adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

B.C. rejects Henry report backing non-prescribed alternates to fentanyl, other drugs

Published

 on

 

VICTORIA – B.C’s Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry joked that “the earth shook” with Thursday’s release of her report on the safer-supply drug program, referring to an earthquake lightly felt on Vancouver Island that morning.

But her report’s recommendation that B.C. should consider allowing access to alternatives to unregulated street drugs without a prescription was felt much more widely.

It was swiftly rejected by the government, while the opposition BC Conservatives and BC United said she should lose her job.

Henry said drug prohibition strategies had not only failed to control access to controlled substances but had also created the toxic unregulated drug supply that had killed more than 14,000 people since a health emergency was declared in B.C. eight years ago.

“Ultimately, we cannot prescribe our way out of this crisis,” Henry said in the report. “Finding new ways to enable access to alternatives to unregulated drugs will require bold conversations, system-level changes, and thinking outside of the constraints that have so far failed to turn this crisis around.”

She said a system to allow access to safer, regulated alternatives to fentanyl and other drugs was necessary because a significant number of those who have died did not have substance-use disorders and could not be protected by “medicalized approaches,” requiring a closer look at access that did not require a prescription.

“I think we all don’t want people to use drugs, particularly drugs that are going to cause harm,” Henry said at a press briefing on Thursday. “But the reality is that there are people who do for a whole variety of reasons, a lot of it having to do with their own personal trauma and their own personal issues that they’re dealing with.”

Henry said an expansion of safer supply would be just one intervention in the drug crisis that required “a whole suite” of initiatives on multiple fronts such as prevention and treatment.

In a written response to Henry’s report, Mental Health and Addictions Minister Jennifer Whiteside said the province does not agree with the recommendation and “will not go in the direction” of “non-medical models of distributing medications.”

Whiteside echoed B.C. Premier David Eby’s previous comments on safer-supply drugs, saying the model of distributing safer-supply drugs through prescriptions separates “people who are at the highest risk of death and harm from the poisoned drug supply.”

“Dr. Henry is an important independent voice on public health issues in this province, and we respect her advice,” Whiteside said. “However, this is a topic we do not agree on.

“Addiction is a health issue and people struggling with addiction need access to the full continuum of services provided by our health care system.”

Henry’s report echoed the findings of former chief coroner Lisa Lapointe, who said in January before leaving her post that prescribed safer-supply drugs would not solve the crisis that has claimed more than 14,000 lives in British Columbia since 2016.

At the time, Eby rejected Lapointe’s pleas and said that he did not believe distribution of opioid drugs should happen without the supervision of medical professionals.

The latest report from Henry said that 225,000 or more people in B.C. are accessing unregulated drugs and fentanyl continues to be the main killer, with 83 per cent of illicit drug deaths linked to the opioid.

Henry said that the distribution of safer-supply drugs through prescriptions faces “barriers and challenges” presented by the system’s limited capacity.

The Conservatives said in a written release that the party wanted Henry’s “immediate dismissal,” calling her recommendations “deeply troubling,” “shocking” and “irresponsible.”

Conservative MLA Elenore Sturko said in an interview that Henry’s recommendations betrayed an ideological approach to B.C.’s drug policy, consistent with initiatives such as last year’s decriminalization of small amounts of hard drugs.

“If the premier is interested in solving the crisis … then he needs to make that signal clear, change directions, and bring on someone who can bring a fresh perspective.”

Henry also said that a “compassion club” model for the delivery of non-prescribed drugs should be explored, and the report cited as an example the program run by the Drug User Liberation Front, or DULF, something Sturko criticized.

DULF co-founders Jeremy Kalicum and Eris Nyx were arrested last October and charged with possession for the purpose of trafficking, closing the “compassion club” service after about a year in operation.

Henry said the report did not endorse DULF’s activities, but described academic research on its outcomes.

BC United Leader Kevin Falcon said in an interview that Henry would not be the provincial health officer if he became premier.

He said the province should focus on free treatment and assistance in recovery, not giving people more access to alternative drugs.

“I don’t want to stigmatize drug users,” he said. “But I definitely want to stigmatize drug use, the same way we stigmatize smokers when we said we’re not going to allow open use of smoking in public spaces and beaches and parks and playgrounds and office buildings and restaurants.”

