Connect with us

Tech

Call of Duty: Warzone 'impossible' kill record has already been beaten – GIVEMESPORT

Published

on


Last week it emerged that a squad on ‘Call of Duty: Warzone’ had smashed the previous world record for the number of kills in the Battle Royale Quads mode.

The team full of pro-gamers managed to secure 113 kills, which left the existing record of 78 in its dust, and it was widely reported that the new tally simply wouldn’t be possible to beat.

Bare in mind there are only 150 players in the Battle Royale Quads mode, it meant that these four gamers demolished nearly all of them.

However, just one week later, that tally has ALREADY been beaten and a new world record has been set.

Yes, we thought it was impossible, we thought it would never be done, but it has…

So you thought 113 kills in a single game was impressive? Well how does 121 sound? Yes you read that right, ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY ONE kills.

No wonder it’s a new world record and surely, SURELY, this time around it will take a long time to beat.

With 150 players, killing 121 of them is simply staggering.

The people to do it? Well, look no further than popular streamers TeePee, Symfuhny, HusKerrs, and DougisRaw.

These four took on the Battle Royale and certainly came out on top, and unsurprisingly, they were quick to take to Twitter to brag about their new world record.

Symfuhny was quick to admit in his tweet that he was carried by his team members, but everyone counts, so even if he didn’t get as many kills, he’s still part of the world record team.

As for TeePee, he was visibly delighted with the new record, starting his tweet with: “NEW QUADS RECORD 121!!!!!”

So there you have it. 

Just one week after saying the new world record of 113 will never be broken, it already has been! 

Next challenge for you Battle Royale players is 121. Can you do it?!


News Now – Sport News

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Sega announces the Game Gear Micro – MobileSyrup

Published

on


Unfortunately, this isn’t the Dreamcast 2. It also isn’t a successor to the Sega Saturn.

To celebrate the company’s 60th anniversary, Sega has revealed a miniature re-release of its 90s handheld console, the Game Gear. Several questions about the console remain unknown, including if it’s coming to North America and what games will be included in the handheld. The Game Gear Micro’s promotional pictures feature Sonic, which makes sense given the blue hedgehog remains Sega’s most recognizable mascot.

Regarding cost, the price comes to ¥4,980 (roughly $62 CAD). Colours include ‘Black,’ ‘Blue,’ ‘Yellow’ and ‘Red.’

The original 8-bit Game Gear was released back in 1991. While the console featured a backlit display and better visuals than Nintendo’s competing Game Boy, the handheld featured poor battery life and was relatively bulky and heavy. Notable Game Gear games include Sonic Chaos, Columns, Sonic The Hedgehog, Sonic Triple Trouble, Tails Adventure, Defenders of the Oasis and more.

The Game Gear eventually failed to beat the Game Boy and was ultimately discontinued in 1997.

Notable Japanese gaming magazine Famitsu recently teased that a significant announcement was coming from Sega this week, with some rumours pointing towards Microsoft utilizing Sega’s brand recognition in Japan to release the Xbox Series X in the region.

Via: Kotaku 

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Sega Celebrates Its 60th Anniversary With A Micro Version Of The Game Gear – Nintendo Life

Published

on


Sega has just announced the Game Gear Micro. As the name suggests, this is a mini version of its original 1990 system.

According to a Twitter image within the source code of the official teaser website, this micro device will launch in Japan on 6th October for ¥4,980, which is expected to translate to about $50 / €50 here in the west.

This new but old system will be available in black, blue, yellow, and red.

Game Gear Micro Colours

What do you think? Tell us below.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Safari in iOS and iPadOS 14 Might Include Built-In Translator, Full Apple Pencil Support – MacRumors

Published

on


Apple is planning to add a built-in language translation feature and full Apple Pencil support to Safari in iOS and iPadOS 14, according to details found in a leaked version of iOS 14 by 9to5Mac.


Safari’s built-in translation feature would allow users to translate web pages without using a third-party app or service. If such a feature comes to ‌iOS 14‌, we can probably also count on it coming to the next-generation version of macOS as well.

The code suggests the translation option will be available for each website that’s visited, but an automatic translation feature will also be able to be turned on, similar to Chrome’s automatic translation. Apple also appears to be testing translation options for other apps, such as the App Store, allowing users to do things like read reviews in other languages.

Apple’s translations are powered by the Neural Engine and may work with or without an internet connection.

As for the ‌Apple Pencil‌, Apple may be planning to add full support for ‌Apple Pencil‌ input on websites, which would allow it to be used for drawing and marking up. This feature would be limited to ‌iPadOS‌ 14 as the ‌Apple Pencil‌ does not work on iPhones.

Earlier this year, MacRumors discovered new PencilKit features that will allow users to handwrite text in any text input field using the ‌Apple Pencil‌, with the handwritten content then converted into standard text.

The code also indicates Apple is working on a kind of “Magic Fill” feature that will let users draw a general shape in an app and have it filled in by the operating system.

The leaked version of ‌iOS 14‌ that’s been floating around the internet is an early version of the software and it’s not clear if Apple’s development plans have changed or if some features might be delayed due to the global health crisis.

We’ll find out what we can expect in ‌iOS 14‌ on June 22, which is when Apple’s virtual WWDC event is set to kick off.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending