adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Media

Broadcaster vs billionaire: the battle for control of India's media – Financial Times

Published

 on


At a private dinner in 2007, a TV anchor was not about to let a politician go unchallenged. Prannoy Roy, a broadcaster and co-founder of media group New Delhi Television, confronted the then Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi over rioting in the state five years earlier that led to the deaths of nearly 2,000 people.

Roy’s ambush set the tone for a combative future relationship with Modi, who was elected India’s prime minister in 2014. At the gathering with journalists, Modi stuck by his denials of any involvement in the riots, but left before food was served, according to investor and Financial Times contributor Ruchir Sharma’s book Democracy on the Road.

Now the media mogul is the one being cornered. Gautam Adani, a tycoon seen as close to Modi, launched a corporate raid on NDTV last week. Roy and his wife and co-founder Radhika Roy are now fighting Adani, the world’s third wealthiest man, for control of a media group that supporters say is a bastion of media independence.

Defeat for the Roys would leave India’s biggest television news channels controlled by billionaires, with what some analysts have argued would be profound implications for media plurality.

Mukesh Ambani, chair of Reliance Industries and India’s second-richest man, already controls the expansive Network18 media group and is building a new streaming service in collaboration with James Murdoch.

“Between Ambani and Adani, they will now control the two largest networks,” said Indrajit Gupta, former editor of Forbes India and co-founder of online platform Founding Fuel. “In a noisy democracy, you need to listen to a few different voices, but with this you lose diversity.”

Adani, like Modi, comes from Gujarat. The first-generation entrepreneur supported the then chief minister when he was criticised over his handling of the deadly 2002 riots and his rise since has tracked Modi’s. Adani has backed the prime minister’s vision for nation building and is now the dominant player in Indian infrastructure.

Adani has strongly denied any improper relationship to the prime minister.

An NDTV microphone in New Delhi, India
NDTV launched India’s first independent TV news show in 1988 © Adnan Abidi/Reuters

The Roys themselves opened the way for their loss of control when they borrowed indirectly from Ambani’s Reliance Industries over a decade ago. That loan paid no interest, but came with warrants convertible to ownership of a company set up by the Roys that holds 29 per cent of NDTV’s stock — a time bomb that was contained inside a shell company bought by Adani late last month.

The Roys are giants of India’s raucous media, famous for producing the country’s first independent TV news show in 1988. Originally appearing on the state broadcaster, NDTV tied up with Rupert Murdoch’s Star network amid liberalisation of India’s economy in the 1990s. NDTV later launched channels for news in Hindi and English as well as for business and lifestyle content.

“There is an entire generation of Indian TV journalists who grew up under the NDTV umbrella and owe a huge debt to the Roys,” said Rajdeep Sardesai, a news anchor and editor with TV channel India Today, who spent 11 years at NDTV.

The company went public in 2004, though the Roys retained controlling stakes. NDTV was already facing fierce rivalry for advertising revenue when the global financial crisis struck in 2008. The Roys had been determined to buy back NDTV stock before the crisis hit, but needed to borrow to do so. Their resulting borrowing eventually led to the ill-fated loan from Ambani, according to a securities regulator tribunal.

Once considered by politicians the go-to station for appearances, NDTV’s testy relationship with Modi’s Bharatiya Janata party administration has hurt its bottom line.

Before the BJP came to power, NDTV in 2013 demonstrated its political connections with a 25th anniversary party in the presidential palace. But one Indian executive said the Roys were part of the old establishment. “The system has turned, and they have turned victim of the system,” the executive said.

Government agencies pulled advertising, while BJP spokespeople did not participate in its programmes. Authorities including the Income Tax Department and Central Bureau of Investigation brought cases against NDTV and the Roys. One such probe prevented them travelling abroad in August 2019. The Roys have always denied wrongdoing.

Still, NDTV’s finances have been improving. Revenue from operations for the financial year ending this March was Rs2.3bn ($29mn), up from Rs2bn the previous year, while annual profits surged to Rs600mn from Rs380mn. NDTV also brought down borrowings from Rs632mn to Rs178mn.

RRPR, the company owned by the Roys that holds the 29 per cent stake, has refused to transfer the shares to an Adani Group subsidiary without approval from the securities regulator.

But analysts said the Roys would struggle to fend off the deep-pocketed Adani, who has offered to buy a further 26 per cent of NDTV’s shares from shareholders. NDTV’s biggest public shareholder, with a nearly 10 per cent stake, is a little-known Mauritius-registered entity, LTS Investment Fund, whose portfolio is 98 per cent invested in Adani Group companies. NDTV’s share price began climbing this spring on deal speculation.

Some observers have predicted that a successful takeover by Adani’s media arm would lead to the watering down of NDTV’s editorial independence. The Adani Group did not respond to a request for comment.

Sanjay Pugalia, chief executive of the group’s AMG Media Networks, said the company sought to “empower Indian citizens, consumers and those interested in India, with information and knowledge”.

Meenakshi Ganguly, south Asia director with Human Rights Watch, said Modi’s government had few remaining critics such as NDTV. “This is an administration that largely enjoys a loyal media — whether by choice or fear,” she said.

India’s information and broadcasting ministry did not respond to a request for comment.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Trump could cash out his DJT stock within weeks. Here’s what happens if he sells

Published

 on

Former President Donald Trump is on the brink of a significant financial decision that could have far-reaching implications for both his personal wealth and the future of his fledgling social media company, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG). As the lockup period on his shares in TMTG, which owns Truth Social, nears its end, Trump could soon be free to sell his substantial stake in the company. However, the potential payday, which makes up a large portion of his net worth, comes with considerable risks for Trump and his supporters.

Trump’s stake in TMTG comprises nearly 59% of the company, amounting to 114,750,000 shares. As of now, this holding is valued at approximately $2.6 billion. These shares are currently under a lockup agreement, a common feature of initial public offerings (IPOs), designed to prevent company insiders from immediately selling their shares and potentially destabilizing the stock. The lockup, which began after TMTG’s merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), is set to expire on September 25, though it could end earlier if certain conditions are met.

Should Trump decide to sell his shares after the lockup expires, the market could respond in unpredictable ways. The sale of a substantial number of shares by a major stakeholder like Trump could flood the market, potentially driving down the stock price. Daniel Bradley, a finance professor at the University of South Florida, suggests that the market might react negatively to such a large sale, particularly if there aren’t enough buyers to absorb the supply. This could lead to a sharp decline in the stock’s value, impacting both Trump’s personal wealth and the company’s market standing.

Moreover, Trump’s involvement in Truth Social has been a key driver of investor interest. The platform, marketed as a free speech alternative to mainstream social media, has attracted a loyal user base largely due to Trump’s presence. If Trump were to sell his stake, it might signal a lack of confidence in the company, potentially shaking investor confidence and further depressing the stock price.

Trump’s decision is also influenced by his ongoing legal battles, which have already cost him over $100 million in legal fees. Selling his shares could provide a significant financial boost, helping him cover these mounting expenses. However, this move could also have political ramifications, especially as he continues his bid for the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential race.

Trump Media’s success is closely tied to Trump’s political fortunes. The company’s stock has shown volatility in response to developments in the presidential race, with Trump’s chances of winning having a direct impact on the stock’s value. If Trump sells his stake, it could be interpreted as a lack of confidence in his own political future, potentially undermining both his campaign and the company’s prospects.

Truth Social, the flagship product of TMTG, has faced challenges in generating traffic and advertising revenue, especially compared to established social media giants like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook. Despite this, the company’s valuation has remained high, fueled by investor speculation on Trump’s political future. If Trump remains in the race and manages to secure the presidency, the value of his shares could increase. Conversely, any missteps on the campaign trail could have the opposite effect, further destabilizing the stock.

As the lockup period comes to an end, Trump faces a critical decision that could shape the future of both his personal finances and Truth Social. Whether he chooses to hold onto his shares or cash out, the outcome will likely have significant consequences for the company, its investors, and Trump’s political aspirations.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Arizona man accused of social media threats to Trump is arrested

Published

 on

Cochise County, AZ — Law enforcement officials in Arizona have apprehended Ronald Lee Syvrud, a 66-year-old resident of Cochise County, after a manhunt was launched following alleged death threats he made against former President Donald Trump. The threats reportedly surfaced in social media posts over the past two weeks, as Trump visited the US-Mexico border in Cochise County on Thursday.

Syvrud, who hails from Benson, Arizona, located about 50 miles southeast of Tucson, was captured by the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office on Thursday afternoon. The Sheriff’s Office confirmed his arrest, stating, “This subject has been taken into custody without incident.”

In addition to the alleged threats against Trump, Syvrud is wanted for multiple offences, including failure to register as a sex offender. He also faces several warrants in both Wisconsin and Arizona, including charges for driving under the influence and a felony hit-and-run.

The timing of the arrest coincided with Trump’s visit to Cochise County, where he toured the US-Mexico border. During his visit, Trump addressed the ongoing border issues and criticized his political rival, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, for what he described as lax immigration policies. When asked by reporters about the ongoing manhunt for Syvrud, Trump responded, “No, I have not heard that, but I am not that surprised and the reason is because I want to do things that are very bad for the bad guys.”

This incident marks the latest in a series of threats against political figures during the current election cycle. Just earlier this month, a 66-year-old Virginia man was arrested on suspicion of making death threats against Vice President Kamala Harris and other public officials.

Continue Reading

Media

Trump Media & Technology Group Faces Declining Stock Amid Financial Struggles and Increased Competition

Published

 on

Tech News in Canada

Trump Media & Technology Group’s stock has taken a significant hit, dropping more than 11% this week following a disappointing earnings report and the return of former U.S. President Donald Trump to the rival social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. This decline is part of a broader downward trend for the parent company of Truth Social, with the stock plummeting nearly 43% since mid-July. Despite the sharp decline, some investors remain unfazed, expressing continued optimism for the company’s financial future or standing by their investment as a show of political support for Trump.

One such investor, Todd Schlanger, an interior designer from West Palm Beach, explained his commitment to the stock, stating, “I’m a Republican, so I supported him. When I found out about the stock, I got involved because I support the company and believe in free speech.” Schlanger, who owns around 1,000 shares, is a regular user of Truth Social and is excited about the company’s future, particularly its plans to expand its streaming services. He believes Truth Social has the potential to be as strong as Facebook or X, despite the stock’s recent struggles.

However, Truth Social’s stock performance is deeply tied to Trump’s political influence and the company’s ability to generate sustainable revenue, which has proven challenging. An earnings report released last Friday showed the company lost over $16 million in the three-month period ending in June. Revenue dropped by 30%, down to approximately $836,000 compared to $1.2 million during the same period last year.

In response to the earnings report, Truth Social CEO Devin Nunes emphasized the company’s strong cash position, highlighting $344 million in cash reserves and no debt. He also reiterated the company’s commitment to free speech, stating, “From the beginning, it was our intention to make Truth Social an impenetrable beachhead of free speech, and by taking extraordinary steps to minimize our reliance on Big Tech, that is exactly what we are doing.”

Despite these assurances, investors reacted negatively to the quarterly report, leading to a steep drop in stock price. The situation was further complicated by Trump’s return to X, where he posted for the first time in a year. Trump’s exclusivity agreement with Trump Media & Technology Group mandates that he posts personal content first on Truth Social. However, he is allowed to make politically related posts on other social media platforms, which he did earlier this week, potentially drawing users away from Truth Social.

For investors like Teri Lynn Roberson, who purchased shares near the company’s peak after it went public in March, the decline in stock value has been disheartening. However, Roberson remains unbothered by the poor performance, saying her investment was more about supporting Trump than making money. “I’m way at a loss, but I am OK with that. I am just watching it for fun,” Roberson said, adding that she sees Trump’s return to X as a positive move that could expand his reach beyond Truth Social’s “echo chamber.”

The stock’s performance holds significant financial implications for Trump himself, as he owns a 65% stake in Trump Media & Technology Group. According to Fortune, this stake represents a substantial portion of his net worth, which could be vulnerable if the company continues to struggle financially.

Analysts have described Truth Social as a “meme stock,” similar to companies like GameStop and AMC that saw their stock prices driven by ideological investments rather than business fundamentals. Tyler Richey, an analyst at Sevens Report Research, noted that the stock has ebbed and flowed based on sentiment toward Trump. He pointed out that the recent decline coincided with the rise of U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic presidential nominee, which may have dampened perceptions of Trump’s 2024 election prospects.

Jay Ritter, a finance professor at the University of Florida, offered a grim long-term outlook for Truth Social, suggesting that the stock would likely remain volatile, but with an overall downward trend. “What’s lacking for the true believer in the company story is, ‘OK, where is the business strategy that will be generating revenue?'” Ritter said, highlighting the company’s struggle to produce a sustainable business model.

Still, for some investors, like Michael Rogers, a masonry company owner in North Carolina, their support for Trump Media & Technology Group is unwavering. Rogers, who owns over 10,000 shares, said he invested in the company both as a show of support for Trump and because of his belief in the company’s financial future. Despite concerns about the company’s revenue challenges, Rogers expressed confidence in the business, stating, “I’m in it for the long haul.”

Not all investors are as confident. Mitchell Standley, who made a significant return on his investment earlier this year by capitalizing on the hype surrounding Trump Media’s planned merger with Digital World Acquisition Corporation, has since moved on. “It was basically just a pump and dump,” Standley told ABC News. “I knew that once they merged, all of his supporters were going to dump a bunch of money into it and buy it up.” Now, Standley is staying away from the company, citing the lack of business fundamentals as the reason for his exit.

Truth Social’s future remains uncertain as it continues to struggle with financial losses and faces stiff competition from established social media platforms. While its user base and investor sentiment are bolstered by Trump’s political following, the company’s long-term viability will depend on its ability to create a sustainable revenue stream and maintain relevance in a crowded digital landscape.

As the company seeks to stabilize, the question remains whether its appeal to Trump’s supporters can translate into financial success or whether it will remain a volatile stock driven more by ideology than business fundamentals.

Continue Reading

Trending