adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Investment

Atlantic Women's Venture Fund launches inaugural fund, Danielle Graham joins as investment principal – BetaKit

Published

 on


The Atlantic Women’s Venture Fund (AWVF) has officially launched its inaugural fund as the group looks to address, head-on, the existing gender imbalance in Canada’s venture capital ecosystem.

“Women entrepreneurs generate more revenues and more profits, and I have all of the data to back it up.”
 

Along with the fund launch, AWVF has also announced that Danielle Graham, formerly of Dream Maker Ventures, has joined to take a leading role in the funds investment activities. Graham is set to officially join Sandpiper as of June 1.

The fund, called Sandpiper Venture, will target early-stage women tech entrepreneurs across Canada “as a proactive and profitable business decision.”

300x250x1

“We as an economy are missing out on potential or missing out on innovation,” Graham said in an interview with BetaKit. “Women entrepreneurs generate more revenues and more profits, and I have all of the data to back it up … we’ve derived a lot of data points that show how problematic it is right now [that women receive less investment capital than men].”

Sandpiper is founded by a group of nine leading entrepreneurs, investors, and executives (in addition to Graham), each of whom invested in the fund and are part of its advisory committee.

Danielle Graham, Investment Principal, Sandpiper Ventures.

Sandpiper’s investment team is made up of Rhiannon Davies, the former VP and board director at GrandVision N.V, Sarah Young, managing partner of public relations firm National, and Cathy Bennet, the former Newfoundland and Labrador finance minister. The three women have all personally invested in Sandpiper and will serve as general partners for the fund, making investment decisions alongside Graham, who will serve as Investment Principal.

Other notable investors in Sandpiper include Amy Risely, CEO of Skinfix, Shannon MacDonald, managing director of Accenture Canada, and Nicole LeBlanc, director of investments and partnerships at Sidewalk Labs, among others.

The AWVF has been working to launch Sandpiper over the past year, with a target size of $20 million. The fund is looking to raise capital from private and public investors and, to date, has closed 50 percent of its private capital goal. While Davies would not confirm the dollar amount raised, she told BetaKit it is less than $10 million. Sandpiper is still actively fundraising to reach its target.

Davies, who also co-founded the AWVF, told BetaKit the group is trying to create a platform to engage women as founders, investors, and mentors. Sandpiper, she explained, is the inaugural fund in that platform, with the intention of providing a base with enough capital to “make a difference.”

RELATED: Canadian government commits $15 million in COVID-19 support to women entrepreneurs

“For us, in general, it’s really about driving diversity and creating better companies and not sort of creating a parallel ecosystem that is all women for women,” she said. “But just recognizing that diversity makes better decision making, and if you have different lenses around your management table you’re going to build better businesses.”

The group behind the AWVF has been active in the Atlantic Canada entrepreneurial and tech space for some while, through programming and angel investing. Graham highlighted that the all-women team behind Sandpiper is purposeful.

“It’s an all women’s team, and that’s what’s unique about it.”
– Danielle Graham, Sandpiper Ventures

“It’s an all women’s team, and that’s what’s unique about it,” she told BetaKit. “We have incredible women business leaders [backing Sandpiper] that have proven their acumen within multiple industries. [They have] built companies, they’ve enabled them to go internationally, they’ve done mergers and acquisitions … this is already a well-established community, and we want to enable that business leadership in the next generation of women.”

While investment in underrepresented founders and women-led companies has increased over the past number of years, women entrepreneurs and venture capitalists continue to receive significantly less capital than their male counterparts.

According to a Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC) report from 2019, women account for 28 percent of all entrepreneurs in Canada. However, other statistics show they raised just four percent of venture capital funding available last year.

When it comes to women in the VC space, the number of women in partnership roles increased over the past year, however, women-led funds only received 15 percent of available LP dollars in Canada.

RELATED: StandUp Ventures holds final close, secures $21 million for women-focused fund

LeBlanc told BetaKit that one of the “most exciting things” that has come out of building Sandpiper is actively engaging female business leaders in the Atlantic Canada region that may not have traditionally participated in the startup or innovation ecosystem.

“This is something that really grabbed their attention and they are now going to be participating in the fund, they’re now able to be advisors and board members to startups, they’re able to now participate more actively,” she said.

“Supporting women entrepreneurs is not anti-male,” added Graham. “It’s just about saying, ‘we’re connected on this level and you know what, it’s okay that men connect with each other. We just need more engagement.’”

Sandpiper plans to invest in pre-seed and seed deals, cutting cheques within the $250,000 to $500,000 range. With a target of $20 million, Sandpiper hopes to make 35 to 40 deals, keeping about 50 percent for follow-on investments. The fund plans to invest in companies that are led by women who have an equal equity share at the founder level.

Graham told BetaKit Sandpiper is looking to close the fund and begin investing within the next three to six months. She noted, however, that given the economic challenges Canadian startups are currently facing around COVID-19, Sandpiper is willing to close earlier in order to provide financial support, so as not to “lose valuable companies” that are currently struggling because of the pandemic.

Graham is joining the AWVF from Dream Maker Ventures where she served as principal. She joined what is the investment arm of Dream Maker Inc. last year as it looked to raise a $75 million Diversity Fund. While at Dream, Graham helped launch the Dream Network, an initiative meant to connect underrepresented founders with potential investment opportunities, as well as Dream Legacy Foundation’s Diversity Program initiative.

The Dream Legacy Foundation recently received support from Microsoft for Startups Canada to help diverse founders in the Canadian tech ecosystem.

RELATED: Lessons learned attending eight days of tech events for International Women’s Day

Regarding her decision to move to Sandpiper, Graham told BetaKit, “without a woman [in a company leadership role], to me, what real impact am I making? I always defined it that way, and Sandpiper and the Atlantic Women’s Venture Fund have allowed me to unlock that capital [so] that I can now directly invest in the types of founders that I’ve been wanting to work with since I began.”

Graham, who also founded the first female-focused accelerator and bootcamp series in Canada, Fierce Founders, also recently helped launch The ArchAngel Network of Funds. An active angel investor, Graham will continue to serve as a venture partner for one of the network’s funds.

Just prior to announcing the launch of Sandpiper, the AWVF helped launch an initiative alongside Calgary-based angel investment platform The51. Dubbed Canada51, in reference to women being 51 percent of the global population, the initiative is about creating a formal, national collective of organizations and individuals supporting women entrepreneurs across the country.

“It’s time for us to invest in what looks like us,” said Shelley Kuipers, co-founder of The51, at the time. “We know we can transform Canada’s economy in this decade and beyond and our partnership with [the Atlantic Women’s Venture Fund] is pivotal to stitching this next economic wave together.”

While Sandpiper is based in Atlantic Canada, it plans to invest in women-led companies from across the country. Graham highlighted to BetaKit that even though Sandpiper is a women-led fund, it “welcomes people of all genders to invest as limited partners.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Taxes should not wag the tail of the investment dog, but that's what Trudeau wants – Financial Post

Published

 on

By


Kim Moody: Ottawa is encouraging people to crystallize their gains and pay tax. That’s a hell of a fiscal plan

Article content

The Canadian federal budget has been out for a week, which is plenty of time to absorb just how terrible it is.

The problems start with weak fiscal policy, excessive spending and growing public-debt charges estimated to be $54.1 billion for the upcoming year. That is more than $1 billion per week that Canadians are paying for things that have no societal benefit.

Advertisement 2

Article content

Article content

Next, the budget clearly illustrates this government’s continued weak taxation policies, two of which it apparently believes  are good for entrepreneurs. But the proposed $2-million Canadian Entrepreneurs Incentive (CEI) and $10-million capital gains exemption for transfers to an employee ownership trust (EOT) are both laughable.

Why? Well, for the CEI, virtually every entrepreneurial industry (except technology) is not eligible. If you happen to be in an industry that qualifies, the $2-million exemption comes with a long, stringent list of criteria (which will be very difficult for most entrepreneurs to qualify for) and it is phased in over a 10-year period of $200,000 per year.

For transfers to EOTs, an entrepreneur must give up complete legal and factual control to be eligible for the $10-million exemption, even though the EOT will likely pay the entrepreneur out of future profits. The commercial risk associated with such a transfer is likely too great for most entrepreneurs to accept.

Capital gains tax hike

But the budget’s highlight proposal was the capital gains inclusion rate increase to 66.7 per cent from 50 per cent for dispositions effective after June 24, 2024. The proposal includes a 50 per cent inclusion rate on the first $250,000 of annual capital gains for individuals, but not for corporations and trusts. Oh, those evil corporations and trusts.

Article content

Advertisement 3

Article content

There is a lot wrong with this proposed policy. The first is that by not putting individuals, corporations and trusts on the same taxation footing for capital gains taxation, the foundational principle of integration (the idea that the corporate and individual tax systems should be indifferent to whether an investment is held in a corporation or directly by the taxpayer) is completely thrown out the window. This is wrong.

Some economists have come out in strong favour of the proposal, mainly because of equity arguments (a buck is a buck), but such arguments ignore the real world of investing where investors look at overall risk, liquidity and the time value of money.

If capital gains are taxed at a rate approaching wage taxation rates, why would entrepreneurs and investors want to risk their capital when such investments might be illiquid for a long period of time and be highly risky?

They will seek greener pastures for their investment dollars and they already are. I’ve been fielding a tremendous number of questions from investors over the past week and I’d invite those academics and economists who support the increased inclusion rate to come live in my shoes for a day to see how the theoretical world of equity and behaviour collide. It’s not good and it certainly does nothing to help Canada’s obvious productivity challenges.

Advertisement 4

Article content

Of course, there has been the usual chatter encouraging such people to leave (“don’t let the door hit you on the way out,” some say) from those who don’t understand basic economics and taxation policy, but these cheerleaders should be careful what they wish for. The loss of successful Canadians and their investment dollars affects all of us in a very negative way.

The government messaging around this tax proposal has many people upset, including me. Specifically, it is the following paragraph in the budget documents that many supporters are parroting that is upsetting:

“Next year, 28.5 million Canadians are not expected to have any capital gains income, and 3 million are expected to earn capital gains below the $250,000 annual threshold. Only 0.13 per cent of Canadians with an average income of $1.4 million are expected to pay more personal income tax on their capital gains in any given year. As a result of this, for 99.87 per cent of Canadians, personal income taxes on capital gains will not increase.” (This is supposedly about 40,000 taxpayers.)

Bluntly, this is garbage. It outright ignores several facts.

Advertisement 5

Article content

For one thing, there are hundreds of thousands of private corporations owned and controlled by Canadian resident individuals. Those corporations will be subject to the increased capital gains inclusion rate with no $250,000 annual phase-in. Because of the way passive income is taxed in these Canadian-controlled private corporations, the increased tax load on realized capital gains will be felt by individual shareholders on the dividend distribution required to recover certain refundable corporate taxes.

Furthermore, public corporations that have capital gains will pay tax at a higher inclusion rate and this results in higher corporate tax, which means decreased amounts are available to be paid out as dividends to individual shareholders (including those held by individuals’ pensions).

The budget documents simply measured the number of corporations that reported capital gains in recent years and said it is 12.6 per cent of all corporations. That measurement is shallow and not the whole story, as described above.

Tax hit for cottages

There are also millions of Canadians who hold a second real estate property, either a cottage-type and/or rental property. Those properties will eventually be sold, with the probability that the gain will exceed the $250,000 threshold.

Advertisement 6

Article content

Upon death, an individual will often have their largest capital gains realized as a result of deemed dispositions that occur immediately prior to death. This will have the distinct possibility of capital gains that exceed $250,000.

And people who become non-residents of Canada — and that is increasing rapidly — have deemed dispositions of their assets (with some exceptions). They will face the distinct possibility that such gains will be more than $250,000.

The politics around the capital gains inclusion rate increase are pretty obvious. The government is planning for Canadian taxpayers to crystallize their inherent gains prior to the implementation date, especially corporations that will not have a $250,000 annual lower inclusion rate. For the current year, the government is projecting a $4.9-billion tax take. But next year, it dramatically drops to an estimated $1.3 billion.

This is a ridiculous way to shield the government’s tremendous spending and try to make them look like they are holding the line on their out-of-control deficits. The government is encouraging people to crystallize their gains and pay tax. That’s a hell of a fiscal plan.

Advertisement 7

Article content

Recommended from Editorial

  1. The federal Liberal government will release a new budget on Tuesday.

    Will budget include corporate excess profits tax?

  2. None

    A single act of courage is needed to fix tax system

  3. CRA on Thursday announced that bare trusts will be exempt from trust reporting requirements for 2023.

    Bare trust debacle shows CRA needs to respect taxpayers

There’s an old saying that tax should not wag the tail of the investment dog, but that is exactly what the government is encouraging Canadians to do in the name of raising short-term taxation revenues. It is simply wrong.

I hope the government has some second sober thoughts about the capital gains proposal, but I’m not holding my breath.

Kim Moody, FCPA, FCA, TEP, is the founder of Moodys Tax/Moodys Private Client, a former chair of the Canadian Tax Foundation, former chair of the Society of Estate Practitioners (Canada) and has held many other leadership positions in the Canadian tax community. He can be reached at kgcm@kimgcmoody.com and his LinkedIn profile is https://www.linkedin.com/in/kimmoody.

_____________________________________________________________

If you like this story, sign up for the FP Investor Newsletter.

_____________________________________________________________

Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don’t miss the business news you need to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here.

Article content

Comments

Join the Conversation

This Week in Flyers

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Everton search for investment to complete 777 deal – BBC.com

Published

 on

By


Getty Images
  • 2 hours ago

Everton are searching for third-party investment in order to push through a protracted takeover by 777 Partners.

The Miami-based firm agreed a deal to buy the Toffees from majority owner Farhad Moshiri in September, but are yet to gain approval from the Premier League.

On Monday, Bloomberg reported the club’s main financial adviser Deloitte has been seeking fresh funding from sports-focused investors and lenders to get 777’s deal over the line.

300x250x1

BBC Sport has been told this is “standard practice contingency planning” and the process may identify other potential lenders to 777.

Sources close to British-Iranian businessman Moshiri have told BBC Sport they remain “working on completing the deal with 777”.

It is understood there are no other parties waiting in the wings to takeover should the takeover fall through and the focus is fully on 777.

The Americans have so far loaned £180m to Everton for day-to-day operational costs, which will be turned into equity once the deal is completed, but repaying money owed to MSP Sports Capital, whose deal collapsed in August, remains a stumbling block.

777 says it can stump up the £158m that is owed to MSP Sports Capital and once that is settled, it is felt the deal should be completed soon after.

Related Topics

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Warren Buffett Predicts 'Bad Ending' for Bitcoin — Is It a Doomed Investment? – Yahoo Finance

Published

 on

By


NanoStockk / Getty Images

Currently sitting in sixth on Forbes’ Real-Time Billionaires List, Berkshire Hathaway co-founder, chairman and CEO Warren Buffett is a first-rate example of an investor who stuck to his core financial beliefs early in life to become not only a success but a once-in-a-lifetime inspiration to those who followed in his footsteps.

One of the most trusted investors for decades, the 93-year-old Buffett isn’t shy to pontificate on his investment philosophy, which is centered around value investing, buying stocks at less than their intrinsic value and holding them for the long term.

Read Next: Warren Buffett: 6 Best Pieces of Money Advice for the Middle Class
Find Out: 5 Genius Things All Wealthy People Do With Their Money

300x250x1

He’s also quite vocal on investments he deems worthless. And one of those is Bitcoin.

Sponsored: Protect Your Wealth With A Gold IRA. Take advantage of the timeless appeal of gold in a Gold IRA recommended by Sean Hannity.

Buffett’s Take on Bitcoin

Over the past decade, it’s been clear that the crypto craze isn’t something Buffett wants any part of. He described Bitcoin as “probably rat poison squared” back in 2018.

“In terms of cryptocurrencies, generally, I can say with almost certainty that they will come to a bad ending,” Buffett said in 2018. And his stance hasn’t wavered since. According to Benzinga, Buffett believes that cryptocurrencies aren’t a viable or valuable investment.

“Now if you told me you own all of the Bitcoin in the world and you offered it to me for $25, I wouldn’t take it because what would I do with it? I’d have to sell it back to you one way or another. It isn’t going to do anything,” Buffett said at the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting in 2022.

Although the Oracle of Omaha has his misgivings about the unpredictable investment, does that mean crypto is doomed as an investment? Not necessarily.

For You: 10 Valuable Stocks That Could Be the Next Apple or Amazon

Is Buffett Wrong About Bitcoin?

Bitcoin bulls argue that while it’s not government-issued, cryptocurrency is as fungible, divisible, secure and portable as fiat currency and gold. Because they occupy a digital space, cryptocurrencies are decentralized, scarce and durable. They can last as long as they can be stored.

Crypto boosters continue to predict massive growth in the coin’s value. Earlier this year, SkyBridge Capital founder and former White House director of communications Anthony Scaramucci told reporters that Bitcoin could exceed $170,000 by mid-2025, and Ark Invest CEO Cathie Wood predicts Bitcoin will hit $1.48 million by 2030, according to Fortune.

“They really don’t understand the concept and the whole history of money,” Scaramucci said of crypto critics like Buffett on a recent episode of Jason Raznick’s “The Raz Report.” Because we place a value on “traditional” currency, it is essentially worthless compared with the transparent and trustworthy digital Bitcoin, Scaramucci said.

Currently trading around the $66,000 mark, Bitcoin is up nearly 50% in 2024. This means it’s massively outperforming most indexes this year, including the S&P 500, which is up about 6% in 2024.

Although Berkshire Hathaway has invested heavily in Bitcoin-related Brazilian fintech company Nu Holdings, which has its own cryptocurrency called Nucoin, it’s possible Buffett will never come around fully to crypto, despite its recent surge in value. It’s contrary to the reliable investment strategy that has served him very well for decades.

“The urge to participate in something where it looks like easy money is a human instinct which has been unleashed,” Buffett said. “People love the idea of getting rich quick, and I don’t blame them … It’s so human, and once unleashed you can’t put it back in the bottle.”

More From GOBankingRates

This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: Warren Buffett Predicts ‘Bad Ending’ for Bitcoin — Is It a Doomed Investment?

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending