what’s next, I expect I’ll still be watching this all with great interest. Can take the boy out of politics, etc.”
REYNOLDS BACKING BROWN -John Reynolds, a former MP and co-chair of the national Conservative campaign for the 2006 federal election that saw Stephen Harper become prime minister, is backing Brampton Mayor Patrick Brown in his bid to lead the Conservative Party. Mr. Reynolds has been named national campaign co-chair for Mr. Brown. The other co-chair is Alberta MP Michelle Rempel Garner. In a statement issued Wednesday by Mr. Brown’s campaign, Mr. Reynolds said, “Mayor Brown is a true Conservative with a record of achievement in government to prove it. He will restore fiscal sanity in Ottawa, champion religious freedom, and give Justin Trudeau the fight of his life.”
The Prime Minister arrived in Brussels, and was scheduled to meet with European Parliament President Roberta Metsola, and to deliver an address to the European Parliament. The Prime Minister was also scheduled to meet with Finland Prime Minister Sanna Marin, and to deliver brief remarks, with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, at the European Commission headquarters. The Prime Minister was also scheduled to attend a working dinner with President von der Leyen.
LEADERS
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh attends the NDP national caucus meeting.
No schedule released for other leaders.
PUBLIC OPINION
FURTHER RUSSIAN INVASION WOULD PROMPT CANADIAN SUPPORT FOR DECLARING WAR ON RUSSIA – Canadians strongly back hitting Russia with more punitive measures for its invasion of Ukraine but are hesitant to go to war over the conflict, which has already killed hundreds of civilians and laid waste to major Ukrainian cities. However, a new Nanos Research poll for The Globe and Mail says a majority of Canadians would support declaring war on Russia, along with NATO, if Moscow were to invade yet another country. Story here.
OPINION – LIBERAL/NDP DEAL
The Globe and Mail Editorial Board on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau finding another way to neuter Parliament: “So if it doesn’t guarantee a stable Parliament, and the programs the Liberals and NDP will collaborate on would have happened anyway, what exactly is the purpose of the deal? For that you have to look at the part where the NDP and Liberals will use their combined majority to control parliamentary committees, in order to prevent the Conservatives from using tactics to stall legislation, and so that the committees can “continue their essential work.” It was various committees that brought so much heat on Mr. Trudeau in 2020 that he prorogued Parliament. Now it appears he doesn’t have to worry about that for the next four years. Mr. Trudeau loves to claim that the Conservatives are obstructionist, and have prevented Parliament from doing its job. He did it in January, and he did it again in the text of the deal with the NDP, implicitly accusing the Official Opposition of causing “parliamentary dysfunction.” But there simply isn’t any evidence of that.”
Campbell Clark (The Globe and Mail)on Prime Minister Trudeau making a deal to solidify his legacy on the left: “This Prime Minister’s legacy was never going to be about balanced budgets or spending restraint. Even now with a Russian invasion of Ukraine, it’s not going to be about increasing Canada’s military spending – even if that is to be expected in the next budget. Mr. Trudeau will surely see his potential legacy as revolving around climate-change policy and social programs, in particular the $10-a-day child-care program now being put into place. Those things can be swept away if he loses power in a year, but in 3 1/2 years, they will be harder to uproot. The Liberals didn’t need this deal right now. No one, especially the NDP, is about to trigger an election. But Mr. Trudeau saw the chance for an agreement that promised the time and space to work on that legacy without the threat that he will find himself, say, fighting an election over inflation in 10 months – and he grabbed it.”
john Ibbitson (The Globe and Mail)on the opportunity that lies ahead if Conservatives can get their act together: “The supply-and-confidence agreement between the Liberals and the NDP presents a splendid opportunity for the federal Conservatives, if they can let go of their anger. By 2025, if the accord survives that long, many Canadians will be sick of the higher taxes, chronic deficits, federal-provincial squabbling over dental care, ever-worsening housing-crisis and general exhaustion of a Liberal government that will have been in power for a decade. Not to mention Aubergine-gate. More on that later. The Conservatives will have 3 1/2 years to craft a brand and a program suited for government. Right now, however, they are too angry to think clearly. They are too much the party of protesting truckers, of rural resentment, of a knee-jerk populism that seeks to fight battles already lost. The next leader must transform the Conservatives from angry into sensible.”
Brian Topp (Contributed to The Globe and Mail) on federal NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh’s deal with the Liberals being one big bet: “In avoiding the temptations of oppositionist political populism (which is rotting and marginalizing our convoy-embracing Conservative Party before our eyes), and instead advancing proposals for change and reform, Mr. Singh and the federal NDP are putting themselves forward as a party of government – a party that can get results. Where do they go with that? First, they go to Quebec. This accord gives Mr. Singh and his team a chance to return to the offer Mr. Layton made to progressive Quebeckers, many of whom have once again temporarily parked their votes with an increasingly improbable Bloc Québécois, which frames federal politics as a looting expedition. Quebeckers know their country can’t run that way. They’ve been waiting for a better offer.”
Paul Wells (Contributed to The Globe and Mail)on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s deal with the NDP allowing him to get back to sunny ways: “Not everything can be an outrage. A confidence agreement between the Liberals and the NDP would be compatible with parliamentary rules. It would have precedent in Ontario, New Brunswick and British Columbia, and in several parliamentary systems abroad. Five of the last seven Canadian federal elections have returned minority governments. It was only a matter of time before this common method of managing minority governments got road-tested in Ottawa. As a bonus, a Liberal-NDP deal calls a bluff. A bunch of Canadians spent 2021 complaining about an unnecessary early election. It would be a bit rich if we spent 2022 complaining about a mechanism for avoiding early elections.”
Sabrina Maddeaux (The National Post) on how the so-called leftist pact could be the best thing to happen to the federal Conservatives: “The deal struck by Singh presents a chance for Conservatives to expose leftist economic hypocrisy and position themselves as the solution. All but eliminating the NDP’s position as a viable option on the left, it could very well accelerate the move of populist-minded young voters to the right. To do that, however, they need to stop ranting about nonexistent socialism that does little to nothing to scare voters under the age of 50 and focus on the very real opportunity they’ve been handed. At his best, Pierre Poilievre may be the best-positioned Conservative leadership candidate to do so with his economic chops and ability to make a political point sting. A couple years as leader may even soften his sometimes too-sharp edges. On the other hand, this longer timeframe likely spells bad news for Jean Charest, who will be rounding his late 60s by the time 2025 comes around and be even less appealing to younger voters.”
Tom Mulcair (CTV News)on how Prime Minister Trudeau’s deal with the NDP is quite a coup: “The important question is: who got what and in exchange for what? On the Liberal side, the answer is easy. They get a full mandate and control 100 per cent of government with less than ⅓ of Canadians’ votes. For the NDP, they get a couple of concrete things they’ll be able to point to at the next election like dental care for kids (promised for this year) and anti-scab legislation in federally-regulated industries. That last one is huge from a labour point of view. Trudeau somehow forgot to mention it during his news conference.”
Got a news tip that you’d like us to look into? E-mail us at tips@globeandmail.com. Need to share documents securely? Reach out via SecureDrop.
REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.
Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.
She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.
Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.
Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.
The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.
HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.
Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.
“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.
Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.
“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”
The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.
In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.
“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”
In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.
“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”
Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.
Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.
“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”
In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.
In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.
“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”
Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.
“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”
The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.
“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.
Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.
“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.
NEW YORK (AP) — In a new video posted early Election Day, Beyoncé channels Pamela Anderson in the television program “Baywatch” – red one-piece swimsuit and all – and asks viewers to vote.
In the two-and-a-half-minute clip, set to most of “Bodyguard,” a four-minute cut from her 2024 country album “Cowboy Carter,” Beyoncé cosplays as Anderson’s character before concluding with a simple message, written in white text: “Happy Beylloween,” followed by “Vote.”
At a rally for Donald Trump in Pittsburgh on Monday night, the former president spoke dismissively about Beyoncé’s appearance at a Kamala Harris rally in Houston in October, drawing boos for the megastar from his supporters.
“Beyoncé would come in. Everyone’s expecting a couple of songs. There were no songs. There was no happiness,” Trump said.
She did not perform — unlike in 2016, when she performed at a presidential campaign rally for Hillary Clinton in Cleveland – but she endorsed Harris and gave a moving speech, initially joined onstage by her Destiny’s Child bandmate Kelly Rowland.
“I’m not here as a celebrity, I’m not here as a politician. I’m here as a mother,” Beyoncé said.
“A mother who cares deeply about the world my children and all of our children live in, a world where we have the freedom to control our bodies, a world where we’re not divided,” she said at the rally in Houston, her hometown.
“Imagine our daughters growing up seeing what’s possible with no ceilings, no limitations,” she continued. “We must vote, and we need you.”
Harris used the song in July during her first official public appearance as a presidential candidate at her campaign headquarters in Delaware. That same month, Beyoncé’s mother, Tina Knowles, publicly endorsed Harris for president.
Beyoncé gave permission to Harris to use the song, a campaign official who was granted anonymity to discuss private campaign operations confirmed to The Associated Press.
