adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

Comcast to spin off cable networks that were once the entertainment giant’s star performers

Published

 on

WASHINGTON (AP) — Comcast is spinning off into a new company many of the cable television networks that were once at the entertainment giant’s heart as consumers increasingly swap out their cable TV subscriptions for streaming platforms.

Those one-time stars for Comcast’s NBCUniversal cable television networks include USA, Oxygen, E!, SYFY and Golf Channel, as well as CNBC and MSNBC. Movie ticketing platform Fandango and the Rotten Tomatoes movie rating site will also become part of the new company.

Streaming service Peacock will remain with Comcast, as will Bravo, which provides significant content for the Peacock streaming service, and other assets like the NBCUniversal’s studios and theme parks.

Comcast telegraphed the shift last month, before confirming Wednesday that it will spin off assets that generated about $7 billion in revenue over the past 12 months ending Sept. 30. That’s about 5.5% of Comcast’s total revenue during that period, according to the company.

How exactly this split will impact customers is not yet clear. Experts maintain it’s too early to tell, given that Comcast aims to complete the transition over the next year.

Some analysts speculate that the spun-off networks may have more freedom to bring their content elsewhere. That could mean you’ll have more options to find and curate what you want to watch and where — or headaches from juggling several different subscriptions in an already-fractured media landscape.

Wednesday’s announcement arrives as more and more people “cut the cord” on cable, with millions canceling service subscriptions every year — and instead signing up for streaming platforms.

Paul Verna, principal analyst and vice president of content for market research company eMarketer, said Comcast’s decision to divest itself from most of its cable TV channels is a reflection of that trend.

“The writing is on the wall that the cable TV business is a dwindling business,” Verna said. “That’s why Comcast did what it did today.”

Mike Proulx, a vice president and research director of Forrester, added that the spin-off marks “simply a reconciliation of assets that detract from the company’s inevitable all streaming future.”

Comcast expects the new company, which it referred to as “SpinCo” Wednesday, to have the financial flexibility to be “a potential partner and acquirer of other complementary media businesses.” And Mark Lazarus, the current chairman of NBCUniversal Media Group who will serve as the new entity’s CEO, said Wednesday that the standalone company “will be better positioned to serve our audiences and drive shareholder returns.”

Like other cable companies, Comcast in recent years has shifted its business emphasis away from traditional cable toward streaming and other sources of revenue, such as its movie studio, theme parks and home wireless and internet services.

Despite a slightly confusing, glitchy start, Peacock has been one of the company’s biggest success stories, with recent boosts gained in part by the streaming platform’s popularity during the 2024 Paris Olympic Games. In its most recent quarter, Comcast reported that paid Peacock subscribers jumped by 3 million, or 29%, to 36 million subscribers. Peacock’s revenue soared 82% to $1.5 billion in the period.

Dropping “money-losing assets” to instead focus on these kinds of lucrative business is clearly beneficial to Comcast, Verna said — but the future of a new company housing primarily cable networks is less promising. He said he finds it hard “to envision that this company will stay independent for a long time,” predicting future consolidation of the networks or acquisitions through private equity.

Howard Gutman, private equity strategy and coverage lead for MorganFranklin Consulting, also expects consolidation to be in the cards. He noted the spin-off might entice bigger streaming services that are in search of more content, for example, to buy up these kinds of assets.

That could mean watchers of the Golf Channel, for example, finding its content on what were once rival platforms. But the spun-off assets might also find more power to focus on priorities specific to them under a smaller company umbrella, Gutman added. That would potentially open the door for networks like CNBC to further monetize its own content or expand its brand.

“I think it will open up opportunities,” he said, adding that customers will also have more options to curate subscriptions based on what interests them the most.

Verna is less optimistic. He pointed to a history of changes in the media landscape that has repeatedly been tough for consumers.

People already have a hard time figuring out where to watch or stream something they’re looking for, Verna said, and deals to license or spread that out further could worsen that. And paying for more and more services adds up, particularly as platforms have hiked prices over time.

“It’s too early to know what impact (the Comcast spin-offs) will have …. But I wouldn’t hold my breath (on there being) a net benefit to consumers,” Verna said. “Consumers are the ones who are supposed to be driving these trends, and to some extent they are. But they also tend to get the short end of the stick every time.”

The spin-off is targeted for completion in about a year, the entertainment giant said Wednesday, pending financing and approval from its board and government regulators.

Beyond Lazarus’ appointment to CEO of the new company, Anand Kini, the current chief financial officer of NBCUniversal, will take on the same title with the new company as well as the chief operating officer role.

Shares of Comcast, based in Philadelphia, ended up 1.6% Wednesday.

Comcast reported revenue of more than $32 billion and profit of $1.12 per share in its most recent quarter, boosted by the summer box-office success of “Despicable Me 4,” which grossed more than $1 billion worldwide.

___

Grantham-Philips reported from New York.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Nvidia is Wall Street’s most valuable company. How it got there, by the numbers

Published

 on

Nvidia has once again turned out quarterly results that exceeded Wall Street’s forecasts. The company has seen soaring demand for its semiconductors, which are used to power artificial intelligence applications.

Revenue nearly doubled in the latest quarter from the same period a year earlier, Nvidia reported Wednesday. The company expects further revenue growth in the current quarter that ends in January. Investors will be watching to see if demand for the company’s next-generation AI chip called Blackwell can help it maintain the red-hot pace.

The company’s journey to be one of the most prominent players in AI has produced some eye-popping numbers. Here’s a look.

$3.579 trillion

Nvidia’s total market value as of the close Wednesday, tops in the S&P 500. It regained the No. 1 sport from Apple ($3.461 trillion) earlier this week. Microsoft is the only other company with a market value above $3 trillion ($3.089 trillion). One year ago, Nvidia’s market value was around $1.243 trillion.

195%

Gain in Nvidia’s stock price so far this year as of the close of trading Wednesday. A $100,000 investment in Nvidia two years ago would now be worth more than $950,000. Shares fell about 1% in after-hours trading following the release of the company’s earnings.

25%

That’s how much of the S&P 500’s gain for the year could be attributed to Nvidia alone, as of Oct. 31. Nvidia replaced Intel in the Dow Jones Industrial Average earlier this month.

$30.8 billion

Nvidia’s revenue from its data center business for the quarter ended Oct. 31, up 112% from a year ago. Overall revenue rose 94% from a year ago to $35.1 billion. By comparison, revenue growth for all the companies in the S&P 500 is expected to be about 5.5% for the latest quarter, according to FactSet.

$37.5 billion

Nvidia’s estimate for overall revenue in the fourth quarter, “plus or minus 2%.” That translates to a range of $36.8 billion to $38.3 billion, compared to Wall Street’s estimate of $37.1 billion. Revenue in the year-ago fourth quarter totaled $22.1 billion.

$126.5 billion

Analysts’ estimate for Nvidia’s revenue for the fiscal year that ends in January 2025. That would be more than double its revenue for fiscal 2024 and more than four times its receipts the year before that.

54.6 billion

The number of Thanksgiving meals one could buy with Nvidia’s market value of $3.579 trillion, using the $65.51 estimated cost of a 15-item meal from retail intelligence provider Datasembly.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Class action lawsuit on AI-related discrimination reaches final settlement

Published

 on

Mary Louis’ excitement to move into an apartment in Massachusetts in the spring of 2021 turned to dismay when Louis, a Black woman, received an email saying that a “third-party service” had denied her tenancy.

That third-party service included an algorithm designed to score rental applicants, which became the subject of a class action lawsuit, with Louis at the helm, alleging that the algorithm discriminated on the basis of race and income.

A federal judge approved a settlement in the lawsuit, one of the first of it’s kind, on Wednesday, with the company behind the algorithm agreeing to pay over $2.2 million and roll back certain parts of it’s screening products that the lawsuit alleged were discriminatory.

The settlement does not include any admissions of fault by the company SafeRent Solutions, which said in a statement that while it “continues to believe the SRS Scores comply with all applicable laws, litigation is time-consuming and expensive.”

While such lawsuits might be relatively new, the use of algorithms or artificial intelligence programs to screen or score Americans isn’t. For years, AI has been furtively helping make consequential decisions for U.S. residents.

When a person submits a job application, applies for a home loan or even seeks certain medical care, there’s a chance that an AI system or algorithm is scoring or assessing them like it did Louis. Those AI systems, however, are largely unregulated, even though some have been found to discriminate.

“Management companies and landlords need to know that they’re now on notice, that these systems that they are assuming are reliable and good are going to be challenged,” said Todd Kaplan, one of Louis’ attorneys.

The lawsuit alleged SafeRent’s algorithm didn’t take into account the benefits of housing vouchers, which they said was an important detail for a renter’s ability to pay the monthly bill, and it therefore discriminated against low-income applicants who qualified for the aid.

The suit also accused SafeRent’s algorithm of relying too much on credit information. They argued that it fails to give a full picture of an applicant’s ability to pay rent on time and unfairly dings applicants with housing vouchers who are Black and Hispanic partly because they have lower median credit scores, attributable to historical inequities.

Christine Webber, one of the plaintiff’s attorneys, said that just because an algorithm or AI is not programmed to discriminate, the data an algorithm uses or weights could have “the same effect as if you told it to discriminate intentionally.”

When Louis’ application was denied, she tried appealing the decision, sending two landlords’ references to show she’d paid rent early or on time for 16 years, even if she didn’t have a strong credit history.

Louis, who had a housing voucher, was scrambling, having already given notice to her previous landlord that she was moving out, and she was charged with taking care of her granddaughter.

The response from the management company, which used SafeRent’s screening service, read, “We do not accept appeals and cannot override the outcome of the Tenant Screening.”

Louis felt defeated; the algorithm didn’t know her, she said.

“Everything is based on numbers. You don’t get the individual empathy from them,” said Louis. “There is no beating the system. The system is always going to beat us.”

While state lawmakers have proposed aggressive regulations for these types of AI systems, the proposals have largely failed to get enough support. That means lawsuits like Louis’ are starting to lay the groundwork for AI accountability.

SafeRent’s defense attorneys argued in a motion to dismiss that the company shouldn’t be held liable for discrimination because SafeRent wasn’t making the final decision on whether to accept or deny a tenant. The service would screen applicants, score them and submit a report, but leave it to landlords or management companies to accept or deny a tenant.

Louis’ attorneys, along with the U.S. Department of Justice, which submitted a statement of interest in the case, argued that SafeRent’s algorithm could be held accountable because it still plays a role in access to housing. The judge denied SafeRent’s motion to dismiss on those counts.

The settlement stipulates that SafeRent can’t include its score feature on its tenant screening reports in certain cases, including if the applicant is using a housing voucher. It also requires that if SafeRent develops another screening score it plans to use, it must be validated by a third-party that the plaintiffs agree to.

Louis’ son found an affordable apartment for her on Facebook Marketplace that she has since moved into, though it was $200 more expensive and in a less desirable area.

“I’m not optimistic that I’m going to catch a break, but I have to keep on keeping, that’s it,” said Louis. “I have too many people who rely on me.”

___

Jesse Bedayn is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Eby’s NDP cabinet ‘bloated, expensive,’ says B.C. Conservative leader John Rustad

Published

 on

VICTORIA – British Columbia Conservative Leader John Rustad says Premier David Eby’s new cabinet appears to be a taxpayer-funded loyalty program that rewards NDP caucus.

Eby introduced his new cabinet this week, which includes 23 ministers, four ministers of state and 14 parliamentary secretaries. 

He also announced postings for caucus chair, deputy caucus chair, government whip, deputy government whip and nominees for deputy Speaker, Speaker and committee of the whole deputy chair.

Rustad says in a statement that Eby’s appointment of 42 of 47 MLAs to a cabinet or parliamentary secretary postings appears to be a “loyalty program for a premier desperate to cling to power.”

Members of the legislature earn an annual basic salary of more than $119,500, with cabinet ministers getting an extra $59,766, which is the same salary boost Rustad receives as Opposition Leader.

Forests Minister Ravi Parmar says in a statement that while Rustad is making claims about an expanded cabinet and promising to force an election, Eby and his team “gets to work on the priorities of British Columbians, like creating good-paying jobs, strengthening health care and delivering a $1,000 middle-class tax cut.”

Eby’s New Democrats were elected last month with 47 members, a one-seat majority in B.C.’s 93-seat legislature.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 20, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending