Global Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management Market to Reach $52. 5 Billion by 2027. Amid the COVID-19 crisis, the global market for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management estimated at US$36.New York, Nov. 04, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Reportlinker.com announces the release of the report “Global Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management Industry” – https://www.reportlinker.com/p05961182/?utm_source=GNW 1 Billion in the year 2020, is projected to reach a revised size of US$52.5 Billion by 2027, growing at aCAGR of 5.5% over the period 2020-2027. Integrated, one of the segments analyzed in the report, is projected to record 5.8% CAGR and reach US$40.4 Billion by the end of the analysis period. After an early analysis of the business implications of the pandemic and its induced economic crisis, growth in the Standalone segment is readjusted to a revised 4.6% CAGR for the next 7-year period. The U.S. Market is Estimated at $10.7 Billion, While China is Forecast to Grow at 5.1% CAGR The Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management market in the U.S. is estimated at US$10.7 Billion in the year 2020. China, the world`s second largest economy, is forecast to reach a projected market size of US$9.2 Billion by the year 2027 trailing a CAGR of 5.1% over the analysis period 2020 to 2027. Among the other noteworthy geographic markets are Japan and Canada, each forecast to grow at 5.3% and 4.3% respectively over the 2020-2027 period. Within Europe, Germany is forecast to grow at approximately 4.5% CAGR.We bring years of research experience to this 8th edition of our report. The 130-page report presents concise insights into how the pandemic has impacted production and the buy side for 2020 and 2021. A short-term phased recovery by key geography is also addressed. Competitors identified in this market include, among others, * 3M Health Information Systems * Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. * Cerner Corporation * Computer Programs and Systems, Inc. (CPSI) * GE Healthcare * McKesson Corporation * Optum, Inc. * Vizient Inc. Read the full report: https://www.reportlinker.com/p05961182/?utm_source=GNW I. INTRODUCTION, METHODOLOGY & REPORT SCOPE II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. MARKET OVERVIEW Global Competitor Market Shares Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management Competitor Market Share Scenario Worldwide (in %): 2019 & 2025 Impact of Covid-19 and a Looming Global Recession 2. FOCUS ON SELECT PLAYERS 3. MARKET TRENDS & DRIVERS 4. GLOBAL MARKET PERSPECTIVE Table 1: World Current & Future Analysis for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Geographic Region – USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2020 through 2027 Table 2: World Historic Review for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Geographic Region – USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2012 through 2019 Table 3: World 15-Year Perspective for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Geographic Region – Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027 Table 4: World Current & Future Analysis for Integrated by Geographic Region – USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2020 through 2027 Table 5: World Historic Review for Integrated by Geographic Region – USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2012 through 2019 Table 6: World 15-Year Perspective for Integrated by Geographic Region – Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027 Table 7: World Current & Future Analysis for Standalone by Geographic Region – USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2020 through 2027 Table 8: World Historic Review for Standalone by Geographic Region – USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2012 through 2019 Table 9: World 15-Year Perspective for Standalone by Geographic Region – Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027 III. MARKET ANALYSIS GEOGRAPHIC MARKET ANALYSIS UNITED STATES Market Facts & Figures US Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management Market Share (in %) by Company: 2019 & 2025 Market Analytics Table 10: USA Current & Future Analysis for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for the Years 2020 through 2027 Table 11: USA Historic Review for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2012 through 2019 Table 12: USA 15-Year Perspective for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Integrated and Standalone for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027 CANADA Table 13: Canada Current & Future Analysis for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for the Years 2020 through 2027 Table 14: Canada Historic Review for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2012 through 2019 Table 15: Canada 15-Year Perspective for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Integrated and Standalone for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027 JAPAN Table 16: Japan Current & Future Analysis for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for the Years 2020 through 2027 Table 17: Japan Historic Review for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2012 through 2019 Table 18: Japan 15-Year Perspective for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Integrated and Standalone for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027 CHINA Table 19: China Current & Future Analysis for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for the Years 2020 through 2027 Table 20: China Historic Review for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2012 through 2019 Table 21: China 15-Year Perspective for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Integrated and Standalone for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027 EUROPE Market Facts & Figures European Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management Market: Competitor Market Share Scenario (in %) for 2019 & 2025 Market Analytics Table 22: Europe Current & Future Analysis for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Geographic Region – France, Germany, Italy, UK and Rest of Europe Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2020 through 2027 Table 23: Europe Historic Review for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Geographic Region – France, Germany, Italy, UK and Rest of Europe Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2012 through 2019 Table 24: Europe 15-Year Perspective for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Geographic Region – Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for France, Germany, Italy, UK and Rest of Europe Markets for Years 2012, 2020 & 2027 Table 25: Europe Current & Future Analysis for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for the Years 2020 through 2027 Table 26: Europe Historic Review for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2012 through 2019 Table 27: Europe 15-Year Perspective for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Integrated and Standalone for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027 FRANCE Table 28: France Current & Future Analysis for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for the Years 2020 through 2027 Table 29: France Historic Review for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2012 through 2019 Table 30: France 15-Year Perspective for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Integrated and Standalone for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027 GERMANY Table 31: Germany Current & Future Analysis for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for the Years 2020 through 2027 Table 32: Germany Historic Review for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2012 through 2019 Table 33: Germany 15-Year Perspective for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Integrated and Standalone for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027 ITALY Table 34: Italy Current & Future Analysis for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for the Years 2020 through 2027 Table 35: Italy Historic Review for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2012 through 2019 Table 36: Italy 15-Year Perspective for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Integrated and Standalone for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027 UNITED KINGDOM Table 37: UK Current & Future Analysis for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for the Years 2020 through 2027 Table 38: UK Historic Review for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2012 through 2019 Table 39: UK 15-Year Perspective for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Integrated and Standalone for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027 REST OF EUROPE Table 40: Rest of Europe Current & Future Analysis for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for the Years 2020 through 2027 Table 41: Rest of Europe Historic Review for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2012 through 2019 Table 42: Rest of Europe 15-Year Perspective for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Integrated and Standalone for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027 ASIA-PACIFIC Table 43: Asia-Pacific Current & Future Analysis for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for the Years 2020 through 2027 Table 44: Asia-Pacific Historic Review for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2012 through 2019 Table 45: Asia-Pacific 15-Year Perspective for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Integrated and Standalone for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027 REST OF WORLD Table 46: Rest of World Current & Future Analysis for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for the Years 2020 through 2027 Table 47: Rest of World Historic Review for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Integrated and Standalone Markets – Independent Analysis of Annual Sales in US$ Million for Years 2012 through 2019 Table 48: Rest of World 15-Year Perspective for Technology Spending on Revenue Cycle Management by Platform – Percentage Breakdown of Value Sales for Integrated and Standalone for the Years 2012, 2020 & 2027 IV. COMPETITION Total Companies Profiled: 46 Read the full report: https://www.reportlinker.com/p05961182/?utm_source=GNW About Reportlinker ReportLinker is an award-winning market research solution. Reportlinker finds and organizes the latest industry data so you get all the market research you need – instantly, in one place. __________________________ CONTACT: Clare: clare@reportlinker.com US: (339)-368-6001 Intl: +1 339-368-6001
TORONTO – Roots Corp. may have built its brand on all things comfy and cosy, but its CEO says activewear is now “really becoming a core part” of the brand.
The category, which at Roots spans leggings, tracksuits, sports bras and bike shorts, has seen such sustained double-digit growth that Meghan Roach plans to make it a key part of the business’ future.
“It’s an area … you will see us continue to expand upon,” she told analysts on a Friday call.
The Toronto-based retailer’s push into activewear has taken shape over many years and included several turns as the official designer and supplier of Team Canada’s Olympic uniform.
But consumers have had plenty of choice when it comes to workout gear and other apparel suited to their sporting needs. On top of the slew of athletic brands like Nike and Adidas, shoppers have also gravitated toward Lululemon Athletica Inc., Alo and Vuori, ramping up competition in the activewear category.
Roach feels Roots’ toehold in the category stems from the fit, feel and following its merchandise has cultivated.
“Our product really resonates with (shoppers) because you can wear it through multiple different use cases and occasions,” she said.
“We’ve been seeing customers come back again and again for some of these core products in our activewear collection.”
Her remarks came the same day as Roots revealed it lost $5.2 million in its latest quarter compared with a loss of $5.3 million in the same quarter last year.
The company said the second-quarter loss amounted to 13 cents per diluted share for the quarter ended Aug. 3, the same as a year earlier.
In presenting the results, Roach reminded analysts that the first half of the year is usually “seasonally small,” representing just 30 per cent of the company’s annual sales.
Sales for the second quarter totalled $47.7 million, down from $49.4 million in the same quarter last year.
The move lower came as direct-to-consumer sales amounted to $36.4 million, down from $37.1 million a year earlier, as comparable sales edged down 0.2 per cent.
The numbers reflect the fact that Roots continued to grapple with inventory challenges in the company’s Cooper fleece line that first cropped up in its previous quarter.
Roots recently began to use artificial intelligence to assist with daily inventory replenishments and said more tools helping with allocation will go live in the next quarter.
Beyond that time period, the company intends to keep exploring AI and renovate more of its stores.
It will also re-evaluate its design ranks.
Roots announced Friday that chief product officer Karuna Scheinfeld has stepped down.
Rather than fill the role, the company plans to hire senior level design talent with international experience in the outdoor and activewear sectors who will take on tasks previously done by the chief product officer.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 13, 2024.
VANCOUVER – Mediated talks between the union representing HandyDART workers in Metro Vancouver and its employer, Transdev, are set to resume today as a strike that has stopped most services drags into a second week.
No timeline has been set for the length of the negotiations, but Joe McCann, president of the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1724, says they are willing to stay there as long as it takes, even if talks drag on all night.
About 600 employees of the door-to-door transit service for people unable to navigate the conventional transit system have been on strike since last Tuesday, pausing service for all but essential medical trips.
Hundreds of drivers rallied outside TransLink’s head office earlier this week, calling for the transportation provider to intervene in the dispute with Transdev, which was contracted to oversee HandyDART service.
Transdev said earlier this week that it will provide a reply to the union’s latest proposal on Thursday.
A statement from the company said it “strongly believes” that their employees deserve fair wages, and that a fair contract “must balance the needs of their employees, clients and taxpayers.”
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.
MONTREAL – Travel company Transat AT Inc. reported a loss in its latest quarter compared with a profit a year earlier as its revenue edged lower.
The parent company of Air Transat says it lost $39.9 million or $1.03 per diluted share in its quarter ended July 31.
The result compared with a profit of $57.3 million or $1.49 per diluted share a year earlier.
Revenue in what was the company’s third quarter totalled $736.2 million, down from $746.3 million in the same quarter last year.
On an adjusted basis, Transat says it lost $1.10 per share in its latest quarter compared with an adjusted profit of $1.10 per share a year earlier.
Transat chief executive Annick Guérard says demand for leisure travel remains healthy, as evidenced by higher traffic, but consumers are increasingly price conscious given the current economic uncertainty.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.
