adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

Gunman entered Texas school unimpeded, police say as questions swirl about response

Published

 on

WASHINGTON — Law enforcement officials described in chilling detail Thursday the time it took for tactical officers to finally gun down an 18-year-old attacker after he shot and killed 19 students and two teachers inside a fourth-grade classroom in small-town Texas.

Victor Escalon, the south Texas regional director for the state’s Department of Public Safety, stood before a backdrop of stone-faced police officers, investigators and officials — a news conference that appeared aimed at deflecting mounting concerns about what took so long.

The gunman entered the school at about 11:40 a.m. local time through an apparently unlocked door, and contrary to initial reports, encountered no resistance, Escalon said — the armed school safety officer, normally a fixture at educational facilities around the U.S., was not there.

“He was not confronted by anybody,” he said. “Four minutes later, law enforcement are coming in to solve this problem step by step.”

Those officers who initially arrived on the scene pursued the gunman into the school, but soon after had to take cover when the shooter began opening fire on them, he continued. It would be a full hour before Border Patrol officers wearing tactical gear found their target.

“They don’t make entry initially because of the gunfire they’re receiving,” Escalon said of the officers who arrived on the scene first.

“But we have officers calling for additional resources — everybody that’s in the area, tactical teams. We need equipment — we need specialty equipment. We need body armour; we need precision riflemen; negotiators.”

Students and teachers were also being evacuated from the building at the same time, he added.

Escalon also suggested that even if tactical officers had been able to breach the classroom sooner, it might have already been too late for the children and teachers inside.

“According to the information we have, the majority of the gunfire was in the beginning — in the beginning,” he said. “I say numerous, more than 25 (rounds) — I repeat, it was a lot of gunfire in the beginning.”

Media reports Thursday, coupled with cellphone video of the civilian pandemonium outside, detailed how parents and bystanders, well aware of the imminent threat inside the building, were frantically trying to get officers to go into the school to confront the gunman.

A Wall Street Journal report detailed how one of the parents on the scene was handcuffed by federal marshals who accused her of interfering with a police investigation. After local officers convinced their colleagues to set her free, she ran into the school and emerged with her two kids, the paper reported.

Escalon did not directly answer questions about why it took so long for tactical officers to get into the classroom, but promised more details would be forthcoming.

U.S. President Joe Biden will travel to Uvalde on Sunday to “offer comfort” to the families of the victims and meet with community leaders, said White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre as she urged Congress to take meaningful steps toward tougher gun restrictions.

“We need the help of Congress … we cannot do this alone,” she said. “We need them to step in and to deal with this gun violence that we’re seeing, that’s tearing up not just families but communities across the country.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said Thursday he’s asked Texas Sen. John Cornyn to meet with Democrats to talk about legislation, but offered no details about what he hopes to see, beyond “an outcome that can actually pass and become law.”

That’s a tall order: Congress remains in a state of gridlock, in part because the Senate is evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans, but also because so many U.S. lawmakers support the rights of gun owners and enjoy the generous financial backing of the National Rifle Association.

The NRA, easily one of the most powerful political groups in the U.S., is meanwhile pressing ahead with its annual meeting in Houston despite the tragedy that unfolded Tuesday just a four-hour drive away.

“Our deepest sympathies are with the families and victims involved in this horrific and evil crime,” the association said in a statement that described the gunman as a “lone, deranged criminal.”

“As we gather in Houston, we will reflect on these events, pray for the victims, recognize our patriotic members, and pledge to redouble our commitment to making our schools secure.”

Texas Republicans Gov. Greg Abbott and Sen. Ted Cruz have come under withering criticism for their planned appearances at the convention, which begins Friday. Former president Donald Trump has already confirmed he’ll be there to deliver a speech.

“They are contributing to the problem of gun violence, not trying to solve it,” Jean-Pierre said of the NRA.

“They don’t represent gun owners who know that we need to take action. And it’s shameful that the NRA and their allies have stood in the way of every attempt to advance measures that we all know will save lives.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 26, 2022.

 

James McCarten, The Canadian Press

 

Note to readers: This is a corrected story. An earlier version contained an incorrect spelling of Uvalde, Tex.

News

Liberals attempt show of unity after tense caucus meeting with Trudeau

Published

 on

OTTAWA – Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told his MPs Wednesday that he would reflect on what they had to say in a three-hour caucus meeting where some Liberals confronted him about his leadership.

Trudeau was smiling when he left the meeting on Wednesday afternoon, and as he walked briskly past a horde of reporters on Parliament Hill he said only that the Liberal party is “strong and united.”

While Liberal MPs were tight-lipped about what happened behind closed doors, most agreed with the prime minister that they were indeed united — though notably many expressed a unified desire to defeat the Conservatives rather than support for Trudeau.

“Yes there is some fatigue over Trudeau, it’s true, it’s clear,” said Nova Scotia Liberal Kody Blois in French Wednesday.

“At the same time, I am a member of the Liberal party and I believe the best vehicle for the Canadians in the next election is the Liberal party, whether it’s Mr. Trudeau or another option. I think our discussions in caucus were constructive… but we are united in the necessity to fight Poilievre.”

Ontario Liberal MP Yvan Baker said it’s up to Trudeau to decide whether he stays on as leader.

“I think our party is united on a path forward to make sure we’re addressing the needs of Canadians, and stopping Pierre Poilievre,” he said.

More than 50 people spoke at the meeting, said British Columbia MP Ken Hardie. He described the conversation as very respectful, and said that caucus must also reflect on what it has heard.

Rumours have circulated for weeks that an undisclosed number of Liberal MPs have signed on to an effort to oust the prime minister in the hopes of improving the party’s chances in the next election.

The Canadian Press has confirmed reports that 24 Liberal MPs signed on to a letter that was presented to Trudeau at the meeting, asking him to step down.

The letter asks the prime minister to let the caucus know what he decides by Oct. 28, but Trudeau made it clear that he feels he’s the right person to lead the Liberals into the next election against Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, Ontario Liberal MP Charles Souza said after the meeting.

“Justin Trudeau is reflecting and he’s standing strong, and we’re standing strong as well, as a Liberal party,” Souza told reporters.

“We as a party recognize that the real threat here is Pierre Poilievre, and that’s what we’re fighting for.”

Ontario Liberal MP Nate Erskine-Smith said the caucus was scheduled to hear details of the plan for the next election from their newly appointed national campaign director Andrew Bevan, but the conversation about Trudeau’s leadership pushed Bevan off the agenda.

“My colleagues need to turn the knives outwards and not inwards, and we need to focus on the most important thing, which is getting things done here in Parliament and taking the fight to Pierre Poilievre,” he said.

Trudeau has so far showed no signs that he plans to step down from the top job.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre gleefully poked Trudeau about the “chaos” in his caucus in question period, referencing the infighting within the Liberal party in each one of his questions, and demanding that Trudeau call an immediate election.

“He cannot fix what he broke because his caucus is revolting,” Poilievre said.

Trudeau received a rousing standing ovation from his caucus the first time he got to his feet and he stood there trying to stifle a grin, before insisting that his party allows for open conversations and is united, unlike what he said the Conservatives do.

“I want to thank all members of this House for their rousing show of confidence,” he said, after his caucus sat down.

Following the last election, Liberal MPs opted against availing themselves of rules that would allow a small number of MPs to force a secret ballot leadership vote in caucus. That means Liberal MPs have no way to force the prime minister to leave his post, and the decision about whether to stay on or step aside is entirely up to him.

Newfoundland MP Ken McDonald, who has already said he does not plan to run in the next election, said some of his colleagues who do plan to put their name on the ballot are nervous because of poor polling numbers.

He said he signed on to the letter, though MPs have been careful not to reveal exactly what the letter said.

McDonald said Trudeau needs to “start listening, listening to the people.”

When asked if he would vote non-confidence in the government, McDonald said it’s not something he is considering at this point, but “it is an option, it’s an option for everybody.”

“It is a tool, yes, but will it get the attention of the prime minister? I don’t know.”

He publicly called for the party to hold a leadership review back in January, but later walked those comments back.

Charlottetown MP Sean Casey also signed the letter. After the meeting, he would not discuss what happened except to say, with a deadpan expression, that it was “great.”

Before the meeting, Casey had said that he wished there was a mechanism to have a blind ballot so MPs could signal their confidence, or lack of confidence, in Trudeau’s leadership anonymously.

New Brunswick MP Wayne Long, who has also said he signed the letter, did not take questions after the meeting.

Trudeau’s personal poll numbers plummeted more than a year ago, and the Liberals have consistently trailed the Conservatives in national polls for a year.

Successive byelection losses over the summer in Toronto and Montreal have compounded concerns about his ability to lead the party into the next election.

Trudeau isn’t just facing calls for his departure from within the caucus. A group of Liberal supporters launched a petition this week calling for caucus and the national executive of the party to vote on their confidence in Trudeau as leader in a secret ballot and report the results to Trudeau and party faithful.

The group won’t yet say how many people have signed the petition, and said the signatories will be kept secret.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 23, 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

B.C. Green leader spoke with NDP’s Eby, but didn’t pick up when Conservatives called

Published

 on

VICTORIA – The leaders of British Columbia’s New Democrats and B.C. Conservatives have received the cold shoulder after looking to start minority government talks with the Greens following last weekend’s inconclusive election result, party leader Sonia Furstenau said Wednesday.

She said she spoke briefly with NDP Leader David Eby on Wednesday and described the exchange as a “conversation,” while a call from B.C. Conservative Leader John Rustad went unanswered.

“I didn’t recognize the phone number,” said Furstenau at a news conference flanked by two Green members elected Saturday, Rob Botterell, in Saanich-North and the Islands, and Jeremy Valeriote, from West Vancouver-Sea to Sky.

The NDP is elected or leading in 46 ridings and the Conservatives in 45 following Saturday’s election, both short of the 47 seats required for a majority.

A final count of ballots, which will include mail-in and absentee ballots, starts this weekend at the same time as the recounts for the ridings of Juan de Fuca-Malahat and Surrey City Centre, where the NDP leads by fewer than 100 votes.

Elections BC said the final results may not come in until Monday.

“The B.C. Greens have played an important role in the legislature for the past seven years and we will continue to do so in this Parliament and future Parliaments in B.C.,” said Furstenau. “Right now in B.C., no party deserves all the power.Based on preliminary results it looks like the people of B.C. have made it clear they lack full confidence in either of the two parties.”

She said the starting place for the Greens to support whichever party comes to power in B.C. is her own party’s platform.

“For me, our platform prioritizes people’s well-being and my motivation has always been guided by the question: how do we best serve?” said Furstenau.

But she said it was too early to discuss Green election platform issues that include continued support for B.C.’s carbon tax, increased voluntary care of people with mental health and addiction issues and no future liquefied natural gas project approvals.

“Meaningful conversations with happen after all the votes are counted,” she said.

The Green platform outlined the party’s plan to combat climate change, which included favouring a carbon tax, Furstenau said.

Eby and Rustad said they would remove the tax, either in part or completely, if the federal government eliminated the requirement, but the Greens would look to close loopholes in the tax for corporations and increase the rebate sent to households, she said during the campaign.

Furstenau also appeared with former chief coroner Lisa Lapointe during the campaign and accused the other party leaders of indulging in unacceptable “dehumanizing rhetoric” against drug users when they pledged involuntary treatment for those with severe mental health problems and drug addiction.

The Greens also promised community health centres in all 93 ridings.

Furstenau said comments made by some B.C. Conservative candidates who won their ridings are truly disturbing, including racist, dehumanizing, homophobic and conspiratorial statements.

“I have yet to see a satisfactory response from John Rustad around this,” she said. “Elected representatives have a serious burden and responsibility to hold themselves to a high standard and to see themselves as representatives for everyone in their communities. It’s John Rustad’s responsibility now to ensure his caucus understands the seriousness of the burden of being an elected representative.”

If the election outcome remains the same, the two elected Green members could hold the balance of power, and Furstenau said her goal until all the votes are counted is to help those candidates get settled into the legislature.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 23, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Court of Appeal upholds Quebec ruling that invalidated random police stops

Published

 on

MONTREAL – Quebec’s Court of Appeal has upheld a landmark 2022 decision that found a law permitting random traffic stops by police led to racial profiling.

The province’s high court agreed with a Superior Court ruling that declared inoperative an article of the province’s Highway Safety Code that allows police to randomly stop drivers without a reasonable suspicion that an offence has been committed.

The Court of Appeal says in the unanimous decision released Wednesday that the law violates Charter rights, including freedom from arbitrary detention and equality rights.

The legal action was brought by Joseph-Christopher Luamba, a 22-year-old Black Montrealer who said he had been stopped by Quebec police nearly a dozen times without reason, and none of the stops resulted in a ticket.

Superior Court Justice Michel Yergeau wrote in the October 2022 decision that “racial profiling does exist. It is not a laboratory-constructed abstraction … It is a reality that weighs heavily on Black communities. It manifests itself in particular with Black drivers of motor vehicles.”

Yergeau said evidence had shown over time that arbitrary power granted to the police to make roadside stops without cause became “for some of them, a vector, even a safe conduit for racial profiling against the Black community.”

“The rule of law thus becomes … a breach through which this sneaky form of racism rushes in,” he added.

The Quebec government had appealed the ruling, arguing the ruling deprived police of an important tool. A senior government minister said they were disappointed with the outcome, adding they would take time to go over the 72-page Appeal Court ruling.

“This was obviously not the desired goal,” Public Security Minister François Bonnardel said in a statement late Wednesday. “This decision could have a direct impact on the work of police officers to ensure the safety of the population.”

Luamba was backed by the Canadian Civil Liberties Association in his constitutional challenge of the practice, with a lawyer representing the organization calling it an enormous victory for equality rights.

Lex Gill, one of the lawyers representing the civil rights group, said to her knowledge, it was the first time the courts have invalidated a police power on the basis it contributes to systemic discrimination.

“By unanimously upholding the Superior Court’s landmark judgment, the Court of Appeal has helped chart a new course for equality rights and civil liberties in Canada,” Gill said in an emailed statement.

“The judgment confirms that where broad, arbitrary and discretionary police powers create a pretext for discrimination and abuse, they will not survive constitutional scrutiny.”

The 2022 decision only affected random stops and not structured police operations such as roadside checkpoints aimed at stopping drunk drivers.

The decision was appealed by the provincial government, and some civil rights groups believe the matter could end up before the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Court of Appeal ruling by a three-judge panel gives the provincial government six months to make the necessary changes to the Highway Safety Code.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 23, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending