adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Tech

Apple, Amazon and Google's smart home alliance has one fatal flaw – Wired.co.uk

Published

 on


Amazon / Apple / Google / WIRED

The smart home is a mess, and now the biggest names in the business are joining forces to tidy it up. Apple, Amazon, Google, and the Zigbee Alliance have announced they’re forming what can best be described as The Smart Home Avengers, with an endgame of having all your smart home gadgets play together. After years of the three big tech companies laying out competing visions for their smart home ecosystems, though, this new team-up is an admission; Amazon, Google and Apple have each failed to make this work on their own terms.

The coalition says it will build a new connectivity standard based on Internet Protocol (IP) to ensure different devices from different manufacturers can talk to one another. As the group put it in its announcement: “smart home devices should be secure, reliable, and seamless to use.” Project Connected Home over IP (apparently the best name these titans of industry could come up with) at least sets out its goals plainly: you should be able to buy any smart home gadget safe in the knowledge it will talk to every other device in your home, securely. The fact it’s based on IP means you should, in theory, be able to connect everything to the internet, rather than going through a hub.

This alliance may be critical to the future of the smart home, and proof that no single company has managed to dominate this space. We’ve seen these types of unions form and fall by the wayside, but the fact that Apple, Google and Amazon are all sat at the same table provides some hope – and an acknowledgement that everyone has failed to own this space.

Apple has generally kept its distance from the other two companies, choosing to walk a more privacy-conscious path with HomeKit. But this has been a double-edged sword, as stricter security demands on device partners have stymied the levels of growth enjoyed by Amazon and Google. For example, Apple demands that some processing takes place locally on an iPhone running its Home app or a smart speaker-hub like the HomePod, limiting how much gets shared to the cloud.

The announcement of the Working Group failed to address these questions. For example, will there still be different requirements for hardware partners when working with Apple HomeKit? There’s clearly a tension between the way Apple operates and the way Amazon and Google do, and it will be interesting to see if the Project Connected Home over IP group is able to reconcile these differences.

Amazon’s Alexa and Google Assistant use a cloud-to-cloud protocol, while Apple demands much of HomeKit’s communications to take place locally and this decision has already had major repercussions for both the competency (of, for instance, Siri) and the privacy complications that come from placing voice assistant-accessing microphones in people’s homes.

It’s likely that this new standard, however it shakes out, will need to satisfy some of Apple’s existing HomeKit requirements, which is good news for all smart home users in the long term. But it’s also worth noting that Apple could benefit the most from joining this alliance, as despite having huge reach with iOS, it currently trails the other two in the number of devices on offer. It’s also yet to launch its own budget smart speaker.

Apple has been reticent to open up its smart home in the same way as rivals. Amazon and Google have built businesses on collecting user data, and see the smart home as an extension of how they learn about our behaviour and spending habits. Apple is less interested in this and has instead prided itself on putting privacy first at the expense of aggressive growth.

Take HomeKit Secure Video, its new way to encrypt all videos on a HomeKit hub and secure them in the cloud – it’s one way for Apple to take steps forward while keeping its focus on privacy. How will Project Connected Home over IP affect initiatives like this? These are all questions yet to be answered and while current Apple HomeKit users won’t be affected, even the fact of Apple’s involvement signals that the Amazon-Google approach may already have won.

Zigbee Alliance also brings A-lister board members including Ikea, Samsung, and Signify, creator of Philips Hue. Seeing Zigbee’s name on the list is especially encouraging: not only does it have major names attached, it has a huge vested interest in the future of smart home interoperability – more so, in fact, than Apple, Amazon or Google.

But more names means more pieces to try and fit together. Apple has its HomeKit platform; Amazon has Alexa; and Google says it’s bringing Thread, Wave and the Google Assistant to the party. (No mention of Brillo – RIP). Meanwhile, the Zigbee protocol, which in the latest version creates an encrypted mesh network operating at 2.4GHz, is already used in devices from Philips Hue, and even some Amazon Echo speakers.

In a press release, Apple said the planned protocol will “complement existing technologies,” suggesting the plan isn’t to eliminate any of the above mentioned standards but find a new common ground between them.

The group will first focus on physical safety devices such as smart locks, connected smoke alarms, smart plugs, security systems and heating/air conditioning devices. Yes, it probably means you’ll need to buy new devices that take advantage of the protocol, but don’t expect those to start hitting the market until 2021 at the earliest. While it’s clear the next 18 months will involve considerable compromises, it’s clear that this will soon be close to mandatory for anyone looking to work in the smart home space.

“I say there is little risk for the three ecosystems because this interoperability will not necessarily impact which ecosystem consumers will pick,” says Carolina Milanesi, analyst at Creative Strategies. “The opportunity in the smart home is still huge and lowering the barrier of entry for mass market consumers starts with better interoperability, consistency of experience when it comes to set up, updates and so on and of course security. We now need to see if the promise of having something in place next year is fulfilled.”

More great stories from WIRED

? SUVs are worse for the planet than anyone realised

⏲️ Science says we should work shorter hours in winter

? The illegal trade of Siberian mammoth tusks revealed

? I ditched Google for DuckDuckGo. Here’s why you should too

? How to use psychology to get people to answer your emails

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Here is how to prepare your online accounts for when you die

Published

 on

 

LONDON (AP) — Most people have accumulated a pile of data — selfies, emails, videos and more — on their social media and digital accounts over their lifetimes. What happens to it when we die?

It’s wise to draft a will spelling out who inherits your physical assets after you’re gone, but don’t forget to take care of your digital estate too. Friends and family might treasure files and posts you’ve left behind, but they could get lost in digital purgatory after you pass away unless you take some simple steps.

Here’s how you can prepare your digital life for your survivors:

Apple

The iPhone maker lets you nominate a “ legacy contact ” who can access your Apple account’s data after you die. The company says it’s a secure way to give trusted people access to photos, files and messages. To set it up you’ll need an Apple device with a fairly recent operating system — iPhones and iPads need iOS or iPadOS 15.2 and MacBooks needs macOS Monterey 12.1.

For iPhones, go to settings, tap Sign-in & Security and then Legacy Contact. You can name one or more people, and they don’t need an Apple ID or device.

You’ll have to share an access key with your contact. It can be a digital version sent electronically, or you can print a copy or save it as a screenshot or PDF.

Take note that there are some types of files you won’t be able to pass on — including digital rights-protected music, movies and passwords stored in Apple’s password manager. Legacy contacts can only access a deceased user’s account for three years before Apple deletes the account.

Google

Google takes a different approach with its Inactive Account Manager, which allows you to share your data with someone if it notices that you’ve stopped using your account.

When setting it up, you need to decide how long Google should wait — from three to 18 months — before considering your account inactive. Once that time is up, Google can notify up to 10 people.

You can write a message informing them you’ve stopped using the account, and, optionally, include a link to download your data. You can choose what types of data they can access — including emails, photos, calendar entries and YouTube videos.

There’s also an option to automatically delete your account after three months of inactivity, so your contacts will have to download any data before that deadline.

Facebook and Instagram

Some social media platforms can preserve accounts for people who have died so that friends and family can honor their memories.

When users of Facebook or Instagram die, parent company Meta says it can memorialize the account if it gets a “valid request” from a friend or family member. Requests can be submitted through an online form.

The social media company strongly recommends Facebook users add a legacy contact to look after their memorial accounts. Legacy contacts can do things like respond to new friend requests and update pinned posts, but they can’t read private messages or remove or alter previous posts. You can only choose one person, who also has to have a Facebook account.

You can also ask Facebook or Instagram to delete a deceased user’s account if you’re a close family member or an executor. You’ll need to send in documents like a death certificate.

TikTok

The video-sharing platform says that if a user has died, people can submit a request to memorialize the account through the settings menu. Go to the Report a Problem section, then Account and profile, then Manage account, where you can report a deceased user.

Once an account has been memorialized, it will be labeled “Remembering.” No one will be able to log into the account, which prevents anyone from editing the profile or using the account to post new content or send messages.

X

It’s not possible to nominate a legacy contact on Elon Musk’s social media site. But family members or an authorized person can submit a request to deactivate a deceased user’s account.

Passwords

Besides the major online services, you’ll probably have dozens if not hundreds of other digital accounts that your survivors might need to access. You could just write all your login credentials down in a notebook and put it somewhere safe. But making a physical copy presents its own vulnerabilities. What if you lose track of it? What if someone finds it?

Instead, consider a password manager that has an emergency access feature. Password managers are digital vaults that you can use to store all your credentials. Some, like Keeper,Bitwarden and NordPass, allow users to nominate one or more trusted contacts who can access their keys in case of an emergency such as a death.

But there are a few catches: Those contacts also need to use the same password manager and you might have to pay for the service.

___

Is there a tech challenge you need help figuring out? Write to us at onetechtip@ap.org with your questions.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Google’s partnership with AI startup Anthropic faces a UK competition investigation

Published

 on

 

LONDON (AP) — Britain’s competition watchdog said Thursday it’s opening a formal investigation into Google’s partnership with artificial intelligence startup Anthropic.

The Competition and Markets Authority said it has “sufficient information” to launch an initial probe after it sought input earlier this year on whether the deal would stifle competition.

The CMA has until Dec. 19 to decide whether to approve the deal or escalate its investigation.

“Google is committed to building the most open and innovative AI ecosystem in the world,” the company said. “Anthropic is free to use multiple cloud providers and does, and we don’t demand exclusive tech rights.”

San Francisco-based Anthropic was founded in 2021 by siblings Dario and Daniela Amodei, who previously worked at ChatGPT maker OpenAI. The company has focused on increasing the safety and reliability of AI models. Google reportedly agreed last year to make a multibillion-dollar investment in Anthropic, which has a popular chatbot named Claude.

Anthropic said it’s cooperating with the regulator and will provide “the complete picture about Google’s investment and our commercial collaboration.”

“We are an independent company and none of our strategic partnerships or investor relationships diminish the independence of our corporate governance or our freedom to partner with others,” it said in a statement.

The U.K. regulator has been scrutinizing a raft of AI deals as investment money floods into the industry to capitalize on the artificial intelligence boom. Last month it cleared Anthropic’s $4 billion deal with Amazon and it has also signed off on Microsoft’s deals with two other AI startups, Inflection and Mistral.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Kuwait bans ‘Call of Duty: Black Ops 6’ video game, likely over it featuring Saddam Hussein in 1990s

Published

 on

 

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — The tiny Mideast nation of Kuwait has banned the release of the video game “Call of Duty: Black Ops 6,” which features the late Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and is set in part in the 1990s Gulf War.

Kuwait has not publicly acknowledged banning the game, which is a tentpole product for the Microsoft-owned developer Activision and is set to be released on Friday worldwide. However, it comes as Kuwait still wrestles with the aftermath of the invasion and as video game makers more broadly deal with addressing historical and cultural issues in their work.

The video game, a first-person shooter, follows CIA operators fighting at times in the United States and also in the Middle East. Game-play trailers for the game show burning oilfields, a painful reminder for Kuwaitis who saw Iraqis set fire to the fields, causing vast ecological and economic damage. Iraqi troops damaged or set fire to over 700 wells.

There also are images of Saddam and Iraq’s old three-star flag in the footage released by developers ahead of the game’s launch. The game’s multiplayer section, a popular feature of the series, includes what appears to be a desert shootout in Kuwait called Scud after the Soviet missiles Saddam fired in the war. Another is called Babylon, after the ancient city in Iraq.

Activision acknowledged in a statement that the game “has not been approved for release in Kuwait,” but did not elaborate.

“All pre-orders in Kuwait will be cancelled and refunded to the original point of purchase,” the company said. “We remain hopeful that local authorities will reconsider, and allow players in Kuwait to enjoy this all-new experience in the Black Ops series.”

Kuwait’s Media Ministry did not respond to requests for comment from The Associated Press over the decision.

“Call of Duty,” which first began in 2003 as a first-person shooter set in World War II, has expanded into an empire worth billions of dollars now owned by Microsoft. But it also has been controversial as its gameplay entered the realm of geopolitics. China and Russia both banned chapters in the franchise. In 2009, an entry in the gaming franchise allowed players to take part in a militant attack at a Russian airport, killing civilians.

But there have been other games recently that won praise for their handling of the Mideast. Ubisoft’s “Assassin’s Creed: Mirage” published last year won praise for its portrayal of Baghdad during the Islamic Golden Age in the 9th century.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending