adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Can Dating Influence Politics? – Psychology Today

Published

 on


Source: Anna Pou / Pexels

At a first glance, dating may seem irrelevant to other aspects of an individual’s life, especially their socio-political attitudes. Yet, there is mounting scientific evidence that romantic successes and failures, and the feedback that individuals receive on the dating market, can impact politics.

One needs to look no further than the “Incel” phenomenon to have a practical example of how dating can affect politics. The involuntary celibates (Incels) are an internet subculture mostly comprised of heterosexual men. Incels say they hold misogynistic attitudes and oppose gender equality because they are unfairly rejected by women. Incels not only post hateful comments on the internet, but they have also been responsible for terrorist attacks aimed at hurting and killing women.

Unstable dating markets characterized by an abundance of men and a scarcity of women, pronounced income inequality, and high “bride prices” (the price in some places that a groom’s family must pay to the bride’s family, usually consisting of money or presents) can lead to radicalization and violence. In other words, in places where many men are unable to find and secure romantic partners or afford marriage, violence, conflicts, and phenomena like the Incel movement become more common.

But why does dating popularity have such a strong influence over socio-political attitudes and behavior? Why do our experiences in the dating market affect the way we think and see the world?

Empirical evidence suggests that dating influences attitudes because people, although often unconsciously, adopt the socio-political attitudes that best reflect their dating and reproductive interests. That is, people who are sexually conservative and are threatened by casual sex hold attitudes that best defend monogamy and traditional values, whereas people who are sexually liberal hold attitudes that allow free sexual expression. Studies have found that sexually conservative people are, for example, significantly more religious, against gay marriage, and in support of authorities than sexually liberal people.

A person’s popularity in the dating market depends, however, on many ever-changing circumstances. A successful gamer is popular at a gaming convention, but perhaps not at a body-building convention. A person who earns a six-figure salary is popular if they are in an area where most people earn five-figure salaries, but not if they are in an area full of millionaires. It is then possible that a person shifts their socio-political attitudes to promote values that best serve their interests in different circumstances.

While observing how dating and socio-political attitudes are related to each other in the real world is important, experiments manipulating dating popularity are necessary to establish causation between dating and attitudes. These experiments allow researchers to test whether dating popularity affects socio-political attitudes, and eliminate alternative explanations, such as that a person’s socio-political attitudes affect their dating popularity or that both dating popularity and socio-political attitudes are caused by another factor.

One experiment showed that heterosexual men, but not women, reported more positive attitudes towards casual sex after being told that they were rated as excellent dating partners. In another experiment, heterosexual men, but not women, who were romantically rejected on an ostensible dating website, reported higher hostility towards the opposite sex. Therefore, dating popularity can affect some attitudes, at least in heterosexual men.

In collaboration with my Ph.D. supervisors, Rob Brooks and Khandis Blake, I aimed to expand upon these findings and tested whether heterosexual people who are popular among potential dating partners report significantly different socio-political attitudes than unpopular people. We created an experimental manipulation of dating popularity that mimicked realistic dating scenarios, such as talking with several potential partners on Tinder, or mingling with strangers in a bar, and receiving positive or negative feedback from each of them.

We recruited young, heterosexual participants (aged 18 to 25) and told them they would participate in a dating game. Each participant recorded an introductory video, in which they described themselves with the goal of making a good first impression. We then ostensibly sent participants’ videos to five opposite-sex peers, who in turn sent back short video feedback indicating whether they would date the participants or not (the feedback videos were pre-recorded with paid actors).

Participants were randomly assigned to receive either positive or negative romantic feedback from each of the five peers, forming a continuous dating popularity experimental manipulation: from high to low popularity. The “popular participants” received a higher number of positive feedback videos, whereas “unpopular participants” received a higher number of negative feedback videos. We then measured participants’ attitudes towards casual sex, traditional gender roles, the minimum wage and healthcare, and implicit sexual and political attitudes.

We found that “unpopular” men reported less support for casual sex than “popular” men. Dating popularity did not influence any of women’s attitudes. Men’s emotions were impacted by their dating popularity, with “unpopular” men reporting feeling positive emotions such as happiness, enthusiasm, and pride to a lesser extent than “popular” men. This, in turn, resulted in “unpopular” men reporting less support for casual sex and less support for increasing the minimum wage and expanding access to healthcare.

In line with previous studies, results from our experiment suggest that heterosexual men are sensitive to changes in their dating market prospects and adjust their socio-political attitudes accordingly. Unpopular and popular men in the experiment adopted the attitudes that best defended their interests. “Unpopular” men, unable to attract dating partners, reported that they were more unwilling to have casual sex and more opposed to others having casual sex than the “popular” men, who instead attracted many partners. Interestingly, feeling fewer positive emotions resulted in “unpopular” men reporting more anti-egalitarian attitudes than “popular” men, which is an important finding that should be further tested in future research.

With research showing that dating, reproduction, and politics are intertwined, it is becoming clearer that the experiences people have in different dating markets can impact everyday political life. Experimental evidence can be key in our understanding of the mechanisms through which dating can cause shifts in socio-political attitudes.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending