adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Hunter Biden makes a dramatic public appearance after defying subpoena

Published

 on

Hunter Biden arrived Wednesday morning in a black Chevy Suburban outside the U.S. Capitol, walking steely-faced toward a microphone set up not far from the Senate steps that his father had ascended countless times.

“For six years, I have been the target of the unrelenting Trump attack machine, shouting, ‘Where’s Hunter?’” he said, with an unmistakable tone of defiance. “Well, here’s my answer: I am here.”

It marked the most dramatic public appearance of a presidential son who for years has been the focus of attacks from Republicans using his business dealings as a basis for an impeachment inquiry into his father, and for federal investigators who have charged Hunter Biden with tax and gun crimes.

And it was the clearest sign that Hunter Biden, who has largely left it to his lawyers and allies to respond to his attackers, is now attempting to wrest control of his own narrative.

“I am here today to acknowledge that I have made mistakes in my life and wasted opportunities and privileges I was afforded,” he said. “For that, I am responsible. For that, I am accountable. And for that, I am making amends.”

The appearance, which was kept under wraps until shortly beforehand and came as Hunter Biden defied a House subpoena, was by turns emotional, plaintive and contentious. It appeared to have two main aims: humanizing him after years of vilification, and emphasizing that his father had nothing to do with his business affairs despite the impeachment inquiry.

People close to Hunter say he views the current chapter of his life as one in which he attempts to make amends and answer for the wrongs that he committed in the throes of addiction. He tried to draw a clear line during his remarks, admitting that he did things he regrets but not those he is being accused of.

“I am also here today to correct how the MAGA right has portrayed me for their political purposes,” he said.

Several times he referenced his battles with drug and alcohol addiction, saying that it may have clouded his judgment at times but that those struggles should not be used against him, and certainly not against his father.

“They have ridiculed my struggle with addiction, they have belittled my recovery and they have tried to dehumanize me — all to embarrass and damage my father, who has devoted his life to public service,” he said.

End of carousel

Hunter’s portrait of his father as a loving, supportive parent contrasted sharply with Republicans’ charges that the “Biden crime family” has improperly mixed business and government, accusations for which they have provided no substantive evidence. His parents “literally saved my life,” Hunter said, stating in the clearest and most public way to date that his father had nothing financially to do with his business.

Not when he worked as a lawyer, he said, nor when he was on the board of Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company. His father was not involved in Hunter’s partnership with a Chinese businessman, he said, and had no part in his foreign or domestic investments. He also had no role in his latest efforts to make a career as an artist.

“In the depths of my addiction, I was extremely irresponsible with my finances,” Hunter Biden said. “But to suggest that is grounds for an impeachment inquiry is beyond the absurd — it is shameless. There is no evidence to support the allegations that my father was financially involved in my business, because it did not happen.”

Hunter’s decision to appear in front of the Capitol came a year after he shook up his legal team and began taking a more combative path in the legal, political and media arenas. He wrote a memoir in 2021 — accompanied by a round of television interviews — and traveled with his father to Ireland earlier this year. More recently, he sat for a lengthy podcast interview with the musician Moby and wrote a piece for USA Today accusing Republicans of weaponizing his addiction.

But his appearance Wednesday put him in direct combat with his Republican antagonists. Many on his team have been upset that he has few defenders — he is viewed in some quarters as a political third rail, and rarely are Democrats on television willing to speak up for him. On Wednesday, he decided to do it himself.

The setting was significant: He spoke in the same place where he came often as a child when his dad was an up-and-coming senator. It was near the spot where his father received a phone call almost exactly 51 years ago, on Dec. 18, 1972, telling him that his wife and daughter had been killed and that his two sons — Beau and Hunter — were in the hospital.

It was not far from Union Station, where his father went every night after Senate business to take the train home to Wilmington, Del. And it was within a few miles of locations where, as he recounts in his memoir, he would buy drugs.

In speaking outside the Capitol instead of inside it, the president’s son was defying a summons from House Republicans that he appear at a closed-door deposition. Hunter Biden’s team argued that a private session would let GOP lawmakers selectively leak his comments, and they offered to have him testify publicly instead — an idea rejected by Republican leaders.

“He does not get to dictate the terms of the subpoena,” Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), who chairs the House Oversight Committee, told reporters outside an empty hearing room where Hunter Biden had been scheduled to appear. Republicans now say they may seek a contempt-of-Congress charge against him.

Hunter has testified before Congress at least once, when he was appointed to the Amtrak board in 2006. This time he was being called for a far different reason, to answer questions about his foreign business deals, his tax problems and — at least on the part of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) — his alleged payments to prostitutes.

Hunter Biden is not the only president’s son to be summoned for congressional testimony in recent years. Donald Trump Jr. spoke to the Senate Intelligence Committee during his father’s presidency about allegations of Russian influence on the 2016 election.

White House officials said that Hunter Biden made his father aware of what he was going to say, but press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre would not say what advice the president gave his son and if he had urged him to comply with a congressional subpoena.

“The president was certainly familiar with what his son was going to say,” she said. “And I think what you saw was from the heart. … When it comes to the president, the first lady, they are proud of him continuing to rebuild his life. They are proud of their son.”

Asked whether the president would remove some of the legal threats looming over his son, she responded: “I’ve been very clear. The president’s not going to pardon his son.”

One offshoot of his struggles, and the legal and political scrutiny he faces, is that he is held at arm’s length by many of President Biden’s advisers. While father and son speak on a near-daily basis, he has not been the kind of high-profile political adviser that he was during much of Joe Biden’s career.

In recent months, he has stepped up his public role, showcasing a willingness to get into the arena and personally battle his Republican opponents. The event Wednesday morning was executed with a bit of showmanship and surprise in an attempt to upstage and outmaneuver House Republicans.

Reporters were told to gather outside the Senate side of the Capitol around 9:30 a.m. Several dozen journalists were there, going through security in one sign that Hunter Biden, who has Secret Service protection, would be arriving. Some networks scrambled to leave the House hearing — where Hunter would clearly not be appearing — and get to the Capitol steps instead.

The president’s son said House Republicans continue to focus on “a nonexistent bribe.” He noted that Greene displayed naked photos of him during committee hearings. “They have taken the light of my dad’s love for me and presented it as darkness,” Hunter Biden said. “They have no shame.”

Hunter Biden reiterated that he was willing to answer questions anytime as long as it is in a public session — although he ignored the questions reporters shouted at him after he gave his statement.

“I am here to testify at a public hearing, today, to answer any of the committees’ legitimate questions,” he said. “Republicans do not want an open process where Americans can see their tactics, expose their baseless inquiry or hear what I have to say. What are they afraid of? I’m here. I’m ready.”

 

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

Youri Chassin quits CAQ to sit as Independent, second member to leave this month

Published

 on

 

Quebec legislature member Youri Chassin has announced he’s leaving the Coalition Avenir Québec government to sit as an Independent.

He announced the decision shortly after writing an open letter criticizing Premier François Legault’s government for abandoning its principles of smaller government.

In the letter published in Le Journal de Montréal and Le Journal de Québec, Chassin accused the party of falling back on what he called the old formula of throwing money at problems instead of looking to do things differently.

Chassin says public services are more fragile than ever, despite rising spending that pushed the province to a record $11-billion deficit projected in the last budget.

He is the second CAQ member to leave the party in a little more than one week, after economy and energy minister Pierre Fitzgibbon announced Sept. 4 he would leave because he lost motivation to do his job.

Chassin says he has no intention of joining another party and will instead sit as an Independent until the end of his term.

He has represented the Saint-Jérôme riding since the CAQ rose to power in 2018, but has not served in cabinet.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘I’m not going to listen to you’: Singh responds to Poilievre’s vote challenge

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says he will not be taking advice from Pierre Poilievre after the Conservative leader challenged him to bring down government.

“I say directly to Pierre Poilievre: I’m not going to listen to you,” said Singh on Wednesday, accusing Poilievre of wanting to take away dental-care coverage from Canadians, among other things.

“I’m not going to listen to your advice. You want to destroy people’s lives, I want to build up a brighter future.”

Earlier in the day, Poilievre challenged Singh to commit to voting non-confidence in the government, saying his party will force a vote in the House of Commons “at the earliest possibly opportunity.”

“I’m asking Jagmeet Singh and the NDP to commit unequivocally before Monday’s byelections: will they vote non-confidence to bring down the costly coalition and trigger a carbon tax election, or will Jagmeet Singh sell out Canadians again?” Poilievre said.

“It’s put up or shut up time for the NDP.”

While Singh rejected the idea he would ever listen to Poilievre, he did not say how the NDP would vote on a non-confidence motion.

“I’ve said on any vote, we’re going to look at the vote and we’ll make our decision. I’m not going to say our decision ahead of time,” he said.

Singh’s top adviser said on Tuesday the NDP leader is not particularly eager to trigger an election, even as the Conservatives challenge him to do just that.

Anne McGrath, Singh’s principal secretary, says there will be more volatility in Parliament and the odds of an early election have risen.

“I don’t think he is anxious to launch one, or chomping at the bit to have one, but it can happen,” she said in an interview.

New Democrat MPs are in a second day of meetings in Montreal as they nail down a plan for how to navigate the minority Parliament this fall.

The caucus retreat comes one week after Singh announced the party has left the supply-and-confidence agreement with the governing Liberals.

It’s also taking place in the very city where New Democrats are hoping to pick up a seat on Monday, when voters go to the polls in Montreal’s LaSalle—Émard—Verdun. A second byelection is being held that day in the Winnipeg riding of Elmwood—Transcona, where the NDP is hoping to hold onto a seat the Conservatives are also vying for.

While New Democrats are seeking to distance themselves from the Liberals, they don’t appear ready to trigger a general election.

Singh signalled on Tuesday that he will have more to say Wednesday about the party’s strategy for the upcoming sitting.

He is hoping to convince Canadians that his party can defeat the federal Conservatives, who have been riding high in the polls over the last year.

Singh has attacked Poilievre as someone who would bring back Harper-style cuts to programs that Canadians rely on, including the national dental-care program that was part of the supply-and-confidence agreement.

The Canadian Press has asked Poilievre’s office whether the Conservative leader intends to keep the program in place, if he forms government after the next election.

With the return of Parliament just days away, the NDP is also keeping in mind how other parties will look to capitalize on the new makeup of the House of Commons.

The Bloc Québécois has already indicated that it’s written up a list of demands for the Liberals in exchange for support on votes.

The next federal election must take place by October 2025 at the latest.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Social media comments blocked: Montreal mayor says she won’t accept vulgar slurs

Published

 on

 

Montreal Mayor Valérie Plante is defending her decision to turn off comments on her social media accounts — with an announcement on social media.

She posted screenshots to X this morning of vulgar names she’s been called on the platform, and says comments on her posts for months have been dominated by insults, to the point that she decided to block them.

Montreal’s Opposition leader and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association have criticized Plante for limiting freedom of expression by restricting comments on her X and Instagram accounts.

They say elected officials who use social media should be willing to hear from constituents on those platforms.

However, Plante says some people may believe there is a fundamental right to call someone offensive names and to normalize violence online, but she disagrees.

Her statement on X is closed to comments.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending