adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Left not to blame for rise of hard right politics – The Western Producer

Published

 on


During his defence of Donald Trump on page 14 of the Feb. 1 issue of The Western Producer, Robert Arnason accepts what his brother-in-law and the rest of the world knows — Trump is a court-established rapist, fraudster and conman who is “immoral and deranged.” The remainder of Arnason’s piece is simply making excuses for Trump by claiming that the political left is the cause.

Trump and his followers do not have a lot in common. Most followers are not criminals, but they are intrigued by his style, unpredictability and lack of conformity.

Read Also

Left not to blame for rise of hard right politics

EU farmer demands don’t all favour Canada

Canadian farmers may watch what’s happening on the streets of Europe this winter with a mixture of envy and admiration….

Trump the conman simply realized early on that he could tap into a deep sense of victimization that was not being addressed by other political forces. So he quickly moved from pretending to be a super-rich property developer on TV to playing the victim and repeating phrases like “I’m just like you” and “I love the uneducated” in order to get in front of a movement of people that were feeling increasingly isolated and demoted within society.

The sense of loss/victimhood that Trump exploits in his followers is deep and real, and it does have something to do with left-wing policies — just not Arnason’s understanding — and it’s important to explore this further.

The improvements in living standards have overwhelmingly occurred within the last 100 years directly as a result of left-wing policies.

Before that, regular folk had little or no chance of rising above their station in life. The feudal system with its own version of “caste” was firmly in place. For the overwhelming majority of people, life was, in fact, “nasty, brutish, and short.”

But then unions, co-ops and functioning democracies showed the way to modest increases in living standards, and people started to feel they could control their own destinies.

This sense of optimism and empowerment greatly increased with the gains made through left-wing policies between 1900 and 1980. Canada and the United States adopted these policies and fostered a much better life for the vast majority of people.

For example, publicly funded education became mandatory, which greatly increased the opportunities for young people and helped lead to the abolition of child labour.

The Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America Union gained the first five-day workweek in 1929, thereby creating the weekend that everyone now takes for granted.

Comprehensive medical care in Canada started in 1962 in Saskatchewan, and the Canada Pension Plan was created in 1965.

The Western Producer itself was created by the revolutionary left-wing policy that created Saskatchewan Wheat Pool in 1923, and the Producer is still living off the fumes of those times.

These New Deal/left-wing policies, and hundreds more just like them, were a process of great awakening and mobilization of humble people understanding how to make a better life for themselves and their children.

In the years between 1946 and 1978, the standard of living in Canada and the U.S. more than doubled, and by 1980 North America enjoyed the highest standard of living in the industrialized world.

Left-wing policies had in fact created a sense of importance, place and opportunity for regular folks — farmers included. In Canada, 1976 recorded the highest ever net income from the markets for Canadian farmers.

But in the last 40 years most of those gains have been greatly eroded. Employment standards and real wages have fallen — several states in the U.S. are now encouraging child labour in industries like beef packing. Public education and medical care are under constant attack.

Families that rose to those higher standards of living in the 1970s have seen their jobs deteriorate from white or blue-collar jobs to part-time jobs without security or pensions.

Housing then becomes unaffordable, the part-time jobs can’t pay for a car good enough to get them to work and documented greedflation by corporate retailers takes extra cash from both farmers and consumers.

And now we are starting to experience climateflation, wherein food production becomes unstable due to global heating in agricultural areas. The climate meltdown is not a left-wing or right- wing problem, but so far only the left wing seems willing to talk about it. Cascading crop failures will make current food prices seem very low.

In short, millions of people in North America can feel the ground shifting under their feet, and they are no longer confident of their place in the world. The prospects for their kids don’t seem as rosy as their own were 30 years ago.

As well, a sense of “let’s just burn it all down” is amplified by destructive politicians like Trump who are more than willing to throw gas on any fire.

No governments in North America have regained the ground lost over the last 40 years.  So-called left-wing governments since the 1990s have simply shadowed the right-wing political forces in their shift to an even more extreme right.

The prime directive of governments has shifted from lifting people up to guaranteeing profits for big business, whether that happens to be seed development and ownership, starving education in favour of tax cuts for industry or killing medicare in order to pave the way for re-privatization.

It is, in fact, the right-wing policies of the last 40 years that prepared the groundwork for Trump. Deregulation, industry self-regulation, industry capture of government agencies, corporate consolidation, obscene executive compensation and climate collapse all cause people to lose hope for the future.

Scapegoating left-wing policies is just another fraud perpetrated on a nervous public.

Stewart Wells farms at Swift Current, Sask.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

Political parties cool to idea of new federal regulations for nomination contests

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Several federal political parties are expressing reservations about the prospect of fresh regulations to prevent foreign meddlers from tainting their candidate nomination processes.

Elections Canada has suggested possible changes to safeguard nominations, including barring non-citizens from helping choose candidates, requiring parties to publish contest rules and explicitly outlawing behaviour such as voting more than once.

However, representatives of the Bloc Québécois, Green Party and NDP have told a federal commission of inquiry into foreign interference that such changes may be unwelcome, difficult to implement or counterproductive.

The Canada Elections Act currently provides for limited regulation of federal nomination races and contestants.

For instance, only contestants who accept $1,000 in contributions or incur $1,000 in expenses have to file a financial return. In addition, the act does not include specific obligations concerning candidacy, voting, counting or results reporting other than the identity of the successful nominee.

A report released in June by the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians expressed concern about how easily foreign actors can take advantage of loopholes and vulnerabilities to support preferred candidates.

Lucy Watson, national director of the NDP, told the inquiry Thursday she had concerns about the way in which new legislation would interact with the internal decision-making of the party.

“We are very proud of the fact that our members play such a significant role in shaping the internal policies and procedures and infrastructure of the party, and I would not want to see that lost,” she said.

“There are guidelines, there are best practices that we would welcome, but if we were to talk about legal requirements and legislation, that’s something I would have to take away and put further thought into, and have discussions with folks who are integral to the party’s governance.”

In an August interview with the commission of inquiry, Bloc Québécois executive director Mathieu Desquilbet said the party would be opposed to any external body monitoring nomination and leadership contest rules.

A summary tabled Thursday says Desquilbet expressed doubts about the appropriateness of requiring nomination candidates to file a full financial report with Elections Canada, saying the agency’s existing regulatory framework and the Bloc’s internal rules on the matter are sufficient.

Green Party representatives Jon Irwin and Robin Marty told the inquiry in an August interview it would not be realistic for an external body, like Elections Canada, to administer nomination or leadership contests as the resources required would exceed the federal agency’s capacity.

A summary of the interview says Irwin and Marty “also did not believe that rules violations could effectively be investigated by an external body like the Office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections.”

“The types of complaints that get raised during nomination contests can be highly personal, politically driven, and could overwhelm an external body.”

Marty, national campaign director for the party, told the inquiry Thursday that more reporting requirements would also place an administrative burden on volunteers and riding workers.

In addition, he said that disclosing the vote tally of a nomination contest could actually help foreign meddlers by flagging the precise number of ballots needed for a candidate to be chosen.

Irwin, interim executive director of the Greens, said the ideal tactic for a foreign country would be working to get someone in a “position of power” within a Canadian political party.

He said “the bad guys are always a step ahead” when it comes to meddling in the Canadian political process.

In May, David Vigneault, director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service at the time, said it was very clear from the design of popular social media app TikTok that data gleaned from its users is available to the Chinese government.

A December 2022 CSIS memo tabled at the inquiry Thursday said TikTok “has the potential to be exploited” by Beijing to “bolster its influence and power overseas, including in Canada.”

Asked about the app, Marty told the inquiry the Greens would benefit from more “direction and guidance,” given the party’s lack of resources to address such things.

Representatives of the Liberal and Conservative parties are slated to appear at the inquiry Friday, while chief electoral officer Stéphane Perrault is to testify at a later date.

After her party representatives appeared Thursday, Green Leader Elizabeth May told reporters it was important for all party leaders to work together to come up with acceptable rules.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 19, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

New Brunswick election candidate profile: Green Party Leader David Coon

Published

 on

 

FREDERICTON – A look at David Coon, leader of the Green Party of New Brunswick:

Born: Oct. 28, 1956.

Early years: Born in Toronto and raised in Montreal, he spent about three decades as an environmental advocate.

Education: A trained biologist, he graduated with a bachelor of science from McGill University in Montreal in 1978.

Family: He and his wife Janice Harvey have two daughters, Caroline and Laura.

Before politics: Worked as an environmental educator, organizer, activist and manager for 33 years, mainly with the Conservation Council of New Brunswick.

Politics: Joined the Green Party of Canada in May 2006 and was elected leader of the New Brunswick Green Party in September 2012. Won a seat in the legislature in 2014 — a first for the province’s Greens.

Quote: “It was despicable. He’s clearly decided to take the low road in this campaign, to adopt some Trump-lite fearmongering.” — David Coon on Sept. 12, 2024, reacting to Blaine Higgs’s claim that the federal government had decided to send 4,600 asylum seekers to New Brunswick.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 19, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

New Brunswick election profile: Progressive Conservative Leader Blaine Higgs

Published

 on

 

FREDERICTON – A look at Blaine Higgs, leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of New Brunswick.

Born: March 1, 1954.

Early years: The son of a customs officer, he grew up in Forest City, N.B., near the Canada-U.S. border.

Education: Graduated from the University of New Brunswick with a degree in mechanical engineering in 1977.

Family: Married his high-school sweetheart, Marcia, and settled in Saint John, N.B., where they had four daughters: Lindsey, Laura, Sarah and Rachel.

Before politics: Hired by Irving Oil a week after he graduated from university and was eventually promoted to director of distribution. Worked for 33 years at the company.

Politics: Elected to the legislature in 2010 and later served as finance minister under former Progressive Conservative Premier David Alward. Elected Tory leader in 2016 and has been premier since 2018.

Quote: “I’ve always felt parents should play the main role in raising children. No one is denying gender diversity is real. But we need to figure out how to manage it.” — Blaine Higgs in a year-end interview in 2023, explaining changes to school policies about gender identity.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 19, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending