adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

Richmond Fed chief: With outlook hazy, economy needs support – 570 News

Published

 on


WASHINGTON — As president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond since 2018, Tom Barkin is a member of the Fed’s powerful committee that sets interest rates. The committee has been engaged this year in an extraordinary drive to support the economy and the financial system through ultra-low rates and new lending programs designed to keep credit markets running smoothly and encourage companies and households to borrow and spend.

Barkin takes part in the rate-setting committee’s discussions, though under the Fed’s rotation system, he is not a voting member of the committee this year.

The Associated Press spoke recently with Barkin about the unusual uncertainty surrounding the economic outlook, how the coronavirus may be affecting financial inequality and the economy’s ongoing need for rescue aid.

Q: What’s the biggest risk facing the economy right now?

A: The biggest risk is on the health side. Will we have a vaccine or a treatment or will we have a set of infections that causes consumers to withdraw from the economy again? As I’ve talked to my contacts in the district, (among) firms, you see such a wide range of uncertainty that it does lead to a level of caution on things like hiring, on things like investing, on things like spending. And so I do think, similarly on the consumer side, how are you going to engage in commerce if you don’t know if you’re going to be putting your family at risk?

Q: Will inequalities in income or wealth slow the recovery?

A: One of the tragic things about this virus is it’s gone very hard after low-end service-level personal contact jobs. And this question of how many of those jobs will recover if restaurants reopen with only 50 or 60 or 70 per cent capacity — you’re going to lose restaurant jobs. If amusement parks and entertainment venues are not able to come back at the same scale or density, you’re going to lose those sorts of lower-pay service-level jobs. And so I do think there is a real risk there — that the normal we get back to will be less robust than the one we just left.

Q: Does the economy need more stimulus from the government or can it recover on its own?

A: One of my concerns as I look at the economy over the next six months, 12 months, 18 months, is whether we will have enough support from (from Congress) to get us back to where we were. That support could be things like deployment of broadband to enhance online learning. It could be things like making Pell Grants available for (job training) programs. My understanding of 2010, 2011, 2012 is that state and local governments had to cut back. And of course, you had the federal government eventually also cutting back. And it would’ve been helpful to have those entities continuing to spend into the recovery. And we’ll need that here as well.

____________________________

Interviewed by Christopher Rugaber.

Edited for clarity and length.

Christopher Rugaber, The Associated Press

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

September merchandise trade deficit narrows to $1.3 billion: Statistics Canada

Published

 on

OTTAWA – Statistics Canada says the country’s merchandise trade deficit narrowed to $1.3 billion in September as imports fell more than exports.

The result compared with a revised deficit of $1.5 billion for August. The initial estimate for August released last month had shown a deficit of $1.1 billion.

Statistics Canada says the results for September came as total exports edged down 0.1 per cent to $63.9 billion.

Exports of metal and non-metallic mineral products fell 5.4 per cent as exports of unwrought gold, silver, and platinum group metals, and their alloys, decreased 15.4 per cent. Exports of energy products dropped 2.6 per cent as lower prices weighed on crude oil exports.

Meanwhile, imports for September fell 0.4 per cent to $65.1 billion as imports of metal and non-metallic mineral products dropped 12.7 per cent.

In volume terms, total exports rose 1.4 per cent in September while total imports were essentially unchanged in September.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending