adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

Covid Recession Hurting State And Local Budgets, And The Economy – Forbes

Published

 on


As President Trump golfs in Florida after disrupting the Congressionally-authorized Covid relief package, state and local budgets continue suffering from the Covid pandemic.  And even if signed, this package contains little direct aid for them.  It will not be any easier for Joe Biden to get adequate funding from a divided Congress, with Republicans arguing that states and cities are mismanaged, not suffering from an extraordinary pandemic and recession.

We are halfway through fiscal year 2021 for states, which for almost all of them began on July 1.  The National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO) tells us this is the first year since the Great Recession where state general fund spending is declining, “1.1 percent compared to fiscal 2020 and…5.5 percent compared to governors’ budgets proposed before the pandemic.”

States so far have avoided even deeper cuts by using their rainy-day funds, built up after the Great Recession.  But those funds are being spent, so they will be less and less available for additional cushioning.  Without budget aid, they will cut spending and jobs, making the economic recovery slower and more painful than it should be. 

300x250x1

In several states, revenues have done better than originally feared, in part because wealthier people have not suffered as much from the pandemic.  This is the so-called “K-shaped recovery”—people with higher incomes, higher education, and white-collar jobs didn’t suffer the lasting damages hitting lower-income workers.

Higher income people often own homes and stocks.  And both of those assets have risen in value.  In spite of dramatic stories about falling prices in New York City, house prices have risen substantially across the nation.  Driven by low interest rates and a lack of housing supply, in September the Case-Shiller national home price index saw an annual increase of 6.9%, with a 6.6% rise in the twenty largest metropolitan areas. And stock indexes have risen so high that some observers worry about an unsustainable bubble.   

For states with progressive taxes, this unequal income and wealth has helped their budgets or at least prevented the worst-case forecasts from coming true.  States that depend more on specific industries and often more regressive taxes—tourism in Florida, Nevada and Hawaii or oil and gas revenues in Texas, North Dakota, and Louisiana—are seeing bigger budget gaps.

Some politicians claim higher-than-predicted tax collections eliminate the need for federal aid.  In rejecting further federal budget aid, Senator Rick Scott (R-FL) says “We’re seeing data now that clearly shows state and local governments’ projected revenue shortfalls from the coronavirus didn’t happen.”  This is in spite of Scott’s state of Florida having an 18 percent revenue gap from last year, fourth-worst in the nation.

These Republicans don’t—or won’t—understand the real picture.  True, revenues didn’t fall as far as first feared.  When the virus first hit, budget forecasters saw the abrupt drop in jobs and the economy and feared the worst.  But we didn’t get the worst case, because the federal government disbursed trillions of dollars in small business relief, expanded unemployment insurance, one-time direct household payments, and other spending.   

But avoiding the absolute worst case isn’t the same as achieving fiscal health.  Scholars at the Urban Institute tell us that although states had “better than expected tax collections,” the “actual revenue losses experienced by the states are deep and widespread, if not universal.”  

So even if Trump signs the relief bill, it isn’t enough, especially for hard-hit states and cities, and especially lower income and non-white workers, households, and children.  And his refusal to sign the bill as of Saturday means “millions of Americans will lose their jobless benefits” because the extension passed earlier this year expires at the end of 2020.

 Thea Lee, President of the Economic Policy Institute, says “the package is a fraction of what is required to address the monumental economic damage caused by inadequate response to the COVID-19 pandemic.”  There’s no real state and local budget aid and the unemployment insurance provisions are too weak.

But the difficulties in getting even this inadequate relief package through the Republican-controlled Senate with an (admittedly erratic and divisive) Republican President doesn’t bode well for the Biden Administration.  Republican legislators continue arguing that state and local budget problems are the fault of poorly managed governments, mostly (and falsely) by Democrats in their telling.

If they keep that narrative when a Democratic president takes office in January, prospects for adequate budgetary relief are not very promising.  And state and local budgets and the economy—and all of us, but especially low-income families—will pay the price.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Biden's Hot Economy Stokes Currency Fears for the Rest of World – Bloomberg

Published

 on


As Joe Biden this week hailed America’s booming economy as the strongest in the world during a reelection campaign tour of battleground-state Pennsylvania, global finance chiefs convening in Washington had a different message: cool it.

The push-back from central bank governors and finance ministers gathering for the International Monetary Fund-World Bank spring meetings highlight how the sting from a surging US economy — manifested through high interest rates and a strong dollar — is ricocheting around the world by forcing other currencies lower and complicating plans to bring down borrowing costs.

Adblock test (Why?)

300x250x1

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Opinion: Higher capital gains taxes won't work as claimed, but will harm the economy – The Globe and Mail

Published

 on


Open this photo in gallery:

Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland hold the 2024-25 budget, on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, on April 16.Patrick Doyle/Reuters

Alex Whalen and Jake Fuss are analysts at the Fraser Institute.

Amid a federal budget riddled with red ink and tax hikes, the Trudeau government has increased capital gains taxes. The move will be disastrous for Canada’s growth prospects and its already-lagging investment climate, and to make matters worse, research suggests it won’t work as planned.

Currently, individuals and businesses who sell a capital asset in Canada incur capital gains taxes at a 50-per-cent inclusion rate, which means that 50 per cent of the gain in the asset’s value is subject to taxation at the individual or business’s marginal tax rate. The Trudeau government is raising this inclusion rate to 66.6 per cent for all businesses, trusts and individuals with capital gains over $250,000.

300x250x1

The problems with hiking capital gains taxes are numerous.

First, capital gains are taxed on a “realization” basis, which means the investor does not incur capital gains taxes until the asset is sold. According to empirical evidence, this creates a “lock-in” effect where investors have an incentive to keep their capital invested in a particular asset when they might otherwise sell.

For example, investors may delay selling capital assets because they anticipate a change in government and a reversal back to the previous inclusion rate. This means the Trudeau government is likely overestimating the potential revenue gains from its capital gains tax hike, given that individual investors will adjust the timing of their asset sales in response to the tax hike.

Second, the lock-in effect creates a drag on economic growth as it incentivizes investors to hold off selling their assets when they otherwise might, preventing capital from being deployed to its most productive use and therefore reducing growth.

Budget’s capital gains tax changes divide the small business community

And Canada’s growth prospects and investment climate have both been in decline. Canada currently faces the lowest growth prospects among all OECD countries in terms of GDP per person. Further, between 2014 and 2021, business investment (adjusted for inflation) in Canada declined by $43.7-billion. Hiking taxes on capital will make both pressing issues worse.

Contrary to the government’s framing – that this move only affects the wealthy – lagging business investment and slow growth affect all Canadians through lower incomes and living standards. Capital taxes are among the most economically damaging forms of taxation precisely because they reduce the incentive to innovate and invest. And while taxes on capital gains do raise revenue, the economic costs exceed the amount of tax collected.

Previous governments in Canada understood these facts. In the 2000 federal budget, then-finance minister Paul Martin said a “key factor contributing to the difficulty of raising capital by new startups is the fact that individuals who sell existing investments and reinvest in others must pay tax on any realized capital gains,” an explicit acknowledgment of the lock-in effect and costs of capital gains taxes. Further, that Liberal government reduced the capital gains inclusion rate, acknowledging the importance of a strong investment climate.

At a time when Canada badly needs to improve the incentives to invest, the Trudeau government’s 2024 budget has introduced a damaging tax hike. In delivering the budget, Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland said “Canada, a growing country, needs to make investments in our country and in Canadians right now.” Individuals and businesses across the country likely agree on the importance of investment. Hiking capital gains taxes will achieve the exact opposite effect.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Nigeria's Economy, Once Africa's Biggest, Slips to Fourth Place – Bloomberg

Published

 on


Nigeria’s economy, which ranked as Africa’s largest in 2022, is set to slip to fourth place this year and Egypt, which held the top position in 2023, is projected to fall to second behind South Africa after a series of currency devaluations, International Monetary Fund forecasts show.

The IMF’s World Economic Outlook estimates Nigeria’s gross domestic product at $253 billion based on current prices this year, lagging energy-rich Algeria at $267 billion, Egypt at $348 billion and South Africa at $373 billion.

Adblock test (Why?)

300x250x1

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending