adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Business

Banking regulator says pandemic uncertainty means now is not the time to consider higher dividends, share buybacks

Published

 on

Bank buildings at Toronto’s financial district on Sept. 3, 2020.

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

Canada’s banking regulator will not yet consider lifting restrictions on banks’ dividends and share buybacks introduced at the start of the pandemic, even though the largest lenders continue to amass growing stockpiles of surplus capital.

As parts of the country move into deeper phases of lockdown, Jeremy Rudin, the head of the regulator, said he is waiting to see “a clear path to a durable recovery” and less “economic uncertainty” before considering any changes.

Since March, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) has told banks to not increase quarterly dividend payments or total executive pay, or buy back stock from investors, in order to preserve capital to absorb shocks from the coronavirus pandemic. That is a major reason why capital reserves have grown by billions of dollars at each of Canada’s big banks since then.

Even with no end to the restrictions in sight, bank CEOs are starting to look for opportunities to spend some of that excess cash. But for now, their hands are still partly tied, as the public-health outlook appears set to worsen before it gets better.

“The fact that lockdowns of indefinite duration and uncertain severity are spreading across the country really means that we’re moving away from the situation of reduced uncertainty that we’ll be looking for, rather than towards it,” Mr. Rudin of OSFI said at a conference hosted by Royal Bank of Canada on Monday.

At the same conference, the chief executives of several banks expressed growing optimism about economic recovery in the latter half of their fiscal year, which ends Oct. 31. Each acknowledged there will be tough months to come, but most predicted a pickup in consumer confidence and business investment as federally led vaccination programs start to curb some of the worst outbreaks of the novel coronavirus.

Royal Bank of Canada CEO Dave McKay estimated that between four million and 4.5 million high-risk Canadians need to be vaccinated before the national economy can start to reopen in earnest. If enough doses of the vaccine are available, “we could achieve that in 100 days,” he said.

Bank of Montreal CEO Darryl White said he is “pretty bullish” on the outlook for the back half of 2021. “You have to kind of think about two time frames. Over the next two to four months, we’re going to witness the race between the vaccine and the virus, and it’ll be a difficult race,” he said. “Beyond that, my confidence just continues to increase.”

Mr. White predicts that global economic growth could rebound to 5 per cent or 5.5 per cent in 2021, and that Canada and the U.S. may not be far behind, with gross domestic product (GDP) projected to rise 4.5 per cent to 5 per cent this year. The big question for 2022 would be whether that rate of growth can be sustained, he said, estimating it could settle between 3 per cent and 4 per cent.

Victor Dodig, the CEO of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, was slightly more measured as his bank’s economists are forecasting GDP growth “in the 4-per-cent range in both markets.”

Story continues below advertisement

A bounce back in economic growth could unleash spending and demand for new loans that have been in short supply through the pandemic. Many households and businesses have curbed spending, stashed away savings and paid down debt, helped by massive amounts of government stimulus. As a results, banks have had a harder time deploying the surplus cash sitting on their balance sheets to earn new revenue, and that has dragged profits lower.

A surge in demand for mortgages has been a notable exception, as a sudden shift to remote work created a spike in demand for homes with more space – often outside major urban centres – that has continued so far this year. But those home loans generate lower profit margins for banks than credit cards or commercial lending.

The result, compounded by OSFI’s restrictions preventing banks from returning more capital to shareholders, is that lenders are generating more capital than they can use. On Monday, bank CEOs sketched out varying strategies to put those funds to use.

Three of the Big Six banks have signalled their willingness to pursue mergers and acquisitions. Toronto-Dominion Bank is often cited as the most likely candidate, and CEO Bharat Masrani said Monday that the bank has a track record of taking advantage of major downturns to make large deals. “If something makes sense … would we look at it? Yes, we would,” he said. “I expect something will show up given the level of dislocations that have taken place. But that does not necessarily mean that we’ll do the deal.”

Mr. White and Mr. McKay both said they would consider making a deal to get stronger outside their core footprints in the United States – BMO is strongest in the Midwest, and RBC in California and New York. But both CEOs also said they will invest first in their existing businesses. “We don’t feel a compulsion to transact,” Mr. White said.

Bank of Nova Scotia has shown little appetite for more deals after buying and selling a number of businesses in recent years. But its leaders are keen to return capital to shareholders. “I’ve been very clear, when the regulator gives us the green flag, the next day we’ll be out buying our stock back,” CEO Brian Porter said. “We think our stock is inexpensive.”

With OSFI showing no sign of budging on shareholder payouts in the near term, however, investors may have to be patient. “I don’t expect that that will change until the back half of this year,” Mr. Dodig said. “So we kind of live with that.”

 

 

Source: – The Globe and Mail

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Stop Asking Your Interviewer Cliché Questions

Published

 on

Most job search advice is cookie-cutter. The advice you’re following is almost certainly the same advice other job seekers follow, making you just another candidate following the same script.

In today’s hyper-competitive job market, standing out is critical, a challenge most job seekers struggle with. Instead of relying on generic questions recommended by self-proclaimed career coaches, which often lead to a forgettable interview, ask unique, thought-provoking questions that’ll spark engaging conversations and leave a lasting impression.

English philosopher Francis Bacon once said, “A prudent question is one half of wisdom.”

The questions you ask convey the following:

  • Your level of interest in the company and the role.
  • Contributing to your employer’s success is essential.
  • You desire a cultural fit.

Here are the top four questions experts recommend candidates ask; hence, they’ve become cliché questions you should avoid asking:

  • “What are the key responsibilities of this position?”

Most likely, the job description answers this question. Therefore, asking this question indicates you didn’t read the job description. If you require clarification, ask, “How many outbound calls will I be required to make daily?” “What will be my monthly revenue target?”

  • “What does a typical day look like?”

Although it’s important to understand day-to-day expectations, this question tends to elicit vague responses and rarely leads to a deeper conversation. Don’t focus on what your day will look like; instead, focus on being clear on the results you need to deliver. Nobody I know has ever been fired for not following a “typical day.” However, I know several people who were fired for failing to meet expectations. Before accepting a job offer, ensure you’re capable of meeting the employer’s expectations.

  • “How would you describe the company culture?”

Asking this question screams, “I read somewhere to ask this question.” There are much better ways to research a company’s culture, such as speaking to current and former employees, reading online reviews and news articles. Furthermore, since your interviewer works for the company, they’re presumably comfortable with the culture. Do you expect your interviewer to give you the brutal truth? “Be careful of Craig; get on his bad side, and he’ll make your life miserable.” “Bob is close to retirement. I give him lots of slack, which the rest of the team needs to pick up.”

Truism: No matter how much due diligence you do, only when you start working for the employer will you experience and, therefore, know their culture firsthand.

  • “What opportunities are there for professional development?”

When asked this question, I immediately think the candidate cares more about gaining than contributing, a showstopper. Managing your career is your responsibility, not your employer’s.

Cliché questions don’t impress hiring managers, nor will they differentiate you from your competition. To transform your interaction with your interviewer from a Q&A session into a dynamic discussion, ask unique, insightful questions.

Here are my four go-to questions—I have many moreto accomplish this:

  • “Describe your management style. How will you manage me?”

This question gives your interviewer the opportunity to talk about themselves, which we all love doing. As well, being in sync with my boss is extremely important to me. The management style of who’ll be my boss is a determining factor in whether or not I’ll accept the job.

  • “What is the one thing I should never do that’ll piss you off and possibly damage our working relationship beyond repair?”

This question also allows me to determine whether I and my to-be boss would be in sync. Sometimes I ask, “What are your pet peeves?”

  • “When I join the team, what would be the most important contribution you’d want to see from me in the first six months?”

Setting myself up for failure is the last thing I want. As I mentioned, focus on the results you need to produce and timelines. How realistic are the expectations? It’s never about the question; it’s about what you want to know. It’s important to know whether you’ll be able to meet or even exceed your new boss’s expectations.

  • “If I wanted to sell you on an idea or suggestion, what do you need to know?”

Years ago, a candidate asked me this question. I was impressed he wasn’t looking just to put in time; he was looking for how he could be a contributing employee. Every time I ask this question, it leads to an in-depth discussion.

Other questions I’ve asked:

 

  • “What keeps you up at night?”
  • “If you were to leave this company, who would follow?”
  • “How do you handle an employee making a mistake?”
  • “If you were to give a Ted Talk, what topic would you talk about?”
  • “What are three highly valued skills at [company] that I should master to advance?”
  • “What are the informal expectations of the role?”
  • “What is one misconception people have about you [or the company]?”

 

Your questions reveal a great deal about your motivations, drive to make a meaningful impact on the business, and a chance to morph the questioning into a conversation. Cliché questions don’t lead to meaningful discussions, whereas unique, thought-provoking questions do and, in turn, make you memorable.

_____________________________________________________________________

 

Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers “unsweetened” job search advice. You can send Nick your questions to artoffindingwork@gmail.com.

Continue Reading

Business

Canadian Natural Resources reports $2.27-billion third-quarter profit

Published

 on

 

CALGARY – Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. reported a third-quarter profit of $2.27 billion, down from $2.34 billion in the same quarter last year.

The company says the profit amounted to $1.06 per diluted share for the quarter that ended Sept. 30 compared with $1.06 per diluted share a year earlier.

Product sales totalled $10.40 billion, down from $11.76 billion in the same quarter last year.

Daily production for the quarter averaged 1,363,086 barrels of oil equivalent per day, down from 1,393,614 a year ago.

On an adjusted basis, Canadian Natural says it earned 97 cents per diluted share for the quarter, down from an adjusted profit of $1.30 per diluted share in the same quarter last year.

The average analyst estimate had been for a profit of 90 cents per share, according to LSEG Data & Analytics.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 31, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:CNQ)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Cenovus Energy reports $820M Q3 profit, down from $1.86B a year ago

Published

 on

 

CALGARY – Cenovus Energy Inc. reported its third-quarter profit fell compared with a year as its revenue edged lower.

The company says it earned $820 million or 42 cents per diluted share for the quarter ended Sept. 30, down from $1.86 billion or 97 cents per diluted share a year earlier.

Revenue for the quarter totalled $14.25 billion, down from $14.58 billion in the same quarter last year.

Total upstream production in the quarter amounted to 771,300 barrels of oil equivalent per day, down from 797,000 a year earlier.

Total downstream throughput was 642,900 barrels per day compared with 664,300 in the same quarter last year.

On an adjusted basis, Cenovus says its funds flow amounted to $1.05 per diluted share in its latest quarter, down from adjusted funds flow of $1.81 per diluted share a year earlier.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 31, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:CVE)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending