adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Media

Media layoffs: How are journalists supposed to make ends meet anymore? – Slate

Published

 on


The day before my deadline, I got a text message from the veteran journalist who was going to be the subject of this week’s column. They had concerns about how they would be portrayed. “Maybe we need to talk about this,” they wrote to me Thursday.

I quickly realized that we were going to have a problem. The interview subject is someone I’ve been friendly with over the years, with us sharing texts about our favorite teams during football season and once meeting up for lunch when I visited their city.

Ordinarily, I shy away from writing about people whose lives are already somewhat known to me, but I thought this could be different. This column is about feelings about money, after all, and I appreciated their candor and thoughtfulness in a recent social media post I’d seen about their current professional reality—namely, the low pay. And the timing seemed grimly appropriate: Their post went up about a week before many more news organizations announced layoffs and buyouts. And those job losses came on the heels of one of the worst years in the news industry.

I asked them if they would talk to me for a column; they eagerly accepted, thinking our prior relationship would give them a safe space to be vulnerable.

We talked for more than two hours, going into intimate detail about the extent of their financial troubles and the difficulty of finding freelance work that pays a livable wage. Our conversation also touched on even more personal issues, like divorce and addiction and how they had impacted their life.

Their responses became tense when I followed up for specifics: How much were you making back then, when you had a staff job? How much now? What did that divorce settlement look like in dollars and cents? They preferred to keep it vague. Of course, “six figures” could mean anything from $100,000 to a cent short of $1 million. “Lol I guess I’m not as comfortable talking about money amounts as I thought I was,” they wrote. After commiserating with my editor later that night, we decided to anonymize their account and strip most of the identifying details out of this column.

I learned a lot from this experience. When we launched Emotional Investment, I knew soliciting stories from people about their thoughts about money and how it had impacted their lives would be extraordinarily difficult. This is why my wife was hesitant for me to write about our finances in this column and why I was worried about mentioning my parents at all.

Even if we feel OK about the objective facts of our relationship with money, we worry about how these stories and confessions will travel. It’s hard to think about how other people will interpret them and how they might judge us. When we share the details (and we so rarely share details, particularly dollar amounts), we lose control of that and lose the ability to control our own narrative, and that’s scary. Will readers think we’re broke? Irresponsible? Privileged? Elitist? The now-anonymous subject of this column worried that my comparison of their current income to what they earned in the past painted them as a “has been.” I can understand wanting to maintain control of your narrative, even if you’re a professional writer who understands the demands of journalism.

But I also think, after the past couple weeks we’ve seen in this industry, from the layoffs at the Los Angeles Times to the implosion of splashy news startup the Messenger, that talking honestly about the infeasibility of freelance work is important. So here is an anonymized version of our conversation.

First, some context: This journalist was in the midst of realizing a long-term project they’d been working on wasn’t going to pan out. And even after getting good print work, they knew the rates didn’t make sense—$1,500 for a 3,000-word reported feature that requires travel wasn’t going to work out to a reasonable hourly rate. So they were preparing. “I’ve been taking out some zero-interest credit cards, just in case. I took out a personal loan to get me through the first part of the year,” they told me. After the big project fell apart, they were scrambling. “That was going to be part of my income this year.”

Here are the parts of our conversation that stuck with me.

On how divorce changed their financial reality:

I remember having to pay as much as a third as much in divorce attorney fees as I got in the settlement. And I did not expect it to be a fight. It turned into a big fight.

We were very comfortable. And I went through a period of not having to think about money, which at first blows your mind and then you get used to it. It’s amazing.

I think I’ve heard other [people] who get divorced say this too. You go from like 60 (miles per hour) to zero. Or maybe not zero, but from 60 to 30 in terms of, like, your lifestyle.

I did not slam on the brakes. I did it more slowly than I wish I had in terms of, like, “Oh, I no longer live a life where I can just do things that I used to do.”

Oh, this is a big one right now, which is that something broke, so I’ll fix it. I’ll pay to get it fixed. But, no, that’s not actually how my life is right now. What I am is back to living a kind of a normal life where I once was living a life where I was incredibly privileged to be able to just fix everything that needed to be fixed.

On keeping up with the mortgage payments:

I worry about it all the time. I worry about keeping it, but I have convinced myself, you know, this is my retirement, and you can go into debt to keep your retirement.

I feel like it is my retirement that I am living in. I put all my savings into this. I have, like, a 401(k) that I haven’t been able to put much into in the past three years. I was still married when we bought this, but it was our second home.

But I remember talking to my dad about, like, how I don’t have any savings left. And my dad was like, “You’re living in your retirement. That’s your retirement.”

My monthly payment is less than $3,000, which is still high. But for the area, that’s not bad. And if it stays that way for the rest of my life, that’s pretty good.

It’s a nice one-story [house] that’s manageable. I can imagine living here for another 10, 15 years. I mean, it is an investment. And I know I’m lucky. I talk to some people who—we do money commiserating and they’re like, “But you have a house.” And I have to keep remembering, “You’re right. Yes. Yes.”

On how their childhood changed after their own parents got divorced:

I look back and realize we were closer to the bone than I realized. Maybe close to the bone is too strong of a word … we lived modestly. When my parents divorced, things became much sketchier for my mom, and I did live with her for the first part.

We had, I would say, a boom-bust situation. When she made a big commission, she would buy steak for dinner, and we’d go to Neiman Marcus. And then we had times when the lights got shut off. My mom was very tasteful. We did a lot of thrifting. She had a good eye.

My dad around the same time … my bedroom at my dad’s house, the mattress was on the floor. And he had patio furniture in his living room.

On becoming a journalist:

When I was in my 20s, I moved to New York, and I just had this idea that I’ll figure it out. I was fortunate enough to put together a career pretty quickly. I just thought, “Oh, this is going to be easy for the rest of my life. I’m just going to keep succeeding. I’m just going to keep getting jobs. And all I have to do is write and be good at it.” The meritocracy.

This is being a white person, by the way. I mean, it’s true, right?

On the end of earning a livable wage as a freelance writer: 

You could make a living. Fifteen years ago, I made a living as a freelance writer. The pay scale—that’s where the difference is, right?

Today, I make $600 a column writing some places and like $750 others. Most places seem to pay about $1 a word. People can do the math. Being a freelance journalist is no longer sustainable.

Imagine how much you’d have to be writing and how much energy it would take to write 10,000 words. If you got paid a dollar a word, writing 10,000 words a month. And I don’t know about you, but I don’t write that fast.

I’m not hustling it like you should. There are people out there who have gigs that they write for like industry specialty publications. That’s different, like if you get a gig writing for Mechanical Engineering. Whatever. I’m just saying, if you get a gig writing for a professional organization, that sometimes that can be pretty lucrative and regular work.

On why they don’t want to write a newsletter:

I know some people—pretty much all of them white guys—who have the confidence to be like, I have opinions worth putting out there as many times a week as possible, right? It is hard to see the market for them getting bigger. But from a writer’s point of view, producing two fucking newsletters a week, how do you even do that?

I’ve always had the opinion there should be some kind of rotation for the sake of the health of op-ed writers. Op-ed writers shouldn’t write for more than six months in a row, or something like that. You run out of opinions pretty fucking quickly.

That’s why I’ve kind of refused to start [a newsletter]. [Substack reached out] early on and maybe I should have taken it. It was in the six-figure days. But I was making money.

And on why they don’t think we need any more newsletters:

I think they’re doomed, because I started signing up for newsletters and paying for newsletters as soon as my friends started getting laid off. And it quickly became like $50 a month or more. And do you know how much a New York Times subscription is? OK, so digital access is $25 a month. … It’s less than all my friends’ newsletters. Also, what do you get from a New York Times? You get hundreds of bylines.

On the prospect of never again making a livable wage as a writer:

I learned to take care of myself. But it’s funny because I think there’s a part of me that always, at some point, thought that eventually someone is going to take care of me. That’s the goal, is eventually what you want to do is work hard early so you don’t have to work so hard all the time.

I do sometimes feel like that’s what I’ve just secretly always really wanted was just, like, I don’t want to keep working as hard my whole life. But I’ve never framed it as, “And then I will take care of me,” right? It’s always been kind of like: I’m going to work hard, and then eventually, like, something will happen where I don’t have to work as hard.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

What to stream this weekend: ‘Civil War,’ Snow Patrol, ‘How to Die Alone,’ ‘Tulsa King’ and ‘Uglies’

Published

 on

 

Hallmark launching a streaming service with two new original series, and Bill Skarsgård out for revenge in “Boy Kills World” are some of the new television, films, music and games headed to a device near you.

Also among the streaming offerings worth your time as selected by The Associated Press’ entertainment journalists: Alex Garland’s “Civil War” starring Kirsten Dunst, Natasha Rothwell’s heartfelt comedy for Hulu called “How to Die Alone” and Sylvester Stallone’s second season of “Tulsa King” debuts.

NEW MOVIES TO STREAM SEPT. 9-15

Alex Garland’s “Civil War” is finally making its debut on MAX on Friday. The film stars Kirsten Dunst as a veteran photojournalist covering a violent war that’s divided America; She reluctantly allows an aspiring photographer, played by Cailee Spaeny, to tag along as she, an editor (Stephen McKinley Henderson) and a reporter (Wagner Moura) make the dangerous journey to Washington, D.C., to interview the president (Nick Offerman), a blustery, rising despot who has given himself a third term, taken to attacking his citizens and shut himself off from the press. In my review, I called it a bellowing and haunting experience; Smart and thought-provoking with great performances. It’s well worth a watch.

— Joey King stars in Netflix’s adaptation of Scott Westerfeld’s “Uglies,” about a future society in which everyone is required to have beautifying cosmetic surgery at age 16. Streaming on Friday, McG directed the film, in which King’s character inadvertently finds herself in the midst of an uprising against the status quo. “Outer Banks” star Chase Stokes plays King’s best friend.

— Bill Skarsgård is out for revenge against the woman (Famke Janssen) who killed his family in “Boy Kills World,” coming to Hulu on Friday. Moritz Mohr directed the ultra-violent film, of which Variety critic Owen Gleiberman wrote: “It’s a depraved vision, yet I got caught up in its kick-ass revenge-horror pizzazz, its disreputable commitment to what it was doing.”

AP Film Writer Lindsey Bahr

NEW MUSIC TO STREAM SEPT. 9-15

— The year was 2006. Snow Patrol, the Northern Irish-Scottish alternative rock band, released an album, “Eyes Open,” producing the biggest hit of their career: “Chasing Cars.” A lot has happened in the time since — three, soon to be four quality full-length albums, to be exact. On Friday, the band will release “The Forest Is the Path,” their first new album in seven years. Anthemic pop-rock is the name of the game across songs of love and loss, like “All,”“The Beginning” and “This Is the Sound Of Your Voice.”

— For fans of raucous guitar music, Jordan Peele’s 2022 sci-fi thriller, “NOPE,” provided a surprising, if tiny, thrill. One of the leads, Emerald “Em” Haywood portrayed by Keke Palmer, rocks a Jesus Lizard shirt. (Also featured through the film: Rage Against the Machine, Wipers, Mr Bungle, Butthole Surfers and Earth band shirts.) The Austin noise rock band are a less than obvious pick, having been signed to the legendary Touch and Go Records and having stopped releasing new albums in 1998. That changes on Friday the 13th, when “Rack” arrives. And for those curious: The Jesus Lizard’s intensity never went away.

AP Music Writer Maria Sherman

NEW SHOWS TO STREAM SEPT. 9-15

— Hallmark launched a streaming service called Hallmark+ on Tuesday with two new original series, the scripted drama “The Chicken Sisters” and unscripted series “Celebrations with Lacey Chabert.” If you’re a Hallmark holiday movies fan, you know Chabert. She’s starred in more than 30 of their films and many are holiday themed. Off camera, Chabert has a passion for throwing parties and entertaining. In “Celebrations,” deserving people are surprised with a bash in their honor — planned with Chabert’s help. “The Chicken Sisters” stars Schuyler Fisk, Wendie Malick and Lea Thompson in a show about employees at rival chicken restaurants in a small town. The eight-episode series is based on a novel of the same name.

Natasha Rothwell of “Insecure” and “The White Lotus” fame created and stars in a new heartfelt comedy for Hulu called “How to Die Alone.” She plays Mel, a broke, go-along-to-get-along, single, airport employee who, after a near-death experience, makes the conscious decision to take risks and pursue her dreams. Rothwell has been working on the series for the past eight years and described it to The AP as “the most vulnerable piece of art I’ve ever put into the world.” Like Mel, Rothwell had to learn to bet on herself to make the show she wanted to make. “In the Venn diagram of me and Mel, there’s significant overlap,” said Rothwell. It premieres Friday on Hulu.

— Shailene Woodley, DeWanda Wise and Betty Gilpin star in a new drama for Starz called “Three Women,” about entrepreneur Sloane, homemaker Lina and student Maggie who are each stepping into their power and making life-changing decisions. They’re interviewed by a writer named Gia (Woodley.) The series is based on a 2019 best-selling book of the same name by Lisa Taddeo. “Three Women” premieres Friday on Starz.

— Sylvester Stallone’s second season of “Tulsa King” debuts Sunday on Paramount+. Stallone plays Dwight Manfredi, a mafia boss who was recently released from prison after serving 25 years. He’s sent to Tulsa to set up a new crime syndicate. The series is created by Taylor Sheridan of “Yellowstone” fame.

Alicia Rancilio

NEW VIDEO GAMES TO PLAY

— One thing about the title of Focus Entertainment’s Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2 — you know exactly what you’re in for. You are Demetrian Titus, a genetically enhanced brute sent into battle against the Tyranids, an insectoid species with an insatiable craving for human flesh. You have a rocket-powered suit of armor and an arsenal of ridiculous weapons like the “Chainsword,” the “Thunderhammer” and the “Melta Rifle,” so what could go wrong? Besides the squishy single-player mode, there are cooperative missions and six-vs.-six free-for-alls. You can suit up now on PlayStation 5, Xbox X/S or PC.

— Likewise, Wild Bastards isn’t exactly the kind of title that’s going to attract fans of, say, Animal Crossing. It’s another sci-fi shooter, but the protagonists are a gang of 13 varmints — aliens and androids included — who are on the run from the law. Each outlaw has a distinctive set of weapons and special powers: Sarge, for example, is a robot with horse genes, while Billy the Squid is … well, you get the idea. Australian studio Blue Manchu developed the 2019 cult hit Void Bastards, and this Wild-West-in-space spinoff has the same snarky humor and vibrant, neon-drenched cartoon look. Saddle up on PlayStation 5, Xbox X/S, Nintendo Switch or PC.

Lou Kesten

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Trump could cash out his DJT stock within weeks. Here’s what happens if he sells

Published

 on

Former President Donald Trump is on the brink of a significant financial decision that could have far-reaching implications for both his personal wealth and the future of his fledgling social media company, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG). As the lockup period on his shares in TMTG, which owns Truth Social, nears its end, Trump could soon be free to sell his substantial stake in the company. However, the potential payday, which makes up a large portion of his net worth, comes with considerable risks for Trump and his supporters.

Trump’s stake in TMTG comprises nearly 59% of the company, amounting to 114,750,000 shares. As of now, this holding is valued at approximately $2.6 billion. These shares are currently under a lockup agreement, a common feature of initial public offerings (IPOs), designed to prevent company insiders from immediately selling their shares and potentially destabilizing the stock. The lockup, which began after TMTG’s merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), is set to expire on September 25, though it could end earlier if certain conditions are met.

Should Trump decide to sell his shares after the lockup expires, the market could respond in unpredictable ways. The sale of a substantial number of shares by a major stakeholder like Trump could flood the market, potentially driving down the stock price. Daniel Bradley, a finance professor at the University of South Florida, suggests that the market might react negatively to such a large sale, particularly if there aren’t enough buyers to absorb the supply. This could lead to a sharp decline in the stock’s value, impacting both Trump’s personal wealth and the company’s market standing.

Moreover, Trump’s involvement in Truth Social has been a key driver of investor interest. The platform, marketed as a free speech alternative to mainstream social media, has attracted a loyal user base largely due to Trump’s presence. If Trump were to sell his stake, it might signal a lack of confidence in the company, potentially shaking investor confidence and further depressing the stock price.

Trump’s decision is also influenced by his ongoing legal battles, which have already cost him over $100 million in legal fees. Selling his shares could provide a significant financial boost, helping him cover these mounting expenses. However, this move could also have political ramifications, especially as he continues his bid for the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential race.

Trump Media’s success is closely tied to Trump’s political fortunes. The company’s stock has shown volatility in response to developments in the presidential race, with Trump’s chances of winning having a direct impact on the stock’s value. If Trump sells his stake, it could be interpreted as a lack of confidence in his own political future, potentially undermining both his campaign and the company’s prospects.

Truth Social, the flagship product of TMTG, has faced challenges in generating traffic and advertising revenue, especially compared to established social media giants like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook. Despite this, the company’s valuation has remained high, fueled by investor speculation on Trump’s political future. If Trump remains in the race and manages to secure the presidency, the value of his shares could increase. Conversely, any missteps on the campaign trail could have the opposite effect, further destabilizing the stock.

As the lockup period comes to an end, Trump faces a critical decision that could shape the future of both his personal finances and Truth Social. Whether he chooses to hold onto his shares or cash out, the outcome will likely have significant consequences for the company, its investors, and Trump’s political aspirations.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Arizona man accused of social media threats to Trump is arrested

Published

 on

Cochise County, AZ — Law enforcement officials in Arizona have apprehended Ronald Lee Syvrud, a 66-year-old resident of Cochise County, after a manhunt was launched following alleged death threats he made against former President Donald Trump. The threats reportedly surfaced in social media posts over the past two weeks, as Trump visited the US-Mexico border in Cochise County on Thursday.

Syvrud, who hails from Benson, Arizona, located about 50 miles southeast of Tucson, was captured by the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office on Thursday afternoon. The Sheriff’s Office confirmed his arrest, stating, “This subject has been taken into custody without incident.”

In addition to the alleged threats against Trump, Syvrud is wanted for multiple offences, including failure to register as a sex offender. He also faces several warrants in both Wisconsin and Arizona, including charges for driving under the influence and a felony hit-and-run.

The timing of the arrest coincided with Trump’s visit to Cochise County, where he toured the US-Mexico border. During his visit, Trump addressed the ongoing border issues and criticized his political rival, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, for what he described as lax immigration policies. When asked by reporters about the ongoing manhunt for Syvrud, Trump responded, “No, I have not heard that, but I am not that surprised and the reason is because I want to do things that are very bad for the bad guys.”

This incident marks the latest in a series of threats against political figures during the current election cycle. Just earlier this month, a 66-year-old Virginia man was arrested on suspicion of making death threats against Vice President Kamala Harris and other public officials.

Continue Reading

Trending