adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

The Liberals and NDP still have reasons to work together — are they good enough? – CBC News

Published

 on


If the 44th Parliament can hold it together until April 28, it will become the longest-lasting minority Parliament in modern Canadian history.

This Parliament’s longevity is already well above average — 823 days as of Thursday. The 10 minority Parliaments that existed between 1957 and 2021 lasted an average of 526 days.

The chance to make history isn’t the best reason the Liberals and NDP have to reach an agreement on pharmacare, but there’s something to be said — maybe even a lot — for stability.

The confidence-and-supply agreement between the Liberals and New Democrats — the deal that has helped keep this Parliament on track — is unprecedented at the federal level. It can still feel like a live experiment meant to answer the question of whether two Canadian political parties are capable of sustaining at least some level of cooperation for a meaningful period of time.

In some countries, that sort of thing is more or less expected. In Ottawa, the end of the Liberal-NDP deal has been anticipated almost from the moment it was signed, and a fresh round of questions about its possible demise has popped up every month or so.

The issue of pharmacare has produced the most speculation to date. And though it’s hard to tell exactly how great the differences between the government and the NDP are, or have been, it’s probably a mistake to dismiss the possibility that this could be the end of the Liberal-NDP deal.

“We’re working with the NDP and I’m confident we’re going to get it,” Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told CBC Radio’s Mainstreet Cape Breton on Thursday.

What pharmacare is about and what it would mean

There seem to be two broad issues: the wording of legislation that would set out the broad parameters of a national pharmacare program and immediate federal funding for specific classes of treatment. While it’s not clear how many areas are up for negotiation, the NDP says it’s focused on making sure contraception and drugs to treat diabetes are covered.

Whatever happens, what comes of these negotiations will not be a full national program covering all pharmaceuticals. The Liberals do not appear to have the fiscal room to cover that and the NDP has not demanded it. The actual deal between the parties only called for “progress” toward such a program and the passage of enabling legislation.

But if the parties do come to an agreement, the NDP would be able to claim with a straight face that it probably wouldn’t have happened if New Democrats hadn’t been in a position to exploit some leverage.

WATCH: Singh warns of consequences if government doesn’t meet pharmacare deadline     

Jagmeet Singh warns of repercussions if Liberals miss another pharmacare deadline

15 days ago

Duration 0:58

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says there will be consequences for the Liberals if they miss the new deadline to table pharmacare legislation on March 1.

The Liberals have shown some interest in pharmacare specifically, and reducing drug costs more generally, since 2015. In 2018, the federal government drafted a former Ontario cabinet minister to advise it on a path forward. But it’s never been clear how high pharmacare ranked on the Liberal government’s list of priorities.

The same can be said of dental care — an issue that was entirely absent from the last three Liberal election platforms.

In the Ottawa bubble, where memories are short and attention spans are shorter, such things are often swept aside not long after the official announcement. But dental care and pharmacare are real things the NDP could point to for years to come — rare achievements for a smaller party in the House of Commons. And while NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh’s ability to convince Canadians to vote for the NDP remains in question, he could end up with a record of legislative accomplishment to rival any of his predecessors.

The NDP could still see plausible reasons to walk away from the confidence-and-supply agreement. Doing so might allow the New Democrats to put more political room between themselves and an unpopular government. And if the government was forced to negotiate the passage of legislation on a case-by-case basis, the NDP might be able to negotiate even greater concessions.

But the Liberals also would be free to work with the Bloc Quebecois (it’s safe to assume the Conservatives would rather not be seen agreeing with the Liberals on anything, and perhaps vice-versa). And while the demise of the Liberal-NDP deal wouldn’t immediately precipitate an election, it would significantly increase the odds of an election happening sooner rather than later.

Reasons for sticking together — or splitting apart

As things stand, it’s not obvious why either the Liberals or New Democrats should be eager for an election to happen in the near future. The latest projection from the Writ’s Eric Grenier has the Liberals falling to 72 seats and the NDP winning 27 seats, just two more than they currently hold. The Conservatives, meanwhile, would win 201 seats.

Both the Liberals and New Democrats might benefit from having as many tangible legislative accomplishments as possible to point to in the next election campaign. But if there’s a decent chance the next election will result in a majority Conservative government — a government that likely would do very different things — it might be wise for the Liberals and NDP to use the time remaining to advance as many of their policy priorities as possible.

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau, left, and NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh, take part in the federal election English-language Leaders debate in Gatineau, Que., on Thursday, Sept. 9, 2021.
Justin Trudeau and Jagmeet Singh take part in the federal election English-language Leaders debate on Thursday, Sept. 9, 2021. The parties have compelling reasons to stick together for now — and equally compelling reasons to call it quits. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

And for the sake of getting things done, the government might be better off maintaining the confidence-and-supply agreement. Obstruction, delay and procedural wrangling are so commonplace in Parliament that having enough support to periodically push things along, or step around roadblocks, is a valuable asset.

“One of the really important things that we’ve seen over the past couple of years in Ottawa, and [are] continuing to see, is what happens when progressive parties work together to deliver for Canadians,” Trudeau said Thursday while sidestepping a reporter’s question about the state of negotiations on pharmacare.

If the prime minister wants to be able to continue boasting about that, he has all the more reason to keep the confidence-and-supply agreement in place.

Any number of factors can cause a deal between two political parties to fall apart, such as real differences over policy, political calculation or simple miscommunication. But even if this agreement collapses at the end of this month, it’s still fair to wonder whether the future of Parliament will look more like this kind of cooperation than not.

The record for the longest-lasting Parliament since 1960 is currently held by the 39th Parliament, which survived for 888 days between 2008 and 2011. The longevity of that Parliament, presided over by a minority Conservative government, was not attributable to any agreement between parties. Instead, it would be fair to say it survived in large part because of the weakness of the opposition parties — and the fact that someone always blinked whenever a confidence vote turned parliamentary democracy into an elaborate game of chicken.

If the Liberals and NDP want to continue demonstrating that there’s a better way to do things, they only need to find a way to agree on the broad terms of pharmacare and some immediate steps to expand drug coverage.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending