adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Media

Social media algorithms to blame for antisemitic, Islamophobic content online, Waterloo expert says

Published

 on

There’s been a reported bump in the amount of antisemitic and Islamophic content on social media platforms like TikTok and X (formerly Twitter) since the start of the Israel-Hamas war, which may be due to algorithms that are geared to enhance engagement and to make money. That’s according to Jimmy Lin, a professor at the David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science at the University of Waterloo.

A headshot of Jimmy Lin, a professor at the David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science at the University of Waterloo.
Jimmy Lin, a professor at the David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science at the University of Waterloo, said that engagement algorithms are to blame for the rise in antisemitic and Islamophobic content on social media, post Oct. 7. (cs.uwaterloo.ca)

“The more engagement that any video gets, the more it’s going to show up in the user feed, and things that get engagement are things that have shock value on either side, either vehemently antisemitic or anti-Palestinian,” said Lin, with the caveat that his view is speculation since he doesn’t “work on the algorithms,” explaining that most of them aren’t publicly available.

“Basically what we’re observing here is that we’ve lost the middle ground here in the sort of modern discourse. Everything is becoming increasingly polarized because polarized content [gets] engagement.”

Antisemitism is up by 919 per cent on X since Oct. 7, according to the Anti-Defamation League. The Institute for Strategic Dialogue indicated that Islamophobia is up by 422 per cent on the platform too.

There is also an open letter penned by some celebrities who say that TikTok “is not safe for Jewish users” due to threats, harassment and antisemitism.

The effects of online hate have been felt nationally too.

“This certainly concerns us in the Jewish community,” said Jaime Kirzner-Roberts, the Greater Toronto Area vice-president of The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs. “But I think it should concern all Canadians because we’re letting algorithms create problems of extremism and polarization in our society.”

Portrait of Jaime Kirzner-Roberts, the Greater Toronto Area vice-president of The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs.
Jaime Kirzner-Roberts is the Greater Toronto Area vice-president of The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs. (cija.ca)

What can be done?

Lin doesn’t believe that the algorithms are creating polarizing content on purpose. It’s more of what he thinks of as “benign neglect, in the sense that engagement and eyeballs … drive traffic and traffic drives revenue.”

“In the absence of countervailing forces this is just what’s going to happen,” Lin said.

“And to speed the conversation along, you’re going to ask, ‘What are the countervailing forces?’ Well, for example, regulation is a countervailing force. Threat of lawsuit is a countervailing force, and so in the absence of these countervailing forces, the profit motive will dominate.”

Lin doesn’t believe that fixing these algorithms is an issue for social media companies, but that doesn’t guarantee it’s going to happen.

“Technically it’s not very challenging but whether or not there is the will, the corporate will, to make these changes, that’s a totally separate matter,” he said.

In a statement to CBC News, a TikTok spokesperson explained that they have taken proactive measures since the start of the Israel-Hamas war to curb hate online.

In response to the open letter directed at the tech company by the Jewish community, their spokesperson said, “We oppose antisemitism in all forms. Antisemitism is on the rise globally, and we’re committed to doing our part to fight it. We’ve taken important steps to protect our community and prevent the spread of hate, and we appreciate ongoing, honest dialogue and feedback as we continually work to strengthen these protections.”

CBC News reached out to X for comment but didn’t receive a response by the time of publication.

Fatema Abdalla, communications coordinator for the National Council of Canadian Muslims, is seen in this undated image.
Fatema Abdalla is an advocacy officer with the National Council of Canadian Muslims. (National Council of Canadian Muslims)

The National Council of Canadian Muslims said that they too have noticed an influx of hate online, but they think the government should do more.

“At this rate the onus is on the government to regulate what is taking place online and what forms of hate are spewing because we see the drastic effects that it can have in the lives of Canadians including many Canadians who have lost their lives due to online forms of hate,” said Fatema Abdalla, an advocacy officer with the organization.

Ian McLeod, a spokesperson for the Department of Justice Canada, said that curbing online hate is on the radar for the federal government.

“The Government of Canada is committed to putting in place a transparent and accountable regulatory framework for online safety in Canada,” said McLeod. “Now, more than ever, online services must be held responsible for addressing harmful content on their platforms and creating a safe online space that protects all Canadians.”

“[Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Arif Virani] has recently publicly reiterated the Government of Canada’s commitment to introducing specific legislation to combat online hate in the near future. At the same time, the Government of Canada continues to take concrete steps to fight hate crime and hate speech, in all their forms.”

McLeod said that Department of Canadian Heritage is “also leading efforts to improve online safety.”

What users can do

There are things that users can do if hateful content persists, and quitting the platforms altogether isn’t a realistic option, said Aimée Morrison, an associate professor at The University of Waterloo’s English department whose work focuses on social media. She said that unwanted content can be filtered out by users in order to get a feed that is less distressing.

Each platform has its own way for users to do this. TikTok, for example, has “content preferences” where keywords used in videos can be filtered.

“The more you do that the more you can clean up your own feed so that that traumatizing material isn’t showing up,” she said. “Or if it’s ruining your vibe there, you’re just there for recipe tips and make-up influencers and you don’t want war content in there you can sort of train the algorithm.”

 However, she warned against engaging with such content.

“I would not click a reaction button. I would not leave a comment on that video,” she said, explaining that doing these things would result in more people seeing the content since it would appear to be engaging.

The future

Lin worries that generative AI, which could create things like deep fakes, will continue to make these issues much worse. He said there used to be misinformation being created by misappropriating media, but now we’ve entered into a whole new sphere.

“Now with generative AI you’re seeing outright fabrications,” he said. “Things that were just made up wholesale that just aren’t true … Once you throw that into the mix it becomes even more complicated to sort out truth from misinformation, intentional from people that were [duping] and amplifying false information.”

When asked whether this could be stopped he said that “the genie is out of the bottle on this one,” adding the only thing that might change it are government regulations or policies.

CBC News reached out to the federal government for comment but didn’t receive a response by the time of publication.

 

Explosion of hate across social media platforms

 

Featured VideoSocial media users from TikTok to X are being exposed to a deluge of different Islamophobic and antisemitic tropes — some of them perpetuated by people like Elon Musk, the owner of X.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Trump could cash out his DJT stock within weeks. Here’s what happens if he sells

Published

 on

Former President Donald Trump is on the brink of a significant financial decision that could have far-reaching implications for both his personal wealth and the future of his fledgling social media company, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG). As the lockup period on his shares in TMTG, which owns Truth Social, nears its end, Trump could soon be free to sell his substantial stake in the company. However, the potential payday, which makes up a large portion of his net worth, comes with considerable risks for Trump and his supporters.

Trump’s stake in TMTG comprises nearly 59% of the company, amounting to 114,750,000 shares. As of now, this holding is valued at approximately $2.6 billion. These shares are currently under a lockup agreement, a common feature of initial public offerings (IPOs), designed to prevent company insiders from immediately selling their shares and potentially destabilizing the stock. The lockup, which began after TMTG’s merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), is set to expire on September 25, though it could end earlier if certain conditions are met.

Should Trump decide to sell his shares after the lockup expires, the market could respond in unpredictable ways. The sale of a substantial number of shares by a major stakeholder like Trump could flood the market, potentially driving down the stock price. Daniel Bradley, a finance professor at the University of South Florida, suggests that the market might react negatively to such a large sale, particularly if there aren’t enough buyers to absorb the supply. This could lead to a sharp decline in the stock’s value, impacting both Trump’s personal wealth and the company’s market standing.

Moreover, Trump’s involvement in Truth Social has been a key driver of investor interest. The platform, marketed as a free speech alternative to mainstream social media, has attracted a loyal user base largely due to Trump’s presence. If Trump were to sell his stake, it might signal a lack of confidence in the company, potentially shaking investor confidence and further depressing the stock price.

Trump’s decision is also influenced by his ongoing legal battles, which have already cost him over $100 million in legal fees. Selling his shares could provide a significant financial boost, helping him cover these mounting expenses. However, this move could also have political ramifications, especially as he continues his bid for the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential race.

Trump Media’s success is closely tied to Trump’s political fortunes. The company’s stock has shown volatility in response to developments in the presidential race, with Trump’s chances of winning having a direct impact on the stock’s value. If Trump sells his stake, it could be interpreted as a lack of confidence in his own political future, potentially undermining both his campaign and the company’s prospects.

Truth Social, the flagship product of TMTG, has faced challenges in generating traffic and advertising revenue, especially compared to established social media giants like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook. Despite this, the company’s valuation has remained high, fueled by investor speculation on Trump’s political future. If Trump remains in the race and manages to secure the presidency, the value of his shares could increase. Conversely, any missteps on the campaign trail could have the opposite effect, further destabilizing the stock.

As the lockup period comes to an end, Trump faces a critical decision that could shape the future of both his personal finances and Truth Social. Whether he chooses to hold onto his shares or cash out, the outcome will likely have significant consequences for the company, its investors, and Trump’s political aspirations.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Arizona man accused of social media threats to Trump is arrested

Published

 on

Cochise County, AZ — Law enforcement officials in Arizona have apprehended Ronald Lee Syvrud, a 66-year-old resident of Cochise County, after a manhunt was launched following alleged death threats he made against former President Donald Trump. The threats reportedly surfaced in social media posts over the past two weeks, as Trump visited the US-Mexico border in Cochise County on Thursday.

Syvrud, who hails from Benson, Arizona, located about 50 miles southeast of Tucson, was captured by the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office on Thursday afternoon. The Sheriff’s Office confirmed his arrest, stating, “This subject has been taken into custody without incident.”

In addition to the alleged threats against Trump, Syvrud is wanted for multiple offences, including failure to register as a sex offender. He also faces several warrants in both Wisconsin and Arizona, including charges for driving under the influence and a felony hit-and-run.

The timing of the arrest coincided with Trump’s visit to Cochise County, where he toured the US-Mexico border. During his visit, Trump addressed the ongoing border issues and criticized his political rival, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, for what he described as lax immigration policies. When asked by reporters about the ongoing manhunt for Syvrud, Trump responded, “No, I have not heard that, but I am not that surprised and the reason is because I want to do things that are very bad for the bad guys.”

This incident marks the latest in a series of threats against political figures during the current election cycle. Just earlier this month, a 66-year-old Virginia man was arrested on suspicion of making death threats against Vice President Kamala Harris and other public officials.

Continue Reading

Media

Trump Media & Technology Group Faces Declining Stock Amid Financial Struggles and Increased Competition

Published

 on

Tech News in Canada

Trump Media & Technology Group’s stock has taken a significant hit, dropping more than 11% this week following a disappointing earnings report and the return of former U.S. President Donald Trump to the rival social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. This decline is part of a broader downward trend for the parent company of Truth Social, with the stock plummeting nearly 43% since mid-July. Despite the sharp decline, some investors remain unfazed, expressing continued optimism for the company’s financial future or standing by their investment as a show of political support for Trump.

One such investor, Todd Schlanger, an interior designer from West Palm Beach, explained his commitment to the stock, stating, “I’m a Republican, so I supported him. When I found out about the stock, I got involved because I support the company and believe in free speech.” Schlanger, who owns around 1,000 shares, is a regular user of Truth Social and is excited about the company’s future, particularly its plans to expand its streaming services. He believes Truth Social has the potential to be as strong as Facebook or X, despite the stock’s recent struggles.

However, Truth Social’s stock performance is deeply tied to Trump’s political influence and the company’s ability to generate sustainable revenue, which has proven challenging. An earnings report released last Friday showed the company lost over $16 million in the three-month period ending in June. Revenue dropped by 30%, down to approximately $836,000 compared to $1.2 million during the same period last year.

In response to the earnings report, Truth Social CEO Devin Nunes emphasized the company’s strong cash position, highlighting $344 million in cash reserves and no debt. He also reiterated the company’s commitment to free speech, stating, “From the beginning, it was our intention to make Truth Social an impenetrable beachhead of free speech, and by taking extraordinary steps to minimize our reliance on Big Tech, that is exactly what we are doing.”

Despite these assurances, investors reacted negatively to the quarterly report, leading to a steep drop in stock price. The situation was further complicated by Trump’s return to X, where he posted for the first time in a year. Trump’s exclusivity agreement with Trump Media & Technology Group mandates that he posts personal content first on Truth Social. However, he is allowed to make politically related posts on other social media platforms, which he did earlier this week, potentially drawing users away from Truth Social.

For investors like Teri Lynn Roberson, who purchased shares near the company’s peak after it went public in March, the decline in stock value has been disheartening. However, Roberson remains unbothered by the poor performance, saying her investment was more about supporting Trump than making money. “I’m way at a loss, but I am OK with that. I am just watching it for fun,” Roberson said, adding that she sees Trump’s return to X as a positive move that could expand his reach beyond Truth Social’s “echo chamber.”

The stock’s performance holds significant financial implications for Trump himself, as he owns a 65% stake in Trump Media & Technology Group. According to Fortune, this stake represents a substantial portion of his net worth, which could be vulnerable if the company continues to struggle financially.

Analysts have described Truth Social as a “meme stock,” similar to companies like GameStop and AMC that saw their stock prices driven by ideological investments rather than business fundamentals. Tyler Richey, an analyst at Sevens Report Research, noted that the stock has ebbed and flowed based on sentiment toward Trump. He pointed out that the recent decline coincided with the rise of U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic presidential nominee, which may have dampened perceptions of Trump’s 2024 election prospects.

Jay Ritter, a finance professor at the University of Florida, offered a grim long-term outlook for Truth Social, suggesting that the stock would likely remain volatile, but with an overall downward trend. “What’s lacking for the true believer in the company story is, ‘OK, where is the business strategy that will be generating revenue?'” Ritter said, highlighting the company’s struggle to produce a sustainable business model.

Still, for some investors, like Michael Rogers, a masonry company owner in North Carolina, their support for Trump Media & Technology Group is unwavering. Rogers, who owns over 10,000 shares, said he invested in the company both as a show of support for Trump and because of his belief in the company’s financial future. Despite concerns about the company’s revenue challenges, Rogers expressed confidence in the business, stating, “I’m in it for the long haul.”

Not all investors are as confident. Mitchell Standley, who made a significant return on his investment earlier this year by capitalizing on the hype surrounding Trump Media’s planned merger with Digital World Acquisition Corporation, has since moved on. “It was basically just a pump and dump,” Standley told ABC News. “I knew that once they merged, all of his supporters were going to dump a bunch of money into it and buy it up.” Now, Standley is staying away from the company, citing the lack of business fundamentals as the reason for his exit.

Truth Social’s future remains uncertain as it continues to struggle with financial losses and faces stiff competition from established social media platforms. While its user base and investor sentiment are bolstered by Trump’s political following, the company’s long-term viability will depend on its ability to create a sustainable revenue stream and maintain relevance in a crowded digital landscape.

As the company seeks to stabilize, the question remains whether its appeal to Trump’s supporters can translate into financial success or whether it will remain a volatile stock driven more by ideology than business fundamentals.

Continue Reading

Trending