adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Opinion | Ketanji Brown Jackson's confirmation will have deep political effects – The Washington Post

Published

 on


With Ketanji Brown Jackson set to be confirmed as the newest justice of the Supreme Court on Thursday, we can judge what came of her confirmation hearings, for the two parties and for the country.

Democrats finally gave their own voters something to celebrate. Their voters, having witnessed the way Jackson was treated by the GOP, should now have a stronger incentive to get to the polls.

Republicans did their best to drag Jackson and her confirmation down into a sewer of their construction, believing it would be to their political benefit. They appear to have failed — and in the process deepened their own radicalization.

Let’s begin with the Democrats. For their voters, who so often see their leaders miss opportunities and shrink from fights, Jackson’s confirmation was not just a victory but one with profound symbolic meaning.

That’s why it was so important when Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey admonished his Republican colleagues for their odious attacks on Jackson, and told her, “I’m not letting anybody in the Senate steal my joy” at seeing her ascend to the court. “You have earned this spot. You are worthy.”

It was so powerful because Americans saw how worthy Jackson is, and saw those preening, dishonest, cynical Republicans tell her she wasn’t.

The Republicans’ strategy was aimed mostly at their base, and though its effects might be complex, there’s not much reason to believe it succeeded beyond reinforcing the beliefs of people who didn’t need any more persuading.

Not only has Jackson’s nomination garnered strong support in polls, but also one survey from Quinnipiac University found 52 percent of Americans saying they disapproved of how Republicans handled her nomination; only 27 percent said they approved of the Republicans’ performance.

Their questioning of Jackson ranged from inane to repulsive; one low point came when Sen. Marsha Blackburn (Tenn.) asked her to define “woman,” something Republicans themselves turn out to be incapable of doing. Sen. Ted Cruz (Tex.) ranted about critical race theory infecting children’s books, and he and Sen. Tom Cotton (Ark.) were so angry about Jackson’s work as a public defender that they now seem to be all but opposed to the very constitutional guarantee that every defendant has a right to a lawyer.

Speaking of public defenders, Cruz said “their heart is with the murderers, with the criminals, and that’s who they are rooting for.” Cotton suggested that Jackson would have rushed to Nuremberg to defend Nazis. These are the people who bray the loudest about their devotion to the Constitution.

As vile as those attacks were, they were a sideshow to the main Republican offering: the rancid accusation that Jackson is soft on pedophiles. Rather than revisiting the details of that calumny, let’s pull our view back a bit, to see it in its political context.

The Republicans who chose to make that the central theme of their attack on Jackson know full well the central role conspiracies of pedophilia play in the fever dreams of QAnon, whose adherents make up a substantial portion of the Republican base. But that’s only part of the story.

One of the key recent developments in the ongoing osmotic process of right-wing hate rhetoric is the way the term “grooming” — i.e., creating a relationship with a child to prepare them for sexual abuse — has rapidly moved from the fringe to the mainstream. Conservatives now use it to refer to any opposition to “Don’t Say Gay” bills, support for inclusivity, or belief that trans people should be treated with the same respect as anyone else.

It’s notable that the use of the term on the right accelerated as Republican senators made their bogus child pornography attacks on Jackson. So even if Republican senators didn’t actually use the term “groomer” during the hearings, their decision to make Jackson’s confirmation all about pedophilia validated, elevated and spread that rancid accusation.

But does that actually help Republicans? It might cheer their most maniacal supporters. But if Republicans are going to be the party that routinely accuses anyone who disagrees with them of being a pedophile, they might find it harder to win converts across the middle of the electorate. That could be one of the lasting effects of Jackson’s confirmation process.

It’s also possible that the sight of Jackson taking her oath of office will fill Democrats with both the joy that Booker spoke of, and an entirely justified anger at Republicans for the way they treated her. It would be more than fair for Democratic candidates everywhere to say, “Did Republicans’ treatment of Jackson disgust you? Then come out to vote so those Republicans don’t get to decide who sits on the Supreme Court.”

It will be some time before we can fully judge the political impact of this confirmation, though one clue as to how this will resonate in the future will be found in whether Democrats bring up this confirmation more often than Republicans do. But it undoubtedly intensified the currents already shaping our politics: Democrats reaching for the mainstream, and Republicans running eagerly to embrace their extremist fringe.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

Youri Chassin quits CAQ to sit as Independent, second member to leave this month

Published

 on

 

Quebec legislature member Youri Chassin has announced he’s leaving the Coalition Avenir Québec government to sit as an Independent.

He announced the decision shortly after writing an open letter criticizing Premier François Legault’s government for abandoning its principles of smaller government.

In the letter published in Le Journal de Montréal and Le Journal de Québec, Chassin accused the party of falling back on what he called the old formula of throwing money at problems instead of looking to do things differently.

Chassin says public services are more fragile than ever, despite rising spending that pushed the province to a record $11-billion deficit projected in the last budget.

He is the second CAQ member to leave the party in a little more than one week, after economy and energy minister Pierre Fitzgibbon announced Sept. 4 he would leave because he lost motivation to do his job.

Chassin says he has no intention of joining another party and will instead sit as an Independent until the end of his term.

He has represented the Saint-Jérôme riding since the CAQ rose to power in 2018, but has not served in cabinet.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘I’m not going to listen to you’: Singh responds to Poilievre’s vote challenge

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says he will not be taking advice from Pierre Poilievre after the Conservative leader challenged him to bring down government.

“I say directly to Pierre Poilievre: I’m not going to listen to you,” said Singh on Wednesday, accusing Poilievre of wanting to take away dental-care coverage from Canadians, among other things.

“I’m not going to listen to your advice. You want to destroy people’s lives, I want to build up a brighter future.”

Earlier in the day, Poilievre challenged Singh to commit to voting non-confidence in the government, saying his party will force a vote in the House of Commons “at the earliest possibly opportunity.”

“I’m asking Jagmeet Singh and the NDP to commit unequivocally before Monday’s byelections: will they vote non-confidence to bring down the costly coalition and trigger a carbon tax election, or will Jagmeet Singh sell out Canadians again?” Poilievre said.

“It’s put up or shut up time for the NDP.”

While Singh rejected the idea he would ever listen to Poilievre, he did not say how the NDP would vote on a non-confidence motion.

“I’ve said on any vote, we’re going to look at the vote and we’ll make our decision. I’m not going to say our decision ahead of time,” he said.

Singh’s top adviser said on Tuesday the NDP leader is not particularly eager to trigger an election, even as the Conservatives challenge him to do just that.

Anne McGrath, Singh’s principal secretary, says there will be more volatility in Parliament and the odds of an early election have risen.

“I don’t think he is anxious to launch one, or chomping at the bit to have one, but it can happen,” she said in an interview.

New Democrat MPs are in a second day of meetings in Montreal as they nail down a plan for how to navigate the minority Parliament this fall.

The caucus retreat comes one week after Singh announced the party has left the supply-and-confidence agreement with the governing Liberals.

It’s also taking place in the very city where New Democrats are hoping to pick up a seat on Monday, when voters go to the polls in Montreal’s LaSalle—Émard—Verdun. A second byelection is being held that day in the Winnipeg riding of Elmwood—Transcona, where the NDP is hoping to hold onto a seat the Conservatives are also vying for.

While New Democrats are seeking to distance themselves from the Liberals, they don’t appear ready to trigger a general election.

Singh signalled on Tuesday that he will have more to say Wednesday about the party’s strategy for the upcoming sitting.

He is hoping to convince Canadians that his party can defeat the federal Conservatives, who have been riding high in the polls over the last year.

Singh has attacked Poilievre as someone who would bring back Harper-style cuts to programs that Canadians rely on, including the national dental-care program that was part of the supply-and-confidence agreement.

The Canadian Press has asked Poilievre’s office whether the Conservative leader intends to keep the program in place, if he forms government after the next election.

With the return of Parliament just days away, the NDP is also keeping in mind how other parties will look to capitalize on the new makeup of the House of Commons.

The Bloc Québécois has already indicated that it’s written up a list of demands for the Liberals in exchange for support on votes.

The next federal election must take place by October 2025 at the latest.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Social media comments blocked: Montreal mayor says she won’t accept vulgar slurs

Published

 on

 

Montreal Mayor Valérie Plante is defending her decision to turn off comments on her social media accounts — with an announcement on social media.

She posted screenshots to X this morning of vulgar names she’s been called on the platform, and says comments on her posts for months have been dominated by insults, to the point that she decided to block them.

Montreal’s Opposition leader and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association have criticized Plante for limiting freedom of expression by restricting comments on her X and Instagram accounts.

They say elected officials who use social media should be willing to hear from constituents on those platforms.

However, Plante says some people may believe there is a fundamental right to call someone offensive names and to normalize violence online, but she disagrees.

Her statement on X is closed to comments.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending