adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Apologies, resignations and state of emergency declarations: 2021 in N.W.T. politics – CBC.ca

Published

 on


What can we say about this second pandemic year in the Northwest Territories? It was kind of a drag.

We wore masks, shrunk our social circles and kept kids home from school — again. 

We tried to be good all year long, and still got a lump of coal called Omicron.

But COVID-19 wasn’t the only story driving news in 2021. 

N.W.T. lawmakers also fed our feeds with scandals, resignations and state of emergency declarations.

What follows is a by-no-means-exhaustive rundown of political stories that made N.W.T. headlines in 2021. 

An apology and some allegations

The year in politics got rolling in February, when the Legislative Assembly reconvened, with a high-profile apology.

Premier Caroline Cochrane expressed regret over a handful of senior government officials who travelled outside the territory during the 2020 Christmas holidays after residents were urged to stay put to avoid importing COVID-19. 

Cochrane apologized “to the public who have been hurt by this,” adding she hoped all members of the Legislative Assembly would “also be role models and not leave the territory until COVID-19 is done.” 

Also in February, one of the territory’s most powerful bureaucrats, Legislative Assembly clerk Tim Mercer, was thrust into the public eye when allegations emerged that he bullied employees and created a toxic work environment. 

Mercer said the accusations came from a small number of disgruntled employees, and that an investigation in 2018 dismissed claims against him.

In August, an independent review determined complaints that Mercer bullied and harassed colleagues were unfounded. One complaint, that Mercer breached confidentiality rules, was found to have merit.  

The clerk of the N.W.T. legislature, Tim Mercer, pictured here in 2014. An independent review determined that complaints that Mercer bullied and harassed colleagues were unfounded. (CBC)

COVID anniversary, more pandemic spending

March marked one year of the global COVID-19 crisis, and the start of N.W.T.’s campaign to inoculate the general population.

It was also when MLAs accepted a $2-billion budget, with $117 million in new spending.

Ahead of the budget’s approval, senior finance officials warned the “current fiscal plan is unsustainable,” with tax revenues expected to fall by almost $40 million, due to COVID-19. 

In her speech on the proposed budget, Finance Minister Caroline Wawzonek defended her fiscal plan, which she said avoided cuts and new taxes.

Wawzonek said the territorial government is a major player in N.W.T.’s economy and “Budget 2021 has no reductions because right now the economy needs support.”

A public inquiry, a threatening Facebook message

In April, Act One opened in what would become the N.W.T.’s stand-out political drama of 2021. 

Late on a Thursday night, then-Tu Nedhé-Wiilideh MLA Steve Norn said in a statement he had tested positive for COVID-19.

The revelation set off a series of events in which Norn played the hapless lead. 

First, he sent mixed messages to reporters about whether he’d broken isolation rules. Then, an integrity commissioner investigation reported that Norn breached public health orders when he visited the Legislative Assembly and the Yellowknife Racquet Club before the end of his mandatory, post-travel isolation period. The commissioner kicked the matter up to a sole adjudicator.

In a public inquiry held over nine days (and costing more than $800,000), that adjudicator found that Norn violated several sections of the Legislative Assembly’s code of conduct and recommended he be removed from his seat. 

Former Tu Nedhé-Wiilideh MLA Steve Norn. After he was found to have violated the Legislative Assembly’s code of conduct, Norn apologized for pain he had caused, and resigned. (Travis Burke/CBC)

The inquiry also brought to light a threatening Facebook message Norn sent to his caucus colleagues in which he swore at them “for making my loved ones cry,” and wrote “I’m coming for you.” 

Norn said his message was “in no way meant to be a physical threat,” and apologized to his coworkers. 

In November, MLAs stated they would accept the adjudicator’s recommendations, but as they prepared to expel Norn, he apologized for pain he had caused, and resigned. (Speaker Frederick Blake Jr. later clarified that Norn’s resignation was invalid.)

Floods and a cabinet shuffle

The spring of 2021 brought devastating floods to the Dehcho and Beaufort Delta regions, with an estimated 700 people displaced in Fort Simpson. Some couldn’t return home for weeks or months

Community members and MLAs expressed frustration over the government’s response, eroding public confidence in the minister in charge of disaster relief, Paulie Chinna.

In early June, the premier stripped Chinna of the Municipal and Community Affairs portfolio, handing it to Minister Shane Thompson.

It was the second time Chinna was taken off MACA. The first was in April of 2020, after COVID-19 snowballed into an international public health disaster. She was re-installed the following July.

Roughly 700 residents of Fort Simpson, N.W.T., evacuated the community due to severe flooding. (Mario De Ciccio/CBC)

Legislature becomes majority women

June also saw a noteworthy exit from the Legislative Assembly.

Then-Monfwi MLA Jackson Lafferty announced his resignation after 16 years representing the Tłıchǫ region, and his intentions to run for Tłıchǫ Grand Chief. 

A by-election installed Jane Weyallon Armstrong in the Monfwi seat. 

Not only was Weyallon Armstrong the first woman elected to represent the riding, but she tipped the gender balance of the Legislative Assembly, making it majority women — a first among Canadian legislatures.

Lafferty was elected Tłıchǫ Grand Chief in November. 

Jane Weyallon Armstrong was the first woman elected to represent the Monfwi riding and her victory tipped the gender balance in the N.W.T. Legislative Assembly. (Chantal Dubuc/CBC)

Marching for lost children

June was also a month of mourning. 

Tk’emlúps te Secwépemc First Nation in B.C. announced in late May it had located unmarked graves of an estimated 215 children near the former Kamloops Indian Residential School. On June 4, hundreds marched in Yellowknife to honour children who lost their lives at residential schools. 

“It’s heartbreaking to hear, but it’s not shocking,” Inuvik Twin Lakes MLA Lesa Semmler said about the Kamloops grave sites. “As an Indigenous person, many of us have heard stories of what our parents, grandparents, great-grandparents have told us and what they’ve had to endure.”

Semmler also remarked upon Indigenous people’s determination to combat racism “so that this is never forgotten and never repeated.”

In the fall, Cochrane said the government could help Indigenous communities “in developing strategies for recording unmarked burial sites at residential schools” and “leveraging federal funding and resources.” 

Hundreds took to the streets of Yellowknife on June 4, 2021, to honour children who died at residential schools. (Avery Zingel/CBC)

Day shelter debated, again

In 2021, Yellowknife was again embroiled in a dispute over where to put an additional day shelter. 

The previous year, the city’s day shelter cut capacity as a COVID-19 precaution. Without that space for people to go during winter, and with pushback from businesses that didn’t want a shelter in their backyard, then-MACA Minister Paulie Chinna took what she called an “extraordinary step” and declared a state of emergency in Yellowknife

The move allowed the government to seize the downtown Mine Rescue Building for a temporary day shelter.

But the building wasn’t meant to be a lasting solution, and when temperatures warmed, the state of emergency lifted, and the temporary day shelter closed

At the time, Health Minister Julie Green said she hoped to find an alternative space before Oct. 1, 2021. But when October arrived, a new spot had yet to be secured. 

Green pleaded with residents to support a day shelter at the former Aurora Village building, but city council voted against it.

Ultimately, the government once again resorted to declaring a state of emergency so it could build a temporary day shelter where the city’s old visitors’ centre used to be. 

Yellowknife’s temporary day shelter going up at the site of the former visitors’ centre. This day shelter is meant to operate until 2024, when a permanent space is set to open. (April Hudson/CBC)

Another apology and a high note

The year in politics closed out like it began: with an apology.

This one, from Green, who said sorry to families forced to leave the territory to have their babies after birthing services were cancelled at Stanton Territorial Hospital due to a staff shortage.

Beyond the disruption this continues to cause for parents, the closure is expected to drain the N.W.T. government’s coffers of more than $1 million.

It was admittedly difficult to keep one’s chin up this year. Good news would land — the vaccines, the loosening of restrictions — and then there’d be an outbreak, our loved ones would get sick, and we’d have to cancel plans. 

As the territory braces for a tsunami of new COVID-19 cases, it will be hard to celebrate the dawn of 2022 with the ebullience of New Year’s Eves past. 

But we’re determined to end the year on a high note.

So please, read this story and watch its extremely adorable videos of toddlers dancing the jig in Tuktoyaktuk.

And here’s to more small moments of pure joy in 2022.

Giselle Kimiksana, left, Elias Gordon-Ruben, centre, and Eva Raddi-Felix were all entered in the Hamlet of Tuktoyaktuk’s online jigging competition this year. (Caroline Jane/Facebook, Tianna Gordon-Ruben/Facebook, Crystal Raddi/Facebook)

With files from Richard Gleeson, Natalie Pressman, Hannah Paulson, Liny Lamberink, Loren McGinnis, Avery Zingel and John Last.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

Trump is consistently inconsistent on abortion and reproductive rights

Published

 on

 

CHICAGO (AP) — Donald Trump has had a tough time finding a consistent message to questions about abortion and reproductive rights.

The former president has constantly shifted his stances or offered vague, contradictory and at times nonsensical answers to questions on an issue that has become a major vulnerability for Republicans in this year’s election. Trump has been trying to win over voters, especially women, skeptical about his views, especially after he nominated three Supreme Court justices who helped overturn the nationwide right to abortion two years ago.

The latest example came this week when the Republican presidential nominee said some abortion laws are “too tough” and would be “redone.”

“It’s going to be redone,” he said during a Fox News town hall that aired Wednesday. “They’re going to, you’re going to, you end up with a vote of the people. They’re too tough, too tough. And those are going to be redone because already there’s a movement in those states.”

Trump did not specify if he meant he would take some kind of action if he wins in November, and he did not say which states or laws he was talking about. He did not elaborate on what he meant by “redone.”

He also seemed to be contradicting his own stand when referencing the strict abortion bans passed in Republican-controlled states since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Trump recently said he would vote against a constitutional amendment on the Florida ballot that is aimed at overturning the state’s six-week abortion ban. That decision came after he had criticized the law as too harsh.

Trump has shifted between boasting about nominating the justices who helped strike down federal protections for abortion and trying to appear more neutral. It’s been an attempt to thread the divide between his base of anti-abortion supporters and the majority of Americans who support abortion rights.

About 6 in 10 Americans think their state should generally allow a person to obtain a legal abortion if they don’t want to be pregnant for any reason, according to a July poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Voters in seven states, including some conservative ones, have either protected abortion rights or defeated attempts to restrict them in statewide votes over the past two years.

Trump also has been repeating the narrative that he returned the question of abortion rights to states, even though voters do not have a direct say on that or any other issue in about half the states. This is particularly true for those living in the South, where Republican-controlled legislatures, many of which have been gerrymandered to give the GOP disproportionate power, have enacted some of the strictest abortion bans since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

Currently, 13 states have banned abortion at all stages of pregnancy, while four more ban it after six weeks — before many women know they’re pregnant.

Meanwhile, anti-abortion groups and their Republican allies in state governments are using an array of strategies to counter proposed ballot initiatives in at least eight states this year.

Here’s a breakdown of Trump’s fluctuating stances on reproductive rights.

Flip-flopping on Florida

On Tuesday, Trump claimed some abortion laws are “too tough” and would be “redone.”

But in August, Trump said he would vote against a state ballot measure that is attempting to repeal the six-week abortion ban passed by the Republican-controlled Legislature and signed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis.

That came a day after he seemed to indicate he would vote in favor of the measure. Trump previously called Florida’s six-week ban a “terrible mistake” and too extreme. In an April Time magazine interview, Trump repeated that he “thought six weeks is too severe.”

Trump on vetoing a national ban

Trump’s latest flip-flopping has involved his views on a national abortion ban.

During the Oct. 1 vice presidential debate, Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social that he would veto a national abortion ban: “Everyone knows I would not support a federal abortion ban, under any circumstances, and would, in fact, veto it.”

This came just weeks after Trump repeatedly declined to say during the presidential debate with Democrat Kamala Harris whether he would veto a national abortion ban if he were elected.

Trump’s running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, said in an interview with NBC News before the presidential debate that Trump would veto a ban. In response to debate moderators prompting him about Vance’s statement, Trump said: “I didn’t discuss it with JD, in all fairness. And I don’t mind if he has a certain view, but I don’t think he was speaking for me.”

‘Pro-choice’ to 15-week ban

Trump’s shifting abortion policy stances began when the former reality TV star and developer started flirting with running for office.

He once called himself “very pro-choice.” But before becoming president, Trump said he “would indeed support a ban,” according to his book “The America We Deserve,” which was published in 2000.

In his first year as president, he said he was “pro-life with exceptions” but also said “there has to be some form of punishment” for women seeking abortions — a position he quickly reversed.

At the 2018 annual March for Life, Trump voiced support for a federal ban on abortion on or after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

More recently, Trump suggested in March that he might support a national ban on abortions around 15 weeks before announcing that he instead would leave the matter to the states.

Views on abortion pills, prosecuting women

In the Time interview, Trump said it should be left up to the states to decide whether to prosecute women for abortions or to monitor women’s pregnancies.

“The states are going to make that decision,” Trump said. “The states are going to have to be comfortable or uncomfortable, not me.”

Democrats have seized on the comments he made in 2016, saying “there has to be some form of punishment” for women who have abortions.

Trump also declined to comment on access to the abortion pill mifepristone, claiming that he has “pretty strong views” on the matter. He said he would make a statement on the issue, but it never came.

Trump responded similarly when asked about his views on the Comstock Act, a 19th century law that has been revived by anti-abortion groups seeking to block the mailing of mifepristone.

IVF and contraception

In May, Trump said during an interview with a Pittsburgh television station that he was open to supporting regulations on contraception and that his campaign would release a policy on the issue “very shortly.” He later said his comments were misinterpreted.

In the KDKA interview, Trump was asked, “Do you support any restrictions on a person’s right to contraception?”

“We’re looking at that and I’m going to have a policy on that very shortly,” Trump responded.

Trump has not since released a policy statement on contraception.

Trump also has offered contradictory statements on in vitro fertilization.

During the Fox News town hall, which was taped Tuesday, Trump declared that he is “the father of IVF,” despite acknowledging during his answer that he needed an explanation of IVF in February after the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law.

Trump said he instructed Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., to “explain IVF very quickly” to him in the aftermath of the ruling.

As concerns over access to fertility treatments rose, Trump pledged to promote IVF by requiring health insurance companies or the federal government to pay for it. Such a move would be at odds with the actions of much of his own party.

Even as the Republican Party has tried to create a national narrative that it is receptive to IVF, these messaging efforts have been undercut by GOP state lawmakers, Republican-dominated courts and anti-abortion leaders within the party’s ranks, as well as opposition to legislative attempts to protect IVF access.

___

The Associated Press receives support from several private foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and democracy. See more about AP’s democracy initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan Party’s Scott Moe, NDP’s Carla Beck react to debate |

Published

 on

 

Saskatchewan‘s two main political party leaders faced off in the only televised debate in the lead up to the provincial election on Oct. 28. Saskatchewan Party Leader Scott Moe and NDP Leader Carla Beck say voters got a chance to see their platforms. (Oct. 17, 2024)

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan political leaders back on campaign trail after election debate

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan‘s main political leaders are back on the campaign trail today after hammering each other in a televised debate.

Saskatchewan Party Leader Scott Moe is set to make an announcement in Moose Jaw.

Saskatchewan NDP Leader Carla Beck is to make stops in Regina, Saskatoon and Prince Albert.

During Wednesday night’s debate, Beck emphasized her plan to make life more affordable and said people deserve better than an out-of-touch Saskatchewan Party government.

Moe said his party wants to lower taxes and put money back into people’s pockets.

Election day is Oct. 28.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending