adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Instagram and Threads Are Limiting Political Content in Your Feed. Here’s How to Turn It Off.

Published

 on

We Are

At least half of US adults get their news from social media at least sometimes, according to a November 2023 study by the Pew Research Center. With the potential TikTok ban on people’s minds and given some people’s distrust of mainstream media, there’s increasing attention on how content is being moderated on mainstream social media platforms. While Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta (parent company of Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp) has had no shortage of complaints over the years, one particular February 2024 platform change recently caught users’ attention.

On March 21, Teen Vogue contributor Olayemi Olurin, a political content creator, posted a screenshot on her Twitter/X account of a comment from one of her Instagram posts. “Did yal know Instagram was actively limiting the reach of political content like this?!” Olurin wrote on the Elon Musk-owned platform. “I had no idea till I saw this comment and I checked my settings and sho nuff political content was limited.”

Here are the basics of what you need to know about Meta’s politics content settings and how you can change yours.

What exactly is the new policy?

In Meta’s words: “We won’t proactively recommend content about politics on recommendation surfaces across Instagram and Threads. If you still want these posts recommended to you, you will have a control to see them.” So, to clarify: This policy specifically impacts content from accounts you don’t follow, meaning those you might stumble upon in “recommended” posts or on your Explore page, or are recommended as an IG Reel.

Now here’s a big “but”: The policy as written doesn’t impact “political” content from accounts you are intentionally following, but it may impact content creators who make political content. According to the Washington Post’s Taylor Lorenz and Naomi Nix, who spoke to Meta about the policy last month:

“While users will still be allowed to follow accounts that post about political and social issues, accounts posting such content will not be recommended and content posted by nonpolitical accounts that is political in nature or includes social commentary also won’t be recommended.”

For more on how creators can contest Meta’s rulings on their content, check out the Verge’s coverage.

The change comes amid a rise in political content on Instagram, likely tied to how many people have left Twitter (now X) since Musk’s takeover.

What counts as “political” content?

Some observed that Meta’s categorization of what could be considered “political” content was quite broad, vaguely lumping together “posts about laws, elections, or social topics,” which could include any number of topics, from LGBTQ+ rights to feminism, to COVID, and more, as noted by CNN’s Oliver Darcy and other journalists.

Other posters wondered if it was related to the accusations of shadowbanning Palestinian content that have followed most platforms in recent months. (In December 2023, Human Rights Watch reported that Meta was engaging in what they called “systemic online censorship” of Palestine-related content.) Meanwhile, some politicians are suggesting that the ability to access “pro-Palestine” content on TikTok is part of the reason why it should be banned.

When and why did Meta make this change?

Some users were quick to call Meta’s change “quiet,” but when it went live in early February, it was widely reported, accompanied by press releases from Meta. It’s possible that this only caught people’s attention as they grow concerned that the ability to use TikTok as an information-sharing platform will be damaged by a possible congressional ban.

So why? As I wrote in an op-ed last summer when Meta launched Twitter competitor Threads, Adam Mosseri, the head of Instagram, told the press that Threads would not “do anything to encourage” content involving politics or hard news. The way I summarized their response in that op-ed still rings true to me now: Basically, “content moderation is hard, so we’re just going to not algorithmically promote content that might require a higher level of moderation.” Given extensive reporting on how poorly their content moderation workers are treated, this isn’t surprising — but the end result could amount to censorship on an app that seems to prefer to function as a shopping mall.

How can I turn it off?

To turn off the setting in your Instagram app, go to Settings, then Content Preferences. From there, you will see Political Content in the list of options. Click on that, and it will allow you to choose between Don’t Limit and Limit. The new change should have automatically set you at Limit.

If you have a Professional account on Instagram, here’s information on how to fix your settings from TechCrunch.

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

Quebec consumer rights bill to regulate how merchants can ask for tips

Published

 on

 

Quebec wants to curb excessive tipping.

Simon Jolin-Barrette, minister responsible for consumer protection, has tabled a bill to force merchants to calculate tips based on the price before tax.

That means on a restaurant bill of $100, suggested tips would be calculated based on $100, not on $114.98 after provincial and federal sales taxes are added.

The bill would also increase the rebate offered to consumers when the price of an item at the cash register is higher than the shelf price, to $15 from $10.

And it would force grocery stores offering a discounted price for several items to clearly list the unit price as well.

Businesses would also have to indicate whether taxes will be added to the price of food products.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Youri Chassin quits CAQ to sit as Independent, second member to leave this month

Published

 on

 

Quebec legislature member Youri Chassin has announced he’s leaving the Coalition Avenir Québec government to sit as an Independent.

He announced the decision shortly after writing an open letter criticizing Premier François Legault’s government for abandoning its principles of smaller government.

In the letter published in Le Journal de Montréal and Le Journal de Québec, Chassin accused the party of falling back on what he called the old formula of throwing money at problems instead of looking to do things differently.

Chassin says public services are more fragile than ever, despite rising spending that pushed the province to a record $11-billion deficit projected in the last budget.

He is the second CAQ member to leave the party in a little more than one week, after economy and energy minister Pierre Fitzgibbon announced Sept. 4 he would leave because he lost motivation to do his job.

Chassin says he has no intention of joining another party and will instead sit as an Independent until the end of his term.

He has represented the Saint-Jérôme riding since the CAQ rose to power in 2018, but has not served in cabinet.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘I’m not going to listen to you’: Singh responds to Poilievre’s vote challenge

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says he will not be taking advice from Pierre Poilievre after the Conservative leader challenged him to bring down government.

“I say directly to Pierre Poilievre: I’m not going to listen to you,” said Singh on Wednesday, accusing Poilievre of wanting to take away dental-care coverage from Canadians, among other things.

“I’m not going to listen to your advice. You want to destroy people’s lives, I want to build up a brighter future.”

Earlier in the day, Poilievre challenged Singh to commit to voting non-confidence in the government, saying his party will force a vote in the House of Commons “at the earliest possibly opportunity.”

“I’m asking Jagmeet Singh and the NDP to commit unequivocally before Monday’s byelections: will they vote non-confidence to bring down the costly coalition and trigger a carbon tax election, or will Jagmeet Singh sell out Canadians again?” Poilievre said.

“It’s put up or shut up time for the NDP.”

While Singh rejected the idea he would ever listen to Poilievre, he did not say how the NDP would vote on a non-confidence motion.

“I’ve said on any vote, we’re going to look at the vote and we’ll make our decision. I’m not going to say our decision ahead of time,” he said.

Singh’s top adviser said on Tuesday the NDP leader is not particularly eager to trigger an election, even as the Conservatives challenge him to do just that.

Anne McGrath, Singh’s principal secretary, says there will be more volatility in Parliament and the odds of an early election have risen.

“I don’t think he is anxious to launch one, or chomping at the bit to have one, but it can happen,” she said in an interview.

New Democrat MPs are in a second day of meetings in Montreal as they nail down a plan for how to navigate the minority Parliament this fall.

The caucus retreat comes one week after Singh announced the party has left the supply-and-confidence agreement with the governing Liberals.

It’s also taking place in the very city where New Democrats are hoping to pick up a seat on Monday, when voters go to the polls in Montreal’s LaSalle—Émard—Verdun. A second byelection is being held that day in the Winnipeg riding of Elmwood—Transcona, where the NDP is hoping to hold onto a seat the Conservatives are also vying for.

While New Democrats are seeking to distance themselves from the Liberals, they don’t appear ready to trigger a general election.

Singh signalled on Tuesday that he will have more to say Wednesday about the party’s strategy for the upcoming sitting.

He is hoping to convince Canadians that his party can defeat the federal Conservatives, who have been riding high in the polls over the last year.

Singh has attacked Poilievre as someone who would bring back Harper-style cuts to programs that Canadians rely on, including the national dental-care program that was part of the supply-and-confidence agreement.

The Canadian Press has asked Poilievre’s office whether the Conservative leader intends to keep the program in place, if he forms government after the next election.

With the return of Parliament just days away, the NDP is also keeping in mind how other parties will look to capitalize on the new makeup of the House of Commons.

The Bloc Québécois has already indicated that it’s written up a list of demands for the Liberals in exchange for support on votes.

The next federal election must take place by October 2025 at the latest.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending