adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Here's why the Post Office is the most important story in politics right now – NBC News

Published

 on


WASHINGTON — After weeks of tension over accusations of political meddling at the Postal Service, it feels like the dam is breaking.

In just the last day or so:

  • The president said in his most explicit terms yet that holding up emergency funds for the Postal Service would ensure that the post office would be unable to “take all of these millions and millions of ballots.” More: “Now, if we don’t make a deal, that means they don’t get the money. That means they can’t have universal mail-in voting. They just can’t have it.”
  • The Biden campaign directly accused the president of attempting to “sabotage” the USPS, calling it an “assault on our democracy.” (Biden himself added that Trump “doesn’t want an election.”)
  • Trump seemed to suggest that he would not veto a coronavirus bill that included postal funding if it made it to his desk, but he also continued to make claims — without evidence — that mail balloting conducted with that funding would be fraudulent.
  • Vice reported (and NBC News confirmed) that the Postal Service is removing sorting machines from facilities around the country without any official explanation
  • We learned that USPS warned secretaries of state in Michigan and Pennsylvania that that their deadlines for mail balloting might be too tight to meet the service’s “delivery standards.”
  • We learned that the president and his wife have requested absentee ballots in Florida for the second time as Palm Beach residents
  • The Washington Post first reported that new Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, who instituted the recent changes that have slowed mail nationwide, is “in frequent contact with top Republican Party officials” and met with the president in the Oval Office last week.
Aug. 14, 202003:13

Oh, and amid all of this, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell adjourned the Senate until after Labor Day, signaling that talks on coronavirus relief — and the emergency mail funding that could be connected to it — have officially completely stalled.

The controversy is now definitely in the public bloodstream — and it’s not going away.

Our question: Does all the attention this story is getting backfire for Trump if Democratic voters start reassessing — again — how and when they’ll cast their votes to ensure they’re counted?

Spaghetti, meet wall

Outside of the mail story, the Trump administration had a positive message they could have run with all day yesterday.

In a diplomatic breakthrough, the United States brokered a deal between Israel and the UAE to normalize ties.

But instead of zeroing in on a historic deal, Trump stepped all over that message by making headlines about a laundry list of other things.

Floating a conspiracy theory about Kamala Harris being ineligible to serve as president. Calling Harris “angry” and a “madwoman” and saying that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez “yaps” … Announcing that he’ll break with protocol and accept the Republican nomination on the White House grounds… telling the New York Post that he has a shot to win New York, a state that he lost by 22 points four years ago… saying Democrats “don’t want to have cows … or any form of animals” — without any further explanation.

Meanwhile, other than a brief response on the USPS story, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris talked about one message on Thursday: Pushing a national mask mandate to save lives and slow the spread of coronavirus.

Which message do voters want? “Wear a mask”? Or Trump’s scattershot approach?

Tweet of the Day

Barr the door

Speaking of the dam breaking… Trump’s mail comments on Fox Business yesterday deservedly got a lot more attention, but don’t miss this statement from President Trump yesterday on Bill Barr’s handling of the Durham probe into the origins of the Russia investigation.

The president told the network that he hopes that U.S. attorney John Durham “is not going to be politically correct” and won’t limit his findings to “just get a couple of the lower guys.” (That comment came after he suggested that Barack Obama and Joe Biden “knew everything.”)

And he made this ominous statement about Barr: “Bill Barr can go down as the greatest attorney general in the history of our country, or he can go down as an average guy. We’ll see what happens.”

Barr, for his part, is promising a “development” in the probe today, although not an “earth-shattering” one.

It’s another example of how the president’s comments publicly pressuring investigators will probably backfire, though.

For any DOJ investigation to have a real-world impact, the investigators would have to have credibility. (That’s what Jeff Sessions was thinking when he recused himself from the Mueller investigation, and look where that ended up.)

But Trump’s threats continually undermine the ability of his Justice Department to be viewed as anything but political.

Help is not on the way

After talks on a coronavirus relief bill hit a standstill, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell adjourned the Senate until after Labor Day. While senators will be on a 24 hour notice to get back to D.C. if a deal is made, there are no signs that negotiations are continuing.

But while the Hill will likely be quiet for the rest of the summer, September will be busy not just dealing with coronavirus relief legislation, but also with investigations into the slow-down of mail, senators campaigning for reelection and a government funding bill — since current funding runs out on Sept. 30.

Data Download: The numbers you need to know today

5,274,473: The number of confirmed cases of coronavirus in the United States, per the most recent data from NBC News and health officials. (That’s 61,225 more than yesterday morning.)

168,329: The number of deaths in the United States from the virus so far. (That’s 1,522 more than yesterday morning.)

64.6 million: The number of coronavirus tests administered in the U.S., according to researchers at The COVID Tracking Project.

20.8 million: Over 20.8 million people have been sickened by coronavirus worldwide, according to a New York Times tracker.

755,294: The number of people who have died worldwide from the virus.

The Lid: Ballot blocks

Don’t miss the pod from yesterday, when we looked at a new poll finding that half of registered voters expect that it will be difficult to cast their ballot this fall.

ICYMI: What else is happening in the world?

Israel and the United Arab Emirates announced they’d formalize relations on Thursday – a decision cheered by Bahrain and Egypt and denounced by Palestinians.

Belarusian authorities released some detained protesters after widespread condemnation and ahead of the European Union meeting to discuss sanctions.

The Justice Department accused Yale University of discriminating against Asian American and white applicants.

President Trump echoed the racist “birther” theorythat California Sen. Kamala Harris doesn’t meet the requirements to be vice president. Harris was born in California.

President Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen said in his new book that Trump worked with Russia to win the 2016 election.

The Biden campaign reported it raised $48 million since announcing Harris as the V.P. choice.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

News

Alberta Premier Smith aims to help fund private school construction

Published

 on

 

EDMONTON – Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says her government’s $8.6-billion plan to fast-track building new schools will include a pilot project to incentivize private ones.

Smith said the ultimate goal is to create thousands of new spaces for an exploding number of new students at a reduced cost to taxpayers.

“We want to put all of the different school options on the same level playing field,” Smith told a news conference in Calgary Wednesday.

Smith did not offer details about how much private school construction costs might be incentivized, but said she wants to see what independent schools might pitch.

“We’re putting it out there as a pilot to see if there is any interest in partnering on the same basis that we’ll be building the other schools with the different (public) school boards,” she said.

Smith made the announcement a day after she announced the multibillion-dollar school build to address soaring numbers of new students.

By quadrupling the current school construction budget to $8.6 billion, the province aims to offer up 30 new schools each year, adding 50,000 new student spaces within three years.

The government also wants to build or expand five charter school buildings per year, starting in next year’s budget, adding 12,500 spaces within four years.

Currently, non-profit independent schools can get some grants worth about 70 per cent of what students in public schools receive per student from the province.

However, those grants don’t cover major construction costs.

John Jagersma, executive director of the Association of Independent Schools and Colleges of Alberta, said he’s interested in having conversations with the government about incentives.

He said the province has never directly funded major capital costs for their facilities before, and said he doesn’t think the association has ever asked for full capital funding.

He said community or religious groups traditionally cover those costs, but they can help take the pressure off the public or separate systems.

“We think we can do our part,” Jagersma said.

Dennis MacNeil, head of the Public School Boards Association of Alberta, said they welcome the new funding, but said money for private school builds would set a precedent that could ultimately hurt the public system.

“We believe that the first school in any community should be a public school, because only public schools accept all kids that come through their doors and provide programming for them,” he said.

Jason Schilling, president of the Alberta Teachers’ Association, said if public dollars are going to be spent on building private schools, then students in the public system should be able to equitably access those schools.

“No other province spends as much money on private schools as Alberta does, and it’s at the detriment of public schools, where over 90 per cent of students go to school,” he said.

Schilling also said the province needs about 5,000 teachers now, but the government announcement didn’t offer a plan to train and hire thousands more over the next few years.

Alberta NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi on Tuesday praised the $8.6 billion as a “generational investment” in education, but said private schools have different mandates and the result could be schools not being built where they are needed most.

“Using that money to build public schools is more efficient, it’s smarter, it’s faster, and it will serve students better,” Nenshi said.

Education Minister Demetrios Nicolaides’ office declined to answer specific questions about the pilot project Wednesday, saying it’s still under development.

“Options and considerations for making capital more affordable for independent schools are being explored,” a spokesperson said. “Further information on this program will be forthcoming in the near future.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 18, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Health Minister Mark Holland appeals to Senate not to amend pharmacare bill

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Health Minister Mark Holland urged a committee of senators Wednesday not to tweak the pharmacare bill he carefully negotiated with the NDP earlier this year.

The bill would underpin a potential national, single-payer pharmacare program and allow the health minister to negotiate with provinces and territories to cover some diabetes and contraceptive medications.

It was the result of weeks of political negotiations with the New Democrats, who early this year threatened to pull out of their supply-and-confidence deal with the Liberals unless they could agree on the wording.

“Academics and experts have suggested amendments to this bill to most of us here, I think,” Independent Senator Rosemary Moodie told Holland at a meeting of the Senate’s social affairs committee.

Holland appeared before the committee as it considers the bill. He said he respects the role of the Senate, but that the pharmacare legislation is, in his view, “a little bit different.”

“It was balanced on a pinhead,” he told the committee.

“This is by far — and I’ve been involved in a lot of complex things — the most difficult bit of business I’ve ever been in. Every syllable, every word in this bill was debated and argued over.”

Holland also asked the senators to move quickly to pass the legislation, to avoid lending credence to Conservative critiques that the program is a fantasy.

When asked about the Liberals’ proposed pharmacare program for diabetes and birth control, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has often responded that the program isn’t real. Once the legislation is passed, the minister must negotiate with every provincial government to actually administer the program, which could take many months.

“If we spend a long time wordsmithing and trying to make the legislation perfect, then the criticism that it’s not real starts to feel real for people, because they don’t actually get drugs, they don’t get an improvement in their life,” Holland told the committee.

He told the committee that one of the reasons he signed a preliminary deal with his counterpart in British Columbia was to help answer some of the Senate’s questions about how the program would work in practice.

The memorandum of understanding between Ottawa and B.C. lays out how to province will use funds from the pharmacare bill to expand on its existing public coverage of contraceptives to include hormone replacement therapy to treat menopausal symptoms.

The agreement isn’t binding, and Holland would still need to formalize talks with the province when and if the Senate passes the bill based on any changes the senators decide to make.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 18, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Nova Scotia NDP accuse government of prioritizing landlord profits over renters

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia’s NDP are accusing the government of prioritizing landlords over residents who need an affordable place to live, as the opposition party tables a bill aimed at addressing the housing crisis.

NDP Leader Claudia Chender took aim at the Progressive Conservatives Wednesday ahead of introducing two new housing bills, saying the government “seems to be more focused on helping wealthy developers than everyday families.”

The Minister of Service Nova Scotia has said the government’s own housing legislation will “balance” the needs of tenants and landlords by extending the five per cent cap on rent until the end of 2027. But critics have called the cap extension useless because it allows landlords to raise rents past five per cent on fixed-term leases as long as property owners sign with a new renter.

Chender said the rules around fixed-term leases give landlords the “financial incentive to evict,” resulting in more people pushed into homelessness. She also criticized the part of the government bill that will permit landlords to issue eviction notices after three days of unpaid rent instead of 15.

The Tories’ housing bill, she said, represents a “shocking admission from this government that they are more concerned with conversations around landlord profits … than they are about Nova Scotians who are trying to find a home they can afford.”

The premier’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Also included in the government’s new housing legislation are clearer conditions for landlords to end a tenancy, such as criminal behaviour, disturbing fellow tenants, repeated late rental payments and extraordinary damage to a unit. It will also prohibit tenants from subletting units for more than they are paying.

The first NDP bill tabled Wednesday would create a “homelessness task force” to gather data to try to prevent homelessness, and the second would set limits on evictions during the winter and for seniors who meet income eligibility requirements for social housing and have lived in the same home for more than 10 years.

The NDP has previously tabled legislation that would create a $500 tax credit for renters and tie rent control to housing units instead of the individual.

Earlier this week landlords defended the use of the contentious fixed-term leases, saying they need to have the option to raise rent higher than five per cent to maintain their properties and recoup costs. Landlord Yarviv Gadish, who manages three properties in the Halifax area, called the use of fixed-term leases “absolutely essential” in order to keep his apartments presentable and to get a return on his investment.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 18, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending