There’s been a lot of talk about Alberta’s electricity grid lately. There were political hot potatoes: the renewable energy surge, followed by the renewable energy pause, and the federal clean electricity regulations, followed by Alberta’s fierce pushback.
Then in January, Albertans got an emergency alert telling them to conserve power as the grid was strained by some of the coldest temperatures in 50 years. And then there are the record-breaking electricity prices.
And now, at the end of February, the province’s moratorium on new renewable energy projects is set to end — meaning conversations about how to expand Alberta’s grid are only going to continue.
The Government of Alberta is set to end its months-long moratorium on new renewable energy projects at the end of February, meaning more solar and wind projects could soon be approved to feed into the electricity grid. Photo: Amber Bracken / The Narwhal
All of this means a lot more people are looking at how Alberta’s electricity system works and wondering what to make of it all.
The province’s so-called deregulated market is unique in Canada and is considerably more complex to consider when you factor in all the companies participating, how they are and aren’t regulated and how it all fits together.
In short, Alberta’s grid is confusing.
Here’s a breakdown of the basics to get you from head scratching and brain melting to something of a lightbulb moment.
Where does Alberta’s electricity come from?
Easy, right? Well…
“It’s a bit confusing for the average person, how that all works. But that’s sort of how it goes,” University of Alberta engineering professor Tim Weis says.
Okay, rough start.
Put simply, electricity comes from many different privately owned generators.
Most of the electricity generated in Alberta, on average almost 80 per cent, is from natural gas. A few big players — Enmax, Heartland Generation, Capital Power and TransAlta — operate most of those plants, as well as the remaining coal plants, which are scheduled to go offline this year.
Coal used to be the primary source of electricity in Alberta. Provincial and federal policy changes have resulted in most coal-fired electricity plants converting to natural gas, like the Keephills power plant in Wabamun, Alta. Photo: Amber Bracken / The Narwhal
Wind is the second biggest source, and renewable generators are among the whole lot of smaller producers in the province.
Then, there are even oilsands companies who produce power for their own operations then sell excess to the larger grid.
And that’s just the power generated here. The electricity can “come from everywhere,” according to Jim Wachowich, a regulator lawyer who has watched Alberta’s system evolve since the days of government control that ended in the ’90s.
That’s because Alberta’s grid is linked to other jurisdictions across western North America and it can buy or sell power across the region.
All of that electricity can then feed into the grid.
Okay, so what is a grid, really?
“Typically, when we think about the grid itself, we think about all the infrastructure — from generators all the way to the wire that hits our house,” Weis, who specializes in renewable energy, says.
Think of that big power plant, or wind or solar farm, then think of the wires going from the generation source and travelling along the big high-tension wires criss-crossing the province.
The word “grid” often conjures up images of transmission lines crisscrossing the landscape, supplying power to communities, but they’re part of a much larger system to produce and distribute electricity. Photo: John Woods / The Canadian Press
Those big lines are the transmission, bringing electricity to regions, cities and towns. That power is then distributed through smaller wires, which then connect to your house.
All of that is the grid. And in Alberta, all of it is owned by private companies or companies controlled by municipalities, such as Enmax in Calgary. And each little corner of the province has its own franchise, or regulated monopoly, for building those wires and delivering that power (again, such as Enmax in Calgary).
Is Alberta’s grid private?
No, not really, but there’s a whole lot of private ownership of everything from generation plants to overhead wires and everything in-between.
If you look to other provinces, the prevailing model is a Crown corporation that generates and distributes electricity, with prices set by a regulator. This was the model in Alberta until the mid-to-late ’90s.
“In Alberta, we have a deregulated system,” Weis says.
“It doesn’t mean there’s no rules, it just means that [generators or companies] don’t stand in front of regulators and figure out what a reasonable price plus profit is going to be. They compete with each other in sort of an open market to figure that out.”
That said, there are some caveats.
What are the provincial gatekeepers and what role do they play?
There are three provincial agencies poking around in Alberta’s market — the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC), the Alberta Electricity System Operator (AESO) and the Market Surveillance Administrator.
At the top of that chain is the commission, which regulates power plants, transmission and distribution in one form or another. It regulates the whole system and approves or rejects power plants and transmission lines. It is also conducting the government’s inquiry into renewable energy projects after being told to pause all renewable electricity project approvals for six months. That moratorium is due to lift at the end of February.
The Alberta Utilities Commission is conducting the government’s inquiry into renewable energy as part of the province’s moratorium on new renewable energy projects. It is in charge of approving new grid infrastructure, like power lines. Photo: Leah Hennel / The Narwhal
Then there’s the system operator, which looks at the real and forecasted energy needs of the province and then sits at the intersection of all those generators in order to fulfill all of that demand at, in theory, the best price. It decides who provides the power and who doesn’t, based on bids and demand. Imagine someone sitting at the controls, allowing some electricity to flow into the grid and preventing others and you’ll have a decent visual idea.
It is also responsible for peering into its crystal ball to forecast how much energy we’ll need in the future and whether we have the transmission capacity to deliver it.
The Market Surveillance Administration, a lesser-known agency, watches over all of the companies in the market to ensure they are playing by the rules and not taking advantage of the mishmash that is Alberta’s grid.
Think of the administration as the police. Companies can’t get together and all agree to charge high prices to line their pockets, for example. Although there is some wiggle room on setting prices — more on that later.
What role does the government play?
All of those provincial entities are — or are supposed to be — independent of government.
If Alberta’s system were to work purely as imagined and designed, the government wouldn’t play much of a role at all. It would merely set everything up through legislation then quietly back away to let the market do its thing.
“We have, sadly, a very interventionist history with all the governments,” Wachowich says.
Along with last summer’s last-minute moratorium on renewables, there have been rate caps and freezes, refund cheques dolled out and, recently, deferred payments on sky high rates. Some of that interference can help with high bills — and sweeten up voters — but more often than not, the help is negligible and largely makes things more confusing, undermining the logic of the system.
“Sometimes what the government does is, in essence, distrusting the independent entities that they’ve created,” Wachowich says. “The [system operator] is supposed to be an independent system operator. The Alberta Utilities Commission is supposed to be the independent utilities regulator. And those things need to be independent to do their job properly.”
How do electricity generators sell their power?
That government intervention sends mixed signals, and confusion, into a market that is supposed to be operating independently.
First, there’s what’s known as the wholesale market. All of the generators compete to sell their electricity every hour — each submits the price it’s willing to sell at to the Alberta Electricity System Operator. The operator buys from the generators with the best prices, as long as they’re also producing enough to cover the forecasted energy needs of the province.
If a generator’s power is too expensive, it has to wait until the next round of bidding. The winners are all piled into the power pool, sending their wares to the wider grid.
Big industrial users can buy directly from that wholesale market, but most Albertans rely on retailers — such as Enmax or Epcor — buying electricity at those wholesale prices and then selling it to us. Some retailers are regulated and some are not, just to make things murkier.
Too easy?
Some of those retailers buy long-term contracts at fixed prices to try to avoid some of the price volatility in Alberta, where prices can change by the hour and where average prices in 2023 went as low as 16 cents per kilowatt hour to as high as 32 cents.
Retailers offer a floating rate, set by the market, and a regulated rate, set by the Alberta Utilities Commission, for consumers to choose from. It’s a gamble on which will provide the best price. “So regardless of what the pool price is, I can go off and buy a fixed-term, fixed-price contract,” says Wachowich. “So my price is locked in for, say, two years future delivery.”
How is electricity in Alberta distributed?
Those big transmission lines we talked about earlier are privately owned, but they are regulated and carry everyone’s electricity. Companies can’t just run willy-nilly across the province building power lines that may or may not be used.
“If you go back way to the beginning of the system, so you go back to the Edison versus Tesla debates, when they were first building these things, they actually had individual lines, like from my power plant, right to your house, to your neighbor,” says Weis, referring to Thomas Edison and Nikola Tesla, two pioneers in electricity transmission, both born in the 19th century.
“My neighbor might be buying from the other guy, and so he would have a line and the next guy would have a line next to another line and it was just a disaster.”
The Alberta Electricity System Operator determines when new lines are needed and where. Companies then bid on building those transmission lines and appear before the Alberta Utilities Commission to seek approval for them, based on expected supply, demand and rates.
The way Alberta’s market is set up, where everyone is able to compete to sell their product, means there tends to be a lot of room on those wires so no one misses out.
“If someone’s boxed out by congestion on the system, you’re not getting the optimal pricing dynamic,” Wachowich says.
Then there are the companies, like Enmax and Epcor, that manage the wires that eventually go into a house. Those companies are responsible for maintenance and repair when, say, a tree falls or an ice storm hits.
So, uh, who pays for all of this?
Surprise! You do.
“What the retailer does is take all the costs of the distributor, all the upstream costs, the power costs, the transmission costs, the [system operator] costs, transmission costs, distribution costs, and they put it into the bill,” Wachowich says. “And that’s how the whole system gets compensated.”
He says Alberta adopted what’s known as the Enron model (those of a certain age will remember that company for other reasons): the theory that presenting all of the details on a customer’s bill ensures transparency and allows customers to make informed decisions.
If you open a bill in Alberta, it shows the distribution charge, transmission charge, balancing pool allocation, rate riders and local access fees — clear as mud, yes?
“Most residential customers just look to the bottom line on their bill,” Wachowich says. “And tragically, recently, in Alberta, the bottom line on those bills has been hundreds of dollars higher than it previously was.”
There was a scare about blackouts this winter, why can’t Alberta just … generate more power?
In the simplest terms: Alberta only has so much generating capacity.
“You can ask everybody to generate, you know, we turned our storage systems — our batteries were all on,” Weis says of the recent grid alert in Alberta during a cold snap. “But at a certain point in time, you do run out. And that’s when you start asking people to shut off.”
Weis says there are agreements with some large power users, who are compensated to shut down in situations like these, but even that won’t be enough if the system is pushed too far. That’s when the operator cuts power involuntarily — a blackout.
Premier Danielle Smith attributed the province’s ability to avoid rolling blackouts during this winter’s cold snap to “swift and impactful actions” by the public. “When the Alberta Electric System Operator issued a call for energy conservation, Albertans answered,” she tweeted. Photo: Drew Anderson / The Narwhal
The Alberta Electricity System Operator’s forecasts are meant to ensure there is enough supply, but there are going to be times when things don’t work out. In the most recent case, there were gas plants that were out of commission, the wind wasn’t blowing and it was night, so solar wasn’t a backup. And demand was through the roof due to extremely cold temperatures.
It’s not easy to just buy more power from the larger North American grid, either. There are limits on both the space available on transmission lines into Alberta and how much power others have to sell. And even if there is line space and power for sale, Alberta has to compete with all other interconnected jurisdictions on price.
“California has a higher maximum price than Alberta does,” Weis says. “So if we’re both short at the same time, California can outbid us.”
Can we build more capacity for emergencies?
This is a confusing point of debate in Alberta right now. You might have heard the terms “energy-only market” and “capacity market” being tossed around.
What Alberta has now is an energy-only market, which means producers are only paid for the electricity that is used in the province.
“We don’t actually contract anyone to build a new power plant, we just kind of hope that the market price will signal the next time to build,” Weis says.
There is no money to be made to have a power plant — and its staff — sitting there in case it’s needed in a crisis.
A capacity market would pay generators money to have more electricity on hand for when it was needed. In a capacity market, there would be money to staff and maintain those plants as they sit and wait. Alberta started to move in that direction in 2016, but the United Conservative Party government quashed those plans when it came to power in 2019.
Didn’t you say something about price setting? Can we please talk about that, because my bill is really high.
Well, there are rules in Alberta that prevent, say, the four largest generators from getting together and driving up consumer costs by submitting artificially high bids.
Generators aren’t allowed to physically withhold power, either. If they have a plant that’s operating, they can’t just decide not to provide that electricity and create artificial scarcity in the market.
But…
“You do have the ability to do what’s called economic withholding,” Weis says.
“No one’s stopping you from bidding very, very high prices which can then drive prices up. The disincentive to do that is if someone undercuts me, then I might not be able to get into the market.”
There are also just a handful of companies in control of the majority of the generating capacity in Alberta, which can also raise concerns.
“If I offer a really high price and one of my powerplants happens to be down for maintenance, you know, wink wink nudge nudge, then I can drive prices up,” Weis says.
That could also mean lower prices are on the horizon, but we’ll have to let the market, or the government, and maybe some regulation, determine that.
Updated on Feb. 26, 2024, at 3:42 pm. MT: This story has been updated to correct a spelling of a name. It is Tim Weis, not Weiss as previously stated.
Banner:
The province’s so-called deregulated market is unique in Canada. It gets complicated when you factor in all the companies participating, how they are and aren’t regulated and how it all fits together.
“Communication is one of the most important skills you require for a successful life.” — Catherine Pulsifer, author.
I’m one hundred percent in agreement with Pulsifer, which is why my evaluation of candidates begins with their writing skills. If a candidate’s writing skills and verbal communication skills, which I’ll assess when interviewing, aren’t well above average, I’ll pass on them regardless of their skills and experience.
Why?
Because business is fundamentally about getting other people to do things—getting employees to be productive, getting customers to buy your products or services, and getting vendors to agree to a counteroffer price. In business, as in life in general, you can’t make anything happen without effective communication; this is especially true when job searching when your writing is often an employer’s first impression of you.
Think of all the writing you engage in during a job search (resumes, cover letters, emails, texts) and all your other writing (LinkedIn profile, as well as posts and comments, blogs, articles, tweets, etc.) employers will read when they Google you to determine if you’re interview-worthy.
With so much of our communication today taking place via writing (email, text, collaboration platforms such as Microsoft Teams, Slack, ClickUp, WhatsApp and Rocket.Chat), the importance of proficient writing skills can’t be overstated.
When assessing a candidate’s writing skills, you probably think I’m looking for grammar and spelling errors. Although error-free writing is important—it shows professionalism and attention to detail—it’s not the primary reason I look at a candidate’s writing skills.
The way someone writes reveals how they think.
Clear writing = Clear thinking
Structured paragraphs = Structured mind
Impactful sentences = Impactful ideas
Effective writing isn’t about using sophisticated vocabulary. Hemingway demonstrated that deceptively simple, stripped-down prose can captivate readers. Effective writing takes intricate thoughts and presents them in a way that makes the reader think, “Damn! Why didn’t I see it that way?” A good writer is a dead giveaway for a good thinker. More than ever, the business world needs “good thinkers.”
Therefore, when I come across a candidate who’s a good writer, hence a good thinker, I know they’re likely to be able to write:
Emails that don’t get deleted immediately and are responded to
Simple, concise, and unambiguous instructions
Pitches that are likely to get read
Social media content that stops thumbs
Human-sounding website copy
Persuasively, while attuned to the reader’s possible sensitivities
Now, let’s talk about the elephant in the room: AI, which job seekers are using en masse. Earlier this year, I wrote that AI’s ability to hyper-increase an employee’s productivity—AI is still in its infancy; we’ve seen nothing yet—in certain professions, such as writing, sales and marketing, computer programming, office and admin, and customer service, makes it a “fewer employees needed” tool, which understandably greatly appeals to employers. In my opinion, the recent layoffs aren’t related to the economy; they’re due to employers adopting AI. Additionally, companies are trying to balance investing in AI with cost-cutting measures. CEOs who’ve previously said, “Our people are everything,” have arguably created today’s job market by obsessively focusing on AI to gain competitive advantages and reduce their largest expense, their payroll.
It wouldn’t be a stretch to assume that most AI usage involves generating written content, content that’s obvious to me, and likely to you as well, to have been written by AI. However, here’s the twist: I don’t particularly care.
Why?
Because the fundamental skill I’m looking for is the ability to organize thoughts and communicate effectively. What I care about is whether the candidate can take AI-generated content and transform it into something uniquely valuable. If they can, they’re demonstrating the skills of being a good thinker and communicator. It’s like being a great DJ; anyone can push play, but it takes skill to read a room and mix music that gets people pumped.
Using AI requires prompting effectively, which requires good writing skills to write clear and precise instructions that guide the AI to produce desired outcomes. Prompting AI effectively requires understanding structure, flow and impact. You need to know how to shape raw information, such as milestones throughout your career when you achieved quantitative results, into a compelling narrative.
So, what’s the best way to gain and enhance your writing skills? As with any skill, you’ve got to work at it.
Two rules guide my writing:
Use strong verbs and nouns instead of relying on adverbs, such as “She dashed to the store.” instead of “She ran quickly to the store.” or “He whispered to the child.” instead of “He spoke softly to the child.”
Avoid using long words when a shorter one will do, such as “use” instead of “utilize” or “ask” instead of “inquire.” As attention spans get shorter, I aim for clarity, simplicity and, most importantly, brevity in my writing.
Don’t just string words together; learn to organize your thoughts, think critically, and communicate clearly. Solid writing skills will significantly set you apart from your competition, giving you an advantage in your job search and career.
Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers “unsweetened” job search advice. You can send Nick your questions to artoffindingwork@gmail.com.
MONTREAL – Politics, public opinion and salary hikes south of the border helped push Air Canada toward a deal that secures major pay gains for pilots, experts say.
Hammered out over the weekend, the would-be agreement includes a cumulative wage hike of nearly 42 per cent over four years — an enormous bump by historical standards — according to one source who was not authorized to speak publicly on the matter. The previous 10-year contract granted increases of just two per cent annually.
The federal government’s stated unwillingness to step in paved the way for a deal, noted John Gradek, after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made it plain the two sides should hash one out themselves.
“Public opinion basically pressed the federal cabinet, including the prime minister, to keep their hands clear of negotiations and looking at imposing a settlement,” said Gradek, who teaches aviation management at McGill University.
After late-night talks at a hotel near Toronto’s Pearson airport, the country’s biggest airline and the union representing 5,200-plus aviators announced early Sunday morning they had reached a tentative agreement, averting a strike that would have grounded flights and affected some 110,000 passengers daily.
The relative precariousness of the Liberal minority government as well as a push to appear more pro-labour underlay the prime minister’s hands-off approach to the negotiations.
Trudeau said Friday the government would not step in to fix the impasse — unlike during a massive railway work stoppage last month and a strike by WestJet mechanics over the Canada Day long weekend that workers claimed road roughshod over their constitutional right to collective bargaining. Trudeau said the government respects the right to strike and would only intervene if it became apparent no negotiated deal was possible.
“They felt that they really didn’t want to try for a third attempt at intervention and basically said, ‘Let’s let the airline decide how they want to deal with this one,'” said Gradek.
“Air Canada ran out of support as the week wore on, and by the time they got to Friday night, Saturday morning, there was nothing left for them to do but to basically try to get a deal set up and accepted by ALPA (Air Line Pilots Association).”
Trudeau’s government was also unlikely to consider back-to-work legislation after the NDP tore up its agreement to support the Liberal minority in Parliament, Gradek said. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, whose party has traditionally toed a more pro-business line, also said last week that Tories “stand with the pilots” and swore off “pre-empting” the negotiations.
Air Canada CEO Michael Rousseau had asked Ottawa on Thursday to impose binding arbitration pre-emptively — “before any travel disruption starts” — if talks failed. Backed by business leaders, he’d hoped for an effective repeat of the Conservatives’ move to head off a strike in 2012 by legislating Air Canada pilots and ground crew to stick to their posts before any work stoppage could start.
The request may have fallen flat, however. Gradek said he believes there was less anxiety over the fallout from an airline strike than from the countrywide railway shutdown.
He also speculated that public frustration over thousands of cancelled flights would have flowed toward Air Canada rather than Ottawa, prompting the carrier to concede to a deal yielding “unheard of” gains for employees.
“It really was a total collapse of the Air Canada bargaining position,” he said.
Pilots are slated to vote in the coming weeks on the four-year contract.
Last year, pilots at Delta Air Lines, United Airlines and American Airlines secured agreements that included four-year pay boosts ranging from 34 per cent to 40 per cent, ramping up pressure on other carriers to raise wages.
After more than a year of bargaining, Air Canada put forward an offer in August centred around a 30 per cent wage hike over four years.
But the final deal, should union members approve it, grants a 26 per cent increase in the first year alone, retroactive to September 2023, according to the source. Three wage bumps of four per cent would follow in 2024 through 2026.
Passengers may wind up shouldering some of that financial load, one expert noted.
“At the end of the day, it’s all us consumers who are paying,” said Barry Prentice, who heads the University of Manitoba’s transport institute.
Higher fares may be mitigated by the persistence of budget carrier Flair Airlines and the rapid expansion of Porter Airlines — a growing Air Canada rival — as well as waning demand for leisure trips. Corporate travel also remains below pre-COVID-19 levels.
Air Canada said Sunday the tentative contract “recognizes the contributions and professionalism of Air Canada’s pilot group, while providing a framework for the future growth of the airline.”
The union issued a statement saying that, if ratified, the agreement will generate about $1.9 billion of additional value for Air Canada pilots over the course of the deal.
Meanwhile, labour tension with cabin crew looms on the horizon. Air Canada is poised to kick off negotiations with the union representing more than 10,000 flight attendants this year before the contract expires on March 31.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.
HALIFAX – Ottawa is negotiating a $500-million bailout for Nova Scotia’s privately owned electric utility, saying the money will be used to prevent a big spike in electricity rates.
Federal Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson made the announcement today in Halifax, saying Nova Scotia Power Inc. needs the money to cover higher costs resulting from the delayed delivery of electricity from the Muskrat Falls hydroelectric plant in Labrador.
Wilkinson says that without the money, the subsidiary of Emera Inc. would have had to increase rates by 19 per cent over “the short term.”
Nova Scotia Power CEO Peter Gregg says the deal, once approved by the province’s energy regulator, will keep rate increases limited “to be around the rate of inflation,” as costs are spread over a number of years.
The utility helped pay for construction of an underwater transmission link between Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, but the Muskrat Falls project has not been consistent in delivering electricity over the past five years.
Those delays forced Nova Scotia Power to spend more on generating its own electricity.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.
