adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

SNF Agora Institute discussion series explores policies, politics of the pandemic – The Hub at Johns Hopkins

Published

 on


With public distrust in media and government running high even before the arrival of COVID-19, scientists and medical experts have stepped up in recent weeks to become trusted voices on the outbreak, sharing fact-based messages designed to inform and protect.

During a virtual conversation on COVID-19 and politics of information, hosted Friday by the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Agora Institute at Johns Hopkins, JHU faculty member Colleen Barry hailed these experts as “true public health heroes.

“Those voices can go a long way toward providing at least the baseline we need to establish trust,” said Barry, who chairs the Department of Health Policy and Management at the university’s Bloomberg School of Public Health.

[embedded content]

Video credit: SNF Agora Institute

Barry was joined for the discussion by Dartmouth government professor and New York Times contributor Brendan Nyhan, an expert on misperceptions about politics and health care. Their conversation, moderated by SNF Agora Institute Director Hahrie Han, was the first in a new series titled “SNF Agora Conversations: The Politics and Policy of COVID-19.” Additional virtual conversations bringing together experts to discuss the political and policy implications of COVID-19 are planned in the weeks ahead.

“Like everyone else, we’ve been watching as events unfold around the coronavirus pandemic and … thinking about how our collective responses to the pandemic have the potential to exacerbate stresses that democracy all over the world has already been experiencing,” said Han, describing the new series as a “social-scientific, evidence-based approach to exploring some of the most vexing political and policy issues surrounding the pandemic.”

Barry and Nyhan noted that the intractable nature of our current media landscape—divisively partisan, with consumers self-selecting their own information sources that often affirm their beliefs, however misguided—has complicated the information exchange related to the global outbreak.

“Hearing different views really increases the confusion. There’s no Walter Cronkite telling us what to think and do on the evening news anymore.”

“Hearing different views really increases the confusion,” Barry said. “There’s no Walter Cronkite telling us what to think and do on the evening news anymore.”

Colleen Barry
Professor, Bloomberg School of Public Health

Misinformation in this context, Nyhan noted, “could be life or death.”

Panelists emphasized that even with trusted voices from the scientific and medical communities stepping forward in this moment, our understanding of COVID-19 is constantly evolving and new data is becoming available every day, so both the media and public must be nimble in adapting.

“The challenge for us is to keep [COVID-19] in the category where there is social consensus around the scientific process—however imperfect it may be,” Nyhan said. “And that’s going to be critical because this science is happening on the fly.”

Nyhan added that it’s key to focus communication on the core set of facts that scientists do unanimously agree upon. “We need to be reinforcing over and over again those important messages about washing your hands and social distancing and all the things that will help us get through this epidemic,” he said.

Agora’s next live telecast takes place on Friday, March 27, at 12:30 p.m. with a conversation, “One Pandemic: A World of Responses,” that explores different countries’ varied responses to COVID-19 and the lessons governments can learn for preparing for future challenges. Participants will be SNF Agora senior fellow and historian Anne Applebaum; Ho-fung Hung, professor and chair of the Johns Hopkins Department of Sociology; and Josh Sharfstein, vice dean of public health practice and community engagement for the Bloomberg School.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

Political parties cool to idea of new federal regulations for nomination contests

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Several federal political parties are expressing reservations about the prospect of fresh regulations to prevent foreign meddlers from tainting their candidate nomination processes.

Elections Canada has suggested possible changes to safeguard nominations, including barring non-citizens from helping choose candidates, requiring parties to publish contest rules and explicitly outlawing behaviour such as voting more than once.

However, representatives of the Bloc Québécois, Green Party and NDP have told a federal commission of inquiry into foreign interference that such changes may be unwelcome, difficult to implement or counterproductive.

The Canada Elections Act currently provides for limited regulation of federal nomination races and contestants.

For instance, only contestants who accept $1,000 in contributions or incur $1,000 in expenses have to file a financial return. In addition, the act does not include specific obligations concerning candidacy, voting, counting or results reporting other than the identity of the successful nominee.

A report released in June by the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians expressed concern about how easily foreign actors can take advantage of loopholes and vulnerabilities to support preferred candidates.

Lucy Watson, national director of the NDP, told the inquiry Thursday she had concerns about the way in which new legislation would interact with the internal decision-making of the party.

“We are very proud of the fact that our members play such a significant role in shaping the internal policies and procedures and infrastructure of the party, and I would not want to see that lost,” she said.

“There are guidelines, there are best practices that we would welcome, but if we were to talk about legal requirements and legislation, that’s something I would have to take away and put further thought into, and have discussions with folks who are integral to the party’s governance.”

In an August interview with the commission of inquiry, Bloc Québécois executive director Mathieu Desquilbet said the party would be opposed to any external body monitoring nomination and leadership contest rules.

A summary tabled Thursday says Desquilbet expressed doubts about the appropriateness of requiring nomination candidates to file a full financial report with Elections Canada, saying the agency’s existing regulatory framework and the Bloc’s internal rules on the matter are sufficient.

Green Party representatives Jon Irwin and Robin Marty told the inquiry in an August interview it would not be realistic for an external body, like Elections Canada, to administer nomination or leadership contests as the resources required would exceed the federal agency’s capacity.

A summary of the interview says Irwin and Marty “also did not believe that rules violations could effectively be investigated by an external body like the Office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections.”

“The types of complaints that get raised during nomination contests can be highly personal, politically driven, and could overwhelm an external body.”

Marty, national campaign director for the party, told the inquiry Thursday that more reporting requirements would also place an administrative burden on volunteers and riding workers.

In addition, he said that disclosing the vote tally of a nomination contest could actually help foreign meddlers by flagging the precise number of ballots needed for a candidate to be chosen.

Irwin, interim executive director of the Greens, said the ideal tactic for a foreign country would be working to get someone in a “position of power” within a Canadian political party.

He said “the bad guys are always a step ahead” when it comes to meddling in the Canadian political process.

In May, David Vigneault, director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service at the time, said it was very clear from the design of popular social media app TikTok that data gleaned from its users is available to the Chinese government.

A December 2022 CSIS memo tabled at the inquiry Thursday said TikTok “has the potential to be exploited” by Beijing to “bolster its influence and power overseas, including in Canada.”

Asked about the app, Marty told the inquiry the Greens would benefit from more “direction and guidance,” given the party’s lack of resources to address such things.

Representatives of the Liberal and Conservative parties are slated to appear at the inquiry Friday, while chief electoral officer Stéphane Perrault is to testify at a later date.

After her party representatives appeared Thursday, Green Leader Elizabeth May told reporters it was important for all party leaders to work together to come up with acceptable rules.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 19, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

New Brunswick election candidate profile: Green Party Leader David Coon

Published

 on

 

FREDERICTON – A look at David Coon, leader of the Green Party of New Brunswick:

Born: Oct. 28, 1956.

Early years: Born in Toronto and raised in Montreal, he spent about three decades as an environmental advocate.

Education: A trained biologist, he graduated with a bachelor of science from McGill University in Montreal in 1978.

Family: He and his wife Janice Harvey have two daughters, Caroline and Laura.

Before politics: Worked as an environmental educator, organizer, activist and manager for 33 years, mainly with the Conservation Council of New Brunswick.

Politics: Joined the Green Party of Canada in May 2006 and was elected leader of the New Brunswick Green Party in September 2012. Won a seat in the legislature in 2014 — a first for the province’s Greens.

Quote: “It was despicable. He’s clearly decided to take the low road in this campaign, to adopt some Trump-lite fearmongering.” — David Coon on Sept. 12, 2024, reacting to Blaine Higgs’s claim that the federal government had decided to send 4,600 asylum seekers to New Brunswick.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 19, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

New Brunswick election profile: Progressive Conservative Leader Blaine Higgs

Published

 on

 

FREDERICTON – A look at Blaine Higgs, leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of New Brunswick.

Born: March 1, 1954.

Early years: The son of a customs officer, he grew up in Forest City, N.B., near the Canada-U.S. border.

Education: Graduated from the University of New Brunswick with a degree in mechanical engineering in 1977.

Family: Married his high-school sweetheart, Marcia, and settled in Saint John, N.B., where they had four daughters: Lindsey, Laura, Sarah and Rachel.

Before politics: Hired by Irving Oil a week after he graduated from university and was eventually promoted to director of distribution. Worked for 33 years at the company.

Politics: Elected to the legislature in 2010 and later served as finance minister under former Progressive Conservative Premier David Alward. Elected Tory leader in 2016 and has been premier since 2018.

Quote: “I’ve always felt parents should play the main role in raising children. No one is denying gender diversity is real. But we need to figure out how to manage it.” — Blaine Higgs in a year-end interview in 2023, explaining changes to school policies about gender identity.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 19, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending