After she’d been buzzed, jostled and full-on trucked at least twice, someone tried to coax Team Canada goaltender Ann-Renée Desbiens into talking about friendship.
Team USA had been out there running her over for two-plus hours in the Olympic final of women’s hockey, but weren’t they all really just great pals? What about this one on the U.S. team and that one and that other you played wherever with?
Desbiens stood there, still sweating, rubbing her gold medal in that covetous way people who’ve just won one all have – my Olympic precious.
Desbiens wanted to be helpful and go along with this line of questioning, but only vaguely. Prompted to get specific, she decided instead on the truth.
“Not hard at all. You just have to put this jersey on,” Desbiens said. “There’s no friendship here.”
That’s how it looked there. Not ugly, but not friendly. Canada dominated for the first half and, having taken a lead, absorbed pressure for the second. It was a perfect game plan. Because it worked. If it hadn’t worked, we’d now be saying that it was a colossal failure of ambition. But that’s how these things go.
Canada won, 3-2.
Afterward, they celebrated like maniacs. Every glove and helmet thrown celebratory in the air was immediately scooped up by a small army of Chinese volunteers on skates. Canada whooped it up, Chinese volunteers circled, and the Americans stood at a non-respectful distance staring at them both.
There is a tableau that must be created after this quadrennial game, and everyone instinctively understands where and how to stand.
Next the medals. The winner beams and cries. The loser is piteous and cries. The third-place team looks startled to be there and cries.
Then they all trek through the mixed zone and do it again. Often, someone is angry. But not at this Olympics. The Americans were outclassed and they knew it. They came armed with their excuses – COVID-19, Brianna Decker’s injury in the first game here, general malaise. They’re good excuses, but they’re still excuses. If they’d won, they’d just be adversity.
Canada got the privilege of being magnanimous. Those women over there, yeah, they’re a tough team, it means something.
While Canadian defender Renata Fast was talking about what it’s like to get a gold hung around you’re neck – “Wow. This is heavy.” – U.S. captain Kendall Coyne Schofield was standing two metres from her shouting between sobs, “Women’s hockey cannot be silent!”
When Canada beats the U.S. in this tournament, the show that follows is almost as compelling as the one on the ice. There’s nothing quite like it in sport, in part because it’s so predictable. It’s as if the same two players made the final of Wimbledon every year, and they made them spend the hour afterward handcuffed together.
Mostly what exudes from these women is the sense that they don’t like each other very much, not in this context, but that they are bound together. For however long you last as a player in the American or Canadian national set-up, this game is your highest calling. It’s your professional rationale. Lose it, and nothing else you do really matters.
Canada lost the last time in the 2018 Pyeongchang Games – making it 1,460 days between meaningful wins.
This time around, women’s hockey didn’t feel like the most important event in this Olympics. It felt like the only event. If Canada could win this one, all the other near misses would be bearable.
So, mission accomplished. They beat the Americans twice. They beat everyone else up.
But this victory over the U.S. felt a little like piling on. Not at the level of players. But in terms of where they are as a country and we are in relation to them.
We might ask ourselves – is right to beat the U.S. any more?
Of course it’s right. That’s the point of coming here. But does it give us the same satisfaction?
This old rivalry – which has reached its perfected version in this smouldering enmity – is born out of the very 1970s idea that the U.S. is a little bit better than we are.
They are loud and confident. We are quiet and mousey. They have Hollywood. We have Murdoch Mysteries. They swagger around the world picking fights. We trail after them calming everyone down.
It was a great Mutt and Jeff routine for a long while. We were happy with losing most of the time because we secretly wanted to be more like them. It gave us something to aspire to. Every now and again, usually on a hockey rink, we got to win one.
The tables haven’t exactly turned, but they are radically reoriented. America’s a basket case. Who’d want to be more like that? What satisfaction is there to be taken from getting on top of someone after they’ve already wrestled themselves down on the ground?
Our proximity and interconnectedness makes it inevitable that all their worst instincts bleed over the border and infect our tendency to sober judgment. All the big fights in Canada today are America’s cultural proxy wars.
If Canada’s voting routines are any indication, most of us don’t want to be like America any more. We want to be a lot less like them.
Don’t call it a breakup. Call it a break. We can still be friends. Give us a shout in a couple of years when you’ve stopped with the attempted coups.
Early in this tournament, Canada’s Fast was asked if she ever feels pity for the other team as they’re getting their head metaphorically and repeatedly hammered into the boards.
“Not really,” Fast said. “By us playing them hard, it makes them better. They’re going to learn things.”
What do you think the U.S. learned on Thursday?
There is the obvious – that life is pain. Some of these American players can count on one hand how many times they’ve lost in the red-white-and-blue.
“I won’t forget this probably forever,” Team USA’s Amanda Kessel said afterward, but doubtfully. Like she wasn’t totally sure it had actually happened. Beyond that, there’s nothing to learn from losing at sports. The learning lesson here is the game itself. The thing considered outside its result.
One of the few nice things Canada and America still share is a love of playing together. Their sports leagues are full of Canadians, and our league is full of Americans. We remain happily intertwined through sport.
As our world views splinter, it can sometimes feel like it’s the last thing left that we have in common.
That’s what’s actually precious now. It’s a tether back to each other at some future, less zany point in history.
So we beat them and they beat us and in the end, both sides win.
At least, that’s the hope.
Our Olympic team will be writing a daily newsletter to land in your inbox every morning during the Games. Sign up today to join us in keeping up with medals, events and other news.
TORONTO – Reigning PWHL MVP and scoring champ Natalie Spooner will miss the start of the regular season for the Toronto Sceptres, general manager Gina Kingsbury announced Tuesday on the first day of training camp.
The 33-year-old Spooner had knee surgery on her left anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) after she was checked into the boards by Minnesota’s Grace Zumwinkle in Game 3 of their best-of-five semifinal series on May 13.
She had a goal and an assist in three playoff games but did not finish the series. Toronto was up 2-1 in the semifinal at that time and eventually fell 3-2 in the series.
Spooner led the PWHL with 27 points in 24 games. Her 20 goals, including five game-winners, were nine more than the closest skater.
Kingsbury said there is no timeline, as the team wants the Toronto native at 100 per cent, but added that “she is doing really well” in her recovery.
The Sceptres open the PWHL season on Nov. 30 when they host the Boston Fleet.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 12, 2024.
LAHORE, Pakistan (AP) — A top official of the Pakistan Cricket Board declined Friday to confirm media reports that India has decided against playing any games in host Pakistan during next year’s Champions Trophy.
“My view is if there’s any problems, they (India) should tell us in writing,” PCB chairman Mohsin Naqvi told reporters in Lahore. “I’ll share that with the media as well as with the government as soon as I get such a letter.”
Indian media reported Friday that the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has communicated its concerns to all the Champions Trophy stakeholders, including the PCB, over the Feb. 19-March 9 tournament and would not play in arch-rival Pakistan.
The Times of India said that “Dubai is a strong candidate to host the fixtures involving the Men in Blue” for the 50-over tournament.
Such a solution would see Pakistan having to travel to a neutral venue to play India in a group match, with another potential meeting later in the tournament if both teams advanced from their group. The final is scheduled for March 9 in Pakistan with the specific venue not yet decided.
“Our stance is clear,” Naqvi said. “They need to give us in writing any objections they may have. Until now, no discussion of the hybrid model has happened, nor are we prepared to accept one.”
Political tensions have stopped bilateral cricket between the two nations since 2008 and they have competed in only multi-nation tournaments, including ICC World Cups.
“Cricket should be free of politics,” Naqvi said. “Any sport should not be entangled with politics. Our preparations for the Champions Trophy will continue unabated, and this will be a successful event.”
The PCB has already spent millions of dollars on the upgrade of stadiums in Karachi, Lahore and Rawalpindi which are due to host 15 Champions Trophy games. Naqvi hoped all the three stadiums will be ready over the next two months.
“Almost every country wants the Champions Trophy to be played here (in Pakistan),” Naqvi said. “I don’t think anyone should make this a political matter, and I don’t expect they will. I expect the tournament will be held at the home of the official hosts.”
Eight countries – Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, England, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and Afghanistan – are due to compete in the tournament, the schedule of which is yet to be announced by the International Cricket Council.
“Normally the ICC announces the schedule of any major tournament 100 days before the event, and I hope they will announce it very soon,” Naqvi said.
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia – Ottawa‘s Gabriela Dabrowski and Erin Routliffe of New Zealand are through to the doubles final at the WTA Finals after a 7-6 (7), 6-1 victory over Nicole Melichar-Martinez of the United States and Australia’s Ellen Perez in semifinal action Friday.
Dabrowski and Routliffe won a hard-fought first set against serve when Routliffe’s quick reaction at the net to defend a Perez shot gave the duo set point, causing Perez to throw down her racket in frustration.
The second seeds then cruised through the second set, winning match point on serve when Melichar-Martinez couldn’t handle Routliffe’s shot.
The showdown was a rematch of last year’s semifinal, which Melichar-Martinez and Perez won in a super tiebreak.
Dabrowski and Routliffe will face the winner of a match between Katerina Siniakova and Taylor Townsend, and Hao-Ching Chan and Veronika Kudermetova in the final on Saturday.
Dabrowski is aiming to become the first Canadian to win a WTA Finals title.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.