adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

Georgia’s Economy Is Booming, But Not Everyone Is Feeling It

Published

 on

 

With tens of thousands of Russians arriving in Georgia since the war in Ukraine began, data suggest the economy is booming: GDP is up by double digits, the currency is the strongest it’s been in years, and remittance money is flowing in.

But many Georgians need to see more benefit, as the most tangible economic change has been spiraling inflation, and many Georgians still need to be more welcoming of the new arrivals.

Nine months following the start of the war, the large number of Russian emigres in Georgia’s big cities, and their economic contributions, are impossible to miss. At currency exchange points the Georgian lari is steadily getting stronger; it now trades at about 2.7 to the dollar compared to a relatively stable rate of 3.1 before the war. Russian speakers also commonly outnumber locals at restaurants and cafes, from fancy establishments in city centers to more modest ones on the outskirts.

The recent arrivals “spend money in our economy, if they consume anything, it naturally means stimulating the economy,” Economy Minister Levan Davitashvili told parliament in October.

The first wave of migrants arrived from Russia in the immediate aftermath of the invasion in February, fleeing heavy sanctions and a crackdown against critics. Then in summer, Georgia saw an unusually high number of Russian vacationers, with August figures exceeding even pre-pandemic totals. And by the end of September, Georgia saw yet another big wave of migrants, this time military-age men fleeing Russia’s mobilization call.

The total number of those who have come from Russia since the war started and stayed in Georgia has been a matter of speculation, but government officials put it at somewhere under 100,000 – or almost 3 percent of the country’s population.

As Georgia’s immigration policies allow Russian citizens to spend a year in the country without a visa, it’s difficult to distinguish the figures for migrants from those for tourists. And with the country enjoying an overall post-pandemic tourism revival, studying the economic effects of the Russian influx has posed a challenge.

Describing the phenomenon as the “war effect,” the National Bank of Georgia did its own math in October, estimating the total number of Russian and Belarussian citizens who came ?s a result of the war at between 80,000 and 90,000. These people, the bank predicts, will contribute an additional $500 million to the Georgian economy this year, about 15 percent of all “travel-related income,” or money connected to migration and tourism.

Several other studies confirm the significant impact the new migrants have had on the Georgian economy.

Analyzing data from the outbreak of the war to the end of August, the Institute for Development of Freedom of Information, a Georgian think tank, said more than 45,000 Russian citizens have opened new accounts in Georgian banks, while the deposit stocks of Russian citizens nearly tripled compared to pre-war sums, increasing by approximately 1.2 billion lari (about $445 million).

In another study published in November, Transparency International Georgia, a corruption watchdog, said 9,500 new Russian companies (the vast majority of them sole proprietors, a business model usually used by individual freelancers) were registered in Georgia from March to September, 10 times more than in all of 2021. Remittances from Russia grew fivefold between April and September to reach $1.1 billion.

And these studies did not include the latest wave of arrivals that began with mobilization in September, meaning the impacts are in reality even greater.

But the war also came as Georgia was already experiencing rapid economic recovery after the pandemic-induced recession, recording as much as 18 percent year-on-year GDP growth in January. And the influx of Russians is only one of the economic impacts of the war; another is an increase in revenue from surging transit demand as international shippers try to avoid traditional routes across Russia.

Whatever the cause, growth projections have surged: the International Monetary Fund had projected 5.4 percent GDP growth for Georgia in 2022, and then in the immediate aftermath of the invasion projected that growth could fall to as low as 3 percent. But now the fund projects 10 percent growth for the year.

“The Georgian economy has performed strongly in 2022 as adverse spillovers from the war in Ukraine thus far have generally been less impactful than expected earlier,” James John, an IMF official, said following a Tbilisi visit in early November. “Buoyant tourism revenues, a surge in immigration and financial inflows triggered by the war, and a rise in transit trade through Georgia come on the heels of a robust recovery from the pandemic.”

But the robust growth numbers have been outpaced by inflation, which the IMF projects at 10.5 percent for 2022.

And for many Georgians, that is the figure that makes the economic picture less rosy than economists and the government are describing. Along with inflation, the influx of Russians has led to dramatic rent hikes.

A recent public opinion poll by the International Republican Institute found that 71 percent of those surveyed believed the country’s economy had gotten worse over the past year. Economic problems, including unemployment and the rising cost of living, continued to top the list of Georgians’ major concerns.

The poll also showed Georgians remaining largely unwelcoming of the influx of Russians, with 78 percent opposing Russian citizens entering Georgia visa-free, registering a business, or purchasing a property.

But aside from the divergent views about the effects of the influx, economists also disagree on how long-lasting the impact will be.

“This is likely only a one-time effect, and much will depend on Russia’s economic state in the future,” Lyaziza Sabyrova, an official from the Asian Development Bank, told reporters on September 29. Sabyrova said that the effects of the second wave of migrants, which had a different demographic profile, are yet to be studied.

Otar Nadaraia, a chief economist of Georgia’s TBC Bank, believes the effects could be longer lasting.

“I do not think that this is only a short-term effect, even in the scenario when the geopolitical situation returns to where it used to be, I think that a large number of migrants will stay in Georgia long term,” he told Business Media Georgia late in September.

Nadaraia said that the migration is now concentrated in two Georgian cities, Tbilisi and Batumi, and that for healthier growth other parts of the country need to develop as well.

“With an approach like that, there is a good chance that we will face a greater influx not only from Russia but from other countries as well, which will ultimately help reduce the exodus of our population” from those economically depressed areas, he said.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.

Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.

Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.

Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.

Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.

Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.

Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.

According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.

That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.

People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.

That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.

Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.

That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending