adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Business

Uber and Lyft approved to operate in Metro Vancouver – Vancouver Sun

Published

 on


VICTORIA – Ride-hailing companies Uber and Lyft have been approved to operate in Metro Vancouver, paving the way for the major companies to get vehicles on the streets within days or weeks.

The Passenger Transportation Board ruled Thursday that both companies can begin to put cars on the streets in the Lower Mainland and Whistler, subject to obtaining local business licenses and proper insurance from the Insurance Corporation of B.C.

The board also declined a demand from the taxi sector that it set a limit on the number of ride-hailing vehicles, or forbid the companies from using variable pricing.

“The Board has determined that, at this point in time, it is not prepared to impose limits on fleet size because of the experiences of other jurisdictions with Uber’s operations,” read its decision.

Uber said it will start operations “very soon.”

“The PTB’s approval is one of the final steps before Uber is able to start providing reliable, safe, affordable rides in Metro Vancouver,” said Michael van Hemmen, head of Uber’s western division, in a statement.

“We hope to launch very soon, once we have obtained a business licence from the City of Vancouver and purchased insurance from ICBC. In the meantime, we encourage all qualified drivers with a Class 4 licence to sign up on the Uber app at drive.uber.com so they can start earning money as soon as operations begin.”

Lyft also promised quick action on launch.

“Lyft thanks the provincial government and the Passenger Transportation Board for their dedication in establishing the framework to make operations possible,” the company said in a statement.

“We are working to secure our provincial and municipal business licences and will soon announce our operating area and launch service. We are excited to further unlock the city with reliable and affordable rides, allowing for more spontaneity and convenience.”

Lyft and Uber will still have to obtain local business license approval.

Mayors on TransLink’s Mayors’ Council voted last month to have an interim regional municipal business license for ride-hailing companies in place by the end of January, in an attempt to remove a hodgepodge of varying fees and applications from each municipality. That came amid threats from the provincial government that it could remove licensing power from municipalities if mayors opposed to ride-hailing, like Surrey’s Doug McCallum, tried to frustrate licenses in an attempt to block the service.

Vancouver mayor Kennedy Stewart said in a statement that his city could very quickly handle license applications from Uber and Lyft.

“The City of Vancouver is ready for ride-hailing,” he said. “We’ve been working hard behind the scenes to make sure that once provincial regulators approved applicants like Lyft and Uber, our staff can turn around business licenses in three days or less. Now that this has finally happened, all we need is for Lyft and Uber to ask us for a business license and we’ll grant one.”

For prospective drivers, the Class 4 license requirement was part of the NDP government’s approval of ride-hailing, and means would-be ride-hailing drivers must take additional training, steps and security screening.

The board decision comes after multiple delays to ride-hailing and a timeline that far exceeded the original promise of the government.

Transportation Minister Claire Trevena said she will still work with the taxi sector to address concerns in coming months.

“I know people were frustrated and wanted to get them immediately,” she said of ride-hailing licenses during a media conference Thursday. “I was as frustrated as everyone at the time it seemed to be taking. But in the end people of British Columbia can feel very comfortable in the services they are getting.”

The taxi sector had lobbied hard for what it called a “level playing field” with ride-hailing companies – specifically a cap on vehicles and a ban on what it called predatory pricing. Those moves would help reduce the economic impact on its sector as it faced with competing with large companies like Uber and Lyft, the taxi sector argued.

However, the board in its decisions Thursday said negative economic consequences to taxis are simply part of the market adjusting.

Although Lyft and Uber will have to start fares at a set minimum, and forbidden from using coupons or discounts, the companies will be allowed to implement dynamic pricing and “surge” pricing.

“Dynamic pricing is the mechanism by which the supply of vehicles is adjusted to respond to passenger demand,” ruled the board.

“The intended effect of dynamic pricing is to reduce wait times at peak periods by incentivising drivers and to lower costs at off peak periods to encourage trips. The Board does not accept the submission that dynamic pricing is discriminatory in purpose or effect. The price of countless goods and services are dictated by market conditions.”

The board also brushed aside the argument from taxis that its approval, without limits, would decimate the traditional taxi sector and devalue the licenses obtained by operators.

“We live in a market economy and competition is the norm in marketplaces,” read the decision.

“The prospect of taxis losing market share to (ride-sharing) and experiencing declines in absolute levels of ridership can occur as a natural consequence of marketplace adjustment. While the Board is sympathetic to the prospect that taxi licence holders may experience a drop in their licence-share value, it has never sanctioned the market for such shares, nor does it have the authority to do so.

“Taxi licensees created the market and invested in licence shares or used them as collateral. As with any investments, there are associated risks and impacts. The introduction of ride hailing has been a point of public discussion and consultation for approximately seven years. As a consequence, there has been ample notice regarding the possible introduction of ride hailing in this province.”

The board received 29 ride-hailing company applications.

It also announced Thursday it has rejected two companies: ReRyde Technologies and Kater Technologies Inc.

Kater had tried to get an early jump on competing with ride-hailing by partnering with Vancouver taxis to roll out an early app-based hybrid taxi service. However, the board said its application proposals for rates and revenue were not realistic.

“Kater’s business plan indicates basic knowledge and understanding of the regulatory requirements,” read the decision.

“However, the Board finds Kater’s business plan commitments and its 36-month cash projections are incongruous and unrealistic. Its business plan is ambitious; the services it says it will provide and the stakeholder relationships it intends to build do not align with its financial information.”

rshaw@postmedia.com

twitter.com/robshaw_vansun

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Business

Transat AT reports $39.9M Q3 loss compared with $57.3M profit a year earlier

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – Travel company Transat AT Inc. reported a loss in its latest quarter compared with a profit a year earlier as its revenue edged lower.

The parent company of Air Transat says it lost $39.9 million or $1.03 per diluted share in its quarter ended July 31.

The result compared with a profit of $57.3 million or $1.49 per diluted share a year earlier.

Revenue in what was the company’s third quarter totalled $736.2 million, down from $746.3 million in the same quarter last year.

On an adjusted basis, Transat says it lost $1.10 per share in its latest quarter compared with an adjusted profit of $1.10 per share a year earlier.

Transat chief executive Annick Guérard says demand for leisure travel remains healthy, as evidenced by higher traffic, but consumers are increasingly price conscious given the current economic uncertainty.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TRZ)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Dollarama keeping an eye on competitors as Loblaw launches new ultra-discount chain

Published

 on

 

Dollarama Inc.’s food aisles may have expanded far beyond sweet treats or piles of gum by the checkout counter in recent years, but its chief executive maintains his company is “not in the grocery business,” even if it’s keeping an eye on the sector.

“It’s just one small part of our store,” Neil Rossy told analysts on a Wednesday call, where he was questioned about the company’s food merchandise and rivals playing in the same space.

“We will keep an eye on all retailers — like all retailers keep an eye on us — to make sure that we’re competitive and we understand what’s out there.”

Over the last decade and as consumers have more recently sought deals, Dollarama’s food merchandise has expanded to include bread and pantry staples like cereal, rice and pasta sold at prices on par or below supermarkets.

However, the competition in the discount segment of the market Dollarama operates in intensified recently when the country’s biggest grocery chain began piloting a new ultra-discount store.

The No Name stores being tested by Loblaw Cos. Ltd. in Windsor, St. Catharines and Brockville, Ont., are billed as 20 per cent cheaper than discount retail competitors including No Frills. The grocery giant is able to offer such cost savings by relying on a smaller store footprint, fewer chilled products and a hearty range of No Name merchandise.

Though Rossy brushed off notions that his company is a supermarket challenger, grocers aren’t off his radar.

“All retailers in Canada are realistic about the fact that everyone is everyone’s competition on any given item or category,” he said.

Rossy declined to reveal how much of the chain’s sales would overlap with Loblaw or the food category, arguing the vast variety of items Dollarama sells is its strength rather than its grocery products alone.

“What makes Dollarama Dollarama is a very wide assortment of different departments that somewhat represent the old five-and-dime local convenience store,” he said.

The breadth of Dollarama’s offerings helped carry the company to a second-quarter profit of $285.9 million, up from $245.8 million in the same quarter last year as its sales rose 7.4 per cent.

The retailer said Wednesday the profit amounted to $1.02 per diluted share for the 13-week period ended July 28, up from 86 cents per diluted share a year earlier.

The period the quarter covers includes the start of summer, when Rossy said the weather was “terrible.”

“The weather got slightly better towards the end of the summer and our sales certainly increased, but not enough to make up for the season’s horrible start,” he said.

Sales totalled $1.56 billion for the quarter, up from $1.46 billion in the same quarter last year.

Comparable store sales, a key metric for retailers, increased 4.7 per cent, while the average transaction was down2.2 per cent and traffic was up seven per cent, RBC analyst Irene Nattel pointed out.

She told investors in a note that the numbers reflect “solid demand as cautious consumers focus on core consumables and everyday essentials.”

Analysts have attributed such behaviour to interest rates that have been slow to drop and high prices of key consumer goods, which are weighing on household budgets.

To cope, many Canadians have spent more time seeking deals, trading down to more affordable brands and forgoing small luxuries they would treat themselves to in better economic times.

“When people feel squeezed, they tend to shy away from discretionary, focus on the basics,” Rossy said. “When people are feeling good about their wallet, they tend to be more lax about the basics and more willing to spend on discretionary.”

The current economic situation has drawn in not just the average Canadian looking to save a buck or two, but also wealthier consumers.

“When the entire economy is feeling slightly squeezed, we get more consumers who might not have to or want to shop at a Dollarama generally or who enjoy shopping at a Dollarama but have the luxury of not having to worry about the price in some other store that they happen to be standing in that has those goods,” Rossy said.

“Well, when times are tougher, they’ll consider the extra five minutes to go to the store next door.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:DOL)

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

U.S. regulator fines TD Bank US$28M for faulty consumer reports

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has ordered TD Bank Group to pay US$28 million for repeatedly sharing inaccurate, negative information about its customers to consumer reporting companies.

The agency says TD has to pay US$7.76 million in total to tens of thousands of victims of its illegal actions, along with a US$20 million civil penalty.

It says TD shared information that contained systemic errors about credit card and bank deposit accounts to consumer reporting companies, which can include credit reports as well as screening reports for tenants and employees and other background checks.

CFPB director Rohit Chopra says in a statement that TD threatened the consumer reports of customers with fraudulent information then “barely lifted a finger to fix it,” and that regulators will need to “focus major attention” on TD Bank to change its course.

TD says in a statement it self-identified these issues and proactively worked to improve its practices, and that it is committed to delivering on its responsibilities to its customers.

The bank also faces scrutiny in the U.S. over its anti-money laundering program where it expects to pay more than US$3 billion in monetary penalties to resolve.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending