adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Media

Can The Royal Family Survive In The Age Of Social Media?

Published

 on

royal family elle uk
What’s Next For The Royal Family?Getty Images

You’ve probably heard the one about Kate Middleton‘s body double. Or that the Princess of Wales is the real Banksy. Or perhaps that’s she’s actually resting following a Brazilian Bum Lift. Since a statement from Kensington Palace confirmed in January that the royal would be recovering from a ‘planned abdominal surgery’ until after Easter, the conspiracy theories – or ‘Katespiracies’, as they’ve since been dubbed – pertaining to the state of her health, geographical location, and marital status have reached fever pitch.

Whether you’re a Royalist or a Republican, the furore around the recent edited family photograph of the Waleses has seeped into every social interaction and fuelled a deluge of misinformation about The Firm, which, given the sharing and instantaneous communication model of social media, has only proliferated.

FIND OUT MORE ON ELLE COLLECTIVE

With just a click of her finger – and a sweep of her airbrush – the Princess of Wales dismantled one of the core tenets of the Royals’ house of cards: that they are honest and transparent. In altering the appearance of her Mother’s Day image (which she has since apologised for), she proved that, as Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have been proclaiming for years, Princesses are just as fallible as their subjects, and plagued by the pursuit for perfection.

royal christmas cardsroyal christmas cards
Matt Porteous

In a similar vein to the aftermath of the family’s ‘annus horribilis’ in 1992 and the growing tension between the royals and the media (from the publication of Princess Diana’s tell-all memoir to the Sussexes ongoing legal battles with the UK tabloids) what has transpired from the wreckage of the ‘Kate-gate’ rumours is a royal family in free fall without a definitive plan on how to escape the swamp of conspiracy theories that threaten to swallow their reputations – and presence – entirely. Its sword? Social media.

The modern-day royal family evolved in tandem with the rise of social media. As Twitter launched in 2006, WhatsApp and Instagram debuted across all platforms in 2010, swiftly followed by Snapchat and TikTok, Prince William met and eventually married Kate, Prince Harry wed Meghan Markle, and King Charles (finally) said ‘I do’ to Queen Camilla. In recent years, the family has used social media to its advantage, creating dedicated household handles, sharing information about their charity work, and announcing royal births with as much vigour as an influencer does a new brand collaboration. Rather than attempt to maintain control of its narrative, as it’s done for years through its tacit historic agreement with the press, its relationship with the likes of Instagram has only served to fuel the murmuring of misinformation online in an ever-evolving news industry.

According to research released last year by Ofcom, in today’s virtual world, two-thirds of adults in the UK cite social media platforms as the source of news they consume. The number is even higher for those aged 18-24, with 83% of them educating themselves with news they’re served on social media platforms. Contrary to the pre-social media world, in which the royals acted in accordance with the Royal Rota – which refers to the practice of news and photographs of their appearances being distributed to the press pool of approved publications – publications no longer have the hold on the public’s opinion that they once did. Instead, the Silicon Valley denizens of social media have seized control of society’s increasingly polarised and discerning opinions, forcing it to metabolise ‘news’ pre-determined by digital algorithms rather than royal press teams.

meghan markle prince harry engagement photocallmeghan markle prince harry engagement photocall
Getty Images

As the tectonic plates of the way we consume news has shifted, so too have the mechanics of the royal family. Despite changing socio-political dynamics and the blurring of what’s now deemed private and public, The Firm has long attempted to function as it always has – never complaining or explaining, the famous Benjamin Disraeli maxim by which Queen Elizabeth II orienteered her existence in public life. That is, until now. In light of Kate’s recent apology over the edited image, it would seem The Firm is waking up to the fact that staying quiet in the noisy age of opinion-based facts and social media not only dilutes the family’s voices, but their power too.

the best royal christmas cards 2023the best royal christmas cards 2023
Josh Shinner/Kensington Palace/PA – Getty Images

‘My family have been briefing the press solidly for well over a decade,’ Prince Harry told reporter Tom Bradby in an ITV interview last year, claiming that, ‘certain members’ have decided to ‘get in bed with the Devil to rehabilitate their image’. In his memoir Spare, he wrote: ‘I’d had it with the Royal Rota, both the individuals and the system, which was more outdated than the horse and cart. It had been devised some 40 years earlier, to give British print and broadcast reporters first crack at the royal family, and it stank to high heaven. It discouraged fair competition, engendered cronyism, encouraged a small mob of hacks to feel entitled.’

‘The royal family has been used to being able to control their narrative through their relationship with the press,’ Dr. Rob Topinka, Senior Lecturer in Media and Cultural Studies and author of the paper, ‘Misinformation in Everyday Life: Portable Principles for Social Media Research’, tells ELLE UK. Referencing the recent photoediting debacle, Dr Topinka adds: ‘What we’re witnessing is a shift in the way that people are perceiving them because their story has been taken out of their hands and they’re struggling to get hold of it. It’s become bigger than them.’

royal family elle ukroyal family elle uk
Getty Images

Conspiracies thrive when they’re fortified with oxygen; the more they are socialised, the more believable they become. It’s in the dark space between people’s perceived reality and the truth that conspiracies take on a life of their own. The term ‘#KateMiddleton’ has been viewed more than 13 billion times on TikTok alone, with users from around the world making videos dissecting what they believe the ‘truth’ is behind Kate’s ‘disappearance’. Because that’s what’s given these conspiracies life: the absence of Kate herself. After all, the importance of the royal family lies in their ability to be seen. As The Queen famously said: ‘I have to be seen to be believed.’ That is one of the very real, tangible ways in which they can be seen to offer support and bolster causes close to their hearts. In ‘robbing’ the public of Kate appearances to see that she’s not only alive and well, but continuing her life as she once did, the public are left filling in the blanks by using the latest dispatches from their virtual echo chambers to self-educate.

Rather than quell suspicions, as appeared to be the intention with Kate’s Mother’s Day post and recent photographed outings, any attempt to ‘keep calm and carry on’ as usual will likely only put The Firm under more scrutiny. As a result, it might be forced to question how it manages its public existence in the age of social media and reconsider the power of silence in an ever-deafening world of ‘fake news’.

Nowadays, it’s no longer enough for the royals to be seen, they’re now expected to be heard and understood too. Such openness is something King Charles has tried to harness in recent months when it comes to his health. In the 24 hours after the Palace shared a statement about his prostate cancer diagnosis, searches for symptoms on Prostate Cancer UK’s online risk checker were up by over 97%. Transparency, when authentic, enables the public to not only see and hear the family it feels a claim to, but also to understand it in a world that’s clutching at comprehension. Then again, as we saw in the backlash towards Prince Harry’s memoir and the Sussexes’ talk of their ‘truth’ in their 2021 Oprah Winfrey documentary, honesty is a double-edged sword. Show too much and it proves that the royal family are just like the rest of us, and that’s a message we the public, and perhaps The Firm too, would rather not admit.

‘Conspiracies tend to stem from things that powerful people do behind closed doors, so for the royal family to really work in today’s age, they have to become more transparent,’ Dr. Topinka says. ‘The way they’ve historically operated is no longer enough, they need to almost become social media influencers in order to work today and to keep their fans abreast of what they’re doing and why. Staying quiet just isn’t really an option anymore.’


ELLE Collective is a new community of fashion, beauty and culture lovers. For access to exclusive content, events, inspiring advice from our Editors and industry experts, as well the opportunity to meet designers, thought-leaders and stylists, become a member today HERE.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

What to stream this weekend: ‘Civil War,’ Snow Patrol, ‘How to Die Alone,’ ‘Tulsa King’ and ‘Uglies’

Published

 on

 

Hallmark launching a streaming service with two new original series, and Bill Skarsgård out for revenge in “Boy Kills World” are some of the new television, films, music and games headed to a device near you.

Also among the streaming offerings worth your time as selected by The Associated Press’ entertainment journalists: Alex Garland’s “Civil War” starring Kirsten Dunst, Natasha Rothwell’s heartfelt comedy for Hulu called “How to Die Alone” and Sylvester Stallone’s second season of “Tulsa King” debuts.

NEW MOVIES TO STREAM SEPT. 9-15

Alex Garland’s “Civil War” is finally making its debut on MAX on Friday. The film stars Kirsten Dunst as a veteran photojournalist covering a violent war that’s divided America; She reluctantly allows an aspiring photographer, played by Cailee Spaeny, to tag along as she, an editor (Stephen McKinley Henderson) and a reporter (Wagner Moura) make the dangerous journey to Washington, D.C., to interview the president (Nick Offerman), a blustery, rising despot who has given himself a third term, taken to attacking his citizens and shut himself off from the press. In my review, I called it a bellowing and haunting experience; Smart and thought-provoking with great performances. It’s well worth a watch.

— Joey King stars in Netflix’s adaptation of Scott Westerfeld’s “Uglies,” about a future society in which everyone is required to have beautifying cosmetic surgery at age 16. Streaming on Friday, McG directed the film, in which King’s character inadvertently finds herself in the midst of an uprising against the status quo. “Outer Banks” star Chase Stokes plays King’s best friend.

— Bill Skarsgård is out for revenge against the woman (Famke Janssen) who killed his family in “Boy Kills World,” coming to Hulu on Friday. Moritz Mohr directed the ultra-violent film, of which Variety critic Owen Gleiberman wrote: “It’s a depraved vision, yet I got caught up in its kick-ass revenge-horror pizzazz, its disreputable commitment to what it was doing.”

AP Film Writer Lindsey Bahr

NEW MUSIC TO STREAM SEPT. 9-15

— The year was 2006. Snow Patrol, the Northern Irish-Scottish alternative rock band, released an album, “Eyes Open,” producing the biggest hit of their career: “Chasing Cars.” A lot has happened in the time since — three, soon to be four quality full-length albums, to be exact. On Friday, the band will release “The Forest Is the Path,” their first new album in seven years. Anthemic pop-rock is the name of the game across songs of love and loss, like “All,”“The Beginning” and “This Is the Sound Of Your Voice.”

— For fans of raucous guitar music, Jordan Peele’s 2022 sci-fi thriller, “NOPE,” provided a surprising, if tiny, thrill. One of the leads, Emerald “Em” Haywood portrayed by Keke Palmer, rocks a Jesus Lizard shirt. (Also featured through the film: Rage Against the Machine, Wipers, Mr Bungle, Butthole Surfers and Earth band shirts.) The Austin noise rock band are a less than obvious pick, having been signed to the legendary Touch and Go Records and having stopped releasing new albums in 1998. That changes on Friday the 13th, when “Rack” arrives. And for those curious: The Jesus Lizard’s intensity never went away.

AP Music Writer Maria Sherman

NEW SHOWS TO STREAM SEPT. 9-15

— Hallmark launched a streaming service called Hallmark+ on Tuesday with two new original series, the scripted drama “The Chicken Sisters” and unscripted series “Celebrations with Lacey Chabert.” If you’re a Hallmark holiday movies fan, you know Chabert. She’s starred in more than 30 of their films and many are holiday themed. Off camera, Chabert has a passion for throwing parties and entertaining. In “Celebrations,” deserving people are surprised with a bash in their honor — planned with Chabert’s help. “The Chicken Sisters” stars Schuyler Fisk, Wendie Malick and Lea Thompson in a show about employees at rival chicken restaurants in a small town. The eight-episode series is based on a novel of the same name.

Natasha Rothwell of “Insecure” and “The White Lotus” fame created and stars in a new heartfelt comedy for Hulu called “How to Die Alone.” She plays Mel, a broke, go-along-to-get-along, single, airport employee who, after a near-death experience, makes the conscious decision to take risks and pursue her dreams. Rothwell has been working on the series for the past eight years and described it to The AP as “the most vulnerable piece of art I’ve ever put into the world.” Like Mel, Rothwell had to learn to bet on herself to make the show she wanted to make. “In the Venn diagram of me and Mel, there’s significant overlap,” said Rothwell. It premieres Friday on Hulu.

— Shailene Woodley, DeWanda Wise and Betty Gilpin star in a new drama for Starz called “Three Women,” about entrepreneur Sloane, homemaker Lina and student Maggie who are each stepping into their power and making life-changing decisions. They’re interviewed by a writer named Gia (Woodley.) The series is based on a 2019 best-selling book of the same name by Lisa Taddeo. “Three Women” premieres Friday on Starz.

— Sylvester Stallone’s second season of “Tulsa King” debuts Sunday on Paramount+. Stallone plays Dwight Manfredi, a mafia boss who was recently released from prison after serving 25 years. He’s sent to Tulsa to set up a new crime syndicate. The series is created by Taylor Sheridan of “Yellowstone” fame.

Alicia Rancilio

NEW VIDEO GAMES TO PLAY

— One thing about the title of Focus Entertainment’s Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2 — you know exactly what you’re in for. You are Demetrian Titus, a genetically enhanced brute sent into battle against the Tyranids, an insectoid species with an insatiable craving for human flesh. You have a rocket-powered suit of armor and an arsenal of ridiculous weapons like the “Chainsword,” the “Thunderhammer” and the “Melta Rifle,” so what could go wrong? Besides the squishy single-player mode, there are cooperative missions and six-vs.-six free-for-alls. You can suit up now on PlayStation 5, Xbox X/S or PC.

— Likewise, Wild Bastards isn’t exactly the kind of title that’s going to attract fans of, say, Animal Crossing. It’s another sci-fi shooter, but the protagonists are a gang of 13 varmints — aliens and androids included — who are on the run from the law. Each outlaw has a distinctive set of weapons and special powers: Sarge, for example, is a robot with horse genes, while Billy the Squid is … well, you get the idea. Australian studio Blue Manchu developed the 2019 cult hit Void Bastards, and this Wild-West-in-space spinoff has the same snarky humor and vibrant, neon-drenched cartoon look. Saddle up on PlayStation 5, Xbox X/S, Nintendo Switch or PC.

Lou Kesten

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Trump could cash out his DJT stock within weeks. Here’s what happens if he sells

Published

 on

Former President Donald Trump is on the brink of a significant financial decision that could have far-reaching implications for both his personal wealth and the future of his fledgling social media company, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG). As the lockup period on his shares in TMTG, which owns Truth Social, nears its end, Trump could soon be free to sell his substantial stake in the company. However, the potential payday, which makes up a large portion of his net worth, comes with considerable risks for Trump and his supporters.

Trump’s stake in TMTG comprises nearly 59% of the company, amounting to 114,750,000 shares. As of now, this holding is valued at approximately $2.6 billion. These shares are currently under a lockup agreement, a common feature of initial public offerings (IPOs), designed to prevent company insiders from immediately selling their shares and potentially destabilizing the stock. The lockup, which began after TMTG’s merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), is set to expire on September 25, though it could end earlier if certain conditions are met.

Should Trump decide to sell his shares after the lockup expires, the market could respond in unpredictable ways. The sale of a substantial number of shares by a major stakeholder like Trump could flood the market, potentially driving down the stock price. Daniel Bradley, a finance professor at the University of South Florida, suggests that the market might react negatively to such a large sale, particularly if there aren’t enough buyers to absorb the supply. This could lead to a sharp decline in the stock’s value, impacting both Trump’s personal wealth and the company’s market standing.

Moreover, Trump’s involvement in Truth Social has been a key driver of investor interest. The platform, marketed as a free speech alternative to mainstream social media, has attracted a loyal user base largely due to Trump’s presence. If Trump were to sell his stake, it might signal a lack of confidence in the company, potentially shaking investor confidence and further depressing the stock price.

Trump’s decision is also influenced by his ongoing legal battles, which have already cost him over $100 million in legal fees. Selling his shares could provide a significant financial boost, helping him cover these mounting expenses. However, this move could also have political ramifications, especially as he continues his bid for the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential race.

Trump Media’s success is closely tied to Trump’s political fortunes. The company’s stock has shown volatility in response to developments in the presidential race, with Trump’s chances of winning having a direct impact on the stock’s value. If Trump sells his stake, it could be interpreted as a lack of confidence in his own political future, potentially undermining both his campaign and the company’s prospects.

Truth Social, the flagship product of TMTG, has faced challenges in generating traffic and advertising revenue, especially compared to established social media giants like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook. Despite this, the company’s valuation has remained high, fueled by investor speculation on Trump’s political future. If Trump remains in the race and manages to secure the presidency, the value of his shares could increase. Conversely, any missteps on the campaign trail could have the opposite effect, further destabilizing the stock.

As the lockup period comes to an end, Trump faces a critical decision that could shape the future of both his personal finances and Truth Social. Whether he chooses to hold onto his shares or cash out, the outcome will likely have significant consequences for the company, its investors, and Trump’s political aspirations.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Arizona man accused of social media threats to Trump is arrested

Published

 on

Cochise County, AZ — Law enforcement officials in Arizona have apprehended Ronald Lee Syvrud, a 66-year-old resident of Cochise County, after a manhunt was launched following alleged death threats he made against former President Donald Trump. The threats reportedly surfaced in social media posts over the past two weeks, as Trump visited the US-Mexico border in Cochise County on Thursday.

Syvrud, who hails from Benson, Arizona, located about 50 miles southeast of Tucson, was captured by the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office on Thursday afternoon. The Sheriff’s Office confirmed his arrest, stating, “This subject has been taken into custody without incident.”

In addition to the alleged threats against Trump, Syvrud is wanted for multiple offences, including failure to register as a sex offender. He also faces several warrants in both Wisconsin and Arizona, including charges for driving under the influence and a felony hit-and-run.

The timing of the arrest coincided with Trump’s visit to Cochise County, where he toured the US-Mexico border. During his visit, Trump addressed the ongoing border issues and criticized his political rival, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, for what he described as lax immigration policies. When asked by reporters about the ongoing manhunt for Syvrud, Trump responded, “No, I have not heard that, but I am not that surprised and the reason is because I want to do things that are very bad for the bad guys.”

This incident marks the latest in a series of threats against political figures during the current election cycle. Just earlier this month, a 66-year-old Virginia man was arrested on suspicion of making death threats against Vice President Kamala Harris and other public officials.

Continue Reading

Trending