adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

A primer on Canadian politics for Americans watching the Freedom Convoy – National Post

Published

 on


Yes, Question Period is a chance for other MPs to yell at the prime minister, but Trudeau is definitely not Fidel Castro’s love child

Article content

One of the biggest political stories in the United States right now is Canadian. The “Freedom Convoy” has attracted the attention of a whole cross-section of U.S. lawmakers, and is getting widespread news coverage, particularly in conservative media. But as thousands of Americans take a close interest in Canadian politics for the first time in their lives, it’s easy to become confused by the strange workings of our particular subarctic constitutional monarchy. Thus, as a public service to our very good American friends, the National Post presents this primer into the Canadian political system.

Advertisement

Article content

We have a regular event where politicians yell at the prime minister

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has made quite a few statements about the truckers in the House of Commons (none of which were very supportive).

The venue was something known as Question Period. The prime minister remains the Canadian equivalent of a congressman (a member of parliament), so he has a seat in the House of Commons like everyone else. (Trudeau’s “district,” if you’re wondering, is a piece of downtown Montreal, Que.) Unlike the U.S., where the executive branch is headed by a president who is directly elected to the position, we simply hand our executive powers to whoever happens to be the most powerful MP.

What this means is that we have a regularly scheduled event known as Question Period where the prime minister takes his usual seat in the House of Commons and is assailed with abuse by members of the opposition. Heckling is allowed, but not nearly to the extent that the Brits do it.

Advertisement

Article content

Justin Trudeau, Canada’s prime minister, speaks during a news conference on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, on Friday, Feb. 11, 2022.  Photographer: David Kawai/Bloomberg
Justin Trudeau, Canada’s prime minister, speaks during a news conference on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, on Friday, Feb. 11, 2022.  Photographer: David Kawai/Bloomberg

We have no Second or First Amendment

This is a big one: Canada does not have absolute free speech and never has. This is actually the case in most of the world; one of the most unique things about the U.S. system is its near-total guarantee on free speech. For one thing, Canada criminalizes what it calls “hate speech”; in 2005, for instance, Indigenous leader David Ahenakew went to trial and was ultimately slapped with a fine for expressing his support for Adolf Hitler in comments to a reporter.

Firearms law also differs sharply from the U.S. Canadians love their guns and would probably be considered among the world’s most-armed countries if not for the proximity of the unbelievably gun-loving United States. But the key difference is that the Canadian system does not technically sanction firearms ownership for personal protection — and we absolutely don’t sanction it in order to ensure that citizens can overthrow the government if it gets too tyrannous.

Advertisement

Article content

Guns here can only technically be used for sports and hunting. And the Royal Canadian Mounted Police maintains pretty wide powers to strip away the gun licence of anyone it wants to.

We don’t need impeachment to get rid of our leader

A fair number of Freedom Convoyers probably wouldn’t mind seeing the immediate departure of Trudeau from office. In the U.S., kicking out an incumbent national leader is an excruciatingly long process of impeachment, at the end of which you’re forced to get their vice president anyway.

But the Canadian system allows the firing of any prime minister at any time and for any reason; Trudeau keeps his job only because a majority of the House of Commons are willing to keep him there.

That could change on a dime for a couple of reasons. First, Trudeau’s party could decide to kick him out as leader. A majority of Liberal Party MPs could revolt tomorrow morning to kick out Trudeau and pick his replacement. That actually just happened on the opposition benches; last week Canada’s Conservative Party turfed out leader Erin O’Toole and replaced him with Candice Bergen (not the Murphy Brown actress, a different one).

Advertisement

Article content

People wave flags on top of a truck in front of Parliament Hill in Ottawa, on Feb. 6.
People wave flags on top of a truck in front of Parliament Hill in Ottawa, on Feb. 6. Photo by Patrick Doyle/Reuters

Secondly, the other parties in the House of Commons could get together and topple Trudeau with a coalition. The Liberals do not currently have a majority of seats in the House of Commons, so they’re at constant risk of this happening. The main reason it doesn’t happen is because the other parties in the House of Commons have so little in common.

If you thought it was hard to get Republicans and Democrats to agree, try doing it with conservatives, democratic socialists, environmentalists and a literal separatist party.

The Canadian constitution is actually remarkably toothless as compared to the American one

For starters, our constitution is so young that some of the people who signed it are still alive. It was signed in 1982. Before then, Canada largely ran itself like the United Kingdom: No set constitution, but we knew the general rules thanks to a stapled together pile of precedents and edicts dating back to the days of the fur trade.

Advertisement

Article content

Freedom Convoyers will often cite the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which like the U.S. Constitution contains stirring passages guaranteeing our citizens’ rights to “freedom of conscience and religion,” “freedom of thought,” and “freedom of association.”

There’s just one problem: Our constitution also tells governments how to infringe those rights. A preamble to the document says that Canadian rights and freedoms only exist within “reasonable limits.” There’s even a section where provincial governments can ignore the Charter of Rights and Freedoms altogether so long as they announce it publicly (this is how the province of Quebec was able to pass laws banning religious head coverings).

The U.S. Supreme Court, of course, recently slapped down a federal attempt to impose nationwide vaccine mandates. Canadians have also tried to get our Supreme Court to slap down mandates as a violation of basic personal liberties, but in part due to our watered-down constitution the Canadian challenges keep failing.

Advertisement

Article content

Blockading stuff is illegal here (as it is in America)

U.S. defenders of Freedom Convoy will often claim that it is a peaceful, legal protest. Fox News host Tucker Carlson said as much in a recent segment on the convoy, and Texas Congressman Dan Crenshaw tweeted that Freedom Convoy was merely engaged in a “lawful protest” against federal COVID strictures.

Yes, Freedom Convoy has been remarkably non-violent, but it’s still pretty illegal to blockade public infrastructure.

In Ontario (the province that contains Ottawa), the Highway Traffic Act naturally forbids people from setting up their own roadblocks. Blockades are also a violation of the federal Criminal Code, which prescribes up to five years’ imprisonment for anyone who “blocks or obstructs a highway.”

Advertisement

Article content

Protestors and supporters attend a blockade at the foot of the Ambassador Bridge, sealing off the flow of commercial traffic over the bridge into Canada from Detroit, on February 11, 2022 in Windsor, Canada.
Protestors and supporters attend a blockade at the foot of the Ambassador Bridge, sealing off the flow of commercial traffic over the bridge into Canada from Detroit, on February 11, 2022 in Windsor, Canada. Photo by Cole Burston /Getty Images

This isn’t any different in the United States: When protesters took over a section of Seattle in 2020 it broke any number of laws — it’s just that nobody wanted to enforce those laws.

Some of our political rituals are remarkably old-timey

As the Canadian quarters gumming up your vending machines may have indicated, the Queen is still a thing here. Queen Elizabeth II is officially Canada’s head of state, which is why Freedom Convoyers keep weirdly petitioning the Queen to fire Trudeau.

As avid watchers of The Crown know all too well, Elizabeth II does technically have the power to pick who gets to be prime minister. But one of the primary reasons we’re still comfortable keeping her around is that she never, ever does. The Queen delegates all her Canadian duties to a Governor General (currently a woman named Mary Simon), and the Governor General’s job is to do what parliament tells them.

Advertisement

Article content

Governor General Mary Simon delivers the Throne Speech, at the Senate in Ottawa, November 23, 2021.
Governor General Mary Simon delivers the Throne Speech, at the Senate in Ottawa, November 23, 2021. Photo by Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press

American watchers of Canadian politics also appear to be confused by some of the regalia used in the Canadian House of Commons. Take this recent Reddit question where someone asks why the Canadian Speaker of the House dresses like he’s going to a 19th century masquerade ball. The quick answer is that’s how the Brits dress their Speaker of the House and we’ve never seen the reason to do it any different (it’s also why parliament’s Sergeant-at-Arms wears a bicorn hat).

All those pictures you’re seeing of Trudeau in blackface are real (but he’s not Castro’s love child)

If you’re spending any time on a Freedom Convoy social media forum, you might see a photo of Trudeau clad in some version of black or brownface.

Trudeau seen wearing blackface during a 2001 Arabian Nights costume party.
Trudeau seen wearing blackface during a 2001 Arabian Nights costume party. Photo by Canada Proud/Twitter

These are not photoshops. Trudeau’s love of cosplay is well-known, and right up until the early 2000s this indeed included frequent trips to the makeup chair for elaborate costumes depicting Arab sheiks, Harry Belafonte or just a generic black man.

Advertisement

Article content

Trudeau also bears a striking resemblance to the former dictator of Cuba, Fidel Castro. Given that Trudeau’s mother knew Castro personally (and raved about him in her autobiography), this has naturally led to speculation that Canada is actually led by the secret love child of one of the United States’ enemies.

The National Post actually looked into this in some detail, and the timelines simply don’t line up between Trudeau’s birth and his mother’s first encounter with Castro. It’s also worth noting that Trudeau’s father Pierre Elliott Trudeau (who was also a prime minister), similarly had a striking resemblance to the Cuban leader.

Advertisement

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending