adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

Caddies and paper bags: Schools figuring out new world of cellphone bans

Published

 on

 

From cellphone “hotels” to patchwork policies to recalibrating lesson plans, teachers and schools across Canada are learning to navigate a classroom without cellphones.

But some say that despite recent bans and restrictions on the phones, little has changed.

A number of provinces, including Saskatchewan, Ontario, Manitoba and Alberta, introduced plans to limit cellphone usage beginning this school year. There is a mix of restrictions along with outright bans.

The changes come as educators try to get students to log off and stay focused, noting online squabbles have forced their way into classrooms and social interactions among youth have dwindled.

It’s early days, with policies still being crafted, leading to some schools finding creative ways to curb students’ itchy cellphone fingers.

In Winnipeg, West Kildonan Collegiate introduced its own ban during the last school year, purchasing 50 cellphone caddies off Amazon to put in each classroom.

Each caddy, visible beside the teacher’s desk, contains holders for students to park their phones at the beginning of class and pick it up at the end.

“They allow the teacher the flexibility to say, ‘We’re going to use the phone for research or to take photos,'” said West Kildonan principal Adam Hildebrandt.

The Manitoba ban applies to students in kindergarten to Grade 8. High school students are restricted from using their devices during class time but are free to use them during breaks and at lunch.

There are exemptions for medical or accessibility reasons, as well as for educational purposes in high schools when directed by teachers. It is also up to school divisions to determine where high school students park their phones while in class.

In Alberta, Premier Danielle Smith’s government announced in June that personal devices are to be turned off and stored out of sight during class time starting this month, with school divisions having until the new year to formalize the rules.

There are exceptions for specialized learning or medical needs.

Support Our Students Alberta, a public education advocacy group, calls it a forward-thinking plan implemented in a backward fashion.

“The rollout itself has been more chaotic than it needed to be because the government left it up to the authorities after the fact,” said Wing Li, the group’s communications director.

Li said there should have been better consultation with the people who are actually enforcing the ban.

In Ontario, the cellphone plan is also a work in progress as school boards figure out where students need to store their devices.

Karen Littlewood, president of the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation, has heard of one instance where a principal purchased all the paper bags at a local dollar store.

“You get a paper bag, you put your cellphone in it, it gets stapled shut and it sits on top of your desk for the period,” she said in an interview.

While inventive, Littlewood said, it’s not a sustainable model.

There are other challenges. While the Ontario government had already put in certain restrictions on cellphones in 2019, new rules set more specific guidelines that are broken down by grade.

Teachers groups say there needs to be more clarity on how the rules should be enforced and more support for educators implementing them.

“We’re going to run into challenges with those inconsistencies … so it remains to be seen how this rolls out in the end,” said Littlewood.

In Saskatchewan, the head of the province’s teachers federation says there are mixed reviews to the ban.

Samantha Becotte said equitable access to technology in the province’s classrooms is already limited and the ban will make things worse.

She said some students had been using their cellphones for tech learning because there weren’t enough computers or tablets to go around.

“Many teachers are having to rework or restructure their lessons and their instruction to ensure that kids are still getting engaging lessons,” said Becotte.

On the positive side, the broad consensus among the provinces is the bans are accepted and are working.

At Winnipeg’s West Kildonan, Hildebrandt said he’s hearing stories of students engaging with each other during free time instead of whipping out their phones and tapping away in isolation. In one case, two students were reading a magazine together. One braided another classmate’s hair.

For some, the change is not even a revolution, but an evolution.

In Saskatchewan, Becotte said a number of the teachers she’s heard from were already restricting cellphone use in their classrooms long before the government came in with a provincewide ban.

The same goes for Manitoba.

Kevin Dueck, principal of Westwood Collegiate in Winnipeg, said the high school had already implemented its own restrictions over the past few years.

“The switch this September to no cellphones in the classroom was a cultural shift,” said Dueck.

“But it wasn’t too far from what we were doing.”

— With files from Steve Lambert in Winnipeg.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 24, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Poilievre makes case for taking down the government to restore ‘promise of Canada’

Published

 on

OTTAWA – Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre delivered a campaign-style speech in the House of Commons as he asked other members of Parliament to support a motion that could trigger an early election.

Poilievre outlined his plans to increase revenue and reduce interest rates and debt, cut development taxes and restore what he calls “the promise of Canada.”

The non-confidence motion Poilievre has put forward is the first test for the minority government since the NDP ended its supply-and-confidence deal with the Liberals earlier this month.

The Bloc Québécois and NDP have already said they will not support the motion, which will be voted on Wednesday.

That all but eliminates the possibility of a snap election this week.

The Conservatives have another chance to introduce a non-confidence motion on Thursday.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 24, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Italian designer Alberta Ferretti resigns as creative director of the brand she founded 43 years ago

Published

 on

 

ROME (AP) — Italian designer Alberta Ferretti announced on Tuesday she is stepping down as creative director of the eponymous brand she founded more than 40 years ago.

“On Sept. 17th, you attended my last fashion show,” Ferretti wrote in a letter sent out by email.

“Yes, it’s time for me to make room for a new chapter for my brand, a new narrative. It was a difficult, complicated, but a very thoughtful choice,” she added.

Ferretti, 74, said the brand will continue to bear her name and she will announce her successor soon.

Fashion group Aeffe — which owns the Alberta Ferretti brand along with Philosophy di Lorenzo Serafini, Moschino and Pollini — said that Ferretti will retain her role as vice president of the group.

At her last show during Milan’s fashion week, Ferretti presented her summery creations in the courtyard of a former cloister, now a science museum, with an elegant dome rising in the background, emphasizing the artisanal heritage in her collection.

“They are real summer clothes, because the world in the summer is very warm. I know a show is supposed to be a show but reality is important,’’ she said backstage, without hinting at her decision of stepping down soon.

Ferretti, who grew up in her family’s dressmaking shop before opening her own boutique as a teenager, has remained true to her signature gentle feminine silhouettes since the launch of the brand in 1981.

“The Alberta of that day is in many ways still the Alberta of today, even if in the meantime a small family business has become a company with 1500 employees,” she wrote in her letter.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Tyreek Hill’s traffic stop can be a reminder of drivers’ constitutional rights

Published

 on

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — American drivers might universally wince or brace themselves at the sight and sound of flashing red and blue lights and blaring sirens, but all drivers have constitutional rights when pulled over on the road.

The question of one’s responsibility to comply with all instructions given by a law enforcement officer recently came up following a pregame traffic stop this month involving Miami Dolphins wide receiver Tyreek Hill.

Although Hill has acknowledged he could have handled the interaction with Miami-Dade police better, the video of him being pulled out of his car, placed on the ground and handcuffed revived a national conversation about the realities of “driving while Black.” Studies show Black motorists are more likely to face the threat or use of force by police in traffic stops, like Hill did, and many Black families give a version of “the talk” to loved ones about how to interact with police officers.

“The immediate short-term goal is to get out of the encounter without being arrested, and the way to do that, again, is to communicate not just with compliance, but obedience and respect, even if you don’t think that that’s deserved,” said Georgetown University law professor Paul Butler.

Black people are disproportionately stopped, data shows

Studies show people of color are often disproportionately targeted for traffic stops in the U.S., said Jenn Rolnick Borchetta, the American Civil Liberties Union’s deputy director on policing.

“They search them more often, even as the rate at which they find evidence of some wrong is lower for Black and Latino people than white people,” she said.

In 2022, Black people accounted for nearly 13% of traffic stops in California, even though they were only 5% of the state’s population. Minneapolis, a predominantly white city, found in 2020 that Black drivers accounted for nearly 80% of police searches and routine traffic stops.

Being combative with traffic officers can invite unwanted scrutiny

Miami lawyer E.J. Hubbs said he believes both Hill and the police officers in the now-viral video of the arrest had faults in their interactions.

Body camera footage showed the officer asking Hill to roll down his window and Hill complying, Hubbs said. Hill then told the officer “to give me my ticket,” after handing him his identification, which Hubbs said was also fair.

Where things escalated was when Hill decided to roll his window back up, as the officer’s body camera footage shows.

“When Mr. Hill refused to roll down his window, that was not complying with one of his commands,” Hubbs said. “And when he was asked to exit the car, he didn’t comply with that command, at least immediately.”

Lawrence Hunter, a former Waterbury, Connecticut, police captain and law enforcement coach, added that Hill appeared confrontational when asking Miami-Dade County officers not to knock on his window.

“From that point, because of the combative nature that Tyreek Hill exposed, the officer then asked him to get out of the car,” Hunter said. “That’s an officer safety thing. He already feels that this is uncooperative. … So therefore, it is best to just get him out of the car.”

Hunter added that Hill’s refusal to keep his window down could be considered a matter of officer safety.

Drivers have rights against self-incrimination and vehicle searches

During a traffic stop, drivers have constitutional rights against incriminating themselves or permitting the search of their car.

The right to remain silent is the most widely known right, Borchetta said. Drivers also have the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizure, and have the right to ask traffic officers questions.

“You don’t have to tell the police where you’re coming from or where you’re going,” Borchetta said. “If they ask to search you or your car, you can say no. And if you’re not sure whether they’re asking or telling, you can ask them that question. And they have to tell you honestly.”

Passengers can also ask if they can leave the scene of the traffic stop.

Police can ask drivers to step out of their vehicles

Once a driver has been pulled over, police will likely run the plates of the vehicle through a database to check whether the car has been stolen or see if any other actionable information comes up, said Hunter, the former police captain.

The officer may also take a long, hard look at the vehicle for visible contraband, weapons or drugs, he said.

The officer does have the right to ask drivers and passengers to get out of the car and can use reasonable force to make sure that happens. Officers can also pull drivers over even if they haven’t committed an infraction, as long as there’s reasonable suspicion to think the person has, according to Butler, the Georgetown University professor. This policing practice is known as a pretextual stop.

Law enforcement can sometimes take advantage of civilians’ lack of knowledge of the law, Butler added. In that case, it’s best to comply and communicate with officers, and complain later.

Drivers can also record the conversation if they feel like the interaction with the officer has been unnecessarily escalated. But they should be sure to let the officer know that they are being recorded. Asking for and writing down the officer’s badge number, time and location of the interaction is also permitted.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending