adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

Diane Francis: Paris Agreement a Trojan Horse threatening the Canadian economy, national unity – Financial Post

Published

 on


Canadians swell with pride when videos, scored with “O Canada,” show sweeping camera shots of the country’s majestic forests, lakes, farmland and parks the size of European countries.

But in the United Nations Paris Agreement, European fanatics and ecological radicals refuse to accept that Canada’s forests, and its other carbon-absorbing assets, more than offset the country’s emissions. And, since 1997, Ottawa has capitulated.

I just wrote about that, which is crazy enough, but then there’s this:

“Trees are remarkable,” said Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in a speech last fall. “They pull carbon out of the atmosphere. They are renewable and they’re sustainable and, eventually, they even recycle themselves. All we have to do is plant the first one.”

Plant the first one? Canada already has the third-largest forest coverage on the planet. What we have here is a prime minister who admires trees and promises (in that same speech) to plant two billion more within a decade.

(This is all magical thinking. To meet that promise, 200 million seedlings a year would need to be planted — that’s 547,945 a day. Four months after the election, some 65.7 million trees should have been planted, but so far, not a twig.)

This is not the first Canadian prime minister who has failed to defend our trees or the national interests at the UN. For instance, former prime minister Jean Chrétien signed onto the Kyoto Protocol (the predecessor to the Paris Agreement) in 1997 and stated that Canada would get credit for its forest sinks, reduced emissions from natural gas exports and nuclear products, but changed nothing.

Then there was a gang-up against Canada’s trees and other carbon sinks, according to a report back then about those Kyoto negotiations by David Suzuki: “On the one hand, Canada, the United States, Japan and Australia wanted to count the carbon dioxide (CO2) removed from the atmosphere by their forests and agricultural soils towards their commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. On the other hand, the European Union wanted to limit credits for carbon removed by forests and soils. Both camps claimed that science and environmental integrity were on their side. By the end of two weeks of talks, the parties remained far apart.”

Canada caved to pressure, but in 2001, the United States quit Kyoto because of the tree issue, and because China and others were let off the hook when it came to emissions. Finally, in 2011, Canada pulled out, too.

But in 2016, both countries signed on to Kyoto’s replacement, the Paris Agreement. A year later, the Trump administration pulled out, again largely over trees and China, while Canada’s prime minister decided to become the poster boy of climate change.

Ironically, U.S. emissions have decreased since that time, thanks to its dramatic replacement of coal plants with natural gas, as it becomes the world leader in liquefied natural gas exports. Meanwhile, Liberal policies have destroyed all 20 Canadian projects that would have allowed us to export natural gas to Asia, thus helping the continent replace its coal usage.

The Paris Agreement is a Trojan Horse threatening the Canadian economy and national unity. Since 1997, only 37 developed countries have reduced CO2 emissions by seven per cent and the rest — led by climate culprit China — have increased emissions by 130 per cent.

And Canada’s government is its accomplice.

Financial Post

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

September merchandise trade deficit narrows to $1.3 billion: Statistics Canada

Published

 on

OTTAWA – Statistics Canada says the country’s merchandise trade deficit narrowed to $1.3 billion in September as imports fell more than exports.

The result compared with a revised deficit of $1.5 billion for August. The initial estimate for August released last month had shown a deficit of $1.1 billion.

Statistics Canada says the results for September came as total exports edged down 0.1 per cent to $63.9 billion.

Exports of metal and non-metallic mineral products fell 5.4 per cent as exports of unwrought gold, silver, and platinum group metals, and their alloys, decreased 15.4 per cent. Exports of energy products dropped 2.6 per cent as lower prices weighed on crude oil exports.

Meanwhile, imports for September fell 0.4 per cent to $65.1 billion as imports of metal and non-metallic mineral products dropped 12.7 per cent.

In volume terms, total exports rose 1.4 per cent in September while total imports were essentially unchanged in September.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

How will the U.S. election impact the Canadian economy? – BNN Bloomberg

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

How will the U.S. election impact the Canadian economy?  BNN Bloomberg

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending