adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

Duane Bratt: The health versus the economy debate will come, but it's a false choice – National Post

Published

 on


It has not happened yet, but it is inevitable that we will have a public debate in Canada about whether, in the words of U.S. President Donald Trump, the restrictions that have been imposed in response to the COVID-19 crisis is a case of “the cure being worse than the disease.” Thankfully, no major Canadian political figure has made such a claim.

However, there are certain pro-business and right-wing voices that have started to make this very case. See, for example, a recent column by Conrad Black or the twitter feed of Brett Wilson. In contrast, despite the restrictions that are already in place, there are some public health professionals and scientists, who argue that existing restrictions might have to last 18 or 24 months and some are demanding even more restrictions. This debate is currently at the margins, but there will be a time — maybe in a couple of weeks; maybe in a couple of months — when the debate goes into the mainstream.

Of course, framing the debate as health care versus the economy is a false choice. Ending restrictions on businesses and public gatherings will not automatically restart the economy. Not if billions of dollars more need to be dedicated to health care to deal with the hundreds of thousands of cases and the tens of thousands of deaths (or more). Likewise, how will businesses function with a workforce and customers depleted due to COVID-19? Or people scared to go to work or shop because of the threat of COVID-19. Likewise, there is plenty of economic activity that needs to occur despite the presence of the COVID-19 pandemic. People still need to eat, so we cannot shut down the agriculture sector and grocery stores. People still need electricity and home heating, so we cannot shut down the energy sector.

Nevertheless, when the rate of increase in COVID-19 cases and deaths starts to slow down or even reverse, there will be calls for restrictions to be lifted. The danger is that we may have just survived the first wave, and the possibility of a second wave intensifies if we move too quickly to reopen society. Conversely, we cannot indefinitely place harsh restrictions on society. At a certain point, some, if not all, are going to need to be lifted.

Regardless of when this debate occurs in a serious way, there are a number of key political science concepts that are going to come into play: authority and legitimacy. Authority is a form of power in which people obey commands not because they have been rationally or emotionally persuaded, or because they fear the consequences of disobedience, but simply because they respect the source of the command. The one who issues the command is accepted as having a right to do so, and those who receive the command accept that they have an obligation to obey. Authority is focused in the one who commands, but legitimacy is the feeling of respect for authority that exists in those who obey — it is what makes authority possible. In other words, people have to trust the source of the command. This is especially critical in times of crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

A major challenge in how the United States is responding to COVID-19 is that many Americans do not trust the leadership of President Trump. His flip-flopping on policies and his narcissism has prevented Trump from taking the leadership role that naturally occurs in crises. The situation is very different in Canada. Even people who strongly oppose Prime Minister Justin Trudeau or Premier Jason Kenney have accepted their decisions. However, this could start to shift if people cease respecting authority. This could be because they do not trust the information provided, do not accept the rationale for severe restrictions, or believe that the decisions issued by authorities are harming them.

Canada has enacted the most draconian restrictions in living memory. The Second World War may have led to the rationing of food, gasoline and other materials, but there were no social distancing requirements. Yet Canadians have largely obeyed these restrictions, because they believe that the orders are coming from a legitimate authority and accept their rationale of responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Canadian state simply lacks the coercive power to enforce these restrictions in the absence of voluntary compliance. If you want to see what happens when society does not voluntarily comply with laws, just look at underage smoking and drinking, and, until its recent legalization, cannabis use.

For those who argued that Canada should have acted quicker and closed our borders (stranding Canadians outside of the country) or shutting down schools and restaurants back in January or February, you need to consider whether society would have voluntarily complied at that time.

When the inevitable debate about reopening the economy occurs, a major factor will be whether the existing restrictions can be sustained in the absence of voluntary compliance.

Duane Bratt is a political science professor and chair of the department of economics, justice and policy studies at Mount Royal University.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.

Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.

Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.

Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.

Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.

Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.

Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.

According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.

That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.

People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.

That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.

Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.

That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending