adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Can Justin Trudeau's Beard Overturn a Century of Politics? – The Wall Street Journal

Published

 on


To beard or not to beard: that is the question for Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.



Photo:

Photo Illustration: WSJ; Photos: REUTERS; AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Canadian Prime Minister

Justin Trudeau

has portrayed himself as a champion of women’s rights, the environment and refugees, with varying degrees of success.

He is now becoming the champion, perhaps unwittingly, of another cause: making politics safe for bearded men.

Mr. Trudeau first won power in 2015 and secured a second mandate in a vote last year, all while maintaining a clean-shaven look. After a 16-day holiday over Christmas and New Year’s in Costa Rica, the 48-year-old Canadian leader returned to work with a trimmed, salt-and-pepper beard.

Hair apparent

“I thought this was a vacation beard that would be gone in a couple of weeks when the novelty wore off. But it has stuck around,” said

Ian Capstick,

a former political aide in Ottawa and now a Montreal-based communications and image consultant.

Pundits have tried to find a deeper meaning in the new look. Perhaps, they said, the beard meant a reserved, reflective tone was in the offing from Mr. Trudeau, following a scandal-plagued year that damaged his personal popularity and reputation, and nearly cost him re-election.

Image consultants and historians with an interest in everything hirsute say they will watch Mr. Trudeau for clues that voters in North America are ready to accept candidates for the highest office who put their best shaggy face forward.

“My sense is that, in light of recent history and the larger global collapse of political norms, beards no longer pose a meaningful obstacle to politicians’ electoral hopes,” said

Sean Trainor,

a professor at the University of Florida who has studied and written about facial hair—including a paper on

Josephine Clofullia,

a bearded lady who toured the U.S. in the 1850s.

Mr. Trudeau hasn’t talked about his new look, and a spokeswoman declined to comment on a series of questions, among them whether the beard was tested on focus groups. He is running a minority government, so in theory he could hit the campaign trail wearing a beard at any time should he lose a vote in the legislature. Veteran Ottawa observers suggest election talk might ramp up in earnest starting in 2021.

Share Your Thoughts

Should it stay or should it go? Join the discussion below.

Beards have been largely missing from the faces of Western-world government leaders or heads of states for some time. A Canadian prime minister last donned a beard in the late 19th century. It’s been nearly that long in Britain, after Lord Salisbury left office in 1902.

In the U.S.,

Abraham Lincoln

famously sported a beard, although some historians contend what Lincoln actually wore should be called “whiskers,” since his beard was considered short for the time period and he had no mustache. The mustachioed

William Howard Taft,

just before World War I, was the last American president with facial hair while in office.

In other parts of the world, the beard has posed no barrier to political success in modern times. India and Brazil elected

Narendra Modi

and

Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva,

respectively, to more than one term. In Spain, the bearded

Mariano Rajoy

ruled between 2011 and 2018. His beard helped mask facial scars from a serious car accident in the late 1970s.

In North America, the rarity of bearded leaders coincided with a trend away from facial hair in the early 20th century, fueled by the invention of the safety razor and a warning from doctors that beards were a haven for microbes. Previously, physicians believed beards helped protect the face from intense sun and wind, said

Christopher Oldstone-Moore.

“A shaved face was part of the uniform, both clean and regular,” said Mr. Oldstone-Moore, a senior lecturer of history at Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio, and the author of a bible on beards titled, “Of Beards and Men.”

Mr. Trudeau also sported facial hair in 2011.



Photo:

Chris Wattie/REUTERS

But beards are back in fashion, and Mr. Trudeau is known for his relative youth and style.

“The beard gives him a lot of gravitas,” said Laura Peck, a partner at Ottawa-based TransformLeaders.ca, which offers communications training for corporate executives and politicians. “It looks good on him.”

For politicians, risk aversion is also a factor. “Voters are cognitive misers looking for shortcuts to evaluate candidates,” researchers at Oklahoma State University wrote in a 2015 paper on facial hair and politics. “Appearance can affect voters’ perceptions of candidates’ beliefs and issue positions.” Their research, which incorporated surveys of students about their impressions of Congress members with and without facial hair, indicated politicians with either a mustache or a beard are seen as more masculine, as well as more conservative on feminist issues.

Mr. Oldstone-Moore argued in his book

Harry Truman’s

upset win in the 1948 presidential election could be linked to

Thomas Dewey’s

mustache, based on anecdotal evidence collected at the time. Dewey even joked to a group of boy scouts in 1950 about how the hair above his lip cost him votes. “No major candidate for the presidency has dared flaunt even a hint of facial hair since that time,” Mr. Oldstone-Moore wrote.

Thomas Dewey with Harry Truman at an event during the presidential campaign in 1948. Dewey would later joke he lost votes because of his mustache.



Photo:

Corbis/Getty Images

Mr. Trudeau dabbled in facial hair before becoming Liberal Party leader and subsequently prime minister. As late as 2011, he donned a variant of a Van Dyke beard, named after a Flemish painter and popularized by

Vladimir Lenin

and

Johnny Depp.

Last year, Mr. Trudeau and his aides were at the center of a political scandal about alleged political interference in a criminal prosecution, and he was also forced to issue apologies during the election campaign after images emerged of him wearing blackface and brownface.

“I think the beard helps him to affirm both to himself and others his personal resilience,” Mr. Oldstone-Moore said. “He may be saying that he is here to stay, that he is tough and that he will not be cowed by his opponents.”

Mr. Capstick, the image consultant and an occasional beard wearer himself, said he is skeptical about attaching any underlying motive to Mr. Trudeau’s new-look face. He said Mr. Trudeau’s beard “makes him look older. If that was the intention, then it worked.”

Write to Paul Vieira at paul.vieira@wsj.com

Copyright ©2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

RFK Jr. says Trump would push to remove fluoride from drinking water. ‘It’s possible,’ Trump says

Published

 on

 

PHOENIX (AP) — Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent proponent of debunked public health claims whom Donald Trump has promised to put in charge of health initiatives, said Saturday that Trump would push to remove fluoride from drinking water on his first day in office if elected president.

Fluoride strengthens teeth and reduces cavities by replacing minerals lost during normal wear and tear, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The addition of low levels of fluoride to drinking water has long been considered one of the greatest public health achievements of the last century.

Kennedy made the declaration Saturday on the social media platform X alongside a variety of claims about the heath effects of fluoride.

“On January 20, the Trump White House will advise all U.S​. water systems to remove fluoride from public water,” Kennedy wrote. Trump and his wife, Melania Trump, “want to Make America Healthy Again,” he added, repeating a phrase Trump often uses and links to Kennedy.

Trump told NBC News on Sunday that he had not spoken to Kennedy about fluoride yet, “but it sounds OK to me. You know it’s possible.”

The former president declined to say whether he would seek a Cabinet role for Kennedy, a job that would require Senate confirmation, but added, “He’s going to have a big role in the administration.”

Asked whether banning certain vaccines would be on the table, Trump said he would talk to Kennedy and others about that. Trump described Kennedy as “a very talented guy and has strong views.”

The sudden and unexpected weekend social media post evoked the chaotic policymaking that defined Trump’s White House tenure, when he would issue policy declarations on Twitter at virtually all hours. It also underscored the concerns many experts have about Kennedy, who has long promoted debunked theories about vaccine safety, having influence over U.S. public health.

In 1950, federal officials endorsed water fluoridation to prevent tooth decay, and continued to promote it even after fluoride toothpaste brands hit the market several years later. Though fluoride can come from a number of sources, drinking water is the main source for Americans, researchers say.

Officials lowered their recommendation for drinking water fluoride levels in 2015 to address a tooth condition called fluorosis, that can cause splotches on teeth and was becoming more common in U.S. kids.

In August, a federal agency determined “with moderate confidence” that there is a link between higher levels of fluoride exposure and lower IQ in kids. The National Toxicology Program based its conclusion on studies involving fluoride levels at about twice the recommended limit for drinking water.

A federal judge later cited that study in ordering the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to further regulate fluoride in drinking water. U.S. District Judge Edward Chen cautioned that it’s not certain that the amount of fluoride typically added to water is causing lower IQ in kids, but he concluded that mounting research points to an unreasonable risk that it could be. He ordered the EPA to take steps to lower that risk, but didn’t say what those measures should be.

In his X post Saturday, Kennedy tagged Michael Connett, the lead attorney representing the plaintiff in that lawsuit, the environmental advocacy group Food & Water Watch.

Kennedy’s anti-vaccine organization has a lawsuit pending against news organizations including The Associated Press, accusing them of violating antitrust laws by taking action to identify misinformation, including about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines. Kennedy is on leave from the group but is listed as one of its attorneys in the lawsuit.

What role Kennedy might hold if Trump wins on Tuesday remains unclear. Kennedy recently told NewsNation that Trump asked him to “reorganize” agencies including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration and some agencies under the Department of Agriculture.

But for now, the former independent presidential candidate has become one of Trump’s top surrogates. Trump frequently mentions having the support of Kennedy, a scion of a Democratic dynasty and the son of former Attorney General Robert Kennedy and nephew of President John F. Kennedy.

Kennedy traveled with Trump Friday and spoke at his rallies in Michigan and Wisconsin.

Trump said Saturday that he told Kennedy: “You can work on food, you can work on anything you want” except oil policy.

“He wants health, he wants women’s health, he wants men’s health, he wants kids, he wants everything,” Trump added.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Danielle Smith receives overwhelming support at United Conservative Party convention

Published

 on

Danielle Smith receives overwhelming support at United Conservative Party convention

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

America’s Election: What it Means to Canadians

Published

 on

Americans and Canadians are cousins that is true. Allies today but long ago people were at loggerheads mostly because of the British Empire and American ambitions.

Canadians appreciate our cousins down south enough to visit them many millions of times over the year. America is Canada’s largest and most important trading partner. As a manufacturer, I can attest to this personally. My American clients have allowed our firm to grow and prosper over the past few decades. There is a problem we have been seeing, a problem where nationalism, both political and economic has been creating a roadblock to our trade relationship.

Both Democrats and Republicans have shown a willingness to play the “buy only American Made product” card, a sounding board for all things isolationist, nationalistic and small-mindedness. We all live on this small planet, and purchase items made from all over the world. Preferences as to what to buy and where it is made are personal choices, never should they become a platform of national pride and thuggery. This has brought fear into the hearts of many Canadians who manufacture for and service the American Economy in some way. This fear will be apparent when the election is over next week.

Canadians are not enemies of America, but allies and friends with a long tradition of supporting our cousins back when bad sh*t happens. We have had enough of the American claim that they want free trade, only to realize that they do so long as it is to their benefit. Tariffs, and undue regulations applied to exporters into America are applied, yet American industry complains when other nations do the very same to them. Seriously! Democrats have said they would place a preference upon doing business with American firms before foreign ones, and Republicans wish to tariff many foreign nations into oblivion. Rhetoric perhaps, but we need to take these threats seriously. As to you the repercussions that will come should America close its doors to us.

Tit for tat neighbors. Tariff for tariff, true selfish competition with no fear of the American Giant. Do you want to build homes in America? Over 33% of all wood comes from Canada. Tit for tat. Canada’s mineral wealth can be sold to others and place preference upon the highest bidder always. You know who will win there don’t you America, the deep-pocketed Chinese.

Reshaping our alliances with others. If America responds as has been threatened, Canadians will find ways to entertain themselves elsewhere. Imagine no Canadian dollars flowing into the Northern States, Florida or California? The Big Apple without its friendly Maple Syrup dip. Canadians will realize just how significant their spending is to America and use it to our benefit, not theirs.

Clearly we will know if you prefer Canadian friendship to Donald Trumps Bravado.

China, Saudi Arabia & Russia are not your friends in America. Canada, Japan, Taiwan the EU and many other nations most definitely are. Stop playing politics, and carry out business in an unethical fashion. Treat allies as they should be treated.

Steven Kaszab
Bradford, Ontario
skaszab@yahoo.ca

Continue Reading

Trending