adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Business

Delta And WestJet Ax Joint Venture Plans Over LaGuardia Slots

Published

 on

 

Delta Air Lines and WestJet have decided to scrap their plans for a joint venture (JV). This comes after the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) sought to have the airlines give up some slots at New York’s LaGuardia Airport (LGA), a move the two airlines called “draconian.” As a heavily slot-controlled airport, giving up slots at LaGuardia was an undesirable requirement from the DOT, leading the two carriers to drop their plans.

Delta LGA Getty
Giving up slots at LaGuardia just proved to be a little too much for Delta and WestJet to stomach. Photo: Getty Images

Delta and WestJet ax JV plans

Delta and WestJet withdrew their application for antitrust immunity on Friday, November 20th, after the DOT asked the two airlines to give up slots at New York’s LaGuardia Airport. In a harsh rebuke of the DOT, the two airlines outlined what they deemed as an unfair set of conditions to receive joint venture approval.

Delta and WestJet had pursued the joint venture in part because of the Air Canada and United Airlines tie-up. The Star Alliance carriers have a dominant position in the market, reaching over 8,100 US-Canada city pairs, which is far greater than the Delta/WestJet network.

WestJet Getty
WestJet and Delta have a much smaller transborder network than Air Canada. Photo: Getty Images

Delta and WestJet had also highlighted the strength of their complementary route networks. The two airlines did not compete on any route. The only way the two compete on any routes is if you consider all three New York City airports as one market, in which case Delta flies between New York and Toronto, but out of John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) and not LGA.

LaGuardia slots were the center of the dispute

The DOT previously stated it had wanted a divestiture of 100% of WestJet’s slot portfolio at LaGuardia. Either WestJet would have to give up all eight slot pairs, or Delta would have to go and get rid of another eight slot pairs from its portfolio. Both carriers were unhappy with this.

Delta and WestJet do not compete directly on any routes out of LaGuardia. WestJet flies to Toronto, and Delta does not. Delta and WestJet outlined concerns that the New York-Toronto route would see reduced capacity with either WestJet pulling out, or else WestJet continuing to serve the route while Delta would have to cut service to small and medium-sized communities out of LaGuardia. Neither of these options appealed to either carrier.

Advertisement:

WestJet LaGuardia Getty
WestJet and Delta viewed LaGuardia slots as too valuable to give up. Photo: Getty Images

Delta also took aim at the DOT’s statement that the lack of slot divestiture would “exacerbate Delta’s dominance at LGA.” Let alone the fact that Delta has no control over how WestJet uses the LGA routes, the airline only has a market share of 45% out of LGA– which is far below what many other airlines have at their respective hubs, including United at Newark Liberty (EWR), which is another New York-area airport.

Delta went out and provided statistics for other hubs. For example, United’s 49% share in San Francisco, 53% share in Denver, 82% share in Houston, and nearly 70% share of Newark operations. Meanwhile, American Airlines has a 57% share out of Washington-National, 86% share out of Dallas/Fort Worth, 90% share in Charlotte, and a 74% share in Miami. Meanwhile, Southwest has a 92% share at gate-restricted Dallas Love Field.


Delta LaGuardia
Delta Air Lines is the dominant carrier at New York-LGA. Photo: Getty Images

An OAG report cited by Delta found that, during the 12 months ending in October 2019, Delta only operated 28% of flights to and from the New York metropolitan area as a whole. All this is on top of Delta’s major multi-billion dollar investment in LaGuardia.

Delta also stated the following in its filing:

“The loss of these slots would deprive the Joint Applicants of critical operating rights at one of the most important strategic hubs in Delta’s global network at a time when Delta is investing billions of dollars of its own capital in a comprehensive facilities improvement project at this airport.”

Delta and WestJet’s other concern was that the sale of these slots could be far below their long-term economic value, given how they would be sold in the midst of an ongoing crisis. Also, decrying the requirement to divest these slots, the airlines noted that the slots would probably be used for domestic routes and not services between LaGuardia and Canada.

Removing LCC Swoop from the joint venture

Delta and WestJet aimed at the DOT considering Swoop to be separate from WestJet and out of the joint venture. The airlines were quick to point to Air Canada’s Rouge subsidiary being included in the United and Air Canada tie-up.

Delta and WestJet sought to use Swoop to target price-sensitive leisure travelers between the United States and Canada. Swoop would not be a major participant, but rather maximize synergies in the combined joint venture network to maximize Swoop’s success in transborder markets.

Swoop
Swoop is WestJet’s ultra-low-cost arm. Photo: Swoop

Swoop does not even offer connections, so its only role in the Delta and WestJet joint venture would be to take advantage of the data and synergies the two mainline airlines see and let Swoop cover the price-sensitive leisure market.

Requiring WestJet to interline with other US airlines

Aside from United Airlines, the DOT further proposed that WestJet would interline upon request for any US airline. Essentially, WestJet would be open for interlining, that is, through-ticketing and baggage handling, for any other airline in the United States looking for a transborder partner.

WestJet and Delta argued that this would come at a huge cost to WestJet, which would have to set up and maintain the interlining relationships when there may be systems incompatibility and other complexities.

The two carriers argue that forcing interlining agreements on WestJet adds an undue cost burden on WestJet. Photo: Getty Images

So, what comes next?

For now, Delta and WestJet have called off their joint venture plans. However, that does not mean the end of the airlines cooperating through codeshare and reciprocal frequent flier agreements. However, this cooperation is on a far less intense scale than a joint venture and would not get close to what United and Air Canada have in the transborder market.

Delta and WestJet can apply again later and hope that the DOT might be a little more lenient and accept the joint venture without requiring some of these conditions. This, however, could take a few years. Which means, for now, Air Canada and United will continue to remain the dominant force on the US transborder market.

It also shows that, for Delta and WestJet, these LaGuardia slots are a lot more important for the carriers than the overall joint venture.

 

 

Source: – Simple Flying

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Transat AT reports $39.9M Q3 loss compared with $57.3M profit a year earlier

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – Travel company Transat AT Inc. reported a loss in its latest quarter compared with a profit a year earlier as its revenue edged lower.

The parent company of Air Transat says it lost $39.9 million or $1.03 per diluted share in its quarter ended July 31.

The result compared with a profit of $57.3 million or $1.49 per diluted share a year earlier.

Revenue in what was the company’s third quarter totalled $736.2 million, down from $746.3 million in the same quarter last year.

On an adjusted basis, Transat says it lost $1.10 per share in its latest quarter compared with an adjusted profit of $1.10 per share a year earlier.

Transat chief executive Annick Guérard says demand for leisure travel remains healthy, as evidenced by higher traffic, but consumers are increasingly price conscious given the current economic uncertainty.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TRZ)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Dollarama keeping an eye on competitors as Loblaw launches new ultra-discount chain

Published

 on

 

Dollarama Inc.’s food aisles may have expanded far beyond sweet treats or piles of gum by the checkout counter in recent years, but its chief executive maintains his company is “not in the grocery business,” even if it’s keeping an eye on the sector.

“It’s just one small part of our store,” Neil Rossy told analysts on a Wednesday call, where he was questioned about the company’s food merchandise and rivals playing in the same space.

“We will keep an eye on all retailers — like all retailers keep an eye on us — to make sure that we’re competitive and we understand what’s out there.”

Over the last decade and as consumers have more recently sought deals, Dollarama’s food merchandise has expanded to include bread and pantry staples like cereal, rice and pasta sold at prices on par or below supermarkets.

However, the competition in the discount segment of the market Dollarama operates in intensified recently when the country’s biggest grocery chain began piloting a new ultra-discount store.

The No Name stores being tested by Loblaw Cos. Ltd. in Windsor, St. Catharines and Brockville, Ont., are billed as 20 per cent cheaper than discount retail competitors including No Frills. The grocery giant is able to offer such cost savings by relying on a smaller store footprint, fewer chilled products and a hearty range of No Name merchandise.

Though Rossy brushed off notions that his company is a supermarket challenger, grocers aren’t off his radar.

“All retailers in Canada are realistic about the fact that everyone is everyone’s competition on any given item or category,” he said.

Rossy declined to reveal how much of the chain’s sales would overlap with Loblaw or the food category, arguing the vast variety of items Dollarama sells is its strength rather than its grocery products alone.

“What makes Dollarama Dollarama is a very wide assortment of different departments that somewhat represent the old five-and-dime local convenience store,” he said.

The breadth of Dollarama’s offerings helped carry the company to a second-quarter profit of $285.9 million, up from $245.8 million in the same quarter last year as its sales rose 7.4 per cent.

The retailer said Wednesday the profit amounted to $1.02 per diluted share for the 13-week period ended July 28, up from 86 cents per diluted share a year earlier.

The period the quarter covers includes the start of summer, when Rossy said the weather was “terrible.”

“The weather got slightly better towards the end of the summer and our sales certainly increased, but not enough to make up for the season’s horrible start,” he said.

Sales totalled $1.56 billion for the quarter, up from $1.46 billion in the same quarter last year.

Comparable store sales, a key metric for retailers, increased 4.7 per cent, while the average transaction was down2.2 per cent and traffic was up seven per cent, RBC analyst Irene Nattel pointed out.

She told investors in a note that the numbers reflect “solid demand as cautious consumers focus on core consumables and everyday essentials.”

Analysts have attributed such behaviour to interest rates that have been slow to drop and high prices of key consumer goods, which are weighing on household budgets.

To cope, many Canadians have spent more time seeking deals, trading down to more affordable brands and forgoing small luxuries they would treat themselves to in better economic times.

“When people feel squeezed, they tend to shy away from discretionary, focus on the basics,” Rossy said. “When people are feeling good about their wallet, they tend to be more lax about the basics and more willing to spend on discretionary.”

The current economic situation has drawn in not just the average Canadian looking to save a buck or two, but also wealthier consumers.

“When the entire economy is feeling slightly squeezed, we get more consumers who might not have to or want to shop at a Dollarama generally or who enjoy shopping at a Dollarama but have the luxury of not having to worry about the price in some other store that they happen to be standing in that has those goods,” Rossy said.

“Well, when times are tougher, they’ll consider the extra five minutes to go to the store next door.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:DOL)

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

U.S. regulator fines TD Bank US$28M for faulty consumer reports

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has ordered TD Bank Group to pay US$28 million for repeatedly sharing inaccurate, negative information about its customers to consumer reporting companies.

The agency says TD has to pay US$7.76 million in total to tens of thousands of victims of its illegal actions, along with a US$20 million civil penalty.

It says TD shared information that contained systemic errors about credit card and bank deposit accounts to consumer reporting companies, which can include credit reports as well as screening reports for tenants and employees and other background checks.

CFPB director Rohit Chopra says in a statement that TD threatened the consumer reports of customers with fraudulent information then “barely lifted a finger to fix it,” and that regulators will need to “focus major attention” on TD Bank to change its course.

TD says in a statement it self-identified these issues and proactively worked to improve its practices, and that it is committed to delivering on its responsibilities to its customers.

The bank also faces scrutiny in the U.S. over its anti-money laundering program where it expects to pay more than US$3 billion in monetary penalties to resolve.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending