adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Opinion: The naked politics of Calgary’s new arena deal

Published

 on

It didn’t take long for Alberta Premier Danielle Smith to state the obvious at Tuesday’s announcement of a new arena deal for the city of Calgary.

Ms. Smith had just revealed that the provincial government would cough up $330-million as part of the $1.2-billion plan to replace the aging Calgary Saddledome with something akin to the gleaming edifice the city of Edmonton finished in 2016 for superstar Connor McDavid to ply his trade.

Calgary needs a new arena desperately. And the Premier needs the city of Calgary desperately if she hopes to win the May 29 election. After announcing the province’s role in the proposed arena deal, she wasn’t exactly subtle: vote for Danielle Smith and the United Conservative Party if you want this arena to become a reality.

That is about the only thing in this startling development that makes any sense: the naked politics of it all. Because after that you have the city of Calgary carrying most of the freight for a new NHL arena. Actually, when you throw in the contribution from the provincial government, Alberta taxpayers are paying an obscene amount of money for what amounts to a new playground for the National Hockey League.

The city pays $537.3-million, the province $330-million, and the hockey team $356-million, only $40-million of which is to be paid up front and the remainder to be spread out over 35 years at a rate of $17-million per annum (plus an increase of 1 per cent per year). I will say one thing: Calgary Flames owner Murray Edwards is a brilliant negotiator.

If you have been paying any attention at all to the arena saga, this deal is a massive head-scratcher. First of all, it’s almost twice the cost of a project that was almost signed off on last year. Back then, the arena was going to cost $634-million, of which the city was going to fork out $287.5-million, and the Flames the balance. But then it fell apart when the city demanded the hockey team pay an additional $10-million in costs related to infrastructure and climate-change mitigation measures.

Now here we are, a year later, and the city is paying more for the project than the Flames.

This is something Albertans are seemingly prepared to do. The Edmonton arena cost $480-million, of which $313-million was picked up by the city and paid for through downtown property taxes and a ticket surcharge. There was no contribution from the provincial government.

And nor should there have been.

Clearly there is more to this story than we know. The Flames are an integral part of the city’s identity. When Brian Burke was the president of the club back in 2017 and in charge of trying to get a new arena built, he didn’t hesitate to suggest at board of trade meetings and elsewhere that it would be a terrible, terrible thing if the city’s hockey team had to flee town because of the condition of its decrepit arena.

Back then, those running the city and province weren’t prepared to give in to such threats. Times have apparently changed.

What wasn’t made clear at the happy arena announcement was who would be on the hook for any cost overruns in the likely event those occur. Given the way Mr. Edwards appears to be able to negotiate, I highly doubt it’s the hockey team. Which means this could be a deal that comes back to haunt Calgary Mayor Jyoti Gondek.

Arena deals are controversial everywhere. The smaller the city, the more pressure there is on taxpayers to pick up part of the bill or risk losing their precious team. But there are plenty of cities in the NFL, the richest sports league in the world, that have contributed taxpayer money to pay for new arena deals.

The argument is always that the investment is good for economic activity. There is probably some truth to that, but ultimately, the taxpayer contribution is good for the team’s owners.

There is little question that what Calgary ends up with will be spectacular in design. There are other elements to the plan – a community arena and new entertainment district – that will make it a popular destination for years to come. The city will now be able to attract the kind of entertainment acts that currently shun it in favour of Edmonton’s swank Rogers Place.

So it will be a source of pride.

It’s too bad the politics around the deal are so galling, including the timing of the announcement on the cusp of a provincial election. I’m guessing there will be many Calgarians who won’t be so easily bribed for their votes.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending