Noah Solomon: Investors would be well-served to keep their FOMO instincts in check and their powder dry
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. chief executive Warren Buffett speaks during an interview in Omaha, Neb. Photo by Nati Harnik/AP files
Warren Buffett is widely regarded as one of the best stock pickers in history. Among the Oracle of Omaha’s most famous pieces of investment advice is: “Rule No. 1: Never lose money. Rule No. 2: Never forget Rule No. 1.”
It goes without saying that when it comes to investing, it is impossible to never lose money. Even the longtime Berkshire Hathaway Inc. chief executive has occasionally taken his lumps. This begs the question of what Buffett meant by his statement. To best interpret his words, I took an “actions speak louder than words” approach and analyzed his historical returns over the 30 years ending December 2022.
Unsurprisingly, Buffett & Co. trounced the S&P 500 index, delivering a 13.1 per cent compound annual rate of return versus 9.6 per cent for the benchmark. Had you invested US$1 million with Buffett rather than the index, your investment would have grown to almost US$39.9 million, exceeding the benchmark investment’s value of US$15.8 million by a whopping US$24 million (it’s with good reason that people call him the Oracle).
Moving beyond the headline numbers, the specific pattern of Berkshire’s returns is highly anomalous. In years when the S&P 500 had a positive return, Buffett’s performance tended to be undifferentiated. On average, for every one per cent the index rose, Buffett’s holdings gained almost exactly the same amount. Clearly, his massive outperformance doesn’t come from knocking the lights out in good times.
In stark contrast, in years when the S&P 500 fell, Buffett gained 4.2 per cent on average. This does not mean he never loses money. In 2008, Berkshire declined 31.78 per cent versus 36 per cent for the S&P 500. However, in down markets, he has either tended to lose far less than the index or not suffer any losses. The latter occurred during 2000-2002, when he gained 29.7 per cent versus a decline of 37.6 per cent for the index.
Fortune’s formula
Very few business school graduates or investment professionals have heard of the Kelly Criterion, which was developed in 1956 by American scientist John Kelly. Despite its relative obscurity and lack of mainstream academic support, the Kelly Criterion has attracted some of the best-known investors on the planet, including Bond King Bill Gross, Renaissance Technologies LLC’s James Simons, Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger (may the great man rest in peace).
The first well-known user of the Kelly Criterion is legendary investor and grandfather of quantitative finance Edward Thorp, who referred to it as “fortune’s formula.” He used Kelly’s theory to develop a system for calculating the odds and altering one’s bets accordingly in blackjack, which forever changed the game.
Thorpe then launched investment firm Princeton Newport Partners (PNP), which produced an annualized return of 15.8 per cent, compared to 10.1 per cent for the S&P 500. PNP achieved this with 75 per cent less volatility than the market and lost money in only three of its 230 months in operation.
When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?
John Maynard Keynes
The Kelly Criterion seeks to maximize long-term wealth by optimally adjusting the amounts of capital committed to investments as their expected returns and risks fluctuate. Importantly, the formula dictates you should increase your allocation when the odds are more favourable, and curtail your commitment as the odds deteriorate.
The imperative of adjusting one’s stance in response to changing circumstances was also espoused by John Maynard Keynes, the father of modern macroeconomic theory. When criticized for being inconsistent during a high-profile government hearing, Keynes responded: “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?”
Interestingly, this premise stands in stark contrast to the traditional approach to money management, whereby client portfolios maintain a fixed allocation to stocks, bonds, etc., regardless of changes in the market environment or economic backdrop.
Cash and courage
Having stated that “our favourite holding period is forever,” Buffett is well-known for buying quality companies and holding them for the long term. However, there is another, lesser-known side to his approach that harbours a more-than-subtle resemblance to Kelly’s.
In her book The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life, author Alice Schroeder explains that his best opportunities have always arisen during periods of crisis and uncertainty. In Buffett’s view, the opportunity cost of holding cash is low when compelling investment opportunities are few and upside is limited.
Cash and courage in a time of crisis is priceless
Warren Buffett
Conversely, when downside is limited and compelling prospects are abundant (typically during the uncertainty that reigns during or after a market crash), the opportunity cost of holding cash becomes unjustifiably high. At such times, investors should aggressively deploy their cash holdings into assets that offer higher returns. This sentiment is well-summarized by Buffett’s assertion that “cash and courage in a time of crisis is priceless.”
Many investors lack the courage and/or cash during such times, but Buffett has historically possessed both. During the dot-com bust of 2002, he went on a shopping spree, scooping up companies in several sectors. Similarly, he made several significant investments in beaten-down stocks when global markets were in free fall in late 2008.
The Oracle speaks
As of the end of the third quarter, Berkshire’s combined cash and U.S. Treasury holdings rose to a record US$157.2 billion versus US$93 billion at the end of last year. For the first nine months of 2023, Berkshire was a net seller of US$23.6-billion worth of equities versus US$48.9 billion of net purchases for the first nine months of 2022.
One need look no further than the current ratio of total U.S. stock market value to U.S. gross domestic product to understand why Buffett is proceeding with caution. He has referred to this metric, which is known as the Buffett indicator, as “the best single measure of where valuations stand at any given moment.”
As of the end of October, the Buffett Indicator stood at 160 per cent, which is 1.1 standard deviations above its historical trend line and in the top 14 per cent of observations dating back to 1950.
These manoeuvres do not necessarily imply that Buffett believes a bear market is imminent. However, one could deduce he is skeptical that stocks are poised to deliver meaningful returns over the near/medium term. Relatedly, he is likely of the view that holding larger-than-normal amounts of cash will not entail any opportunity costs, given that rates have risen with a vengeance from their near-zero slumber.
The Oracle may be telling you that there won’t be much to miss and that better opportunities lie ahead. Given his track record, investors would be well-served to keep their FOMO (fear of missing out) instincts in check and their powder dry.
Noah Solomon is chief investment officer at Outcome Metric Asset Management LP.
TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was down more than 200 points in late-morning trading, weighed down by losses in the technology, base metal and energy sectors, while U.S. stock markets also fell.
The S&P/TSX composite index was down 239.24 points at 22,749.04.
In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was down 312.36 points at 40,443.39. The S&P 500 index was down 80.94 points at 5,422.47, while the Nasdaq composite was down 380.17 points at 16,747.49.
The Canadian dollar traded for 73.80 cents US compared with 74.00 cents US on Thursday.
The October crude oil contract was down US$1.07 at US$68.08 per barrel and the October natural gas contract was up less than a penny at US$2.26 per mmBTU.
The December gold contract was down US$2.10 at US$2,541.00 an ounce and the December copper contract was down four cents at US$4.10 a pound.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 6, 2024.
TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was up more than 150 points in late-morning trading, helped by strength in technology, financial and energy stocks, while U.S. stock markets also pushed higher.
The S&P/TSX composite index was up 171.41 points at 23,298.39.
In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 278.37 points at 41,369.79. The S&P 500 index was up 38.17 points at 5,630.35, while the Nasdaq composite was up 177.15 points at 17,733.18.
The Canadian dollar traded for 74.19 cents US compared with 74.23 cents US on Wednesday.
The October crude oil contract was up US$1.75 at US$76.27 per barrel and the October natural gas contract was up less than a penny at US$2.10 per mmBTU.
The December gold contract was up US$18.70 at US$2,556.50 an ounce and the December copper contract was down less than a penny at US$4.22 a pound.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 29, 2024.
The crypto market has recently experienced a significant downturn, mirroring broader risk asset sell-offs. Over the past week, Bitcoin’s price dropped by 24%, reaching $53,000, while Ethereum plummeted nearly a third to $2,340. Major altcoins also suffered, with Cardano down 27.7%, Solana 36.2%, Dogecoin 34.6%, XRP 23.1%, Shiba Inu 30.1%, and BNB 25.7%.
The severe downturn in the crypto market appears to be part of a broader flight to safety, triggered by disappointing economic data. A worse-than-expected unemployment report on Friday marked the beginning of a technical recession, as defined by the Sahm Rule. This rule identifies a recession when the three-month average unemployment rate rises by at least half a percentage point from its lowest point in the past year.
Friday’s figures met this threshold, signaling an abrupt economic downshift. Consequently, investors sought safer assets, leading to declines in major stock indices: the S&P 500 dropped 2%, the Nasdaq 2.5%, and the Dow 1.5%. This trend continued into Monday with further sell-offs overseas.
The crypto market’s rapid decline raises questions about its role as either a speculative asset or a hedge against inflation and recession. Despite hopes that crypto could act as a risk hedge, the recent crash suggests it remains a speculative investment.
Since the downturn, the crypto market has seen its largest three-day sell-off in nearly a year, losing over $500 billion in market value. According to CoinGlass data, this bloodbath wiped out more than $1 billion in leveraged positions within the last 24 hours, including $365 million in Bitcoin and $348 million in Ether.
Khushboo Khullar of Lightning Ventures, speaking to Bloomberg, argued that the crypto sell-off is part of a broader liquidity panic as traders rush to cover margin calls. Khullar views this as a temporary sell-off, presenting a potential buying opportunity.
Josh Gilbert, an eToro market analyst, supports Khullar’s perspective, suggesting that the expected Federal Reserve rate cuts could benefit crypto assets. “Crypto assets have sold off, but many investors will see an opportunity. We see Federal Reserve rate cuts, which are now likely to come sharper than expected, as hugely positive for crypto assets,” Gilbert told Coindesk.
Despite the recent volatility, crypto continues to make strides toward mainstream acceptance. Notably, Morgan Stanley will allow its advisors to offer Bitcoin ETFs starting Wednesday. This follows more than half a year after the introduction of the first Bitcoin ETF. The investment bank will enable over 15,000 of its financial advisors to sell BlackRock’s IBIT and Fidelity’s FBTC. This move is seen as a significant step toward the “mainstreamization” of crypto, given the lengthy regulatory and company processes in major investment banks.
The recent crypto market downturn highlights its volatility and the broader economic concerns affecting all risk assets. While some analysts see the current situation as a temporary sell-off and a buying opportunity, others caution against the speculative nature of crypto. As the market evolves, its role as a mainstream alternative asset continues to grow, marked by increasing institutional acceptance and new investment opportunities.
