adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Media

Canadian media group Overstory sheds jobs as staff push back

Published

 on

Nearly two years ago, a journalism startup made bold promises to reshape community news in Canada, announcing plans to hire more than 200 journalists and open 50 new publications across the country.

But this month, as they culled nearly half the staff from their most successful publication, executives from the Overstory media group admitted that – despite the cascade of recent failures across the industry – they had thought turning a profit in local journalism would be “a lot simpler”. The job cuts have raised larger questions over the company’s future, and about that of alternative models of experimental journalism.

With legacy publications around the world in turmoil – just last month, Canada’s Postmedia Network Corp announced it would cut 11% of its editorial staff – a growing number of startups have emerged, all hopeful that they can find the right formula to reinvent journalism.

Copies of Postmedia-owned newspapers the Vancouver Sun and the Province are displayed at a store in Burnaby, Canada, Tuesday, Jan. 19, 2016. Postmedia has cut approximately 90 jobs and merged newsrooms in four cities as it steps up plans to slash costs amid mounting revenue Postmedia has cut approximately 90 jobs and merged newsrooms in four cities as it steps up plans to slash costs amid mounting revenue losses, according to the Canadian Press. (Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press via AP) MANDATORY CREDIT
Fifty new outlets, 250 journalists: Canadian startup unveils plan to revive local news
Read more

Last summer, Overstory solicited millions in investment capital to expand into small and mid-size North American cities. “These local markets are wide open and we intend to take them,” the company said in a pitch deck obtained by the Logic.

Since launching in 2021, however, the company has fallen far short of its ambitious expansion goals. With growth slowing in recent months, Overstory began cutting jobs. The deepest came in early February at Capital Daily, after the publication lost four of its employees, bringing its staff to three. The Victoria-based publication had repeatedly been held up as the company’s exemplar of an award-winning, profit-making publication.

Amid deteriorating finances, the outlet was also caught in a larger battle over the future of its operations, with executives weighing a shift to more frequent daily stories and staff pushing for longer, more time-consuming investigative articles.

“We know the daily newsletter is the most profitable part of the operation. And we were willing to play ball with this idea of shorter, quicker and more responsive pieces,” said Jimmy Thomson, the former managing editor of Capital Daily, who was among those fired. “But we also really felt that our community needs and values the longer stuff. And we really loved doing it.”

The layoffs quickly morphed into a broader public feud, after company cofounders posted a series of tweets seen as both naive about the journalism industry and dismissive of their employees.

Cofounder Andrew Wilkinson tweeted the executives were “guilty of being overly optimistic” in their goals.

“Not fun. News is hard,” he wrote.

The Overstory CEO, Farhan Mohamed, prompted indignation when he tweeted: “Many journalists don’t understand business. But worse? They don’t care to.” He later apologized to staff for his remarks.

But employees pushed back, saying the cuts left them “blindsided” and confused over the direction of the company, according to audio from a 6 February meeting.

Mohamed, who previously ran the news and entertainment media outlet Daily Hive, told staff the past weeks have been among the worst in his career.

“Maybe we underestimated this business and how hard it actually is. I thought it would be easier, thought it was going to be a lot simpler than it actually turned out to be,” Mohamed told staff, according to the recording. “We made some big bets, and a lot of them haven’t paid off.”

The firings in early February came a day before Overstory staff announced they were unionizing, but those involved in the efforts don’t believe the events are linked.

As it tried to quickly expand across the country, Overstory faced growth challenges, including questions over recruitment efforts.

Gabrielle Drolet, a Montreal-based freelance writer, said she spoke with Mohamed two years ago, hoping for an internship at Overstory. Instead, he suggested she run a publication.

“I had never been in a newsroom before. I didn’t have much editing experience … I could not believe it was happening.”

Drolet turned down the offer.

“It’s frustrating to see people who don’t know much about journalism assume that the industry is failing because of journalists, and not because of wider issues,” she said.

In a separate row, journalists and senior staff at the Ontario-based Queen’s Park Briefing resigned last week over allegations of editorial interference by company owners.

Days later, other reporters were also laid off.

But the cuts at Overstory have also raised broader questions about the company’s model, which aimed to rapidly turn a profit in an industry where publications struggle to survive.

Emma Gilchrist, editor in chief and cofounder of the environmentally focused publication the Narwhal, said pursuing nonprofit status made sense when she and colleague Carol Linnitt launched in 2018.

“When we started, we looked around and saw that other outlets were all operating as for-profit entities – but they weren’t making any profit. They were technically for profit, but they’re operating like a nonprofit without any of the benefits of being a nonprofit,’ she said.

The approach has paid off, with more than 6,000 readers contributing in 2022, enough to expand.

“People come to us to find stories they can’t find anywhere else,” Gilchrist said. “You need to have an audience and you need to have a growing audience. They need to be loyal and they need to be coming back.”

Other newly launched outlets have taken the nonprofit route, including the Investigative Journalism Foundation, which styles itself as the “future of Canadian journalism”.

Wilkinson, the Overstory cofounder, tweeted that he had lost C$5m (US$3.75m) of his own money in the venture, adding that nonprofit status “doesn’t mean you can lose money endlessly without cutting costs”.

Amid the tumult, former and current staff have also expressed concern about the future of the brand.

“There’s an opportunity here for Overstory. But they need to meet us in good faith and be a part of this solution together,” said Martin Bauman, a spokesperson for the Overstory media guild and a reporter at the Coast, which is owned by Overstory.

“We still believe in the vision of community news. We want to see they still do too. At this point, we’re looking for actions, not words.”

… as you’re joining us today from Canada, we have a small favour to ask. Tens of millions have placed their trust in the Guardian’s fearless journalism since we started publishing 200 years ago, turning to us in moments of crisis, uncertainty, solidarity and hope. More than 1.5 million supporters, from 180 countries, now power us financially – keeping us open to all, and fiercely independent. Will you make a difference and support us too?

Unlike many others, the Guardian has no shareholders and no billionaire owner. Just the determination and passion to deliver high-impact global reporting, always free from commercial or political influence. Reporting like this is vital for democracy, for fairness and to demand better from the powerful.

And we provide all this for free, for everyone to read. We do this because we believe in information equality. Greater numbers of people can keep track of the events shaping our world, understand their impact on people and communities, and become inspired to take meaningful action. Millions can benefit from open access to quality, truthful news, regardless of their ability to pay for it.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Trump could cash out his DJT stock within weeks. Here’s what happens if he sells

Published

 on

Former President Donald Trump is on the brink of a significant financial decision that could have far-reaching implications for both his personal wealth and the future of his fledgling social media company, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG). As the lockup period on his shares in TMTG, which owns Truth Social, nears its end, Trump could soon be free to sell his substantial stake in the company. However, the potential payday, which makes up a large portion of his net worth, comes with considerable risks for Trump and his supporters.

Trump’s stake in TMTG comprises nearly 59% of the company, amounting to 114,750,000 shares. As of now, this holding is valued at approximately $2.6 billion. These shares are currently under a lockup agreement, a common feature of initial public offerings (IPOs), designed to prevent company insiders from immediately selling their shares and potentially destabilizing the stock. The lockup, which began after TMTG’s merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), is set to expire on September 25, though it could end earlier if certain conditions are met.

Should Trump decide to sell his shares after the lockup expires, the market could respond in unpredictable ways. The sale of a substantial number of shares by a major stakeholder like Trump could flood the market, potentially driving down the stock price. Daniel Bradley, a finance professor at the University of South Florida, suggests that the market might react negatively to such a large sale, particularly if there aren’t enough buyers to absorb the supply. This could lead to a sharp decline in the stock’s value, impacting both Trump’s personal wealth and the company’s market standing.

Moreover, Trump’s involvement in Truth Social has been a key driver of investor interest. The platform, marketed as a free speech alternative to mainstream social media, has attracted a loyal user base largely due to Trump’s presence. If Trump were to sell his stake, it might signal a lack of confidence in the company, potentially shaking investor confidence and further depressing the stock price.

Trump’s decision is also influenced by his ongoing legal battles, which have already cost him over $100 million in legal fees. Selling his shares could provide a significant financial boost, helping him cover these mounting expenses. However, this move could also have political ramifications, especially as he continues his bid for the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential race.

Trump Media’s success is closely tied to Trump’s political fortunes. The company’s stock has shown volatility in response to developments in the presidential race, with Trump’s chances of winning having a direct impact on the stock’s value. If Trump sells his stake, it could be interpreted as a lack of confidence in his own political future, potentially undermining both his campaign and the company’s prospects.

Truth Social, the flagship product of TMTG, has faced challenges in generating traffic and advertising revenue, especially compared to established social media giants like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook. Despite this, the company’s valuation has remained high, fueled by investor speculation on Trump’s political future. If Trump remains in the race and manages to secure the presidency, the value of his shares could increase. Conversely, any missteps on the campaign trail could have the opposite effect, further destabilizing the stock.

As the lockup period comes to an end, Trump faces a critical decision that could shape the future of both his personal finances and Truth Social. Whether he chooses to hold onto his shares or cash out, the outcome will likely have significant consequences for the company, its investors, and Trump’s political aspirations.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Arizona man accused of social media threats to Trump is arrested

Published

 on

Cochise County, AZ — Law enforcement officials in Arizona have apprehended Ronald Lee Syvrud, a 66-year-old resident of Cochise County, after a manhunt was launched following alleged death threats he made against former President Donald Trump. The threats reportedly surfaced in social media posts over the past two weeks, as Trump visited the US-Mexico border in Cochise County on Thursday.

Syvrud, who hails from Benson, Arizona, located about 50 miles southeast of Tucson, was captured by the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office on Thursday afternoon. The Sheriff’s Office confirmed his arrest, stating, “This subject has been taken into custody without incident.”

In addition to the alleged threats against Trump, Syvrud is wanted for multiple offences, including failure to register as a sex offender. He also faces several warrants in both Wisconsin and Arizona, including charges for driving under the influence and a felony hit-and-run.

The timing of the arrest coincided with Trump’s visit to Cochise County, where he toured the US-Mexico border. During his visit, Trump addressed the ongoing border issues and criticized his political rival, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, for what he described as lax immigration policies. When asked by reporters about the ongoing manhunt for Syvrud, Trump responded, “No, I have not heard that, but I am not that surprised and the reason is because I want to do things that are very bad for the bad guys.”

This incident marks the latest in a series of threats against political figures during the current election cycle. Just earlier this month, a 66-year-old Virginia man was arrested on suspicion of making death threats against Vice President Kamala Harris and other public officials.

Continue Reading

Media

Trump Media & Technology Group Faces Declining Stock Amid Financial Struggles and Increased Competition

Published

 on

Tech News in Canada

Trump Media & Technology Group’s stock has taken a significant hit, dropping more than 11% this week following a disappointing earnings report and the return of former U.S. President Donald Trump to the rival social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. This decline is part of a broader downward trend for the parent company of Truth Social, with the stock plummeting nearly 43% since mid-July. Despite the sharp decline, some investors remain unfazed, expressing continued optimism for the company’s financial future or standing by their investment as a show of political support for Trump.

One such investor, Todd Schlanger, an interior designer from West Palm Beach, explained his commitment to the stock, stating, “I’m a Republican, so I supported him. When I found out about the stock, I got involved because I support the company and believe in free speech.” Schlanger, who owns around 1,000 shares, is a regular user of Truth Social and is excited about the company’s future, particularly its plans to expand its streaming services. He believes Truth Social has the potential to be as strong as Facebook or X, despite the stock’s recent struggles.

However, Truth Social’s stock performance is deeply tied to Trump’s political influence and the company’s ability to generate sustainable revenue, which has proven challenging. An earnings report released last Friday showed the company lost over $16 million in the three-month period ending in June. Revenue dropped by 30%, down to approximately $836,000 compared to $1.2 million during the same period last year.

In response to the earnings report, Truth Social CEO Devin Nunes emphasized the company’s strong cash position, highlighting $344 million in cash reserves and no debt. He also reiterated the company’s commitment to free speech, stating, “From the beginning, it was our intention to make Truth Social an impenetrable beachhead of free speech, and by taking extraordinary steps to minimize our reliance on Big Tech, that is exactly what we are doing.”

Despite these assurances, investors reacted negatively to the quarterly report, leading to a steep drop in stock price. The situation was further complicated by Trump’s return to X, where he posted for the first time in a year. Trump’s exclusivity agreement with Trump Media & Technology Group mandates that he posts personal content first on Truth Social. However, he is allowed to make politically related posts on other social media platforms, which he did earlier this week, potentially drawing users away from Truth Social.

For investors like Teri Lynn Roberson, who purchased shares near the company’s peak after it went public in March, the decline in stock value has been disheartening. However, Roberson remains unbothered by the poor performance, saying her investment was more about supporting Trump than making money. “I’m way at a loss, but I am OK with that. I am just watching it for fun,” Roberson said, adding that she sees Trump’s return to X as a positive move that could expand his reach beyond Truth Social’s “echo chamber.”

The stock’s performance holds significant financial implications for Trump himself, as he owns a 65% stake in Trump Media & Technology Group. According to Fortune, this stake represents a substantial portion of his net worth, which could be vulnerable if the company continues to struggle financially.

Analysts have described Truth Social as a “meme stock,” similar to companies like GameStop and AMC that saw their stock prices driven by ideological investments rather than business fundamentals. Tyler Richey, an analyst at Sevens Report Research, noted that the stock has ebbed and flowed based on sentiment toward Trump. He pointed out that the recent decline coincided with the rise of U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic presidential nominee, which may have dampened perceptions of Trump’s 2024 election prospects.

Jay Ritter, a finance professor at the University of Florida, offered a grim long-term outlook for Truth Social, suggesting that the stock would likely remain volatile, but with an overall downward trend. “What’s lacking for the true believer in the company story is, ‘OK, where is the business strategy that will be generating revenue?'” Ritter said, highlighting the company’s struggle to produce a sustainable business model.

Still, for some investors, like Michael Rogers, a masonry company owner in North Carolina, their support for Trump Media & Technology Group is unwavering. Rogers, who owns over 10,000 shares, said he invested in the company both as a show of support for Trump and because of his belief in the company’s financial future. Despite concerns about the company’s revenue challenges, Rogers expressed confidence in the business, stating, “I’m in it for the long haul.”

Not all investors are as confident. Mitchell Standley, who made a significant return on his investment earlier this year by capitalizing on the hype surrounding Trump Media’s planned merger with Digital World Acquisition Corporation, has since moved on. “It was basically just a pump and dump,” Standley told ABC News. “I knew that once they merged, all of his supporters were going to dump a bunch of money into it and buy it up.” Now, Standley is staying away from the company, citing the lack of business fundamentals as the reason for his exit.

Truth Social’s future remains uncertain as it continues to struggle with financial losses and faces stiff competition from established social media platforms. While its user base and investor sentiment are bolstered by Trump’s political following, the company’s long-term viability will depend on its ability to create a sustainable revenue stream and maintain relevance in a crowded digital landscape.

As the company seeks to stabilize, the question remains whether its appeal to Trump’s supporters can translate into financial success or whether it will remain a volatile stock driven more by ideology than business fundamentals.

Continue Reading

Trending