When Neil Pitman was trying to buy a new piece for his pressure cooker, he couldn’t believe the price difference between getting it shipped from the United States to his home in Sherbrooke, Que., compared to the cost of it coming from China.
The part would have cost him less than $1 to ship from China. But if he had ordered it from the U.S., it would have cost $22.99 to ship.
“I buy stuff off of eBay reasonably often, and I’m always surprised how much it costs to ship things from the U.S. as compared to from China,” said Pitman.
“It costs almost nothing to ship from China. And I’d like to buy American or Canadian. But even from the next province, it costs way more.”
Serasu Duran, a University of Calgary assistant professor of operations and supply chain management in the Haskayne School of Business, says it can cost about $5 or $6 per kilogram to ship a package from China to Canada.
“Which is quite cheap,” said Duran.
According to Canada Post’s shipping rate calculator, it can cost about $24 to send a one-kilogram package between provinces. And it would cost $28.50 to send a one-kilogram package from Canada to China, depending on its size.
The reason for that dates all the way back to 1874 and an international agency called the Universal Postal Union.
The history of post
It used to be quite difficult to send a letter from one country to another, according to Paulus Schoorl, program manager and policy and regulatory adviser for the Universal Postal Union in Bern, Switzerland.
If you sent a letter through multiple countries, you’d have to pay big bucks, he said. Each time mail crossed a border, it would incur an additional cost for the sender.
“It was awfully complex and difficult to send a letter from one country to another country, actually, sometimes across different jurisdictions or administrative areas,” said Schoorl.
That led to representatives meeting in Bern, Switzerland, in 1874 and signing the Treaty of Bern, leading to the creation of the Universal Postal Union. It was an agreement that countries would carry other countries’ letters and small parcels for free.
“At that point, it was decided that all the [postal] services are universal service,” said Schoorl.
The idea was it would all balance out, with each country helping the other.
An imbalance
After 100 years, there was a change.
Schoorl says that Italy felt there was an imbalance. Italian postal carriers were delivering more international mail, as people there were ordering heavy magazines. Meanwhile, the country wasn’t sending out nearly as much mail as it was receiving.
In the 1960s, countries that were a part of the Universal Postal Union came to a new agreement. If a country was receiving more international mail than it was sending, it would be paid for the difference.
At the time, that was one half of a gold franc, a currency formerly used by international organizations, per kilogram of international mail. But not all countries could afford it.
The Universal Postal Union set up a fee so richer countries would pay more to have their international mail delivered than countries with developing economies.
“The central idea is that any citizen or business should be able to send mail packages through the Global Postal Network to any destination,” said Schoorl.
At the time, China was considered a country with a developing economy, meaning the country would be changed less for international mail than other countries. And that went unchanged for decades.
Where we are now
As e-commerce took off in the 2010s, China found itself with a major competitive advantage. It could ship to North America at a cheap rate. Canada Post and the U.S. Postal Service were delivering packages and not being compensated very well, says Schoorl.
In 2018, U.S. President Donald Trump pushed back on the rates and threatened to pull the country out of the Universal Postal Union.
The United States and other countries, including Canada, were able to negotiate a new deal withing the Universal Postal Union.
According to Mindaugus Cerpikin, an economist who studies the postal system in Copenhagen, the U.S. was able to land the biggest concessions. Canada was able to increase its rates over time, but Cerpikin says there is still a big gap.
“The U.S. was allowed to raise its fees and they were allowed to do it faster than other industrialized countries.”
Canada and other countries can raise their fees about 16 per cent annually, Cerpikin said.
“While 16 per cent may sound like a lot, one must consider that some countries like Canada need between [a] 200 to 400 per cent increase to close the gap between domestic rates and international rates.”
The CBC reached out to Canada Post about the cost of shipping in Canada. It declined an interview, but sent an emailed response.
“Parcel rates are non-regulated and fully competitive within the industry,” spokesperson Lisa Liu said.
“Canada Post determines shipping rates based on several factors, including the origin and destination, which also consider population densities. The parcel weight and size, costs of processing and transportation and delivery are factored into the rate.”
In the meantime, Pitman would like to support local and buy from sellers in North America. But as long as shipping costs are as high as they are, it’s hard for him to justify it.
“I would like to prefer Canadian and our American suppliers, but it really doesn’t make any sense.”
TORONTO – Cineplex Inc. reported a loss in its latest quarter compared with a profit a year ago as it was hit by a fine for deceptive marketing practices imposed by the Competition Tribunal.
The movie theatre company says it lost $24.7 million or 39 cents per diluted share for the quarter ended Sept. 30 compared with a profit of $29.7 million or 40 cents per diluted share a year earlier.
The results in the most recent quarter included a $39.2-million provision related to the Competition Tribunal decision, which Cineplex is appealing.
The Competition Bureau accused the company of misleading theatregoers by not immediately presenting them with the full price of a movie ticket when they purchased seats online, a view the company has rejected.
Revenue for the quarter totalled $395.6 million, down from $414.5 million in the same quarter last year, while theatre attendance totalled 13.3 million for the quarter compared with nearly 15.7 million a year earlier.
Box office revenue per patron in the quarter climbed to $13.19 compared with $12 in the same quarter last year, while concession revenue per patron amounted to $9.85, up from $8.44 a year ago.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.
TORONTO – Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported net income of US$357 million for its third quarter, down from US$364 million in the same quarter last year.
The company, which keeps its books in U.S. dollars, says its profit amounted to 79 cents US per diluted share for the quarter ended Sept. 30 compared with 79 cents US per diluted share a year earlier.
Revenue for the parent company of Tim Hortons, Burger King, Popeyes and Firehouse Subs, totalled US$2.29 billion, up from US$1.84 billion in the same quarter last year.
Consolidated comparable sales were up 0.3 per cent.
On an adjusted basis, Restaurant Brands says it earned 93 cents US per diluted share in its latest quarter, up from an adjusted profit of 90 cents US per diluted share a year earlier.
The average analyst estimate had been for a profit of 95 cents US per share, according to LSEG Data & Analytics.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.
ST. JOHN’S, N.L. – Fortis Inc. reported a third-quarter profit of $420 million, up from $394 million in the same quarter last year.
The electric and gas utility says the profit amounted to 85 cents per share for the quarter ended Sept. 30, up from 81 cents per share a year earlier.
Fortis says the increase was driven by rate base growth across its utilities, and strong earnings in Arizona largely reflecting new customer rates at Tucson Electric Power.
Revenue in the quarter totalled $2.77 billion, up from $2.72 billion in the same quarter last year.
On an adjusted basis, Fortis says it earned 85 cents per share in its latest quarter, up from an adjusted profit of 84 cents per share in the third quarter of 2023.
The average analyst estimate had been for a profit of 82 cents per share, according to LSEG Data & Analytics.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.