adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Chris Selley: Danielle Smith can’t avoid the combustible politics of children’s gender – National Post

Published

 on


The political and culture-war motivations with this issue are too strong to keep politicians on the straight and narrow and compassionate

Get the latest from Chris Selley straight to your inbox

Article content

Over the past few days, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has put a far more compassionate face on new rules and regulations governing gender-dysphoric children than her counterparts in New Brunswick and Saskatchewan did before her. She began a seven-minute online video, posted Wednesday afternoon, and a Thursday-afternoon press conference, by professing love and support for all children going through such challenges. She vowed to recruit more doctors skilled in the field to the province, so patients can receive care at home. (Alberta currently sends patients to Quebec for gender-reassignment surgery.)

Advertisement 2

Article content

Neither New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs nor Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe seemed half as empathetic in introducing their own rules. Smith speaks from experience, she says: A young person she knows well is in this situation, and her aim is to help children hoe that tough row, not to scapegoat them or make their lives more difficult — but also to make sure they don’t make any irrevocable decisions about their bodies until they are adults.

Article content

At the same time, Alberta’s new rules, which Smith characterized in a “high-level” outline that will accumulate specificity in forthcoming months of consultations, are more wide-ranging and stricter than those of Saskatchewan and New Brunswick. Like those other provinces, Alberta will require parental consent for children to “socially transition” at school — a new name, new pronouns, etc.

The rules require an “opt in” from parents before their kids receive any “formal instruction on subject matter involving gender identity, sexual orientation or human sexuality.” They will “ensure biologically born female athletes are able to compete in a biological female-only division without having to compete against transgender female athletes.” (Have fun with that one, provincial Sports Minister Joseph Schow!) Most notably, they stipulate which treatments and surgeries will be available and unavailable to gender-dysphoric minors.

Article content

Advertisement 3

Article content

No gender-reassignment surgeries would be allowed for Albertans under 18, and puberty blockers would be banned for those under 16. (For the record, so-called “bottom surgeries” — i.e., to the genital region — are already “restricted to individuals 18 years of age and older,” per the Canadian Pediatric Society.)

Many are aghast at all of this, needless to say, or at least pretending to be. Federal Health Minister Mark Holland spoke of “the devastation that (these policies are) going to bring.”

Even the proposed Alberta policy doesn’t mandate that schools immediately narc on a child who wishes to socially transition

Sports and surgeries aside, however, the fact Canadians monolithically support parents being involved in their children’s life-altering decisions is not some unfortunate intolerant detour along the march of progress. The detour is the notion that parents don’t have a right to know about such things (of course they do), and that children have a right to private lives, the details of which they share only with a few unrelated adults at school (of course they do not). In 25 years, people will look back on such ludicrous arguments the way we do nowadays on trepanation or phrenology.

Advertisement 4

Article content

That said, I’m more skeptical of government than just about any other institution, the medical and educational professions included, when it comes to solving problems like these (or any others, really). The political and culture-war motivations are just too strong to keep politicians on the straight and narrow and compassionate.

The biggest problem with the rules Smith unveiled this week is that they’re not rules at all. They’re proposed rules, presented (and therefore rightly reported on) as faits accomplis, by a politician who may well want to help gender-dysphoric kids, but who also clearly has a political incentive to be seen cracking down as hard as possible on what many conservatives see as a social contagion.

Because a distressing number of Canadian journalists either haven’t read Saskatchewan’s and New Brunswick’s policies, or are simply too activist-minded to care what those actually say, you will often hear and read that those policies require notification of parents as soon as their children request to go by a different name or gender. They do not, because that would be crazy and reckless.

Advertisement 5

Article content

In fact, both provinces rule out parental notification in cases where the child doesn’t want that to happen. New Brunswick’s policy allows for children to use another name at school, without their parents knowing, so long as they are “communicating with appropriate professionals in the development of a plan to speak to their parents (about it).”

I suspect Alberta’s policy will be very similar, when it lands in its final form. Even the proposed Alberta policy doesn’t mandate that schools immediately narc on a child who wishes to socially transition. It just says “parents must consent for their child aged 15 and under to alter their name or pronouns used by school teachers, administration and other educational staff.”

If we trust teachers and school administrators to adhere to that policy, in my view, we should trust them to use their best professional judgment in how to deal with the very unique individual, familial and community circumstances in which Canadian children have to navigate gender dysphoria. None of these policies should be necessary. But it helps no one to pretend they’re more draconian than they are. If Smith really hoped to “depoliticize” these issues, as she claimed this week, she’s out of luck.

National Post

cselley@postmedia.com

Recommended from Editorial

  1. Justin Trudeau and his family — plus an assorted cadre of staff and bodyguards — travelled to Jamaica over the Christmas holidays to stay at a luxurious resort owned by Peter Green, who also happens to be a donor to the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation.

    Chris Selley: Trudeau’s cartoonishly aristocratic lifestyle more than a matter of ethics

  2. Chris Selley: Canada will never be ‘ready’ to euthanize the mentally ill

Article content

Get the latest from Chris Selley straight to your inbox

Comments

Join the Conversation

This Week in Flyers

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending