adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Art

Blue Checks Attack Google’s ‘Woke’ AI Art While Admiring Hitler’s Paintings – Rolling Stone

Published

 on


As a young aspiring artist of minimal talent, Adolf Hitler had difficulty drawing human figures, according to the professors who rejected his application to Vienna’s fine arts academy. Google‘s AI model Gemini has its own issues with generating images of people, and, curiously, some of those angriest about its shortcomings have lately offered kinder appraisals of the landscapes painted by a future genocidal dictator.

Earlier this month, Google unveiled the newest versions of Gemini, first introduced in December. The program includes a chatbot as well as a text-to-image function that promises to deliver “vibrant and playful” pictures based on user prompts. Right-wing culture warriors with paid blue check accounts on X (formerly Twitter) in need of something new to denounce as “woke” set about feeding it descriptions meant to test its political inclinations — and hit the jackpot.

Not only would Gemini sometimes refuse to create images of white people, it also produced historically inaccurate illustrations of Black Vikings, Indigenous U.S. “founding fathers,” and women popes. Conservative influencers used these examples to argue that Google had built left-wing bias into the model, with Elon Musk among those declaring it “racist” against whites.

While it’s true that Gemini’s output is flawed, it doesn’t necessarily reflect a grand conspiracy to force wokeness upon the masses. Every AI image generator churns out tons of worthless slop, including countless distorted portraits that bear little or no similarity to people as they really look — they famously even struggle to get our hands right. If Google’s tool skewed in a weird direction on race, it’s probably because of guardrails intended to prevent users from cooking up offensive, stereotypical images, as former MMA fighter Jake Shields seemingly attempted to do by asking for images of people enjoying fried chicken, watermelon and grape soda. (He sarcastically noted that the resulting pictures of mostly non-Black individuals looked “normal” to him.)

A few days before he started experimenting with an AI model to see if it would spit out racially inflammatory content, Shields was involved in a different discourse on art. “The first two paintings are by failed artist Adolf Hitler,” he wrote in a post on X. “The [second] pair of pictures is from one of today’s most successful artists Hunter Biden. Which do you prefer?” In a follow-up reply, Shields — who has publicly aired his skepticism about details of the Holocaustwrote that “Hitler is much better than I expected because I always heard he was [an] awful artist.”

It’s possible he had just encountered one of the paintings he shared, of the Karlskirche church in Vienna, in an earlier viral post from another blue check who used it to argue that Hitler was “a good painter,” at least in comparison to “disgusting leftist art at the time.” That thread, by the author of a popular newsletter on “Classical Ideals” who regularly rails against “woke” culture, kicked off debate about Hitler’s artistic ability, with several more conservative influencers defending his work and lamenting that he wasn’t accepted at the academy. (Critics, meanwhile, mocked the paintings as similar to AI-generated drek.)  

Amid this debate, Mike Solana, a vice president of the venture capital firm Founders Fund, tweeted: “It’s pretty simple actually, art should be beautiful.” Although he didn’t mention Hitler or the paintings, this statement was interpreted by some of his followers as an endorsement of Hitler’s visual aesthetic. (He did not immediately respond to a request for comment.) Solana would be one of the prominent commentators who went on to blast Google over the Gemini debacle, publishing a column blasting the AI system as an “anti-white lunatic.” Joining him in this assessment was Andrew Torba, the CEO of Gab — an alternative social media platform preferred by neo-Nazis where Torba is known for posting antisemitic content — who claimed that Gemini was designed to promote diversity. Gab, as it happens, just rolled out a number of their own “uncensored and unbiased” AI chatbots — including one that responds to inputs as if it is Hitler and denies the Holocaust. Torba has yet to weigh in on Hitler’s artistic abilities, though if you ask Gab’s Hitler bot “Were you a good painter?” it replies, untruthfully, “I was not just a good painter, I was an accomplished one,” and that Hitler’s paintings were “appreciated by many.”

Gemini’s detractors quickly honed in on Jack Krawczyk, a senior director on the project, and Jen Gennai, who leads Google’s responsible innovation team, as two parties they believed played a role in Gemini becoming a “woke” AI. In Krawczyk’s case, they surfaced old tweets indicating his support of Biden in the 2020 election and concerns about systemic racism and white privilege. (He took his account private, presumably due to harassment.) A clip from a keynote address by Gennai on how to make non-white employees feel welcomed and supported at Google also made the rounds. Musk joined both pile-ons and used the backlash to again promote his own AI, Grok, which he likes to tout as a “based” or anti-woke alternative to similar technology — although a number of right-wingers have so far voiced dismay at the bot taking liberal stances on a range of topics, something Musk has vowed to fix.

In the end, Google chose to suspend Gemini’s image-generation capabilities while they ironed out its historical mistakes — much to the delight of the type of reactionary shitposters who had gone to bat for Hitler’s paintings as superior to modernist, abstract and subversive art. (In a tweet Friday morning, Musk claimed that he spoke with a Google executive for “an hour” on Thursday night and that they pledged to “fix the racial and gender bias” in the model.) Of course, a reasonable person might conclude that both AI illustrations and Hitler’s scenes are trash, but when your whole ideology revolves around attacking truly free expression as moral degeneracy, you can’t help admiring a fascist mass murderer’s lifeless postcard pictures.

Almost anyone can identify a creatively bankrupt fraud. Recognizing genius isn’t so easy. Gemini’s biggest haters still prefer AI imagery that flatters Republicans over the work of a visionary artist. There is, now and then, a clear accounting for taste.

Trending

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Art

Calvin Lucyshyn: Vancouver Island Art Dealer Faces Fraud Charges After Police Seize Millions in Artwork

Published

 on

In a case that has sent shockwaves through the Vancouver Island art community, a local art dealer has been charged with one count of fraud over $5,000. Calvin Lucyshyn, the former operator of the now-closed Winchester Galleries in Oak Bay, faces the charge after police seized hundreds of artworks, valued in the tens of millions of dollars, from various storage sites in the Greater Victoria area.

Alleged Fraud Scheme

Police allege that Lucyshyn had been taking valuable art from members of the public under the guise of appraising or consigning the pieces for sale, only to cut off all communication with the owners. This investigation began in April 2022, when police received a complaint from an individual who had provided four paintings to Lucyshyn, including three works by renowned British Columbia artist Emily Carr, and had not received any updates on their sale.

Further investigation by the Saanich Police Department revealed that this was not an isolated incident. Detectives found other alleged victims who had similar experiences with Winchester Galleries, leading police to execute search warrants at three separate storage locations across Greater Victoria.

Massive Seizure of Artworks

In what has become one of the largest art fraud investigations in recent Canadian history, authorities seized approximately 1,100 pieces of art, including more than 600 pieces from a storage site in Saanich, over 300 in Langford, and more than 100 in Oak Bay. Some of the more valuable pieces, according to police, were estimated to be worth $85,000 each.

Lucyshyn was arrested on April 21, 2022, but was later released from custody. In May 2024, a fraud charge was formally laid against him.

Artwork Returned, but Some Remain Unclaimed

In a statement released on Monday, the Saanich Police Department confirmed that 1,050 of the seized artworks have been returned to their rightful owners. However, several pieces remain unclaimed, and police continue their efforts to track down the owners of these works.

Court Proceedings Ongoing

The criminal charge against Lucyshyn has not yet been tested in court, and he has publicly stated his intention to defend himself against any pending allegations. His next court appearance is scheduled for September 10, 2024.

Impact on the Local Art Community

The news of Lucyshyn’s alleged fraud has deeply affected Vancouver Island’s art community, particularly collectors, galleries, and artists who may have been impacted by the gallery’s operations. With high-value pieces from artists like Emily Carr involved, the case underscores the vulnerabilities that can exist in art transactions.

For many art collectors, the investigation has raised concerns about the potential for fraud in the art world, particularly when it comes to dealing with private galleries and dealers. The seizure of such a vast collection of artworks has also led to questions about the management and oversight of valuable art pieces, as well as the importance of transparency and trust in the industry.

As the case continues to unfold in court, it will likely serve as a cautionary tale for collectors and galleries alike, highlighting the need for due diligence in the sale and appraisal of high-value artworks.

While much of the seized artwork has been returned, the full scale of the alleged fraud is still being unraveled. Lucyshyn’s upcoming court appearances will be closely watched, not only by the legal community but also by the wider art world, as it navigates the fallout from one of Canada’s most significant art fraud cases in recent memory.

Art collectors and individuals who believe they may have been affected by this case are encouraged to contact the Saanich Police Department to inquire about any unclaimed pieces. Additionally, the case serves as a reminder for anyone involved in high-value art transactions to work with reputable dealers and to keep thorough documentation of all transactions.

As with any investment, whether in art or other ventures, it is crucial to be cautious and informed. Art fraud can devastate personal collections and finances, but by taking steps to verify authenticity, provenance, and the reputation of dealers, collectors can help safeguard their valuable pieces.

Continue Reading

Art

Ukrainian sells art in Essex while stuck in a warzone – BBC.com

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Ukrainian sells art in Essex while stuck in a warzone  BBC.com

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Art

Somerset House Fire: Courtauld Gallery Reopens, Rest of Landmark Closed

Published

 on

The Courtauld Gallery at Somerset House has reopened its doors to the public after a fire swept through the historic building in central London. While the gallery has resumed operations, the rest of the iconic site remains closed “until further notice.”

On Saturday, approximately 125 firefighters were called to the scene to battle the blaze, which sent smoke billowing across the city. Fortunately, the fire occurred in a part of the building not housing valuable artworks, and no injuries were reported. Authorities are still investigating the cause of the fire.

Despite the disruption, art lovers queued outside the gallery before it reopened at 10:00 BST on Sunday. One visitor expressed his relief, saying, “I was sad to see the fire, but I’m relieved the art is safe.”

The Clark family, visiting London from Washington state, USA, had a unique perspective on the incident. While sightseeing on the London Eye, they watched as firefighters tackled the flames. Paul Clark, accompanied by his wife Jiorgia and their four children, shared their concern for the safety of the artwork inside Somerset House. “It was sad to see,” Mr. Clark told the BBC. As a fan of Vincent Van Gogh, he was particularly relieved to learn that the painter’s famous Self-Portrait with Bandaged Ear had not been affected by the fire.

Blaze in the West Wing

The fire broke out around midday on Saturday in the west wing of Somerset House, a section of the building primarily used for offices and storage. Jonathan Reekie, director of Somerset House Trust, assured the public that “no valuable artefacts or artworks” were located in that part of the building. By Sunday, fire engines were still stationed outside as investigations into the fire’s origin continued.

About Somerset House

Located on the Strand in central London, Somerset House is a prominent arts venue with a rich history dating back to the Georgian era. Built on the site of a former Tudor palace, the complex is known for its iconic courtyard and is home to the Courtauld Gallery. The gallery houses a prestigious collection from the Samuel Courtauld Trust, showcasing masterpieces from the Middle Ages to the 20th century. Among the notable works are pieces by impressionist legends such as Edouard Manet, Claude Monet, Paul Cézanne, and Vincent Van Gogh.

Somerset House regularly hosts cultural exhibitions and public events, including its popular winter ice skating sessions in the courtyard. However, for now, the venue remains partially closed as authorities ensure the safety of the site following the fire.

Art lovers and the Somerset House community can take solace in knowing that the invaluable collection remains unharmed, and the Courtauld Gallery continues to welcome visitors, offering a reprieve amid the disruption.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending