adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Trump’s indictment presents a myriad of questions without answers

Published

 on

Open this photo in gallery:

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump delivers remarks in Greensboro, N.C., on June 10. Trump spoke during the North Carolina Republican party’s annual state convention two days after becoming the first former U.S. president indicted on federal charges.Win McNamee/Getty Images

Boxes in a bathroom. A legal case called United States of America v. Donald J. Trump. Assertions that “no one is above the law” versus claims that the law is being employed for low political reasons. Calls for violence and “revolution” in a 21st-century country stocked with guns and a history that reveres its 18th-century revolution.

This a trial for a former president that also is a trial of the democratic political system he once led and now seeks to command again.

With apologies to Felix Mendelssohn, whose Songs Without Words were published more than a century-and-a-half ago, this is a period of myriad Questions Without Answers.

We don’t know whether the 37 counts in the indictment against Donald Trump – much more dangerous than those in the New York case involving hush money to a porn star but also more dangerous for a democracy in upheaval – provide an actual peril to the former president.

We don’t know the political implications of the charges – more incendiary than the ones that led to a surge in Trump fundraising in April but also at a time when his donor base may have grown weary – for his presidential candidacy.

We don’t know how his rivals – who rallied to his side after the New York indictment but now actually are raising funds of their own and setting out plans for their own campaigns – will set themselves apart from the Republican front-runner even if they feel they must mouth tinny talking points that share his supporters’ outrage.

We don’t know – we can’t know – how the three following vital questions at the heart of this and the other legal challenges to Mr. Trump will be resolved in history’s verdict:

Is this a case of a corrupt public figure or of a corrupted political system? Is the chaos and disregard for precedent that Mr. Trump has sowed an aberration or is it the “new normal” in a country that – after a terrifying terrorist attack, a widening of the gap between the rich and everyone else, and a hardening of the 50-50 political stalemate – has grown weary of new normals? And has the war against established norms itself become normal?

This is known: There is a bad stench all around – not moral equivalence, to be sure, but the pervasive odour that comes with a former president harbouring documents that belong elsewhere. There is a governing administration bringing federal charges against a predecessor president who desires to be a future president; the uncomfortable coincidence that the sitting president is being investigated for similar possession of similarly cached documents, all converging in a toxic environment of warring conventional media and social-media forces during the beginning of a presidential campaign.

This too, is known: America is in the midst of what Daniel Patrick Moynihan – Harvard scholar, Richard Nixon aide, United Nations diplomat and Democratic senator – called, in a less fraught period, a “crisis of the regime.”

Beyond that, all is a guess, and in these circumstances, without precedent in a period of persistent social, political and cultural upheaval, there can be no educated guesses. The only byword is caveat emptor. To apply an image employed by both Plato and Longfellow: Given that America’s battered ship of state – no longer ship-shape but pounded by severe weather in rough seas – is steaming into uncharted waters, distrust all analyses, including this one.

This is because, unlike Scotland (Mary Queen of Scots), France (Louis XVI), Czarist Russia (Nicholas II), Peru (Alberto Fujimori), Brazil (Lula da Silva) and numberless other places, no top leader of the United States has faced the prospect, however dim, of imprisonment. The possession of the documents is not at the centre of his peril, but the obstruction, which in an ordinary citizen’s case would lead to an 18-month prison sentence, is.

Because the case against Mr. Trump – based on his own remarks, unforgettable photographic images, incriminating texts and compromising remarks investigators received from members of the former president’s inner circle – is not frivolous.

Because commentators of all political allegiances acknowledge that these recurrent Trump crises might well be a harbinger of an even more venomous political atmosphere, increasing the likelihood that tit-for-tat prosecutions will be commonplace and will dominate the politics of a superpower confronting challenges from China, Russia and other countries resentful of American power and prerogatives.

Because the threat of multiple constitutional crises is not trifling, including the prospect that Mr. Trump might pardon himself if, after winning a second term in the White House, he is convicted in trials that are not expected to conclude until after Election Day next year. (Within days, watch for his rivals for the Republican nomination being asked whether they would pardon Mr. Trump if they won the White House.)

Because one of the globe’s most important, stable and substantial political parties – known as the Grand Old Party but now riven by divisions that undermine its grandiosity and are entirely new – is breaking apart.

In recent days, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia asserted that “what they’re doing to President Trump is exactly what they will do to any one of us when they deem us a threat.”

Meanwhile, Senator Mitt Romney of Utah, less than a dozen years ago the Republicans’ presidential nominee, characterized the charges against Mr. Trump as “serious.” He argues that if they were proven, they “would be consistent with his other actions offensive to the national interest, such as withholding defensive weapons from Ukraine for political reasons and failing to defend the Capitol from violent attack and insurrection.”

And because this affair, while creating a dangerous moment in American history, also has trivialized American politics, with the principal figure a Fitzgerald-type tycoon with the gift of turning adversity into a personal advantage and of transforming legal liability into financial advantage.

If this were a television docudrama rather than a political Survival episode, the central element would be a mystery: Why did Mr. Trump retain a classified “plan of attack” against Iran and documents involving America’s nuclear strategies?

Perhaps it was sloppiness, perhaps it was as a means to show off at Mar-a-Lago and elsewhere to people he thinks are his friends. And perhaps former governor Chris Christie, of New Jersey, a onetime and current presidential nomination rival, had it right when he speculated that the documents were nothing more than “a trophy that he walks around and says, ‘look, I’ve got this.’”

 

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending