adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Trudeau’s political inertia keeping vaccine mandates past their time

Published

 on

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks with Vancouver residents about his handling of vaccine mandates and the Ottawa trucker convoy protests, on May 24.JESSE WINTER/Reuters

If politics is a reason for doing something in Ottawa, then the absence of politics is a reason for doing nothing.

So when Justin Trudeau’s federal Liberals reached a point when it made sense to end the federal vaccine mandates for air and rail travel they did nothing, because they didn’t feel a political imperative pushing them in that direction.

The political inertia inside Mr. Trudeau’s seven-year-old government is so heavy that the Prime Minister and the people around him don’t even seem to feel the nudges of MPs in their own party – the folks in touch with constituents – who are telling them it is time for those mandates to go.

One Liberal MP, Joël Lightbound, voted two weeks ago for a Conservative motion calling for all pandemic rules to be dropped. Another, Nathaniel Erskine-Smith, said in a tweet that while he didn’t agree with all of that motion, he believes “a two-dose vaccine mandate without accommodation is no longer justified.” Others, such as New Brunswick MP Wayne Long, have publicly called for the travel mandates to be lifted. There are more Liberal MPs who feel that way.

Federal government temporarily suspends random COVID-19 airport testing, leaves vaccine mandates in place

COVID-19 restrictions to remain in place at border for at least another month, health agency says

A year ago, there was a compelling reason for vaccine mandates. Two shots slowed the spread of COVID-19 and reduced serious illness, easing the burden on overstretched hospitals and other health care facilities.

But it was politics that entrenched vaccines in the Liberal government’s brand. Mr. Trudeau ran hard on the need for mandates in the 2021 election campaign, saying he would do what was necessary to get through the pandemic. He argued that Erin O’Toole’s Conservatives were too tied to anti-vaxxers to take action.

Now that the benefits of those vaccine mandates have been reduced, there is no justification for barring people, without any accommodation, from domestic travel. But the Liberal government apparently still feels tied to the simple political formula that helped win it the election – that mandates are good – even as the facts have changed.

They have changed because the two-dose vaccination required by the mandates – without boosters – is less effective than it used to be. They have changed because of the Omicron variant, which infected many who had been vaccinated. They have changed because health care networks are less overloaded than they were at previous pandemic peaks. And they have changed because provincial vaccine mandates have been dropped in most places. The vaccinated and unvaccinated are mingling extensively in Canadian society, meaning restrictions on travel have less effect.

Of course, vaccine mandates still could have a positive effect by encouraging a few more people to get life-saving shots. But that smaller potential benefit can’t be used indefinitely as an excuse for barring people from travel in a country like Canada.

If Mr. Trudeau’s government wants to make the case that some mandates are still justified, it is time for it to do so in detail. But, for mandates to remain useful, the government would have to start requiring boosters to keep up with the science. And after all this time it would have to find some way of accommodating unvaccinated travellers, such as by letting them fly if they have negative rapid tests.

So why hasn’t the Liberal government done anything about vaccine mandates?

You might chalk some of it up to the pattern of bureaucratic inertia in federal pandemic measures. The government was slow to reopen Canada’s borders to the fully vaccinated, slow to reopen government offices to the public and slow to ease checks and forms that add to delays at crowded airports.

When imposing unprecedented emergency measures, no one worked out a set of metrics for when those measures should be dropped. Now they are being re-evaluated at Ottawa’s pace.

But all that is compounded by the political inertia inside Mr. Trudeau’s government. Without a political impetus to do something, the default is to do nothing. Liberals argued vaccine mandates were necessary, and some Liberal supporters are in no rush to remove them. Mr. Trudeau’s government seems to see dropping the measures as the Conservative position.

So now the two biggest political parties are like broken clocks that are right twice a day. The Conservatives were against vaccine mandates even when they made sense, and the Liberals are for them even when they don’t.

That doesn’t make sense as policy. And Liberal MPs are effectively telling Mr. Trudeau it doesn’t make sense politically, either. Mr. Trudeau’s strategists might think public opinion isn’t ready for it, but the public statements from Liberals MPs are a warning that politics are changing rapidly – and that he is already behind the curve.

Source link

Politics

Youri Chassin quits CAQ to sit as Independent, second member to leave this month

Published

 on

 

Quebec legislature member Youri Chassin has announced he’s leaving the Coalition Avenir Québec government to sit as an Independent.

He announced the decision shortly after writing an open letter criticizing Premier François Legault’s government for abandoning its principles of smaller government.

In the letter published in Le Journal de Montréal and Le Journal de Québec, Chassin accused the party of falling back on what he called the old formula of throwing money at problems instead of looking to do things differently.

Chassin says public services are more fragile than ever, despite rising spending that pushed the province to a record $11-billion deficit projected in the last budget.

He is the second CAQ member to leave the party in a little more than one week, after economy and energy minister Pierre Fitzgibbon announced Sept. 4 he would leave because he lost motivation to do his job.

Chassin says he has no intention of joining another party and will instead sit as an Independent until the end of his term.

He has represented the Saint-Jérôme riding since the CAQ rose to power in 2018, but has not served in cabinet.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘I’m not going to listen to you’: Singh responds to Poilievre’s vote challenge

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says he will not be taking advice from Pierre Poilievre after the Conservative leader challenged him to bring down government.

“I say directly to Pierre Poilievre: I’m not going to listen to you,” said Singh on Wednesday, accusing Poilievre of wanting to take away dental-care coverage from Canadians, among other things.

“I’m not going to listen to your advice. You want to destroy people’s lives, I want to build up a brighter future.”

Earlier in the day, Poilievre challenged Singh to commit to voting non-confidence in the government, saying his party will force a vote in the House of Commons “at the earliest possibly opportunity.”

“I’m asking Jagmeet Singh and the NDP to commit unequivocally before Monday’s byelections: will they vote non-confidence to bring down the costly coalition and trigger a carbon tax election, or will Jagmeet Singh sell out Canadians again?” Poilievre said.

“It’s put up or shut up time for the NDP.”

While Singh rejected the idea he would ever listen to Poilievre, he did not say how the NDP would vote on a non-confidence motion.

“I’ve said on any vote, we’re going to look at the vote and we’ll make our decision. I’m not going to say our decision ahead of time,” he said.

Singh’s top adviser said on Tuesday the NDP leader is not particularly eager to trigger an election, even as the Conservatives challenge him to do just that.

Anne McGrath, Singh’s principal secretary, says there will be more volatility in Parliament and the odds of an early election have risen.

“I don’t think he is anxious to launch one, or chomping at the bit to have one, but it can happen,” she said in an interview.

New Democrat MPs are in a second day of meetings in Montreal as they nail down a plan for how to navigate the minority Parliament this fall.

The caucus retreat comes one week after Singh announced the party has left the supply-and-confidence agreement with the governing Liberals.

It’s also taking place in the very city where New Democrats are hoping to pick up a seat on Monday, when voters go to the polls in Montreal’s LaSalle—Émard—Verdun. A second byelection is being held that day in the Winnipeg riding of Elmwood—Transcona, where the NDP is hoping to hold onto a seat the Conservatives are also vying for.

While New Democrats are seeking to distance themselves from the Liberals, they don’t appear ready to trigger a general election.

Singh signalled on Tuesday that he will have more to say Wednesday about the party’s strategy for the upcoming sitting.

He is hoping to convince Canadians that his party can defeat the federal Conservatives, who have been riding high in the polls over the last year.

Singh has attacked Poilievre as someone who would bring back Harper-style cuts to programs that Canadians rely on, including the national dental-care program that was part of the supply-and-confidence agreement.

The Canadian Press has asked Poilievre’s office whether the Conservative leader intends to keep the program in place, if he forms government after the next election.

With the return of Parliament just days away, the NDP is also keeping in mind how other parties will look to capitalize on the new makeup of the House of Commons.

The Bloc Québécois has already indicated that it’s written up a list of demands for the Liberals in exchange for support on votes.

The next federal election must take place by October 2025 at the latest.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Social media comments blocked: Montreal mayor says she won’t accept vulgar slurs

Published

 on

 

Montreal Mayor Valérie Plante is defending her decision to turn off comments on her social media accounts — with an announcement on social media.

She posted screenshots to X this morning of vulgar names she’s been called on the platform, and says comments on her posts for months have been dominated by insults, to the point that she decided to block them.

Montreal’s Opposition leader and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association have criticized Plante for limiting freedom of expression by restricting comments on her X and Instagram accounts.

They say elected officials who use social media should be willing to hear from constituents on those platforms.

However, Plante says some people may believe there is a fundamental right to call someone offensive names and to normalize violence online, but she disagrees.

Her statement on X is closed to comments.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending