Ken Bennett, an avid hiker and recreational hockey player, wanted a cereal packed with protein. So last month, he picked up Kellogg’s Vector. Bold lettering on the box declares that it has “high protein” — more specifically, that it “provides 13 g of protein” per serving.
“[It’s] actually pretty high for a breakfast cereal. That’s why I bought it,” said Bennett, who lives in Chilliwack, B.C.
He felt good about his choice — until he noticed the fine print on the box one morning during breakfast.
The fine print reveals that a serving of Vector flakes alone contains just 5.6 grams of protein. The rest of the advertised 13 grams comes from the recommended 200 millilitres of skim milk to be added to the flakes.
“I felt tricked. I felt duped,” said Bennett. “I took it for face value that these breakfast cereal flakes had 13 grams of protein.”
As Canadians grapple with rising grocery prices, they’re becoming more concerned about food marketing tactics they believe are deceptive — including “shrinkflation” (when companies reduce the weight of a food product, but not the price or packaging), “skimpflation” (when they use cheaper ingredients but keep the price the same), and bold claims that gloss over key details.
“It really offends consumers,”said Mary L’Abbé, a nutritional sciences professor emeritus at the University of Toronto.
“They really feel like they’re being … cheated out of their hard-earned dollars.”
Transparency needed on shrinkflation, consumer advocates say
Consumers and advocates are calling for more transparency around the practice of shrinking packaging rather than increasing prices, known as ‘shrinkflation.’ Other countries make companies display weight changes on product labels.
CBC News has heard from several Canadians who had gripes about cereal packaging, such as taller boxes containing less cereal, and bold statements on box labels that may not match up with what’s inside.
In Vector’s case, Health Canada spokesperson André Gagnon said Kellogg can add milk to the protein count, because the product isn’t a cereal. Instead, Vector is a “meal replacement” — a product that meets specific nutrition criteria that may require added milk.
Bennett said he thought Vector was a cereal because he bought it in the cereal aisle. He also didn’t notice the words “meal replacement” on the bottom corner of the box.
“I don’t know what it means by a meal replacement,” he said. “They shouldn’t be able to do that.”
L’Abbé agrees. She says although Vector’s label complies with regulations, it’s still misleading to many shoppers who believe the product is a cereal.
“It’s not sold grouped in the supermarket with all these other nutritional meal replacements,” she said. “It’s in with the breakfast cereals.”
U.S.-based WK Kellogg Co. said Vector’s label is not only compliant, but voluntarily discloses on the box the protein count without added milk.
No blueberries in ‘blueberry’ cereal
Don Bajom of Winnipeg recently bought a box of Kellogg’s Mini-Wheats Blueberry because he believed it contained blueberries. After all, the berry is in the cereal’s name and in pictures on the box.
But he thought the cereal didn’t taste quite right, so he checked the ingredients. That’s when he discovered that it contains no blueberries — dried or in any other form.
“I feel like I was lied to,” he told CBC News in a written statement. “I feel like this company does not care about its customers.”
According to Canadian regulations, if a cereal shows a real food on the box that is simulated in the product with flavouring, it must be made clear on the packaging.
Kellogg Co. said Mini-Wheats Blueberry is compliant, because the front of the box states “natural and artificial flavour,” and the nutrition label lists all the ingredients.
But L’Abbé still takes issue with the cereal’s packaging, saying she believes the “natural and artificial flavour” statement — near the bottom corner of the box — doesn’t make clear that the cereal contains no blueberries.
“That product doesn’t say ‘blueberry-flavoured Mini-Wheats,’ it just says, ‘blueberry Mini-Wheats,'” she said. “This one I think is absolutely, terribly misleading to the consumer.”
How skimpflation might be affecting your groceries
Skimpflation is when companies swap out ingredients for cheaper ones, without lowering the price or alerting customers. One consumer advocate calls it a ‘sneaky way to give you less for your money’ that most people don’t notice.
L’Abbé says the federal government needs to do more to help shoppers read food labels with a critical eye.
“I don’t think they’ve thought enough about how important these labels are to consumers,” she said.
Boston-based consumer advocate Edgar Dworsky, who tracks shrinkflation on his website, Consumer World, said the best safeguard for shoppers is to educate themselves.
“We have to become aware of the different tricks and ploys that manufacturers use,” he said. “We can outsmart them.”
TORONTO – Cineplex Inc. reported a loss in its latest quarter compared with a profit a year ago as it was hit by a fine for deceptive marketing practices imposed by the Competition Tribunal.
The movie theatre company says it lost $24.7 million or 39 cents per diluted share for the quarter ended Sept. 30 compared with a profit of $29.7 million or 40 cents per diluted share a year earlier.
The results in the most recent quarter included a $39.2-million provision related to the Competition Tribunal decision, which Cineplex is appealing.
The Competition Bureau accused the company of misleading theatregoers by not immediately presenting them with the full price of a movie ticket when they purchased seats online, a view the company has rejected.
Revenue for the quarter totalled $395.6 million, down from $414.5 million in the same quarter last year, while theatre attendance totalled 13.3 million for the quarter compared with nearly 15.7 million a year earlier.
Box office revenue per patron in the quarter climbed to $13.19 compared with $12 in the same quarter last year, while concession revenue per patron amounted to $9.85, up from $8.44 a year ago.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.
TORONTO – Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported net income of US$357 million for its third quarter, down from US$364 million in the same quarter last year.
The company, which keeps its books in U.S. dollars, says its profit amounted to 79 cents US per diluted share for the quarter ended Sept. 30 compared with 79 cents US per diluted share a year earlier.
Revenue for the parent company of Tim Hortons, Burger King, Popeyes and Firehouse Subs, totalled US$2.29 billion, up from US$1.84 billion in the same quarter last year.
Consolidated comparable sales were up 0.3 per cent.
On an adjusted basis, Restaurant Brands says it earned 93 cents US per diluted share in its latest quarter, up from an adjusted profit of 90 cents US per diluted share a year earlier.
The average analyst estimate had been for a profit of 95 cents US per share, according to LSEG Data & Analytics.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.
ST. JOHN’S, N.L. – Fortis Inc. reported a third-quarter profit of $420 million, up from $394 million in the same quarter last year.
The electric and gas utility says the profit amounted to 85 cents per share for the quarter ended Sept. 30, up from 81 cents per share a year earlier.
Fortis says the increase was driven by rate base growth across its utilities, and strong earnings in Arizona largely reflecting new customer rates at Tucson Electric Power.
Revenue in the quarter totalled $2.77 billion, up from $2.72 billion in the same quarter last year.
On an adjusted basis, Fortis says it earned 85 cents per share in its latest quarter, up from an adjusted profit of 84 cents per share in the third quarter of 2023.
The average analyst estimate had been for a profit of 82 cents per share, according to LSEG Data & Analytics.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.