The B.C. Greens said in a statement that they support Henry’s findings and that “ignoring expert advice in favour of sensational headlines and political narratives is dangerously irresponsible.”

“The ‘war on drugs’ has never succeeded,” Sonia Furstenau, Leader of the BC Greens, said in the statement. “It only exacerbates the problem.”

B.C.’s current prescribed safer-supply policy has also been intensely debated beyond provincial boundaries, with federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith both claiming that drugs from the program were being diverted into the rest of Canada.

On Thursday, federal Conservative shadow addictions minister Laila Goodridge called for British Columbia to reject Henry’s recommendations and focus on “treatment and recovery.”

Solicitor General Mike Farnworth has said that there’s no evidence of widespread diversion of safer-supply drugs, and Henry says in the latest report that “anecdotes may not reflect the experience of most people who are prescribed alternatives to unregulated drugs.”

“Ongoing monitoring, evaluation and research is required to assess the degree to which diversion is occurring, and its impacts,” Henry said in the 88-page report.

Henry also criticized prohibition-based drug policies, saying Canada has a long history of such laws “that are rooted in racism, colonialism and xenophobia.”

— By Chuck Chiang in Vancouver

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 11, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

How to get a whole city to stop lawn watering? Experts say praise over punishment

Published

 on

CALGARY – For almost two weeks, a city of 1.6 million people has been told once again to stop watering lawns, take three-minute showers, hold off on laundry and dishes, and let the yellow in their toilets mellow.

Calgarians are about halfway through water rationing redux and, this time, more has gone down the drain than the city can sustainably manage as a troubled pipe is repaired.

Some who study social dynamics during crises say it will take continued appeals to citizens’ better natures, a constant stream of detailed information and a sparing use of punishment to get through the outage, slated to end around Sept. 23.

Canadians are generally a rule-following bunch who are willing to act for the common good, says University of Calgary philosophy professor Allen Habib.

“If the authorities asked you to do something, that’s a reason to do it right there,” he said.

But he said it gets harder the longer it goes on.

In early June, the Bearspaw South Feeder Main in northwest Calgary suddenly burst, forcing a citywide clampdown on water use.

Restrictions had mostly been eased, when the city announced in early August that more trouble spots had been found along the more than 10-kilometre pipe, which would have to be dug up and reinforced.

Not doing so, city officials have said, would risk another catastrophic break during the winter, when river flows can’t be relied upon to replenish reservoirs.

Calgarians typically use about 600 million litres of water each day. The city says it can comfortably manage 485 million litres of daily usage while the massive main is down.

Between that amount and 500 million litres, the system is working full-tilt. Anything above 500 million litres means the city would struggle to replenish supplies.

On Friday, water usage was roughly 502 million litres, likely due to scorching weather, said Francois Bouchart, the city’s director of capital priorities and investment.

“We are incredibly thankful for the water savings Calgarians have made so far,” he said.

“If everyone in Calgary skipped one extra toilet flush, we would save a further eight million litres. Skip two flushes, and we have reached our goal.

“These small actions truly add up.”

But Bouchart said enforcement officers continue to hand out $3,000 fines for outdoor watering with potable supplies.

“We understand that it can be frustrating when you’re doing your part and see others who are not,” he said, encouraging people to report water misuse.

Punishment is one important lever the city has, but Habib said positive reinforcement tends to be the best first-line approach.

“I’d be surprised if (fines) played a super big role in motivating people,” he said.

Caroline McDonald-Harker, a sociologist at Mount Royal University, said Albertans have faced a litany of recent crises, like the 2013 southern Alberta floods, the 2016 Fort McMurray wildfire and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Calgary’s water restrictions are a minor nuisance in comparison, she said.

“It is understandable that people are starting to become a little frustrated,” said McDonald-Harker, who also directs the Centre for Community Disaster Research.

“We’re seeing that some individuals are just getting tired of constantly having to be on alert, constantly thinking about their day-to-day life and routines and having to adapt.”

Most residents seem to be on board, she said. The more information they get, the more likely they are to comply.

“They’re able to see what impact it’s having and they’re able to see the end goal,” McDonald-Harker said.

City officials have held almost daily news conferences on water use, reiterating why restrictions are necessary and describing in painstaking detail the progress of the dig-up.

It helps when citizens can see they can collectively make a difference, said McDonald-Harker, pointing to how Albertans cut their power use almost instantly when the electrical grid came under strain earlier this year.

Children could be enlisted in the effort, she said, as research has shown them to be effective intermediaries between authorities and the adults in their lives when a problem requires collective action.

“My recommendation would even be for this messaging to be pushed through the school system to kids and they can take that information back to their parents,” said McDonald-Harker.

John Ellard, a University of Calgary psychology professor, said messaging about fines should be couched in praise and appreciation for the majority who seem to be doing what’s asked.

He’s not so sure the uptick in water use can be explained by non-compliance. It could be that, with the school year starting, there are simply more people drawing on resources than before.

“The more people perceive there’s fatigue and non-compliance, the more it gives them justification for breaking the rules themselves.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 7, 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Girl, 14, charged with attempted murder after allegedly setting classmate on fire at Sask. high school – CBC.ca

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Girl, 14, charged with attempted murder after allegedly setting classmate on fire at Sask. high school  CBC.ca

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Trudeau insists he’s staying on as Liberal leader. But what if he changes his mind?

Published

 on

OTTAWA – The Liberal caucus is set to meet in Nanaimo, B.C., next week for a retreat ahead of the fall parliamentary sitting. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau insists he will lead his party into the next election despite polls citing his unpopularity among Canadians. Here’s a look at what would happen if he decided to call it quits.

Could Prime Minister Justin Trudeau step down?

Absolutely. But a decision to step down becomes a lot harder now that the New Democrats have pulled out of a supply and confidence agreement with the Liberals, which has helped keep the minority government in power. If Trudeau were to resign, the New Democrats could vote with the Conservatives on a confidence motion and trigger a snap election. That could leave the Liberal party without a leader as parties vie for votes.

What would happen if he resigned?

An interim leader would be appointed and a leadership race would be triggered. The national president would have 27 days to call a meeting with the party’s board of directors. A leadership vote committee would also form to plan, organize and carry out the leadership vote.

How quickly could a new leader be named?

It’s not typically a fast process. Trudeau won after a five-month race, but planning was in the works for years.

By comparison, it took two years for the Conservatives to vote in a new leader after Stephen Harper’s resignation following the 2015 election.

The race that brought Pierre Poilievre to the helm of the Conservatives in 2022 lasted eight months.

The Liberal party constitution lays out the process for any potential nominee. They have at least 90 days before a leadership vote to announce their intention to run. They need at least 300 signatures from registered Liberals, 100 of which must come from Liberals in three different provinces.

Could Trudeau resign but finish out his mandate?

Yes. But again, it would be complicated given a Liberal minority government and the threat of a snap election. NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh acknowledged this week that an election could happen earlier than initially expected, which is currently set for October of 2025.

Has a prime minister ever stepped down before?

Yes. In 2002, prime minister Jean Chrétien, facing a challenge from former finance minister and longtime rival Paul Martin, announced he would not lead the Liberals into the next election.

And in 1993 prime minister Brian Mulroney resigned as Progressive Conservative leader. Kim Campbell, defence minister in Mulroney’s cabinet, won the contest to succeed him.

Trudeau’s popularity has also faded, so why is this different?

Chrétien and Mulroney had majority governments, allowing leadership races to unfold without the threat of their administrations falling.

Though there have been rumblings of discontent about Trudeau from within his party, he continues to enjoy the public support of the cabinet and caucus. The exception is Liberal MP Wayne Long, who has called for his resignation.

In addition, there is no obvious heir apparent to Trudeau. Among the rumoured contenders for his job are Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne and former Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney.

Why were the U.S. Democrats able to replace their candidate for president?

Canada and the U.S. have different systems of government, and Democrats and Liberals have their own sets of party rules.

Even though U.S. President Joe Biden was the Democrats’ presumptive nominee for president, he was not yet their official candidate. This allowed the Democrats to switch candidates before their convention in Chicago last month.

It’s always up to Democratic delegates at their convention to formally vote for an official presidential nominee.

And because there was no major challenge from within the party, it allowed for a smooth transition to replace Biden’s name on the ticket with that of U.S. Vice-President Kamala Harris.

Can Liberals oust Trudeau?

Unlikely. The Liberal party’s constitution says the party leader can be removed only because of a triggering event such as an electoral loss, incapacitation or death.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 7, 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending